Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Disorder-controlled relaxation in a three-dimensional Hubbard model quantum simulator

W. Morong1,*, S. R. Muleady2,3, I. Kimchi2,3,†, W. Xu1,‡, R. M. Nandkishore3,4, A. M. Rey2,3, and B. DeMarco1,§

  • 1Department of Physics, IQUIST, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
  • 2JILA, National Institute of Standards and Technology and Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
  • 3Center for Theory of Quantum Matter, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
  • 4Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA

  • *Present address: Joint Quantum Institute and Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science, University of Maryland and NIST, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.
  • †Present address: School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
  • ‡Present address: Department of Physics and Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
  • §Corresponding author: bdemarco@illinois.edu

Phys. Rev. Research 3, L012009 – Published 27 January, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L012009

Abstract

Understanding the collective behavior of strongly correlated electrons in materials remains a central problem in many-particle quantum physics. A minimal description of these systems is provided by the disordered Fermi-Hubbard model (DFHM), which incorporates the interplay of motion in a disordered lattice with local interparticle interactions. Despite its minimal elements, many dynamical properties of the DFHM are not well understood, owing to the complexity of systems combining out-of-equilibrium behavior, interactions, and disorder in higher spatial dimensions. Here, we study the relaxation dynamics of doubly occupied lattice sites in the three-dimensional DFHM using interaction-quench measurements on a quantum simulator composed of fermionic atoms confined in an optical lattice. In addition to observing the widely studied effect of disorder inhibiting relaxation, we find that the cooperation between strong interactions and disorder also leads to the emergence of a dynamical regime characterized by disorder-enhanced relaxation. To support these results, we develop an approximate numerical method and a phenomenological model that each capture the essential physics of the decay dynamics. Our results provide a theoretical framework for a previously inaccessible regime of the DFHM and demonstrate the ability of quantum simulators to enable understanding of complex many-body systems through minimal models.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (43)

  1. P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958).
  2. P. A. Lee, Disordered electronic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 287 (1985).
  3. N. F. Mott, The basis of the electron theory of metals, with special reference to the transition metals, Proc. Phys. Soc., London, Sect. A 62, 416 (1949).
  4. D. Belitz and T. R. Kirkpatrick, The Anderson-Mott transition, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 261 (1994).
  5. K. Byczuk, W. Hofstetter, and D. Vollhardt, Anderson localization vs. Mott-Hubbard metal-insulator transition in disordered, interacting lattice fermion systems, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 24, 1727 (2010).
  6. L. Sanchez-Palencia and M. Lewenstein, Disordered quantum gases under control, Nat. Phys. 6, 87 (2010).
  7. I. V. Gornyi, A. D. Mirlin, and D. G. Polyakov, Interacting Electrons in Disordered Wires: Anderson Localization and Low-T Transport, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 206603 (2005).
  8. D. M. Basko, I. L. Aleiner, and B. L. Altshuler, Metal-insulator transition in a weakly interacting many-electron system with localized single-particle states, Ann. Phys. 321, 1126 (2006).
  9. R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse, Many-body localization and thermalization in quantum statistical mechanics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 15 (2015).
  10. D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Colloquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 021001 (2019).
  11. M. Schreiber, S. S. Hodgman, P. Bordia, H. P. Luschen, M. H. Fischer, R. Vosk, E. Altman, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Observation of many-body localization of interacting fermions in a quasi-random optical lattice, Science 349, 842 (2015).
  12. J. Smith, A. Lee, P. Richerme, B. Neyenhuis, P. W. Hess, P. Hauke, M. Heyl, D. A. Huse, and C. Monroe, Many-body localization in a quantum simulator with programmable random disorder, Nat. Phys. 12, 907 (2016).
  13. P. Roushan, C. Neill, J. Tangpanitanon, V. M. Bastidas, A. Megrant, R. Barends, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, A. Fowler, B. Foxen, M. Giustina, E. Jeffrey, J. Kelly, E. Lucero, J. Mutus, M. Neeley, C. Quintana, D. Sank et al., Spectroscopic signatures of localization with interacting photons in superconducting qubits, Science 358, 1175 (2017).
  14. H. P. Lüschen, P. Bordia, S. Scherg, F. Alet, E. Altman, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Observation of Slow Dynamics near the Many-Body Localization Transition in One-Dimensional Quasiperiodic Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 260401 (2017).
  15. S. S. Kondov, W. R. McGehee, W. Xu, and B. DeMarco, Disorder-Induced Localization in a Strongly Correlated Atomic Hubbard Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 083002 (2015).
  16. J.-y. Choi, S. Hild, J. Zeiher, P. Schauss, A. Rubio-Abadal, T. Yefsah, V. Khemani, D. A. Huse, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Exploring the many-body localization transition in two dimensions, Science 352, 1547 (2016).
  17. P. Bordia, H. Lüschen, S. Scherg, S. Gopalakrishnan, M. Knap, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Probing Slow Relaxation and Many-Body Localization in Two-Dimensional Quasiperiodic Systems, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041047 (2017).
  18. N. Strohmaier, D. Greif, R. Jördens, L. Tarruell, H. Moritz, T. Esslinger, R. Sensarma, D. Pekker, E. Altman, and E. Demler, Observation of Elastic Doublon Decay in the Fermi-Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 080401 (2010).
  19. R. Sensarma, D. Pekker, E. Altman, E. Demler, N. Strohmaier, D. Greif, R. Jördens, L. Tarruell, H. Moritz, and T. Esslinger, Lifetime of double occupancies in the Fermi-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 82, 224302 (2010).
  20. E. Lahoud, O. N. Meetei, K. B. Chaska, A. Kanigel, and N. Trivedi, Emergence of a Novel Pseudogap Metallic State in a Disordered 2D Mott Insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 206402 (2014).
  21. Z. Wang, Y. Okada, J. O'Neal, W. Zhou, D. Walkup, C. Dhital, T. Hogan, P. Clancy, Y.-J. Kim, Y. F. Hu, L. H. Santos, S. D. Wilson, N. Trivedi, and V. Madhavan, Disorder induced power-law gaps in an insulator-metal Mott transition, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 11198 (2018).
  22. D. Semmler, J. Wernsdorfer, U. Bissbort, K. Byczuk, and W. Hofstetter, Localization of correlated fermions in optical lattices with speckle disorder, Phys. Rev. B 82, 235115 (2010).
  23. S. Q. Zhou and D. M. Ceperley, Construction of localized wave functions for a disordered optical lattice and analysis of the resulting Hubbard model parameters, Phys. Rev. A 81, 013402 (2010).
  24. M. White, M. Pasienski, D. McKay, S. Q. Zhou, D. Ceperley, and B. DeMarco, Strongly Interacting Bosons in a Disordered Optical Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 055301 (2009).
  25. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L012009 for details of the experimental procedure and theory, and for data at different values of U/12t, which includes Refs. [40, 41, 42, 43].
  26. W. K. Wootters, A Wigner-function formulation of quantum mechanics, Ann. Phys. 176, 1 (1987).
  27. B. Zhu, A. M. Rey, and J. Schachenmayer, A generalized phase space approach for solving quantum spin dynamics, New. J. Phys. 21, 082001 (2019).
  28. J. Schachenmayer, A. Pikovski, and A. M. Rey, Many-Body Quantum Spin Dynamics with Monte Carlo Trajectories on a Discrete Phase Space, Phys. Rev. X 5, 011022 (2015).
  29. O. L. Acevedo, A. Safavi-Naini, J. Schachenmayer, M. L. Wall, R. Nandkishore, and A. M. Rey, Exploring many-body localization and thermalization using semiclassical methods, Phys. Rev. A 96, 033604 (2017).
  30. S. Lepoutre, J. Schachenmayer, L. Gabardos, B. H. Zhu, B. Naylor, E. Maréchal, O. Gorceix, A. M. Rey, L. Vernac, and B. Laburthe-Tolra, Exploring out-of-equilibrium quantum magnetism and thermalization in a spin-3 many-body dipolar lattice system, Nat. Commun. 10, 1714 (2019).
  31. A. Patscheider, B. Zhu, L. Chomaz, D. Petter, S. Baier, A.-M. Rey, F. Ferlaino, and M. J. Mark, Controlling dipolar exchange interactions in a dense three-dimensional array of large-spin fermions, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 023050 (2020).
  32. K. Winkler, G. Thalhammer, F. Lang, R. Grimm, J. Hecker Denschlag, A. J. Daley, A. Kantian, H. P. Büchler, and P. Zoller, Repulsively bound atom pairs in an optical lattice, Nature (London) 441, 853 (2006).
  33. D. Hansen, E. Perepelitsky, and B. S. Shastry, Split Hubbard bands at low densities, Phys. Rev. B 83, 205134 (2011).
  34. J. P. Covey, S. A. Moses, M. Gärttner, A. Safavi-Naini, M. T. Miecnikowski, Z. Fu, J. Schachenmayer, P. S. Julienne, A. M. Rey, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye, Doublon dynamics and polar molecule production in an optical lattice, Nat. Commun. 7, 11279 (2016).
  35. B. Deissler, M. Zaccanti, G. Roati, C. D'Errico, M. Fattori, M. Modugno, G. Modugno, and M. Inguscio, Delocalization of a disordered bosonic system by repulsive interactions, Nat. Phys. 6, 354 (2010).
  36. W. Xu, W. R. McGehee, W. N. Morong, and B. DeMarco, Bad-metal relaxation dynamics in a Fermi lattice gas, Nat. Commun. 10, 1588 (2019).
  37. P. T. Brown, D. Mitra, E. Guardado-Sanchez, R. Nourafkan, A. Reymbaut, C.-D. Hébert, S. Bergeron, A.-M. S. Tremblay, J. Kokalj, D. A. Huse, P. Schauß, and W. S. Bakr, Bad metallic transport in a cold atom Fermi-Hubbard system, Science 363, 379 (2019).
  38. S. A. Hartnoll, Theory of universal incoherent metallic transport, Nat. Phys. 11, 54 (2014).
  39. C. L. Hung, X. Zhang, N. Gemelke, and C. Chin, Slow Mass Transport and Statistical Evolution of an Atomic Gas Across the Superfluid-Mott-Insulator Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 160403 (2010).
  40. T. Loftus, C. A. Regal, C. Ticknor, J. L. Bohn, and D. S. Jin, Resonant Control of Elastic Collisions in an Optically Trapped Fermi Gas of Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 173201 (2002).
  41. S. S. Kondov, W. R. McGehee, J. J. Zirbel, and B. DeMarco, Three-Dimensional Anderson Localization of Ultracold Matter, Science 334, 66 (2011).
  42. R. Jördens, N. Strohmaier, K. Günter, H. Moritz, and T. Esslinger, A Mott insulator of fermionic atoms in an optical lattice, Nature (London) 455, 204 (2008).
  43. L. De Leo, J.-S. Bernier, C. Kollath, A. Georges, and V. W. Scarola, Thermodynamics of the three-dimensional Hubbard model: Implications for cooling cold atomic gases in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A 83, 023606 (2011).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation