Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Theoretical predictions for ultrasensitive sensing in three-dimensional stochastic interferometry

Guillaume Graciani*

Marcel Filoche

  • *Contact author: guillaume.graciani@telecom-sudparis.eu

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043122 – Published 31 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7fhh-zqcx

Abstract

We show that a random light field can be harnessed for high-precision metrology by introducing specific boundary conditions in the form of Lambertian reflections inside a cavity. We demonstrate a quantifiable and reproducible interferometric response to minute perturbations in wavelength, refractive index, and geometry, predicting high sensitivities consistent with experimental measurements of geometrical deformations down to the picometer scale.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (34)

  1. Y. Wan, X. Fan, and Z. He, Review on speckle-based spectrum analyzer, Photonic Sens. 11, 187 (2021).
  2. N. K. Metzger, R. Spesyvtsev, G. D. Bruce, B. Miller, G. T. Maker, G. Malcolm, M. Mazilu, and K. Dholakia, Harnessing speckle for a sub-femtometre resolved broadband wavemeter and laser stabilization, Nat. Commun. 8, 15610 (2017).
  3. V. Tran, S. K. Sahoo, D. Wang, and C. Dang, Utilizing multiple scattering effect for highly sensitive optical refractive index sensing, Sens. Actuators A: Phys. 301, 111776 (2020).
  4. A. Vijayakumar, D. Jayavel, M. Muthaiah, S. Bhattacharya, and J. Rosen, Implementation of a speckle-correlation-based optical lever with extended dynamic range, Appl. Opt. 58, 5982 (2019).
  5. B. J. Berne and R. Pecora, Dynamic Light Scattering: With Applications to Chemistry, Biology, and Physics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1976).
  6. G. Maret and P. E. Wolf, Multiple light scattering from disordered media. The effect of Brownian motion of scatterers, Z. Phys. B Condens. Matter 65, 409 (1987).
  7. D. J. Pine, D. A. Weitz, P. M. Chaikin, and E. Herbolzheimer, Diffusing wave spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1134 (1988).
  8. F. C. MacKintosh and S. John, Diffusing-wave spectroscopy and multiple scattering of light in correlated random media, Phys. Rev. B 40, 2383 (1989).
  9. G. Graciani, L. Le Goff, and F. Amblard, Protein conformational dynamics probed correlation spectroscopy of multiply scattered light, Biophys. J. 118, 136a (2020).
  10. P. Zakharov and F. Scheffold, Advances in dynamic light scattering techniques, in Light Scattering Reviews 4, edited by A. A. Kokhanovsky (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009), pp. 433–467.
  11. H. S. Kim, N. Şenbil, C. Zhang, F. Scheffold, and T. G. Mason, Diffusing wave microrheology of highly scattering concentrated monodisperse emulsions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 7766 (2019).
  12. G. Graciani, M. Filoche, and F. Amblard, 3D stochastic interferometer detects picometer deformations and minute dielectric fluctuations of its optical volume, Commun. Phys. 5, 239 (2022).
  13. G. Graciani and F. Amblard, Random dynamic interferometer: Cavity amplified speckle spectroscopy using a highly symmetric coherent field created inside a closed Lambertian optical cavity, in Applied Optical Metrology III, edited by E. Novak and J. D. Trolinger (International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, San Diego, 2019), Vol. 11102, p. 111020N.
  14. G. Graciani, J. T. King, and F. Amblard, Cavity-amplified scattering spectroscopy reveals the dynamics of proteins and nanoparticles in quasi-transparent and miniature samples, ACS Nano 16, 16796 (2022).
  15. G. Graciani, J. T. King, and F. Amblard, Marker-free protein study by amplified light scattering, in SPIE Advanced Biophotonics Conference, edited by E. Chung, K.-H. Jeong, C. Joo, W. Jung, H.-W. Kang, C.-S. Kim, C. Kim, P. Kim, and H. Yoo (International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, Busan, Republic of Korea, 2022), Vol. 12159, p. 1215908.
  16. R. F. S. Blanco, An invariance property of diffusive random walks, Europhys. Lett. 61, 168 (2003).
  17. R. Savo, R. Pierrat, U. Najar, R. Carminati, S. Rotter, and S. Gigan, Observation of mean path length invariance in light-scattering media, Science 358, 765 (2017).
  18. M. V. Berry and M. R. Dennis, Phase singularities in isotropic random waves, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 456, 2059 (2000).
  19. J. Uozumi, K. Uno, and T. Asakura, Statistics of Gaussian speckles with enhanced fluctuations, Opt. Rev. 2, 174 (1995).
  20. M. Facchin, S. N. Khan, K. Dholakia, and G. D. Bruce, Determining intrinsic sensitivity and the role of multiple scattering in speckle metrology, Nat. Rev. Phys. 6, 500 (2024).
  21. B. van Tiggelen, P. Sebbah, M. Stoytchev, and A. Genack, Delay-time statistics for diffuse waves, Phys. Rev. E 59, 7166 (1999).
  22. M. Facchin, K. Dholakia, and G. D. Bruce, Wavelength sensitivity of the speckle patterns produced by an integrating sphere, J. Phys. Photonics 3, 035005 (2021).
  23. M. Facchin, G. D. Bruce, and K. Dholakia, Measurement of variations in gas refractive index with 10−9 resolution using laser speckle, ACS Photonics 9, 830 (2022).
  24. M. Facchin, G. D. Bruce, and K. Dholakia, Measuring picometre-level displacements using speckle patterns produced by an integrating sphere, Sci. Rep. 13, 14607 (2023).
  25. G. Iooss, R. H. Helleman, and R. Stora, Chaotic behaviour of deterministic systems, Les Houches Summer School Proceedings (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983), Vol. 36.
  26. P. O'Connor, J. Gehlen, and E. J. Heller, Properties of random superpositions of plane waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1296 (1987).
  27. M. Berry and M. Dennis, Polarization singularities in isotropic random vector waves, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 457, 141 (2001).
  28. L. De Angelis, F. Alpeggiani, A. Di Falco, and L. Kuipers, Spatial distribution of phase singularities in optical random vector waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 093901 (2016).
  29. N. Shvartsman and I. Freund, Vortices in random wave fields: Nearest neighbor anticorrelations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1008 (1994).
  30. N. Jhajj, I. Larkin, E. W. Rosenthal, S. Zahedpour, J. K. Wahlstrand, and H. M. Milchberg, Spatiotemporal optical vortices, Phys. Rev. X 6, 031037 (2016).
  31. F. Eilenberger, K. Prater, S. Minardi, R. Geiss, U. Röpke, J. Kobelke, K. Schuster, H. Bartelt, S. Nolte, A. Tünnermann, and T. Pertsch, Observation of discrete, vortex light bullets, Phys. Rev. X 3, 041031 (2013).
  32. W. Wang, S. G. Hanson, Y. Miyamoto, and M. Takeda, Experimental investigation of local properties and statistics of optical vortices in random wave fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 103902 (2005).
  33. I. Khaoua, G. Graciani, A. Kim, and F. Amblard, Stochastic light concentration from 3D to 2D reveals ultraweak chemi- and bioluminescence, Sci. Rep. 11, 10050 (2021).
  34. I. Khaoua, G. Graciani, A. Kim, and F. Amblard, Detectivity optimization to measure ultraweak light fluxes using an EM-CCD as binary photon counter array, Sci. Rep. 11, 3530 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation