Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Energetically efficient, mediated mechanical system for precise control of hoisting operations

Mikel Palmero1,2,*, Juan Gonzalo Muga3,2, and Ander Tobalina4,2

  • *Contact author: mikel.palmero@ehu.eus

Phys. Rev. Research 8, L012040 – Published 20 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7s9h-p8v1

Abstract

We introduce a mechanical control system for energy efficient and robust hoisting crane operations. The control system efficiently translates the harmonic motion of a spring-loaded mediating system into the desired driving of the load, recycling most of the employed energy for subsequent operations. The control output is a shortcut-to-adiabaticity protocol borrowed from quantum mechanics. The control system reduces the single operation consumption in realistic working regimes, but it is in cyclical processes where the energetic advantage becomes substantial. The design of the control system and the control output is flexible enough to allow additional optimization of the robustness against perturbations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (37)

  1. I. E. Agency, Electricity market report 2023, IEA, Paris, (2023), https://www.iea.org/reports/electricity-market-report-2023.
  2. M. G. Patterson, What is energy efficiency? Concepts, indicators and methodological issues, Energy Policy 24, 377 (1996).
  3. D. Iannuzzi, L. Piegari, and P. Tricoli, Use of supercapacitors for energy saving in overhead travelling crane drives, in 2009 International Conference on Clean Electrical Power (IEEE, Capri, Italy, 2009), p. 562.
  4. N. B. b. Ahamad, C.-L. Su, X. Zhaoxia, J. C. Vasquez, J. M. Guerrero, and C.-H. Liao, Energy harvesting from harbor cranes with flywheel energy storage systems, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 55, 3354 (2019).
  5. R. Burns, Advanced Control Engineering (Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 2001).
  6. Z. Wu and X. Xia, Energy efficiency of overhead cranes, IFAC Proc. 47, 19 (2014).
  7. T. Ho, K. Suzuki, M. Tsume, R. Tasaki, T. Miyoshi, and K. Terashima, A switched optimal control approach to reduce transferring time, energy consumption, and residual vibration of payload's skew rotation in crane systems, Control Eng. Pract. 84, 247 (2019).
  8. A. KosucKi, Łukasz Stawiński, P. Malenta, J. Zaczyński, and J. Skowrońska, Energy consumption and energy efficiency improvement of overhead crane's mechanisms, Eksploatacja i Niezawodność 22, 323 (2020).
  9. S. González-Resines, D. Guéry-Odelin, A. Tobalina, I. Lizuain, E. Torrontegui, and J. G. Muga, Invariant-based inverse engineering of crane control parameters, Phys. Rev. Appl. 8, 054008 (2017).
  10. D. Guéry-Odelin, A. Ruschhaupt, A. Kiely, E. Torrontegui, S. Martínez-Garaot, and J. G. Muga, Shortcuts to adiabaticity: Concepts, methods, and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 045001 (2019).
  11. C. Jarzynski, Generating shortcuts to adiabaticity in quantum and classical dynamics, Phys. Rev. A 88, 040101 (2013).
  12. C. Jarzynski, S. Deffner, A. Patra, and Y. Subaşi, Fast forward to the classical adiabatic invariant, Phys. Rev. E 95, 032122 (2017).
  13. Y. Li, L.-A. Wu, and Z. D. Wang, Fast ground-state cooling of mechanical resonators with time-dependent optical cavities, Phys. Rev. A 83, 043804 (2011).
  14. S. Faure, S. Ciliberto, E. Trizac, and D. Guéry-Odelin, Shortcut to stationary regimes: A simple experimental demonstration, Am. J. Phys. 87, 125 (2019).
  15. S. Iram, E. Dolson, J. Chiel, J. Pelesko, N. Krishnan, Özenç Güngör, B. Kuznets-Speck, S. Deffner, E. Ilker, J. G. Scott, and M. Hinczewski, Controlling the speed and trajectory of evolution with counterdiabatic driving, Nat. Phys. 17, 135 (2021).
  16. D. Stefanatos, Fast control of a gun-turret using shortcuts to adiabaticity, J. Appl. Math. Bioinf. 8, 17 (2018).
  17. E. Torrontegui, I. Lizuain, S. González-Resines, A. Tobalina, A. Ruschhaupt, R. Kosloff, and J. G. Muga, Energy consumption for shortcuts to adiabaticity, Phys. Rev. A 96, 022133 (2017).
  18. A. Tobalina, J. Alonso, and J. G. Muga, Energy consumption for ion-transport in a segmented Paul trap, New J. Phys. 20, 065002 (2018).
  19. A. Tobalina, I. Lizuain, and J. G. Muga, Vanishing efficiency of a speeded-up ion-in-Paul-trap Otto engine, Europhys. Lett. 127, 20005 (2019).
  20. H. Ralph Lewis and P. G. L. Leach, A direct approach to finding exact invariants for one-dimensional time-dependent classical Hamiltonians, J. Math. Phys. 23, 2371 (1982).
  21. X. Chen, A. Ruschhaupt, S. Schmidt, A. del Campo, D. Guéry-Odelin, and J. G. Muga, Fast optimal frictionless atom cooling in harmonic traps: Shortcut to adiabaticity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 063002 (2010).
  22. J. Safko, H. Goldstein, C. Poole, Classical Mechanics, 3rd ed. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 2002).
  23. NTN, Rolling bearings handbook (cat. no. 9012/e), Official document from NTN Corporation (2016), https://www.ntnglobal.com/en/products/catalog/en/9012/index.html.
  24. R. Stock, D. T. Eadie, D. Elvidge, and K. Oldknow, Influencing rolling contact fatigue through top of rail friction modifier application—A full scale wheel–rail test rig study, Wear 271, 134 (2011).
  25. X. Lu, T. W. Makowsky, D. T. Eadie, K. Oldknow, J. Xue, J. Jia, G. Li, X. Meng, Y. Xu, and Y. Zhou, Friction management on a Chinese heavy haul coal line, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 226, 630 (2012).
  26. J. Lundberg, M. Rantatalo, C. Wanhainen, and J. Casselgren, Measurements of friction coefficients between rails lubricated with a friction modifier and the wheels of an IORE locomotive during real working conditions, Wear 324-325, 109 (2015).
  27. A. Auffèves, Quantum technologies need a quantum energy initiative, PRX Quantum 3, 020101 (2022).
  28. A. C. Santos, R. D. Silva, and M. S. Sarandy, Shortcut to adiabatic gate teleportation, Phys. Rev. A 93, 012311 (2016).
  29. Y. Zheng, S. Campbell, G. De Chiara, and D. Poletti, Cost of counterdiabatic driving and work output, Phys. Rev. A 94, 042132 (2016).
  30. S. Campbell and S. Deffner, Trade-off between speed and cost in shortcuts to adiabaticity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 100601 (2017).
  31. K. Funo, J.-N. Zhang, C. Chatou, K. Kim, M. Ueda, and A. del Campo, Universal work fluctuations during shortcuts to adiabaticity by counterdiabatic driving, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 100602 (2017).
  32. A. Bravetti and D. Tapias, Thermodynamic cost for classical counterdiabatic driving, Phys. Rev. E 96, 052107 (2017).
  33. E. Calzetta, Not-quite-free shortcuts to adiabaticity, Phys. Rev. A 98, 032107 (2018).
  34. R. Kosloff, Quantum thermodynamics: A dynamical viewpoint, Entropy 15, 2100 (2013).
  35. J. A. Marín Guzmán, P. Erker, S. Gasparinetti, M. Huber, and N. Yunger Halpern, Key issues review: Useful autonomous quantum machines, Rep. Prog. Phys. 87, 122001 (2024).
  36. Mikelpalmero, Mikelpalmero/energetically-efficient-crane-operations: EEMC hoisting control code (v1.0), Zenodo (2025), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17379783.
  37. M. Palmero, S. Martínez-Garaot, U. G. Poschinger, A. Ruschhaupt, and J. G. Muga, Fast separation of two trapped ions, New J. Phys. 17, 093031 (2015).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation