Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Fano resonance between Stokes and anti-Stokes Brillouin scattering

KwanTo Lai1, Daniel Finkelstein-Shapiro2, Sebastian Lehmann3, Arnaud Devos4, and Pierre-Adrien Mante1,2,*

  • 1Department of Applied Physics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR
  • 2Division of Chemical Physics and NanoLund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • 3Division of Solid State Physics and NanoLund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • 4Institut d'Électronique, de Microélectronique et de Nanotechnologie, Unité Mixte de Recherche, CNRS 8250, Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex, France

  • *pierre-adrien.mante@chemphys.lu.se

Phys. Rev. Research 3, L032010 – Published 8 July, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L032010

Abstract

In recent years, the manipulation of Fano resonances in the time domain has unlocked deep insights into a broad spectrum of systems' coherent dynamics. Here, inelastic scattering of light with coherent acoustic phonons is harnessed to achieve complex Fano resonances. The sudden change of phonon momentum during reflection leads to a transition from anti-Stokes to Stokes light scattering, producing two different resonances that interfere in the measurement process. We highlight the conditions necessary to achieve such interference, revealing an underlying symmetry between photons and phonons, and verify the theory experimentally. Then, we demonstrate the possibility to characterize energy and coherence losses at rough interfaces, thus providing a mechanism for nondestructive testing of interface quality. Our results describe numerous unexplained observations in ultrafast acoustics and can be generalized to the scattering of light with any waves.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (39)

  1. U. Fano, Effects of configuration interaction on intensities and phase shifts, Phys. Rev. 124, 1866 (1961).
  2. H. Beutler, Über Absorptionsserien von Argon, Krypton und Xenon zu Termen zwischen den beiden Ionisierungsgrenzen2P32/0 und2P12/0, Z. Phys. 93, 177 (1935).
  3. B. Lukyanchuk, N. I. Zheludev, S. A. Maier, N. J. Halas, P. Nordlander, H. Giessen, and C. T. Chong, The Fano resonance in plasmonic nanostructures and metamaterials, Nat. Mater. 9, 707 (2010).
  4. A. E. Miroshnichenko, S. Flach, and Y. S. Kivshar, Fano resonances in nanoscale structures, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2257 (2010).
  5. B. Gallinet and O. J. F. Martin, Influence of electromagnetic interactions on the line shape of plasmonic Fano resonances, ACS Nano 5, 8999 (2011).
  6. W. Wang, Y. Jin, W. Wang, B. Bonello, B. Djafari-Rouhani, and R. Fleury, Robust Fano resonance in a topological mechanical beam, Phys. Rev. B 101, 024101 (2020).
  7. T. Still, W. Cheng, M. Retsch, R. Sainidou, J. Wang, U. Jonas, N. Stefanou, and G. Fytas, Simultaneous Occurrence of Structure-Directed and Particle-Resonance-Induced Phononic Gaps in Colloidal Films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 194301 (2008).
  8. F. Lemoult, N. Kaina, M. Fink, and G. Lerosey, Wave propagation control at the deep subwavelength scale in metamaterials, Nat. Phys. 9, 55 (2013).
  9. T. Vasileiadis, H. Zhang, H. Wang, M. Bonn, G. Fytas, and B. Graczykowski, Frequency-domain study of nonthermal gigahertz phonons reveals Fano coupling to charge carriers, Sci. Adv. 6, eabd4540 (2020).
  10. S. Xiao, Y. Yoon, Y.-H. Lee, J. P. Bird, Y. Ochiai, N. Aoki, J. L. Reno, and J. Fransson, Detecting weak coupling in mesoscopic systems with a nonequilibrium Fano resonance, Phys. Rev. B 93, 165435 (2016).
  11. S. Zhang, K. Bao, N. J. Halas, H. Xu, and P. Nordlander, Substrate-induced Fano resonances of a plasmonic nanocube: A route to increased-sensitivity localized surface plasmon resonance sensors revealed, Nano Lett. 11, 1657 (2011).
  12. A. A. Clerk, X. Waintal, and P. W. Brouwer, Fano Resonances as a Probe of Phase Coherence in Quantum Dots, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4636 (2001).
  13. A. Bärnthaler, S. Rotter, F. Libisch, J. Burgdörfer, S. Gehler, U. Kuhl, and H.-J. Stöckmann, Probing Decoherence through Fano Resonances, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 056801 (2010).
  14. D. Finkelstein-Shapiro and A. Keller, Ubiquity of Beutler-Fano profiles: From scattering to dissipative processes, Phys. Rev. A 97, 023411 (2018).
  15. M. I. Tribelsky and A. E. Miroshnichenko, Giant in-particle field concentration and Fano resonances at light scattering by high-refractive-index particles, Phys. Rev. A 93, 053837 (2016).
  16. U. Siegner, M. A. Mycek, S. Glutsch, and D. S. Chemla, Ultrafast Coherent Dynamics of Fano Resonances in Semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 470 (1995).
  17. M. Wickenhauser, J. Burgdörfer, F. Krausz, and M. Drescher, Time Resolved Fano Resonances, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 023002 (2005).
  18. C. Ott, A. Kaldun, P. Raith, K. Meyer, M. Laux, J. Evers, C. H. Keitel, C. H. Greene, and T. Pfeifer, Lorentz meets Fano in spectral line shapes: A universal phase and its laser control, Science 340, 716 (2013).
  19. A. Kaldun, A. Blättermann, V. Stooß, S. Donsa, H. Wei, R. Pazourek, S. Nagele, C. Ott, C. D. Lin, J. Burgdörfer, and T. Pfeifer, Observing the ultrafast buildup of a Fano resonance in the time domain, Science 354, 738 (2016).
  20. M. Kotur, D. Guénot, Á. Jiménez-Galán, D. Kroon, E. W. Larsen, M. Louisy, S. Bengtsson, M. Miranda, J. Mauritsson, C. L. Arnold, S. E. Canton, M. Gisselbrecht, T. Carette, J. M. Dahlström, E. Lindroth, A. Maquet, L. Argenti, F. Martín, and A. L'Huillier, Spectral phase measurement of a Fano resonance using tunable attosecond pulses, Nat. Commun. 7, 10566 (2016).
  21. M. I. Tribelsky and A. E. Miroshnichenko, Dynamics of destructive Fano resonances, Phys. Rev. A 100, 053824 (2019).
  22. L. Brillouin, Diffusion de la lumière et des rayons x par un corps transparent homogène - influence de l'agitation thermique, Ann. Phys. (Paris) 9, 88 (1922).
  23. A. Borovik-Romanov and N. Kreines, Brillouin-Mandelstam scattering from thermal and excited magnons, Phys. Rep. 81, 351 (1982).
  24. P. Y. Yu, Brillouin scattering of exciton polaritons and additional boundary conditions, Solid State Commun. 32, 29 (1979).
  25. N. T. Otterstrom, R. O. Behunin, E. A. Kittlaus, Z. Wang, and P. T. Rakich, A silicon Brillouin laser, Science 360, 1113 (2018).
  26. G. Bahl, M. Tomes, F. Marquardt, and T. Carmon, Observation of spontaneous Brillouin cooling, Nat. Phys. 8, 203 (2012).
  27. P.-A. Mante, A. Devos, and A. Le Louarn, Generation of terahertz acoustic waves in semiconductor quantum dots using femtosecond laser pulses, Phys. Rev. B 81, 113305 (2010).
  28. P.-A. Mante, C.-C. Chen, Y.-C. Wen, J.-K. Sheu, and C.-K. Sun, Thermal Boundary Resistance between GaN and Cubic Ice and THz Acoustic Attenuation Spectrum of Cubic Ice from Complex Acoustic Impedance Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 225901 (2013).
  29. C. Thomsen, H. T. Grahn, H. J. Maris, and J. Tauc, Surface generation and detection of phonons by picosecond light pulses, Phys. Rev. B 34, 4129 (1986).
  30. A. Devos and C. Lerouge, Evidence of Laser-Wavelength Effect in Picosecond Ultrasonics: Possible Connection with Interband Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2669 (2001).
  31. C. He, O. Ristow, M. Grossmann, D. Brick, Y. Guo, M. Schubert, M. Hettich, V. Gusev, and T. Dekorsy, Acoustic waves undetectable by transient reflectivity measurements, Phys. Rev. B 95, 184302 (2017).
  32. O. Matsuda, M. C. Larciprete, R. Li Voti, and O. B. Wright, Fundamentals of picosecond laser ultrasonics, Ultrasonics 56, 3 (2015).
  33. Y.-C. Wen, C.-L. Hsieh, K.-H. Lin, H.-P. Chen, S.-C. Chin, C.-L. Hsiao, Y.-T. Lin, C.-S. Chang, Y.-C. Chang, L.-W. Tu, and C.-K. Sun, Specular Scattering Probability of Acoustic Phonons in Atomically Flat Interfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 264301 (2009).
  34. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L032010 for detailed calculations of the model, a comparison of the model to experiments in the literature, AFM images of the rough surface, and fitting of the model to the experimental data obtained on the rough sample.
  35. L. V. R. de Marcos, J. I. Larruquert, J. A. Méndez, and J. A. Aznárez, Self-consistent optical constants of SiO2 and Ta2O5 films, Opt. Mater. Express 6, 3622 (2016).
  36. P. A. Mante, J. F. Robillard, and A. Devos, Complete thin film mechanical characterization using picosecond ultrasonics and nanostructured transducers: experimental demonstration on SiO2, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 071909 (2008).
  37. A. D. Rakić, A. B. Djurišić, J. M. Elazar, and M. L. Majewski, Optical properties of metallic films for vertical-cavity optoelectronic devices, Appl. Opt. 37, 5271 (1998).
  38. G. V. Samsonov, Handbook of the Physicochemical Properties of the Elements (Springer, New York, 1968).
  39. S. L. Broschat, Reflection loss from a “Pierson-Moskowitz” sea surface using the nonlocal small slope approximation, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 37, 632 (1999).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation