- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Partial order on passive states and Hoffman majorization in quantum thermodynamics

Uttam Singh*, Siddhartha Das†, and Nicolas J. Cerf‡

  • Centre for Quantum Information and Communication, École polytechnique de Bruxelles, CP 165, Université libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium

  • *utsingh@ulb.ac.be
  • †sidddas@ulb.ac.be
  • ‡ncerf@ulb.ac.be
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 3, 033091 – Published 26 July, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.033091

Abstract

Passive states, i.e., those states from which no work can be extracted via unitary operations, play an important role in the foundations and applications of quantum thermodynamics. They generalize the familiar Gibbs thermal states, which are the sole passive states being stable under tensor product. Here, we introduce a partial order on the set of passive states that captures the idea of a passive state being virtually cooler than another one. This partial order, which we build by defining the notion of relative passivity, offers a fine-grained comparison between passive states based on virtual temperatures (just like thermal states are compared based on their temperatures). We then characterize the quantum operations that are closed on the set of virtually cooler states with respect to some fixed input and output passive states. Viewing the activity, i.e., nonpassivity, of a state as a resource, our main result is then a necessary and sufficient condition on the transformation of a class of pure active states under these relative passivity-preserving operations. This condition gives a quantum thermodynamical meaning to the majorization relation on the set of nonincreasing vectors due to Hoffman. The maximum extractable work under relative passivity-preserving operations is then shown to be equal to the ergotropy of these pure active states. Finally, we are able to fully characterize passivity-preserving operations in the simpler case of qubit systems, and hence to derive a state interconversion condition under passivity-preserving qubit operations. The prospect of this work is a general resource-theoretical framework for the extractable work via quantum operations going beyond thermal operations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (57)

  1. H. Callen, Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics (Wiley, New York, 1985).
  2. H. E. D. Scovil and E. O. Schulz-DuBois, Three-Level Masers as Heat Engines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2, 262 (1959).
  3. J. E. Geusic, E. O. Schulz-DuBios, and H. E. D. Scovil, Quantum equivalent of the Carnot cycle, Phys. Rev. 156, 343 (1967).
  4. M. O. Scully, Quantum Afterburner: Improving the Efficiency of an Ideal Heat Engine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 050602 (2002).
  5. J. Howard, Molecular motors: structural adaptations to cellular functions, Nature (London) 389, 561 (1997).
  6. P. Hänggi and F. Marchesoni, Artificial Brownian motors: Controlling transport on the nanoscale, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 387 (2009).
  7. L. P. Faucheux, L. S. Bourdieu, P. D. Kaplan, and A. J. Libchaber, Optical Thermal Ratchet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1504 (1995).
  8. W. Pusz and S. L. Woronowicz, Passive states and KMS states for general quantum systems, Commun. Math. Phys. 58, 273 (1978).
  9. A. Lenard, Thermodynamical proof of the Gibbs formula for elementary quantum systems, J. Stat. Phys. 19, 575 (1978).
  10. R. Alicki, The quantum open system as a model of the heat engine, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 12, L103 (1979).
  11. J. Rousselet, L. Salome, A. Ajdari, and J. Prostt, Directional motion of brownian particles induced by a periodic asymmetric potential, Nature (London) 370, 446 (1994).
  12. M. Horodecki and J. Oppenheim, Fundamental limitations for quantum and nanoscale thermodynamics, Nat. Commun. 4, 2059 (2013).
  13. F. G. S. L. Brandão, M. Horodecki, J. Oppenheim, J. M. Renes, and R. W. Spekkens, Resource Theory of Quantum States Out of Thermal Equilibrium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 250404 (2013).
  14. F. Brandão, M. Horodecki, N. Ng, J. Oppenheim, and S. Wehner, The second laws of quantum thermodynamics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3275 (2015).
  15. P. Ćwikliński, M. Studziński, M. Horodecki, and J. Oppenheim, Limitations on the Evolution of Quantum Coherences: Towards Fully Quantum Second Laws of Thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 210403 (2015).
  16. J. Goold, M. Huber, A. Riera, L. del Rio, and P. Skrzypczyk, The role of quantum information in thermodynamics—a topical review, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 143001 (2016).
  17. S. Vinjanampathy and J. Anders, Quantum Thermodynamics, Contemp. Phys. 57, 545 (2016).
  18. J. Millen and A. Xuereb, Perspective on quantum thermodynamics, New J. Phys. 18, 011002 (2016).
  19. P. Faist, F. Dupuis, J. Oppenheim, and R. Renner, The minimal work cost of information processing, Nat. Commun. 6, 7669 (2015).
  20. P. Faist, J. Oppenheim, and R. Renner, Gibbs-preserving maps outperform thermal operations in the quantum regime, New J. Phys. 17, 043003 (2015).
  21. N. Yunger Halpern, P. Faist, J. Oppenheim, and A. Winter, Microcanonical and resource-theoretic derivations of the thermal state of a quantum system with noncommuting charges, Nat. Commun. 7, 12051 (2016).
  22. R. Uzdin and S. Rahav, Global Passivity in Microscopic Thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021064 (2018).
  23. N. Koukoulekidis, R. Alexander, T. Hebdige, and D. Jennings, The geometry of passivity for quantum systems and a novel elementary derivation of the Gibbs state, Quantum 5, 411 (2021).
  24. P. Faist, M. Berta, and F. Brandão, Thermodynamic Capacity of Quantum Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 200601 (2019).
  25. R. Uzdin and S. Rahav, The passivity deformation approach for the thermodynamics of isolated quantum setups, Quantum 2, 010336 (2021).
  26. I. Marvian, Coherence distillation machines are impossible in quantum thermodynamics, Nat. Commun. 11, 25 (2020).
  27. G. Francica, F. C. Binder, G. Guarnieri, M. T. Mitchison, J. Goold, and F. Plastina, Quantum Coherence and Ergotropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 180603 (2020).
  28. N. Brunner, N. Linden, S. Popescu, and P. Skrzypczyk, Virtual qubits, virtual temperatures, and the foundations of thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. E 85, 051117 (2012).
  29. A. J. Hoffman, A special class of doubly stochastic matrices, Aequ. Math. 2, 319 (1969).
  30. J. Kästner, A. Borobia, A. Dress, and C. Zylka, Extremal majorizing and anti-majorizing matrices, Linear Algebra Appl. 278, 133 (1998).
  31. A. W. Marshall, I. Olkin, and B. C. Arnold, Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and its Applications (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2011).
  32. A. E Allahverdyan, R Balian, and T. M. Nieuwenhuizen, Maximal work extraction from finite quantum systems, Europhys. Lett. 67, 565 (2004).
  33. P. Skrzypczyk, R. Silva, and N. Brunner, Passivity, complete passivity, and virtual temperatures, Phys. Rev. E 91, 052133 (2015).
  34. J. Gemmer and J. Anders, From single-shot towards general work extraction in a quantum thermodynamic framework, New J. Phys. 17, 085006 (2015).
  35. K. Korzekwa, M. Lostaglio, J. Oppenheim, and D. Jennings, The extraction of work from quantum coherence, New J. Phys. 18, 023045 (2016).
  36. E. G. Brown, N. Friis, and M. Huber, Passivity and practical work extraction using Gaussian operations, New J. Phys. 18, 113028 (2016).
  37. M. Perarnau-Llobet, K. V. Hovhannisyan, M. Huber, P. Skrzypczyk, J. Tura, and A. Acín, Most energetic passive states, Phys. Rev. E 92, 042147 (2015).
  38. M. Perarnau-Llobet, K. V. Hovhannisyan, M. Huber, P. Skrzypczyk, N. Brunner, and A. Acín, Extractable Work from Correlations, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041011 (2015).
  39. T. Baumgratz, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Quantifying Coherence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140401 (2014).
  40. A. Winter and D. Yang, Operational Resource Theory of Coherence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 120404 (2016).
  41. I. Marvian and R. W. Spekkens, The theory of manipulations of pure state asymmetry: I. Basic tools, equivalence classes and single copy transformations, New J. Phys. 15, 033001 (2013).
  42. A. Streltsov, U. Singh, H. S. Dhar, M. N. Bera, and G. Adesso, Measuring Quantum Coherence with Entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 020403 (2015).
  43. A. Streltsov, G. Adesso, and M. B. Plenio, Colloquium: Quantum coherence as a resource, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 041003 (2017).
  44. L. Lami, Completing the grand tour of asymptotic quantum coherence manipulation, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 66, 2165 (2020).
  45. E. Chitambar and G. Gour, Comparison of incoherent operations and measures of coherence, Phys. Rev. A 94, 052336 (2016).
  46. K. Bu, Swati, U. Singh, and J. Wu, Coherence-breaking channels and coherence sudden death, Phys. Rev. A 94, 052335 (2016).
  47. C. Sparaciari, D. Jennings, and J. Oppenheim, Energetic instability of passive states in thermodynamics, Nat. Commun. 8, 1895 (2017).
  48. M. Shaked and G. Shanthikumar, Stochastic Orders (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2007).
  49. R. Silva, G. Manzano, P. Skrzypczyk, and N. Brunner, Performance of autonomous quantum thermal machines: Hilbert space dimension as a thermodynamical resource, Phys. Rev. E 94, 032120 (2016).
  50. S. Du, Z. Bai, and Y. Guo, Conditions for coherence transformations under incoherent operations, Phys. Rev. A 91, 052120 (2015).
  51. S. Du, Z. Bai, and Y. Guo, Erratum: Conditions for coherence transformations under incoherent operations [Phys. Rev. A 91, 052120 (2015)], Phys. Rev. A 95, 029901(E) (2017).
  52. C. Zylka, A note on the attainability of states by equalizing processes, Theoret. Chim. Acta 68, 363 (1985).
  53. D. Thon and S. W. Wallace, Dalton transfers, inequality and altruism, Soc. Choice Welfare 22, 447 (2004).
  54. A. Streltsov, S. Rana, P. Boes, and J. Eisert, Structure of the Resource Theory of Quantum Coherence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 140402 (2017).
  55. M. G. Jabbour, R. García-Patrón, and N. J. Cerf, Majorization preservation of Gaussian bosonic channels, New J. Phys. 18, 073047 (2016).
  56. M. G. Jabbour and N. J. Cerf, Fock majorization in bosonic quantum channels with a passive environment, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52, 105302 (2019).
  57. J. Aberg, Quantifying Superposition, arXiv:quant-ph/0612146.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 3, 033091– Published 26 July, 2021
  • Received 21 December 2020
  • Revised 8 April 2021
  • Accepted 27 April 2021
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation