Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Theoretical framework for the atomistic modeling of frequency-dependent liquid-solid friction

Haruki Oga1,*, Takeshi Omori2,†, Cecilia Herrero3, Samy Merabia3, Laurent Joly3,4, and Yasutaka Yamaguchi1,5,‡

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Osaka University, 2-1 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
  • 2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Osaka City University, 3-3-138 Sugimoto, Sumiyoshi, Osaka, Osaka 558-8585, Japan
  • 3Univ Lyon and Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Institut Lumière Matière, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
  • 4Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), 1 rue Descartes, 75005 Paris, France
  • 5Water Frontier Research Center (WaTUS), Research Institute for Science & Technology, Tokyo University of Science, 1-3 Kagurazaka, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan

  • *haruki@nnfm.mech.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp
  • †omori@osaka-cu.ac.jp
  • ‡yamaguchi@mech.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. Research 3, L032019 – Published 27 July, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L032019

Abstract

Nanofluidics shows great promise for energy conversion and desalination applications. The performance of nanofluidic devices is controlled by liquid-solid friction, quantified by the Navier friction coefficient (FC). Despite decades of research, there is no well-established generic framework to determine the frequency-dependent Navier FC from atomistic simulations. Here, we have derived analytical expressions to connect the Navier FC to the random force autocorrelation on the confining wall, from the observation that the random force autocorrelation can be related to the hydrodynamic boundary condition, where the Navier FC appears. The analytical framework is generic in the sense that it explicitly includes the system size dependence and also the frequency dependence of the FC, which enabled us to address (i) the long-standing plateau issue in the evaluation of the FC and (ii) the non-Markovian behavior of liquid-solid friction of a Lennard-Jones liquid and of water on various walls and at various temperatures, including the supercooled regime. This framework opens the way to explore the frequency-dependent FC for a wide range of complex liquids.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (47)

  1. W. Sparreboom, A. van den Berg, and J. C. T. Eijkel, Principles and applications of nanofluidic transport, Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 713 (2009).
  2. L. Bocquet and E. Charlaix, Nanofluidics, from bulk to interfaces, Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 1073 (2010).
  3. H. Daiguji, Ion transport in nanofluidic channels, Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 901 (2010).
  4. S. Faucher, N. Aluru, M. Z. Bazant, D. Blankschtein, A. H. Brozena, J. Cumings, J. P. de Souza, M. Elimelech, R. Epsztein, J. T. Fourkas, A. G. Rajan, H. J. Kulik, A. Levy, A. Majumdar, C. Martin, M. McEldrew, R. P. Misra, A. Noy, T. A. Pham, M. Reed et al., Critical knowledge gaps in mass transport through single-digit nanopores: A review and perspective, J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 21309 (2019).
  5. N. Kavokine, R. R. Netz, and L. Bocquet, Fluids at the nanoscale: From continuum to subcontinuum transport, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 53, 377 (2021).
  6. L. Bocquet, Nanofluidics coming of age, Nat. Mater. 19, 254 (2020).
  7. L. Joly, C. Ybert, E. Trizac, and L. Bocquet, Hydrodynamics within the Electric Double Layer on Slipping Surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 257805 (2004).
  8. A. Ajdari and L. Bocquet, Giant Amplification of Interfacially Driven Transport by Hydrodynamic Slip: Diffusio-Osmosis and Beyond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 186102 (2006).
  9. Y. Ren and D. Stein, Slip-enhanced electrokinetic energy conversion in nanofluidic channels, Nanotechnology 19, 195707 (2008).
  10. B. Radha, A. Esfandiar, F. C. Wang, A. P. Rooney, K. Gopinadhan, A. Keerthi, A. Mishchenko, A. Janardanan, P. Blake, L. Fumagalli, M. Lozada-Hidalgo, S. Garaj, S. J. Haigh, I. V. Grigorieva, H. A. Wu, and A. K. Geim, Molecular transport through capillaries made with atomic-scale precision, Nature (London) 538, 222 (2016).
  11. C. Navier, Mémoire sur les lois du mouvement des fluides, Mem. Acad. Sci. Inst. Fr. 6, 389 (1823).
  12. C. Neto, D. R. Evans, E. Bonaccurso, H.-J. Butt, and V. S. J. Craig, Boundary slip in Newtonian liquids: a review of experimental studies, Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 2859 (2005).
  13. A. Maali and B. Bhushan, Measurement of slip length on superhydrophobic surfaces, Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A 370, 2304 (2012).
  14. W. Lei, M. K. Rigozzi, and D. R. McKenzie, The physics of confined flow and its application to water leaks, water permeation and water nanoflows: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 025901 (2016).
  15. L. Bocquet and J. L. Barrat, Hydrodynamic Boundary Conditions and Correlation Functions of Confined Fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2726 (1993).
  16. L. Bocquet and J. L. Barrat, Hydrodynamic boundary conditions, correlation functions, and Kubo relations for confined fluids, Phys. Rev. E 49, 3079 (1994).
  17. J. Petravic and P. Harrowell, On the equilibrium calculation of the friction coefficient for liquid slip against a wall, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 174706 (2007).
  18. V. P. Sokhan and N. Quirke, Slip coefficient in nanoscale pore flow, Phys. Rev. E 78, 015301(R) (2008).
  19. J. S. Hansen, B. D. Todd, and P. J. Daivis, Prediction of fluid velocity slip at solid surfaces, Phys. Rev. E 84, 016313 (2011).
  20. K. Huang and I. Szlufarska, Green-Kubo relation for friction at liquid-solid interfaces, Phys. Rev. E 89, 032119 (2014).
  21. H. Oga, Y. Yamaguchi, T. Omori, S. Merabia, and L. Joly, Green-Kubo measurement of liquid-solid friction in finite-size systems, J. Chem. Phys. 151, 054502 (2019).
  22. P. Español, J. A. de la Torre, and D. Duque-Zumajo, Solution to the plateau problem in the Green-Kubo formula, Phys. Rev. E 99, 022126 (2019).
  23. J. A. De La Torre, D. Duque-Zumajo, D. Camargo, and P. Español, Microscopic Slip Boundary Conditions in Unsteady Fluid Flows, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 264501 (2019).
  24. H. Nakano and S.-i. Sasa, Microscopic determination of macroscopic boundary conditions in Newtonian liquids, Phys. Rev. E 99, 013106 (2019).
  25. H. Nakano and S.-i. Sasa, Equilibrium measurement method of slip length based on fluctuating hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. E 101, 033109 (2020).
  26. T. Omori, N. Inoue, L. Joly, S. Merabia, and Y. Yamaguchi, Full characterization of the hydrodynamic boundary condition at the atomic scale using an oscillating channel: Identification of the viscoelastic interfacial friction and the hydrodynamic boundary position, Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 114201 (2019).
  27. W. M. Slie, A. R. Donfor Jr., and T. A. Litovitz, Ultrasonic shear and longitudinal measurements in aqueous glycerol, J. Chem. Phys. 44, 3712 (1966).
  28. C. Masciovecchio, S. Santucci, A. Gessini, S. Di Fonzo, G. Ruocco, and F. Sette, Structural Relaxation in Liquid Water by Inelastic UV Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 255507 (2004).
  29. I. Omelyan, I. Mryglod, and M. Tokarchuk, Wavevector- and frequency-dependent shear viscosity of water: the modified collective mode approach and molecular dynamics calculations, Condens. Matter Phys. 8, 25 (2005).
  30. T. J. O'Sullivan, S. K. Kannam, D. Chakraborty, B. D. Todd, and J. E. Sader, Viscoelasticity of liquid water investigated using molecular dynamics simulations, Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 123302 (2019).
  31. A. V. Straube, B. G. Kowalik, R. R. Netz, and F. Höfling, Rapid onset of molecular friction in liquids bridging between the atomistic and hydrodynamic pictures, Commun. Phys. 3, 126 (2020).
  32. J. C. F. Schulz, A. Schlaich, M. Heyden, R. R. Netz, and J. Kappler, Molecular interpretation of the non-Newtonian viscoelastic behavior of liquid water at high frequencies, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 103301 (2020).
  33. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L032019 for the unabridged derivation of the theory and additional computational information, which includes Refs. [26, 34].
  34. L. Bocquet and J.-L. Barrat, On the Green-Kubo relationship for the liquid-solid friction coefficient, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 044704 (2013).
  35. As we show in the Supplemental Material [33], the frequency response characteristics of the FC and of the bulk viscosity are similar. This means that there is no bulk flow in the time scales where the high-frequency mode of the FC such as the elasticity dominates [26], and therefore one can neglect the frequency-dependent component of the bulk viscosity in the present analysis.
  36. P. Mazur and I. Oppenheim, Molecular theory of Brownian motion, Physica (Amsterdam) 50, 241 (1970).
  37. S. Nishida, D. Surblys, Y. Yamaguchi, K. Kuroda, M. Kagawa, T. Nakajima, and H. Fujimura, Molecular dynamics analysis of multiphase interfaces based on in situ extraction of the pressure distribution of a liquid droplet on a solid surface, J. Chem. Phys. 140, 074707 (2014).
  38. K. Ogawa, H. Oga, H. Kusudo, Y. Yamaguchi, T. Omori, S. Merabia, and L. Joly, Large effect of lateral box size in molecular dynamics simulations of liquid-solid friction, Phys. Rev. E 100, 023101 (2019).
  39. J. L. F. Abascal, E. Sanz, R. García Fernández, and C. Vega, A potential model for the study of ices and amorphous water: TIP4P/Ice, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 234511 (2005).
  40. D. M. Huang, C. Cottin-Bizonne, C. Ybert, and L. Bocquet, Aqueous electrolytes near hydrophobic surfaces: Dynamic effects of ion specificity and hydrodynamic slip, Langmuir 24, 1442 (2008).
  41. K. Falk, F. Sedlmeier, L. Joly, R. R. Netz, and L. Bocquet, Molecular origin of fast water transport in carbon nanotube membranes: superlubricity versus curvature dependent friction, Nano Lett. 10, 4067 (2010).
  42. C. Herrero, G. Tocci, S. Merabia, and L. Joly, Fast increase of nanofluidic slip in supercooled water: the key role of dynamics, Nanoscale 12, 20396 (2020).
  43. The dimensions of the larger system were identical to those in Ref. [26]. Therefore the hydrodynamic height of the system h of the larger system was taken from Ref. [26]. For the smaller system, h was calculated considering that the hydrodynamic wall position should be identical to that of the larger system.
  44. L. Joly, G. Tocci, S. Merabia, and A. Michaelides, Strong coupling between nanofluidic transport and interfacial chemistry: How defect reactivity controls liquid–solid friction through hydrogen bonding, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 1381 (2016).
  45. C. Herrero, T. Omori, Y. Yamaguchi, and L. Joly, Shear force measurement of the hydrodynamic wall position in molecular dynamics, J. Chem. Phys. 151, 041103 (2019).
  46. W. Kob and H. C. Andersen, Testing mode-coupling theory for a supercooled binary Lennard-Jones mixture. II. Intermediate scattering function and dynamic susceptibility, Phys. Rev. E 52, 4134 (1995).
  47. P. Gallo, F. Sciortino, P. Tartaglia, and S. H. Chen, Slow Dynamics of Water Molecules in Supercooled States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2730 (1996).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation