Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Quantum friction through monolayers

Eivind Kristen Osestad1, Stefan Yoshi Buhmann2, and Johannes Fiedler1,*

  • *Contact author: johanes.fiedler@uib.no

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 023037 – Published 13 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/787l-w86q

Abstract

Quantum friction is a friction force caused by electromagnetic fluctuations as an atom moves relative to macroscopic bodies. This effect is only predicted theoretically and requires high velocity and close proximity to give a significant signal. To date, experiments have not been able to measure this effect. Recent experiments with ultrafast atoms have sent neutral atoms through the crystal structure of monolayer graphene [Science 389, 724 (2025)]. We present a theoretical framework describing quantum friction as atoms pass through monolayers and calculate the force on helium passing through graphene. Once the atom passes the monolayer, we find that the velocity-dependent force no longer opposes the direction of motion due to strong interactions caused by having been closer to the monolayer in the past. For the experimental parameters, we find a kinetic energy loss caused by quantum friction on the order of ten to hundred µeV. We find that quantum friction cannot be measured with this setup with current techniques.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (23)

  1. H. B. G. Casimir and D. Polder, The influence of retardation on the London-van der Waals forces, Phys. Rev. 73, 360 (1948).
  2. S.Scheel and S. Buhmann, Macroscopic quantum electrodynamics—Concepts and applications, Acta Phys. Slovaca 58, 675 (2008).
  3. S. Y. Buhmann, Dispersion Forces I: Macroscopic Quantum Electrodynamics and Ground-State Casimir, Casimir–Polder and van der Waals Forces (Springer, Heidelberg, 2012).
  4. C. I. Sukenik, M. G. Boshier, D. Cho, V. Sandoghdar, and E. A. Hinds, Measurement of the Casimir-Polder force, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 560 (1993).
  5. K. Autumn, M. Sitti, Y. A. Liang, A. M. Peattie, W. R. Hansen, S. Sponberg, T. W. Kenny, R. Fearing, J. N. Israelachvili, and R. J. Full, Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12252 (2002).
  6. D. M. Harber, J. M. Obrecht, J. M. McGuirk, and E. A. Cornell, Measurement of the Casimir-Polder force through center-of-mass oscillations of a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A 72, 033610 (2005).
  7. J. M. Obrecht, R. J. Wild, M. Antezza, L. P. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, and E. A. Cornell, Measurement of the temperature dependence of the Casimir-Polder force, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 063201 (2007).
  8. F. A. Burger, R. W. Corkery, S. Y. Buhmann, and J. Fiedler, Comparison of theory and experiments on van der Waals forces in media—A survey, J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 24179 (2020).
  9. N. Gack, C. Reitz, J. L. Hemmerich, M. Könne, R. Bennett, J. Fiedler, H. Gleiter, S. Y. Buhmann, H. Hahn, and T. Reisinger, Signature of short-range van der Waals forces observed in Poisson spot diffraction with indium atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 050401 (2020).
  10. T. L. Ferrell and R. H. Ritchie, Dynamical and geometrical effects on the physisorption of atoms, Phys. Rev. A 21, 1305 (1980).
  11. J. B. Pendry, Shearing the vacuum—Quantum friction, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9, 10301 (1997).
  12. A. I. Volokitin and B. N. J. Persson, Near-field radiative heat transfer and noncontact friction, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 1291 (2007).
  13. G. Barton, On van der Waals friction. II: Between atom and half-space, New J. Phys. 12, 113045 (2010).
  14. F. Intravaia, V. E. Mkrtchian, S. Y. Buhmann, S. Scheel, D. A. R. Dalvit, and C. Henkel, Friction forces on atoms after acceleration, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 27, 214020 (2015).
  15. F. Intravaia, R. O. Behunin, C. Henkel, K. Busch, and D. A. R. Dalvit, Failure of local thermal equilibrium in quantum friction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 100402 (2016).
  16. J. Klatt, M. B. Farías, D. A. R. Dalvit, and S. Y. Buhmann, Quantum friction in arbitrarily directed motion, Phys. Rev. A 95, 052510 (2017).
  17. J. Klatt, The Casimir-Polder Effect and Quantum Friction Across Timescales, Ph.D. thesis, Physikalisches Institut, Universität Freiburg, 2017.
  18. C. Kanitz, J. Bühler, V. Zobač, J. J. Robinson, T. Susi, M. Debiossac, and C. Brand, Diffraction of helium and hydrogen atoms through single-layer graphene, Science 389, 724 (2025).
  19. C. Brand, M. Debiossac, T. Susi, F. Aguillon, J. Kotakoski, P. Roncin, and M. Arndt, Coherent diffraction of hydrogen through the 246 pm lattice of graphene, New J. Phys. 21, 033004 (2019).
  20. S. Buhmann, Dispersion Forces II. Many-Body Effects, Excited Atoms, Finite Temperature and Quantum Friction (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012), Vol. 248.
  21. W. L. Wiese and J. R. Fuhr, Accurate atomic transition probabilities for hydrogen, helium, and lithium, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 38, 565 (2009).
  22. I. V. Fialkovsky, V. N. Marachevsky, and D. V. Vassilevich, Finite-temperature Casimir effect for graphene, Phys. Rev. B 84, 035446 (2011).
  23. S. Ribeiro and S. Scheel, Controlled ripple texturing of suspended graphene membranes due to coupling with ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. A 88, 052521 (2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation