Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Characterizing the dynamical phase diagram of the Dicke model via classical and quantum probes

R. J. Lewis-Swan1,2, S. R. Muleady3,4,*, D. Barberena3,4,*, J. J. Bollinger5, and A. M. Rey3,4

  • 1Homer L. Dodge Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA
  • 2Center for Quantum Research and Technology, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA
  • 3JILA, NIST, Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
  • 4Center for Theory of Quantum Matter, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
  • 5National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado 80305, USA

  • *These two authors contributed equally.

Phys. Rev. Research 3, L022020 – Published 4 June, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L022020

Abstract

We theoretically study the dynamical phase diagram of the Dicke model in both classical and quantum limits using large, experimentally relevant system sizes. Our analysis elucidates that the model features dynamical critical points that are strongly influenced by features of chaos and emergent integrability in the model. Moreover, our numerical calculations demonstrate that mean-field features of the dynamics remain valid in the exact quantum dynamics, but we also find that in regimes where quantum effects dominate signatures of the dynamical phases and chaos can persist in purely quantum metrics such as entanglement and correlations. Our predictions can be verified in current quantum simulators of the Dicke model including arrays of trapped ions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (62)

  1. M. Heyl, A. Polkovnikov, and S. Kehrein, Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions in the Transverse-Field Ising Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 135704 (2013).
  2. M. Schiró and M. Fabrizio, Time-Dependent Mean Field Theory for Quench Dynamics in Correlated Electron Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 076401 (2010).
  3. B. Sciolla and G. Biroli, Dynamical transitions and quantum quenches in mean-field models, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2011) P11003.
  4. J. C. Halimeh, V. Zauner-Stauber, I. P. McCulloch, I. de Vega, U. Schollwöck, and M. Kastner, Prethermalization and persistent order in the absence of a thermal phase transition, Phys. Rev. B 95, 024302 (2017).
  5. J. C. Halimeh and V. Zauner-Stauber, Dynamical phase diagram of quantum spin chains with long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. B 96, 134427 (2017).
  6. B. Žunkovič, M. Heyl, M. Knap, and A. Silva, Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions in Spin Chains with Long-Range Interactions: Merging Different Concepts of Nonequilibrium Criticality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 130601 (2018).
  7. A. Lerose, J. Marino, B. Žunkovič, A. Gambassi, and A. Silva, Chaotic Dynamical Ferromagnetic Phase Induced by Nonequilibrium Quantum Fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 130603 (2018).
  8. A. Lerose, B. Žunkovič, J. Marino, A. Gambassi, and A. Silva, Impact of nonequilibrium fluctuations on prethermal dynamical phase transitions in long-range interacting spin chains, Phys. Rev. B 99, 045128 (2019).
  9. M. Schiró and M. Fabrizio, Quantum quenches in the Hubbard model: Time-dependent mean-field theory and the role of quantum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. B 83, 165105 (2011).
  10. F. Peronaci, M. Schiró, and M. Capone, Transient Dynamics of d-Wave Superconductors after a Sudden Excitation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 257001 (2015).
  11. B. Sciolla and G. Biroli, Quantum quenches, dynamical transitions, and off-equilibrium quantum criticality, Phys. Rev. B 88, 201110(R) (2013).
  12. A. Chiocchetta, M. Tavora, A. Gambassi, and A. Mitra, Short-time universal scaling in an isolated quantum system after a quench, Phys. Rev. B 91, 220302(R) (2015).
  13. A. Chiocchetta, A. Gambassi, S. Diehl, and J. Marino, Dynamical Crossovers in Prethermal Critical States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 135701 (2017).
  14. M. Eckstein, M. Kollar, and P. Werner, Thermalization after an Interaction Quench in the Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 056403 (2009).
  15. A. Gambassi and P. Calabrese, Quantum quenches as classical critical films, Europhys. Lett. 95, 66007 (2011).
  16. P. Smacchia, M. Knap, E. Demler, and A. Silva, Exploring dynamical phase transitions and prethermalization with quantum noise of excitations, Phys. Rev. B 91, 205136 (2015).
  17. J. Lang, B. Frank, and J. C. Halimeh, Concurrence of dynamical phase transitions at finite temperature in the fully connected transverse-field Ising model, Phys. Rev. B 97, 174401 (2018).
  18. S. Smale, P. He, B. A. Olsen, K. G. Jackson, H. Sharum, S. Trotzky, J. Marino, A. M. Rey, and J. H. Thywissen, Observation of a transition between dynamical phases in a quantum degenerate Fermi gas, Sci. Adv. 5, eaax1568 (2019).
  19. H.-X. Yang, T. Tian, Y.-B. Yang, L.-Y. Qiu, H.-Y. Liang, A.-J. Chu, C. B. Dağ, Y. Xu, Y. Liu, and L.-M. Duan, Observation of dynamical quantum phase transitions in a spinor condensate, Phys. Rev. A 100, 013622 (2019).
  20. T. Tian, H.-X. Yang, L.-Y. Qiu, H.-Y. Liang, Y.-B. Yang, Y. Xu, and L.-M. Duan, Observation of Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions with Correspondence in an Excited State Phase Diagram, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 043001 (2020).
  21. J. A. Muniz, D. Barberena, R. J. Lewis-Swan, D. J. Young, J. R. K. Cline, A. M. Rey, and J. K. Thompson, Exploring dynamical phase transitions with cold atoms in an optical cavity, Nature (London) 580, 602 (2020).
  22. J. Zhang, G. Pagano, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, H. Kaplan, A. V. Gorshkov, Z.-X. Gong, and C. Monroe, Observation of a many-body dynamical phase transition with a 53-qubit quantum simulator, Nature (London) 551, 601 (2017).
  23. R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes, Phys. Rev. 93, 99 (1954).
  24. B. M. Garraway, The Dicke model in quantum optics: Dicke model revisited, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London A 369, 1137 (2011).
  25. P. Kirton, M. M. Roses, J. Keeling, and E. G. Dalla Torre, Introduction to the Dicke model: From equilibrium to nonequilibrium, and vice versa, Adv. Quantum Technol. 2, 1800043 (2019).
  26. A. Altland and F. Haake, Equilibration and macroscopic quantum fluctuations in the Dicke model, New J. Phys. 14, 073011 (2012).
  27. A. Altland and F. Haake, Quantum Chaos and Effective Thermalization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 073601 (2012).
  28. W. Buijsman, V. Gritsev, and R. Sprik, Nonergodicity in the Anisotropic Dicke Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 080601 (2017).
  29. J. Chávez-Carlos, M. A. Bastarrachea-Magnani, S. Lerma-Hernández, and J. G. Hirsch, Classical chaos in atom-field systems, Phys. Rev. E 94, 022209 (2016).
  30. R. Lewis-Swan, A. Safavi-Naini, J. J. Bollinger, and A. M. Rey, Unifying scrambling, thermalization and entanglement through measurement of fidelity out-of-time-order correlators in the Dicke model, Nat. Commun. 10, 1 (2019).
  31. D. Villaseñor, S. Pilatowsky-Cameo, M. A. Bastarrachea-Magnani, S. Lerma-Hernández, L. F. Santos, and J. G. Hirsch, Quantum vs classical dynamics in a spin-boson system: Manifestations of spectral correlations and scarring, New J. Phys. 22, 063036 (2020).
  32. C. Emary and T. Brandes, Quantum Chaos Triggered by Precursors of a Quantum Phase Transition: The Dicke Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 044101 (2003).
  33. C. Emary and T. Brandes, Chaos and the quantum phase transition in the Dicke model, Phys. Rev. E 67, 066203 (2003).
  34. P. Pérez-Fernández, A. Relaño, J. M. Arias, P. Cejnar, J. Dukelsky, and J. E. García-Ramos, Excited-state phase transition and onset of chaos in quantum optical models, Phys. Rev. E 83, 046208 (2011).
  35. T. Brandes, Excited-state quantum phase transitions in Dicke superradiance models, Phys. Rev. E 88, 032133 (2013).
  36. R. Puebla and A. Relaño, Non-thermal excited-state quantum phase transitions, Europhys. Lett. 104, 50007 (2014).
  37. M. A. Bastarrachea-Magnani, S. Lerma-Hernández, and J. G. Hirsch, Comparative quantum and semiclassical analysis of atom-field systems. I. Density of states and excited-state quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. A 89, 032101 (2014).
  38. A. Safavi-Naini, R. J. Lewis-Swan, J. G. Bohnet, M. Gärttner, K. A. Gilmore, J. E. Jordan, J. Cohn, J. K. Freericks, A. M. Rey, and J. J. Bollinger, Verification of a Many-Ion Simulator of the Dicke Model Through Slow Quenches across a Phase Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 040503 (2018).
  39. J. Cohn, A. Safavi-Naini, R. J. Lewis-Swan, J. G. Bohnet, M. Gärttner, K. A. Gilmore, J. E. Jordan, A. M. Rey, J. J. Bollinger, and J. K. Freericks, Bang-bang shortcut to adiabaticity in the Dicke model as realized in a Penning trap experiment, New J. Phys. 20, 055013 (2018).
  40. K. Baumann, C. Guerlin, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger, Dicke quantum phase transition with a superfluid gas in an optical cavity, Nature (London) 464, 1301 (2010).
  41. J. Klinder, H. Keßler, M. Wolke, L. Mathey, and A. Hemmerich, Dynamical phase transition in the open Dicke model, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3290 (2015).
  42. Z. Zhang, C. H. Lee, R. Kumar, K. J. Arnold, S. J. Masson, A. L. Grimsmo, A. S. Parkins, and M. D. Barrett, Dicke-model simulation via cavity-assisted Raman transitions, Phys. Rev. A 97, 043858 (2018).
  43. R. M. Kroeze, Y. Guo, V. D. Vaidya, J. Keeling, and B. L. Lev, Spinor Self-Ordering of a Quantum Gas in a Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 163601 (2018).
  44. R. Puebla, Finite-component dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 102, 220302(R) (2020).
  45. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L022020 for analytic calculation of dynamical critical points in SR and BDR, analysis of connection between the DPT and EQPT, extended data from numerical simulations and a discussion of parameters for a proposed experimental realization.
  46. A. Safavi-Naini, R. J. Lewis-Swan, J. G. Bohnet, M. Garttner, K. A. Gilmore, E. Jordan, J. Cohn, J. K. Freericks, A. M. Rey, and J. J. Bollinger, Exploring adiabatic quantum dynamics of the Dicke model in a trapped ion quantum simulator, arXiv:1711.07392.
  47. S. Strogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering, Studies in Nonlinearity (CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2000).
  48. I. Sainz, A. B. Klimov, and L. Roa, Quantum phase transitions in an effective Hamiltonian: Fast and slow systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41, 355301 (2008).
  49. G. Liberti, F. Plastina, and F. Piperno, Scaling behavior of the adiabatic Dicke model, Phys. Rev. A 74, 022324 (2006).
  50. J. Keeling, M. J. Bhaseen, and B. D. Simons, Collective Dynamics of Bose-Einstein Condensates in Optical Cavities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 043001 (2010).
  51. M. A. Bastarrachea-Magnani, A. Relaño, S. Lerma-Hernández, B. L. del Carpio, J. Chávez-Carlos, and J. G. Hirsch, Adiabatic invariants for the regular region of the Dicke model, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50, 144002 (2017).
  52. A. Relaño, M. A. Bastarrachea-Magnani, and S. Lerma-Hernández, Approximated integrability of the Dicke model, Europhys. Lett. 116, 50005 (2016).
  53. H. B. Kaplan, L. Guo, W. L. Tan, A. De, F. Marquardt, G. Pagano, and C. Monroe, Many-Body Dephasing in a Trapped-Ion Quantum Simulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 120605 (2020).
  54. T. Kiendl and F. Marquardt, Many-Particle Dephasing after a Quench, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 130601 (2017).
  55. A. Lerose and S. Pappalardi, Bridging entanglement dynamics and chaos in semiclassical systems, Phys. Rev. A 102, 032404 (2020).
  56. A. Lerose and S. Pappalardi, Origin of the slow growth of entanglement entropy in long-range interacting spin systems, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 012041(R) (2020).
  57. J. W. Britton, B. C. Sawyer, A. C. Keith, C.-C. J. Wang, J. K. Freericks, H. Uys, M. J. Biercuk, and J. J. Bollinger, Engineered two-dimensional Ising interactions in a trapped-ion quantum simulator with hundreds of spins, Nature (London) 484, 489 (2012).
  58. J. G. Bohnet, B. C. Sawyer, J. W. Britton, M. L. Wall, A. M. Rey, M. Foss-Feig, and J. J. Bollinger, Quantum spin dynamics and entanglement generation with hundreds of trapped ions, Science 352, 1297 (2016).
  59. A. Mortensen, E. Nielsen, T. Matthey, and M. Drewsen, Observation of Three-Dimensional Long-Range Order in Small Ion Coulomb Crystals in an rf Trap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 103001 (2006).
  60. M. K. Joshi, A. Elben, B. Vermersch, T. Brydges, C. Maier, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Quantum Information Scrambling in a Trapped-Ion Quantum Simulator with Tunable Range Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 240505 (2020).
  61. K. A. Gilmore, J. G. Bohnet, B. C. Sawyer, J. W. Britton, and J. J. Bollinger, Amplitude Sensing Below the Zero-Point Fluctuations with a Two-Dimensional Trapped-Ion Mechanical Oscillator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 263602 (2017).
  62. S. M. Brewer, J.-S. Chen, A. M. Hankin, E. R. Clements, C. W. Chou, D. J. Wineland, D. B. Hume, and D. R. Leibrandt, Al+27 Quantum-Logic Clock with a Systematic Uncertainty Below 10−18, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 033201 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation