Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

From the grain to galactic scale; Milky Way neutral hydrogen and terrestrial zircon oxygen support coupling of astrophysical and geological processes over deep-time

C. L. Kirkland1,* and P. J. Sutton2

  • *Contact author: c.kirkland@curtin.edu.au

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 033265 – Published 19 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/98c3-d9j2

Abstract

Neutral hydrogen (HI) is fundamental for tracing spiral structure in galaxies, including the Milky Way, through its 21-cm emission line, revealing features otherwise obscured by dust and gas. However, much of the Milky Way remains poorly resolved due to the Solar System’s embedded location within the galactic disk. Here, we present the first direct comparison between zircon oxygen isotope kurtosis, a terrestrial deep time record, and spatial variations in HI density along the Solar System’s galactic orbit. Significant correlations between Earth’s magmatic zircon oxygen isotope kurtosis and HI density in spiral arms suggest astrophysical influences on Earth’s crustal evolution. Peaks in HI density near the Scutum-Centaurus and Perseus spiral arms are consistent with the hypothesis that periodic disruptions of the Oort cloud during galactic arm crossings increased impact rates on Earth. These periods of elevated impact flux may have contributed substantial thermal energy, leading to more variable magmatic petrogenesis. This variability is recorded by zircon oxygen isotopes, a proxy sensitive to the depth of crustal melting and the degree of interaction with surface-derived water. These results provide new insights into the interplay between galactic-scale processes and Earth’s geological history, arguing for consideration of astrophysical drivers of planetary evolution.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (71)

  1. N. M. McClure-Griffiths, S. Stanimirović, and D. R. Rybarczyk, Atomic hydrogen in the Milky Way: A stepping stone in the evolution of galaxies, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 61, 19 (2023).
  2. H. C. van de Hulst, C. A. Muller, and J. H. Oort, The spiral structure of the outer part of the galactic system derived from the hydrogen emission at 21 cm wavelength, Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth. 12, 117 (1954).
  3. H. I. Ewen and E. M. Purcell, Observation of a line in the galactic radio spectrum: Radiation from galactic hydrogen at 1,420 Mc./sec, Nature (London) 168, 356 (1951).
  4. J. Vallée, Kinematic structure of the Milky Way galaxy, near the spiral arm tangents, Int. J. Astron. Astrophys. 12, 382 (2022).
  5. C. L. Kirkland and P. Sutton, A geological telescope through the galaxy? J. Geol. Soc. 181, jgs2023 (2024).
  6. F. H. Shu, Six decades of spiral density wave theory, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 54, 667 (2016).
  7. F. Bigiel, A. Leroy, F. Walter, E. Brinks, W. J. G. de Blok, B. Madore, and M. D. Thornley, The star formation law in nearby galaxies on sub-kpc scales, Astron. J. 136, 2846 (2008).
  8. R. J. Rand, S. R. Kulkarni, and W. Rice, Star formation and the distribution of H i and infrared emission in M51, Astrophys. J. 390, 66 (1992).
  9. T. Wong and L. Blitz, The relationship between gas content and star formation in molecule-rich spiral galaxies, Astrophys. J. 569, 157 (2002).
  10. J. A. Guerrette, A. V. Mosenkov, D. Spencer, and Z. D. Shakespear, Comparing the structural parameters of the Milky Way to other spiral galaxies, Res. Astron. Astrophys. 24, 035002 (2024).
  11. M. Fouchard, H. Rickman, C. Froeschlé, and G. B. Valsecchi, On the present shape of the Oort cloud and the flux of “new” comets, Icarus 292, 218 (2017).
  12. H. F. Levison, A. Morbidelli, L. Dones, R. Jedicke, P. A. Wiegert, and W. F. Bottke, The mass disruption of Oort cloud comets, Science 296, 2212 (2002).
  13. I. D. Karachentsev and D. I. Makarov, Orbital velocity of the Sun and the apex of the galactic center, Astron. Lett. 22, 455 (1996).
  14. T. Camarillo, P. Dredger, and B. Ratra, Median statistics estimate of the galactic rotational velocity, Astrophys. Space Sci. 363, 268 (2018).
  15. C. C. Lin and F. H. Shu, On the spiral structure of disk galaxies, Astrophys. J. 140, 646 (1964).
  16. B. G. Elmegreen, Star formation in spiral arms, EAS Publ. Ser. 51, 19 (2011).
  17. C. C. Lin and F. H. Shu, On the spiral structure of disk galaxies, II. outline of a theory of density waves, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 55, 229 (1966).
  18. J. Shen and X.-W. Zheng, The bar and spiral arms in the Milky Way: Structure and kinematics, Res. Astron. Astrophys. 20, 159 (2020).
  19. A. N. Pearl, H. J. Newberg, J. L. Carlin, and R. F. Smith, A map of the local velocity substructure in the Milky Way disk, Astrophys. J. 847, 123 (2017).
  20. R. Bottema, The stellar kinematics of galactic disks, Astron. Astrophys. 275, 16 (1993).
  21. R. B. Tully and J. R. Fisher, A new method of determining distances to galaxies, Astron. Astrophys. 54, 661 (1977).
  22. R. Reyes, R. Mandelbaum, J. E. Gunn, J. Pizagno, and C. N. Lackner, Calibrated Tully-Fisher relations for improved estimates of disc rotation velocities, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 417, 2347 (2011).
  23. C. Hawkesworth, P. Cawood, T. Kemp, C. Storey, and B. Dhuime, A matter of preservation, Science 323, 49 (2009).
  24. J. W. Valley et al., 4.4 billion years of crustal maturation: Oxygen isotope ratios of magmatic zircon, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 150, 561 (2005).
  25. I. N. Bindeman, D. A. Ionov, P. M. E. Tollan, and A. V. Golovin, Oxygen isotope (δO18, Δ′O17) insights into continental mantle evolution since the Archean, Nat. Commun. 13, 3779 (2022).
  26. C. L. Kirkland, T. E. Johnson, J. Gillespie, L. Martin, K. Rankenburg, J. Kaempf, and C. Clark, Bimodality in zircon oxygen isotopes and implications for crustal melting on the early Earth, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 625, 118491 (2024).
  27. J. L. Payne, M. Hand, N. J. Pearson, K. M. Barovich, and D. J. McInerney, Crustal thickening and clay: Controls on O isotope variation in global magmatism and siliciclastic sedimentary rocks, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 412, 70 (2015).
  28. M. J. Van Kranendonk, C. L. Kirkland, and J. Cliff, Oxygen isotopes in Pilbara Craton zircons support a global increase in crustal recycling at 3.2 Ga, Lithos 228-229, 90 (2015).
  29. M. Gillman and H. Erenler, Reconciling the Earth’s stratigraphic record with the structure of our galaxy, Geosci. Front. 10, 2147 (2019).
  30. M. Gillman and R. Zhang, Generation of a galactic chronology with impact ages and spiral arm tangents, Sci. Rep. 14, 5790 (2024).
  31. C. L. Kirkland, P. J. Sutton, T. Erickson, T. E. Johnson, M. I. H. Hartnady, H. Smithies, and M. Prause, Did transit through the galactic spiral arms seed crust production on the early Earth? Geology 50, 1312 (2022).
  32. J. H. Oort, F. J. Kerr, and G. Westerhout, The galactic system as a spiral nebula (Council Note), Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 118, 379 (1958).
  33. B.-C. Koo, G. Park, W.-T. Kim, M. G. Lee, D. S. Balser, and T. V. Wenger, Tracing the spiral structure of the outer Milky Way with dense atomic hydrogen gas, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 129, 094102 (2017).
  34. K. Foyle, H. W. Rix, C. L. Dobbs, A. K. Leroy, and F. Walter, Observational evidence against long-lived spiral arms in galaxies, Astrophys. J. 735, 101 (2011).
  35. Y. N. Efremov, On the spiral structure of the Milky Way galaxy, Astron. Rep. 55, 108 (2011).
  36. J. Bovy et al., The Milky Way’s circular-velocity curve between 4 and 14 kpc from APOGEE data, Astrophys. J. 759, 131 (2012).
  37. E. Gardner, P. Nurmi, C. Flynn, and S. Mikkola, The effect of the solar motion on the flux of long-period comets, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 411, 947 (2011).
  38. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/98c3-d9j2 for datasets for the timeseries used for evaluating the relationship between Milky Way atomic hydrogen and Earth’s crustal evolution are available as five Supplemental dataset files (ds01-ds05) and also software scripts used in timeseries analysis, which also includes Refs. [64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70].
  39. L. P. Crosthwaite, J. L. Turner, and P. T. P. Ho, Structure in the neutral hydrogen disk of the spiral galaxy IC 342, Astron. J. 119, 1720 (2000).
  40. J. P. Vallée, Statistics on 24 spiral galaxies having different observed arm locations using different arm tracers, New Astron. 76, 101337 (2020).
  41. J. D. Hamilton, Time Series Analysis (Princeton University Press, William St. Princeton, New Jersey, 1994), Vol. 10.
  42. J. C. Davis, Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology (Wiley, New York, NY, 2002), 3rd ed.
  43. J. M. Polanco-Martínez and J. L. López-Martínez, NonParRolCor: An R package for estimating rolling correlation for two regular time series, SoftwareX 22, 101353 (2023).
  44. P. I. Good, Permutation, Parametric, and Bootstrap Tests of Hypotheses (Springer, New York, NY, 2005).
  45. G. R. Osinski et al., Impact Earth: A review of the terrestrial impact record, Earth Sci. Rev. 232, 104112 (2022).
  46. D. K. Yeomans and A. B. Chamberlin, Comparing the Earth impact flux from comets and near-Earth asteroids, Acta Astronaut. 90, 3 (2013).
  47. T. Kenkmann, The terrestrial impact crater record: A statistical analysis of morphologies, structures, ages, lithologies, and more, Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 56, 1024 (2021).
  48. M. Seton, R. D. Müller, S. Zahirovic, S. Williams, N. M. Wright, J. Cannon, J. M. Whittaker, K. J. Matthews, and R. McGirr, A global data set of present-day oceanic crustal age and seafloor spreading parameters, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 21, e2020GC009214 (2020).
  49. R. B. J. Benson, R. Butler, R. A. Close, E. Saupe, and D. L. Rabosky, Biodiversity across space and time in the fossil record, Curr. Biol. 31, R1225 (2021).
  50. D. M. Raup, Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: An interpretation, Paleobiology 2, 289 (1976).
  51. M. R. Rampino and A. Prokoph, Are impact craters and extinction episodes periodic? Implications for planetary science and astrobiology, Astrobiology 20, 1097 (2020).
  52. D. M. Raup and J. J. Sepkoski, Periodicity of extinctions in the geologic past, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 801 (1984).
  53. R. A. Rohde and R. A. Muller, Cycles in fossil diversity, Nature (London) 434, 208 (2005).
  54. J. A. Kitchell and D. Pena, Periodicity of extinctions in the geologic past: Deterministic versus stochastic explanations, Science 226, 689 (1984).
  55. C. A. L. Bailer-Jones, The evidence for and against astronomical impacts on climate change and mass extinctions: A review, Int. J. Astrobiol. 8, 213 (2009).
  56. T. E. Johnson, C. L. Kirkland, Y. Lu, R. H. Smithies, M. Brown, and M. I. H. Hartnady, Giant impacts and the origin and evolution of continents, Nature (London) 608, 330 (2022).
  57. B. O. Dressler and W. U. Reimold, Terrestrial impact melt rocks and glasses, Earth Sci. Rev. 56, 205 (2001).
  58. C. O’Neill, S. Marchi, W. Bottke, and R. Fu, The role of impacts on Archaean tectonics, Geology 48, 174 (2019).
  59. C. O’Neill, S. Marchi, S. Zhang, and W. Bottke, Impact-driven subduction on the Hadean Earth, Nat. Geosci. 10, 793 (2017).
  60. T. Long et al., Constraining the formation and transport of lunar impact glasses using the ages and chemical compositions of Chang’e-5 glass beads, Sci. Adv. 8, eabq2542 (2022).
  61. A. A. Nemchin, M. D. Norman, M. L. Grange, R. A. Zeigler, M. J. Whitehouse, J. R. Muhling, and R. Merle, U-Pb isotope systematics and impact ages recorded by a chemically diverse population of glasses from an Apollo 14 lunar soil, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 321, 206 (2022).
  62. Y. Xu, C. J. Hao, D. J. Liu, Z. H. Lin, S. B. Bian, L. G. Hou, J. J. Li, and Y. J. Li, What does the Milky Way look like? Astrophys. J. 947, 54 (2023).
  63. D. Colombo et al., The SEDIGISM survey: The influence of spiral arms on the molecular gas distribution of the inner Milky Way, Astron. Astrophys. 658, A54 (2022).
  64. C. J. Spencer, A. J. Cavosie, T. R. Morrell, G. M. Lu, J. Liebmann, and N. M. W. Roberts, Disparities in oxygen isotopes of detrital and igneous zircon identify erosional bias in crustal rock record, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 577, 117248 (2022).
  65. J. H. Oort, A summary and assessment of current 21-cm results concerning spiral and disk structures in our galaxy, in Paris Symposium on Radio Astronomy, edited by R. N. Bracewell, IAU Symposium No. 9 and URSI Symposium No. 1 (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1959).
  66. A. Trapletti and K. Hornik, tseries: Time series analysis and computational finance, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tseries (2020).
  67. H. Wickham, Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2016), p. 260.
  68. H. Wickham et al., Welcome to the tidyverse, J. Open Source Softw. 4, 1686 (2019).
  69. A. Zeileis and G. Grothendieck, zoo: S3 infrastructure for regular and irregular time series, J. Stat. Softw. 14, 1 (2005).
  70. J. Ulrich and E. B. Smith, Package ‘TTR’, https://github.com/joshuaulrich/TTR (2019).
  71. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29632055; http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27290340.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation