- Open Access
Inhibition of explosive transitions in spreading dynamics by nonlinear higher-order adaptation
Phys. Rev. Research 8, 033068 – Published 16 July, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5vff-syxb
Abstract
The coevolution of structure and dynamics, known as adaptation, is a fundamental property in various systems and drives diverse emergent behaviors. However, the adaptation in most works primarily stems from pairwise situations, which is insufficient to capture ubiquitous higher-order characteristics of real systems. Here, we introduce higher-order adaptation, characterized by baseline rewiring rate and nonlinear higher-order exponent, to model the coevolution of higher-order structure and spreading dynamics. We develop a hyperedge-based theoretical framework that well predicts critical behaviors and outbreak sizes. Notably, the inherent nonlinearity of higher-order adaptation inhibits bistability and explosive transitions, which is qualitatively opposite to the classical findings associated with pairwise adaptation or higher-order contagion. This inhibitory effect is enhanced by rewiring accuracy and remains robust across various adaptive spreading models. Our work establishes higher-order adaptation as a fundamentally distinct mechanism from pairwise adaptation, shedding light on adaptive systems.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (50)
- S. Boccaletti, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M. Chavez, and D.-U. Hwang, Complex networks: Structure and dynamics, Phys. Rep. 424, 175 (2006).
- S. N. Dorogovtsev, A. V. Goltsev, and J. F. F. Mendes, Critical phenomena in complex networks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1275 (2008).
- A. Barrat, M. Barthelemy, and A. Vespignani, Dynamical Processes on Complex Networks (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2008).
- W. Zhu, X. Wang, C. Wang, L. Liu, H. Zheng, and S. Tang, Reputation-based synergy and discounting mechanism promotes cooperation, New J. Phys. 26, 033046 (2024).
- R. Berner, T. Gross, C. Kuehn, J. Kurths, and S. Yanchuk, Adaptive dynamical networks, Phys. Rep. 1031, 1 (2023).
- T. Gross and B. Blasius, Adaptive coevolutionary networks: A review, J. R. Soc. Interface 5, 259 (2008).
- L. Liu, X. Wang, Y. Zheng, W. Fang, S. Tang, and Z. Zheng, Homogeneity trend on social networks changes evolutionary advantage in competitive information diffusion, New J. Phys. 22, 013019 (2020).
- T. Gross, C. J. D. D’Lima, and B. Blasius, Epidemic dynamics on an adaptive network, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 208701 (2006).
- X. Wang, A. D. Sirianni, S. Tang, Z. Zheng, and F. Fu, Public discourse and social network echo chambers driven by socio-cognitive biases, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041042 (2020).
- F. Fu, C. Hauert, M. A. Nowak, and L. Wang, Reputation-based partner choice promotes cooperation in social networks, Phys. Rev. E 78, 026117 (2008).
- F. Battiston, G. Cencetti, I. Iacopini, V. Latora, M. Lucas, A. Patania, J.-G. Young, and G. Petri, Networks beyond pairwise interactions: Structure and dynamics, Phys. Rep. 874, 1 (2020).
- A. Santoro, F. Battiston, G. Petri, and E. Amico, Higher-order organization of multivariate time series, Nat. Phys. 19, 221 (2023).
- J. Grilli, G. Barabás, M. J. Michalska-Smith, and S. Allesina, Higher-order interactions stabilize dynamics in competitive network models, Nature (London) 548, 210 (2017).
- G. Burgio, S. Gómez, and A. Arenas, Triadic approximation reveals the role of interaction overlap on the spread of complex contagions on higher-order networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 077401 (2024).
- R. Lambiotte, M. Rosvall, and I. Scholtes, From networks to optimal higher-order models of complex systems, Nat. Phys. 15, 313 (2019).
- D. Shi and G. Chen, Simplicial networks: A powerful tool for characterizing higher-order interactions, Natl. Sci. Rev. 9, nwac038 (2022).
- S. Boccaletti, P. De Lellis, C. I. del Genio, K. Alfaro-Bittner, R. Criado, S. Jalan, and M. Romance, The structure and dynamics of networks with higher order interactions, Phys. Rep. 1018, 1 (2023).
- G. Ferraz de Arruda, A. Aleta, and Y. Moreno, Contagion dynamics on higher-order networks, Nat. Rev. Phys. 6, 468 (2024).
- F. Battiston, E. Amico, A. Barrat, G. Bianconi, G. Ferraz de Arruda, B. Franceschiello, I. Iacopini, S. Kéfi, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, et al., The physics of higher-order interactions in complex systems, Nat. Phys. 17, 1093 (2021).
- S. Majhi, M. Perc, and D. Ghosh, Dynamics on higher-order networks: A review, J. R. Soc. Interface 19, 20220043 (2022).
- F. Malizia, S. Lamata-Otín, M. Frasca, V. Latora, and J. Gómez-Gardeñes, Hyperedge overlap drives explosive transitions in systems with higher-order interactions, Nat. Commun. 16, 555 (2025).
- L. Neuhäuser, A. Mellor, and R. Lambiotte, Multibody interactions and nonlinear consensus dynamics on networked systems, Phys. Rev. E 101, 032310 (2020).
- I. Iacopini, G. Petri, A. Barrat, and V. Latora, Simplicial models of social contagion, Nat. Commun. 10, 2485 (2019).
- A. Civilini, O. Sadekar, F. Battiston, J. Gómez-Gardeñes, and V. Latora, Explosive cooperation in social dilemmas on higher-order networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 167401 (2024).
- L. Di Gaetano, F. Battiston, and M. Starnini, Percolation and topological properties of temporal higher-order networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 037401 (2024).
- G. Petri and A. Barrat, Simplicial activity driven model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 228301 (2018).
- Z. Han, L. Liu, X. Wang, Y. Hao, H. Zheng, S. Tang, and Z. Zheng, Probabilistic activity driven model of temporal simplicial networks and its application on higher-order dynamics, Chaos 34, 023137 (2024).
- I. Iacopini, M. Karsai, and A. Barrat, The temporal dynamics of group interactions in higher-order social networks, Nat. Commun. 15, 7391 (2024).
- G. St-Onge, H. Sun, A. Allard, L. Hébert-Dufresne, and G. Bianconi, Universal nonlinear infection kernel from heterogeneous exposure on higher-order networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 158301 (2021).
- W. Wang, Y. Nie, W. Li, T. Lin, M.-S. Shang, S. Su, Y. Tang, Y.-C. Zhang, and G.-Q. Sun, Epidemic spreading on higher-order networks, Phys. Rep. 1056, 1 (2024).
- Y. Chen, Y. R. Gel, M. V. Marathe, and H. V. Poor, A simplicial epidemic model for covid-19 spread analysis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2313171120 (2024).
- V. Marceau, P.-A. Noël, L. Hébert-Dufresne, A. Allard, and L. J. Dubé, Adaptive networks: Coevolution of disease and topology, Phys. Rev. E 82, 036116 (2010).
- G. Burgio, G. St-Onge, and L. Hébert-Dufresne, Characteristic scales and adaptation in higher-order contagions, Nat. Commun. 16, 4589 (2025).
- S. Lai, N. W. Ruktanonchai, L. Zhou, O. Prosper, W. Luo, J. R. Floyd, A. Wesolowski, M. Santillana, C. Zhang, X. Du, et al., Effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions to contain covid-19 in China, Nature (London) 585, 410 (2020).
- N. Perra, Non-pharmaceutical interventions during the covid-19 pandemic: A review, Phys. Rep. 913, 1 (2021).
- S. Flaxman, S. Mishra, A. Gandy, H. J. T. Unwin, T. A. Mellan, H. Coupland, C. Whittaker, H. Zhu, T. Berah, J. W. Eaton, et al., Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on covid-19 in Europe, Nature (London) 584, 257 (2020).
- G. St-Onge, I. Iacopini, V. Latora, A. Barrat, G. Petri, A. Allard, and L. Hébert-Dufresne, Influential groups for seeding and sustaining nonlinear contagion in heterogeneous hypergraphs, Commun. Phys. 5, 25 (2022).
- R. Pastor-Satorras, C. Castellano, P. Van Mieghem, and A. Vespignani, Epidemic processes in complex networks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 925 (2015).
- See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/5vff-syxb for details about data processing and model simulations, procedures of theoretical analysis, and results under different hyperedge sizes, rewiring mechanisms, higher-order spreading models, and adaptation kernels for verifying robustness and generality of our findings, which includes Refs. [8, 23, 43, 44, 46, 47].
- B. Morsky, F. Magpantay, T. Day, and E. Akçay, The impact of threshold decision mechanisms of collective behavior on disease spread, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2221479120 (2023).
- World Health Organization, Report of the WHO-China joint mission on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), 2020, https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/who-china-joint-mission-on-covid-19-final-report.pdf.
- M. A. Nowak, Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006).
- R. Mastrandrea, J. Fournet, and A. Barrat, Contact patterns in a high school: A comparison between data collected using wearable sensors, contact diaries and friendship surveys, PLoS One 10, e0136497 (2015).
- M. Génois and A. Barrat, Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts? EPJ Data Sci. 7, 11 (2018).
- http://www.sociopatterns.org.
- J.-G. Young, G. Petri, F. Vaccarino, and A. Patania, Construction of and efficient sampling from the simplicial configuration model, Phys. Rev. E 96, 032312 (2017).
- A. Dhooge, W. Govaerts, Y. A. Kuznetsov, H. G. E. Meijer, and B. Sautois, New features of the software MatCont for bifurcation analysis of dynamical systems, Math. Comput. Modell. Dyn. Syst. 14, 147 (2008).
- L. Liu, X. Wang, X. Chen, S. Tang, and Z. Zheng, Modeling confirmation bias and peer pressure in opinion dynamics, Front. Phys. 9, 649852 (2021).
- N. E. Friedkin, A. V. Proskurnikov, R. Tempo, and S. E. Parsegov, Network science on belief system dynamics under logic constraints, Science 354, 321 (2016).
- U. Alvarez-Rodriguez, F. Battiston, G. F. de Arruda, Y. Moreno, M. Perc, and V. Latora, Evolutionary dynamics of higher-order interactions in social networks, Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 586 (2021).