Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Inhibition of explosive transitions in spreading dynamics by nonlinear higher-order adaptation

Longzhao Liu1,2,3,4,5, Hongwei Zheng6, Zhihao Han1,2, Xin Wang1,2,3,4,5,7,*, and Shaoting Tang1,8,2,9,3,4,5,†

  • 1Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
  • 2Key laboratory of Mathematics, Informatics and Behavioral Semantics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
  • 3Zhongguancun Laboratory, Beijing 100094, China
  • 4Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Future Blockchain and Privacy Computing, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
  • 5State Key Laboratory of Complex & Critical Software Environment, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
  • 6Beijing Academy of Blockchain and Edge Computing, Beijing 100085, China
  • 7State Key Laboratory of General Artificial Intelligence, BIGAI, Beijing 100080, China
  • 8Hangzhou International Innovation Institute, Beihang University, Hangzhou 311115, China
  • 9Institute of Medical Artificial Intelligence, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264003, China

  • *Contact author: wangxin_1993@buaa.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: tangshaoting@buaa.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 033068 – Published 16 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5vff-syxb

Abstract

The coevolution of structure and dynamics, known as adaptation, is a fundamental property in various systems and drives diverse emergent behaviors. However, the adaptation in most works primarily stems from pairwise situations, which is insufficient to capture ubiquitous higher-order characteristics of real systems. Here, we introduce higher-order adaptation, characterized by baseline rewiring rate and nonlinear higher-order exponent, to model the coevolution of higher-order structure and spreading dynamics. We develop a hyperedge-based theoretical framework that well predicts critical behaviors and outbreak sizes. Notably, the inherent nonlinearity of higher-order adaptation inhibits bistability and explosive transitions, which is qualitatively opposite to the classical findings associated with pairwise adaptation or higher-order contagion. This inhibitory effect is enhanced by rewiring accuracy and remains robust across various adaptive spreading models. Our work establishes higher-order adaptation as a fundamentally distinct mechanism from pairwise adaptation, shedding light on adaptive systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (50)

  1. S. Boccaletti, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M. Chavez, and D.-U. Hwang, Complex networks: Structure and dynamics, Phys. Rep. 424, 175 (2006).
  2. S. N. Dorogovtsev, A. V. Goltsev, and J. F. F. Mendes, Critical phenomena in complex networks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1275 (2008).
  3. A. Barrat, M. Barthelemy, and A. Vespignani, Dynamical Processes on Complex Networks (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2008).
  4. W. Zhu, X. Wang, C. Wang, L. Liu, H. Zheng, and S. Tang, Reputation-based synergy and discounting mechanism promotes cooperation, New J. Phys. 26, 033046 (2024).
  5. R. Berner, T. Gross, C. Kuehn, J. Kurths, and S. Yanchuk, Adaptive dynamical networks, Phys. Rep. 1031, 1 (2023).
  6. T. Gross and B. Blasius, Adaptive coevolutionary networks: A review, J. R. Soc. Interface 5, 259 (2008).
  7. L. Liu, X. Wang, Y. Zheng, W. Fang, S. Tang, and Z. Zheng, Homogeneity trend on social networks changes evolutionary advantage in competitive information diffusion, New J. Phys. 22, 013019 (2020).
  8. T. Gross, C. J. D. D’Lima, and B. Blasius, Epidemic dynamics on an adaptive network, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 208701 (2006).
  9. X. Wang, A. D. Sirianni, S. Tang, Z. Zheng, and F. Fu, Public discourse and social network echo chambers driven by socio-cognitive biases, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041042 (2020).
  10. F. Fu, C. Hauert, M. A. Nowak, and L. Wang, Reputation-based partner choice promotes cooperation in social networks, Phys. Rev. E 78, 026117 (2008).
  11. F. Battiston, G. Cencetti, I. Iacopini, V. Latora, M. Lucas, A. Patania, J.-G. Young, and G. Petri, Networks beyond pairwise interactions: Structure and dynamics, Phys. Rep. 874, 1 (2020).
  12. A. Santoro, F. Battiston, G. Petri, and E. Amico, Higher-order organization of multivariate time series, Nat. Phys. 19, 221 (2023).
  13. J. Grilli, G. Barabás, M. J. Michalska-Smith, and S. Allesina, Higher-order interactions stabilize dynamics in competitive network models, Nature (London) 548, 210 (2017).
  14. G. Burgio, S. Gómez, and A. Arenas, Triadic approximation reveals the role of interaction overlap on the spread of complex contagions on higher-order networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 077401 (2024).
  15. R. Lambiotte, M. Rosvall, and I. Scholtes, From networks to optimal higher-order models of complex systems, Nat. Phys. 15, 313 (2019).
  16. D. Shi and G. Chen, Simplicial networks: A powerful tool for characterizing higher-order interactions, Natl. Sci. Rev. 9, nwac038 (2022).
  17. S. Boccaletti, P. De Lellis, C. I. del Genio, K. Alfaro-Bittner, R. Criado, S. Jalan, and M. Romance, The structure and dynamics of networks with higher order interactions, Phys. Rep. 1018, 1 (2023).
  18. G. Ferraz de Arruda, A. Aleta, and Y. Moreno, Contagion dynamics on higher-order networks, Nat. Rev. Phys. 6, 468 (2024).
  19. F. Battiston, E. Amico, A. Barrat, G. Bianconi, G. Ferraz de Arruda, B. Franceschiello, I. Iacopini, S. Kéfi, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, et al., The physics of higher-order interactions in complex systems, Nat. Phys. 17, 1093 (2021).
  20. S. Majhi, M. Perc, and D. Ghosh, Dynamics on higher-order networks: A review, J. R. Soc. Interface 19, 20220043 (2022).
  21. F. Malizia, S. Lamata-Otín, M. Frasca, V. Latora, and J. Gómez-Gardeñes, Hyperedge overlap drives explosive transitions in systems with higher-order interactions, Nat. Commun. 16, 555 (2025).
  22. L. Neuhäuser, A. Mellor, and R. Lambiotte, Multibody interactions and nonlinear consensus dynamics on networked systems, Phys. Rev. E 101, 032310 (2020).
  23. I. Iacopini, G. Petri, A. Barrat, and V. Latora, Simplicial models of social contagion, Nat. Commun. 10, 2485 (2019).
  24. A. Civilini, O. Sadekar, F. Battiston, J. Gómez-Gardeñes, and V. Latora, Explosive cooperation in social dilemmas on higher-order networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 167401 (2024).
  25. L. Di Gaetano, F. Battiston, and M. Starnini, Percolation and topological properties of temporal higher-order networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 037401 (2024).
  26. G. Petri and A. Barrat, Simplicial activity driven model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 228301 (2018).
  27. Z. Han, L. Liu, X. Wang, Y. Hao, H. Zheng, S. Tang, and Z. Zheng, Probabilistic activity driven model of temporal simplicial networks and its application on higher-order dynamics, Chaos 34, 023137 (2024).
  28. I. Iacopini, M. Karsai, and A. Barrat, The temporal dynamics of group interactions in higher-order social networks, Nat. Commun. 15, 7391 (2024).
  29. G. St-Onge, H. Sun, A. Allard, L. Hébert-Dufresne, and G. Bianconi, Universal nonlinear infection kernel from heterogeneous exposure on higher-order networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 158301 (2021).
  30. W. Wang, Y. Nie, W. Li, T. Lin, M.-S. Shang, S. Su, Y. Tang, Y.-C. Zhang, and G.-Q. Sun, Epidemic spreading on higher-order networks, Phys. Rep. 1056, 1 (2024).
  31. Y. Chen, Y. R. Gel, M. V. Marathe, and H. V. Poor, A simplicial epidemic model for covid-19 spread analysis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2313171120 (2024).
  32. V. Marceau, P.-A. Noël, L. Hébert-Dufresne, A. Allard, and L. J. Dubé, Adaptive networks: Coevolution of disease and topology, Phys. Rev. E 82, 036116 (2010).
  33. G. Burgio, G. St-Onge, and L. Hébert-Dufresne, Characteristic scales and adaptation in higher-order contagions, Nat. Commun. 16, 4589 (2025).
  34. S. Lai, N. W. Ruktanonchai, L. Zhou, O. Prosper, W. Luo, J. R. Floyd, A. Wesolowski, M. Santillana, C. Zhang, X. Du, et al., Effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions to contain covid-19 in China, Nature (London) 585, 410 (2020).
  35. N. Perra, Non-pharmaceutical interventions during the covid-19 pandemic: A review, Phys. Rep. 913, 1 (2021).
  36. S. Flaxman, S. Mishra, A. Gandy, H. J. T. Unwin, T. A. Mellan, H. Coupland, C. Whittaker, H. Zhu, T. Berah, J. W. Eaton, et al., Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on covid-19 in Europe, Nature (London) 584, 257 (2020).
  37. G. St-Onge, I. Iacopini, V. Latora, A. Barrat, G. Petri, A. Allard, and L. Hébert-Dufresne, Influential groups for seeding and sustaining nonlinear contagion in heterogeneous hypergraphs, Commun. Phys. 5, 25 (2022).
  38. R. Pastor-Satorras, C. Castellano, P. Van Mieghem, and A. Vespignani, Epidemic processes in complex networks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 925 (2015).
  39. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/5vff-syxb for details about data processing and model simulations, procedures of theoretical analysis, and results under different hyperedge sizes, rewiring mechanisms, higher-order spreading models, and adaptation kernels for verifying robustness and generality of our findings, which includes Refs. [8, 23, 43, 44, 46, 47].
  40. B. Morsky, F. Magpantay, T. Day, and E. Akçay, The impact of threshold decision mechanisms of collective behavior on disease spread, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2221479120 (2023).
  41. World Health Organization, Report of the WHO-China joint mission on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), 2020, https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/who-china-joint-mission-on-covid-19-final-report.pdf.
  42. M. A. Nowak, Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006).
  43. R. Mastrandrea, J. Fournet, and A. Barrat, Contact patterns in a high school: A comparison between data collected using wearable sensors, contact diaries and friendship surveys, PLoS One 10, e0136497 (2015).
  44. M. Génois and A. Barrat, Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts? EPJ Data Sci. 7, 11 (2018).
  45. http://www.sociopatterns.org.
  46. J.-G. Young, G. Petri, F. Vaccarino, and A. Patania, Construction of and efficient sampling from the simplicial configuration model, Phys. Rev. E 96, 032312 (2017).
  47. A. Dhooge, W. Govaerts, Y. A. Kuznetsov, H. G. E. Meijer, and B. Sautois, New features of the software MatCont for bifurcation analysis of dynamical systems, Math. Comput. Modell. Dyn. Syst. 14, 147 (2008).
  48. L. Liu, X. Wang, X. Chen, S. Tang, and Z. Zheng, Modeling confirmation bias and peer pressure in opinion dynamics, Front. Phys. 9, 649852 (2021).
  49. N. E. Friedkin, A. V. Proskurnikov, R. Tempo, and S. E. Parsegov, Network science on belief system dynamics under logic constraints, Science 354, 321 (2016).
  50. U. Alvarez-Rodriguez, F. Battiston, G. F. de Arruda, Y. Moreno, M. Perc, and V. Latora, Evolutionary dynamics of higher-order interactions in social networks, Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 586 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation