- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Collisionless phase mixing mimics diffusive transport in radiation belt observations

Adnane Osmane1,*, Xin An2, Anton V. Artemyev2,3, Oliver Allanson4,5, Jay Albert6, and Miroslav Hanzelka7

  • *Contact author: adnane.osmane@helsinki.fi
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 033104 – Published 24 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5mmn-fm2p

Abstract

Since the dawn of the space age, observations of energetic particles in planetary radiation belts have been interpreted within a diffusive transport framework, even though the dominant processes that populate and deplete these belts—such as injections and moon-driven absorption—produce particle distributions that are highly structured and spatially localized. This exposes a fundamental question: How can coherent phase-space structures evolving under collisionless dynamics give rise to observational signatures that appear consistent with diffusion-based transport? Here, we show that diffusionlike behavior inferred from radiation belt observations can arise solely from an observational phase-mixing effect, independent of stochastic wave-particle transport. As orbiting spacecraft sweep across neighboring drift shells while trapped particles undergo electromagnetic drifts, measurements inevitably sample regions with slightly different drift frequencies. This converts spatially localized drift-phase structures into rapidly decorrelating temporal signals, making them observationally indistinguishable from those produced by stochastic wave-particle processes. We derive the associated correlation function analytically and show that the effective lifetime of these structures is only a few drift periods. Consequently, even highly localized injections rapidly lose coherence, preventing spacecraft from resolving fine-scale structure in the distribution function. These results show that collisionless dynamics can produce observational signatures that mimic diffusive transport on timescales shorter than those expected from radial transport, limiting the inference of particle acceleration processes and leading to biased transport rates and inaccurate long-term flux predictions. This calls for a reassessment of diffusion-based interpretations inferred from sparse in situ measurements of radiation belts at Earth, across the solar system, and in the recently discovered radiation belts of ultracool brown dwarfs.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (144)

  1. J. A. Van Allen, G. H. Ludwig, E. C. Ray, and C. E. McIlwain, Observation of high intensity radiation by satellites 1958 Alpha and Gamma, J. Jet Propuls. 28, 588 (1958).
  2. S. J. Bolton, M. Janssen, R. Thorne, S. Levin, M. Klein, S. Gulkis, T. Bastian, R. Sault, C. Elachi, M. Hofstadter, et al., Ultra-relativistic electrons in Jupiter’s radiation belts, Nature (London) 415, 987 (2002).
  3. P. Kollmann, E. Roussos, A. Kotova, C. Paranicas, and N. Krupp, The evolution of Saturn’s radiation belts modulated by changes in radial diffusion, Nat. Astron. 1, 872 (2017).
  4. R. C. Allen, S. K. Vines, and G. C. Ho, Solving the mystery of the electron radiation belt at Uranus: Leveraging knowledge of Earth’s radiation belts in a re-examination of Voyager 2 observations, Geophys. Res. Lett. 52, e2025GL119311 (2025).
  5. G. Clark, P. Kollmann, B. H. Mauk, C. Paranicas, D. Haggerty, A. Rymer, H. T. Smith, J. Saur, F. Allegrini, S. Duling, et al., Energetic charged particle observations during Juno’s close flyby of Ganymede, Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL098572 (2022).
  6. P. Kollmann, G. Clark, C. Paranicas, B. Mauk, D. Haggerty, A. Rymer, and F. Allegrini, Ganymede’s radiation cavity and radiation belts, Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL098474 (2022).
  7. M. M. Kao, A. J. Mioduszewski, J. Villadsen, and E. L. Shkolnik, Resolved imaging confirms a radiation belt around an ultracool dwarf, Nature (London) 619, 272 (2023).
  8. J. B. Climent, J. C. Guirado, M. Pérez-Torres, J. M. Marcaide, and L. Peña-Moñino, Evidence for a radiation belt around a brown dwarf, Science 381, 1120 (2023).
  9. P. J. Kellogg, Van Allen radiation of solar origin, Nature (London) 183, 1295 (1959).
  10. L. Davis Jr. and D. B. Chang, On the effect of geomagnetic fluctuations on trapped particles, J. Geophys. Res. 67, 2169 (1962).
  11. T. G. Northrop, The Adiabatic Motion of Charged Particles, John Wiley & Sons (Interscience Publishers, New York–London–Sidney, 1963), Vol. 21.
  12. T. J. Birmingham, T. G. Northrop, and C. Fälthammar, Charged particle diffusion by violation of the third adiabatic invariant, Phys. Fluids 10, 2389 (1967).
  13. J. R. Cary and A. J. Brizard, Hamiltonian theory of guiding-center motion, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 693 (2009).
  14. E. Parker, Geomagnetic fluctuations and the form of the outer zone of the Van Allen radiation belt, J. Geophys. Res. 65, 3117 (1960).
  15. C.-G. Fälthammar, Effects of time-dependent electric fields on geomagnetically trapped radiation, J. Geophys. Res. 70, 2503 (1965).
  16. A. J. Brizard and A. A. Chan, Relativistic bounce-averaged quasilinear diffusion equation for low-frequency electromagnetic fluctuations, Phys. Plasmas 8, 4762 (2001).
  17. Y. Y. Shprits, R. M. Thorne, R. Friedel, G. D. Reeves, J. Fennell, D. N. Baker, and S. G. Kanekal, Outward radial diffusion driven by losses at magnetopause, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 111, A11214 (2006).
  18. Y. Y. Shprits, D. Subbotin, and B. Ni, Evolution of electron fluxes in the outer radiation belt computed with the VERB code, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 114, A11209 (2009).
  19. L. G. Ozeke, I. R. Mann, K. R. Murphy, I. J. Rae, D. K. Milling, S. R. Elkington, A. A. Chan, and H. J. Singer, ULF wave derived radiation belt radial diffusion coefficients, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 117, 2011JA017463 (2012).
  20. R. M. Thorne, W. Li, B. Ni, Q. Ma, J. Bortnik, L. Chen, D. N. Baker, H. E. Spence, G. D. Reeves, M. G. Henderson, C. A. Kletzing, W. S. Kurth, G. B. Hospodarsky, J. B. Blake, J. F. Fennell, S. G. Claudepierre, and S. G. Kanekal, Rapid local acceleration of relativistic radiation-belt electrons by magnetospheric chorus, Nature (London) 504, 411 (2013).
  21. G. D. Reeves, H. E. Spence, M. G. Henderson, S. K. Morley, R. H. W. Friedel, H. O. Funsten, D. N. Baker, S. G. Kanekal, J. B. Blake, J. F. Fennell, S. G. Claudepierre, R. M. Thorne, D. L. Turner, C. A. Kletzing, W. S. Kurth, B. A. Larsen, and J. T. Niehof, Electron acceleration in the heart of the Van Allen radiation belts, Science 341, 991 (2013).
  22. W. Tu, G. S. Cunningham, Y. Chen, M. G. Henderson, E. Camporeale, and G. D. Reeves, Modeling radiation belt electron dynamics during GEM challenge intervals with the DREAM3D diffusion model, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 118, 6197 (2013).
  23. D. N. Baker, A. N. Jaynes, V. C. Hoxie, R. M. Thorne, J. C. Foster, X. Li, J. F. Fennell, J. R. Wygant, S. G. Kanekal, P. J. Erickson, W. Kurth, W. Li, Q. Ma, Q. Schiller, L. Blum, D. M. Malaspina, A. Gerrard, and L. J. Lanzerotti, An impenetrable barrier to ultrarelativistic electrons in the Van Allen radiation belts, Nature (London) 515, 531 (2014).
  24. L. G. Ozeke, I. R. Mann, D. L. Turner, K. R. Murphy, A. W. Degeling, I. J. Rae, and D. K. Milling, Modeling cross L shell impacts of magnetopause shadowing and ULF wave radial diffusion in the Van Allen belts, Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 6556 (2014).
  25. A. N. Jaynes, D. N. Baker, H. J. Singer, J. V. Rodriguez, T. M. Loto’aniu, A. F. Ali, S. R. Elkington, X. Li, S. G. Kanekal, S. G. Claudepierre, J. F. Fennell, W. Li, R. M. Thorne, C. A. Kletzing, H. E. Spence, and G. D. Reeves, Source and seed populations for relativistic electrons: Their roles in radiation belt changes, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 120, 7240 (2015).
  26. I. R. Mann, L. G. Ozeke, K. R. Murphy, S. G. Claudepierre, D. L. Turner, D. N. Baker, I. J. Rae, A. Kale, D. K. Milling, A. J. Boyd, H. E. Spence, G. D. Reeves, H. J. Singer, S. Dimitrakoudis, I. A. Daglis, and F. Honary, Explaining the dynamics of the ultra-relativistic third Van Allen radiation belt, Nat. Phys. 12, 978 (2016).
  27. G. Cunningham, Radial diffusion of radiation belt particles in nondipolar magnetic fields, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 121, 5149 (2016).
  28. A. F. Ali, S. R. Elkington, W. Tu, L. G. Ozeke, A. A. Chan, and R. H. W. Friedel, Magnetic field power spectra and magnetic radial diffusion coefficients using CRRES magnetometer data, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 120, 973 (2015).
  29. A. F. Ali, D. M. Malaspina, S. R. Elkington, A. N. Jaynes, A. A. Chan, J. Wygant, and C. A. Kletzing, Electric and magnetic radial diffusion coefficients using the Van Allen Probes data, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 121, 9586 (2016).
  30. A. N. Jaynes, A. F. Ali, S. R. Elkington, D. M. Malaspina, D. N. Baker, X. Li, S. G. Kanekal, M. G. Henderson, C. A. Kletzing, and J. R. Wygant, Fast diffusion of ultrarelativistic electrons in the outer radiation belt: 17 March 2015 storm event, Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 10,874 (2018).
  31. L. Olifer, I. R. Mann, L. G. Ozeke, I. J. Rae, and S. K. Morley, On the relative strength of electric and magnetic ULF wave radial diffusion during the March 2015 geomagnetic storm, JGR Space Phys. 124, 2569 (2019).
  32. W. Tu, Z. Xiang, and S. K. Morley, Modeling the magnetopause shadowing loss during the June 2015 dropout event, Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 9388 (2019).
  33. S. Lejosne and P. Kollmann, Radiation belt radial diffusion at Earth and beyond, Space Sci. Rev. 216, 19 (2020).
  34. F. A. Staples, A. Kellerman, K. R. Murphy, I. J. Rae, J. K. Sandhu, and C. Forsyth, Resolving magnetopause shadowing using multimission measurements of phase space density, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 127, e2021JA029298 (2022).
  35. H. George, G. Reeves, G. Cunningham, M. M. H. Kalliokoski, E. Kilpua, A. Osmane, M. G. Henderson, S. K. Morley, S. Hoilijoki, and M. Palmroth, Contributions to loss across the magnetopause during an electron dropout event, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 127, e2022JA030751 (2022).
  36. S. Lejosne, H. J. Allison, L. W. Blum, A. Y. Drozdov, M. D. Hartinger, M. K. Hudson, A. N. Jaynes, L. Ozeke, E. Roussos, and H. Zhao, Differentiating between the leading processes for electron radiation belt acceleration, Front. Astron. Space Sci. 9, 896245 (2022).
  37. H. George, A. Osmane, E. K. J. Kilpua, S. Lejosne, L. Turc, M. Grandin, M. M. H. Kalliokoski, S. Hoilijoki, U. Ganse, M. Alho, et al., Estimating inner magnetospheric radial diffusion using a hybrid-Vlasov simulation, Front. Astron. Space Sci. 9, 866455 (2022).
  38. L. Olifer, S. K. Morley, L. G. Ozeke, I. R. Mann, M. M. H. Kalliokoski, M. G. Henderson, M. R. Carver, and A. Hoover, Rapid acceleration bursts in the Van Allen radiation belt, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 129, e2024JA032544 (2024).
  39. T. E. Sarris, X. Li, H. Zhao, W. Tu, K. Papadakis, S. Tourgaidis, W. Liu, L. Yan, R. Rankin, Z. Xiang, Y. Mei, D. O’Brien, B. Hogan, D. Brennan, R. E. Ergun, V. Angelopoulos, D. Baloukidis, and P. Pirnaris, On the contribution of latitude-dependent ULF waves to the radial transport of off-equatorial relativistic electrons in the radiation belts, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 129, e2024JA032905 (2024).
  40. S. N. Bentley, J. R. Stout, R. L. Thompson, D. J. Ratliff, and C. E. J. Watt, Two methods to analyze radial diffusion ensembles: The perils of space- and time-dependent diffusion, Phys. Plasmas 31, 112901 (2024).
  41. L. G. Ozeke, I. R. Mann, S. G. Claudepierre, M. Henderson, S. K. Morley, K. R. Murphy, L. Olifer, H. E. Spence, and D. N. Baker, The March 2015 superstorm revisited: Phase space density profiles and fast ULF wave diffusive transport, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 124, 1143 (2019).
  42. A. Osmane, E. Kilpua, H. George, O. Allanson, and M. Kalliokoski, Radial transport in the Earth’s radiation belts: Linear, quasi-linear, and higher-order processes, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 269, 44 (2023).
  43. M. F. Thomsen, C. K. Goertz, and J. A. Van Allen, On determining magnetospheric diffusion coefficients from the observed effects of Jupiter’s satellite Io, J. Geophys. Res. 82, 5541 (1977).
  44. J. A. Van Allen, M. F. Thomsen, and B. A. Randall, The energetic charged particle absorption signature of Mimas, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 85, 5709 (1980).
  45. R. S. Selesnick, Micro- and macro-signatures of energetic charged particles in planetary magnetospheres, Adv. Space Res. 13, 221 (1993).
  46. E. Roussos, G. H. Jones, N. Krupp, C. Paranicas, D. G. Mitchell, A. Lagg, J. Woch, U. Motschmann, S. M. Krimigis, and M. K. Dougherty, Electron microdiffusion in the Saturnian radiation belts: Cassini MIMI/LEMMS observations of energetic electron absorption by the icy moons, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 112, 2006JA012027 (2007).
  47. D. L. Turner, J. F. Fennell, J. B. Blake, S. G. Claudepierre, J. H. Clemmons, A. N. Jaynes, T. Leonard, D. N. Baker, I. J. Cohen, M. Gkioulidou, et al., Multipoint observations of energetic particle injections and substorm activity during a conjunction between magnetospheric multiscale (MMS) and Van Allen Probes, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 122, 11,481 (2017).
  48. L. Olifer, I. R. Mann, S. K. Morley, L. G. Ozeke, and D. Choi, On the role of last closed drift shell dynamics in driving fast losses and Van Allen radiation belt extinction, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 123, 3692 (2018).
  49. H.-J. Kim, D.-Y. Lee, R. Wolf, J. Bortnik, K.-C. Kim, L. Lyons, W. Choe, S.-J. Noh, K.-E. Choi, C. Yue, and J. Li, Rapid injections of MeV electrons and extremely fast step-like outer radiation belt enhancements, Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2021GL093151 (2021).
  50. H.-J. Kim, K.-C. Kim, S.-J. Noh, L. Lyons, D.-Y. Lee, and W. Choe, New perspective on phase space density analysis for outer radiation belt enhancements: The influence of MeV electron injections, Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2023GL104614 (2023).
  51. S. Xiong, L. Dai, C. Wang, X. Yang, J. R. Wygant, and D. N. Baker, Rapid relativistic electron enhancements and associated particle injections: A multi-spacecraft statistical study, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 129, e2023JA032095 (2024).
  52. S. R. Kamaletdinov, A. V. Artemyev, and V. Angelopoulos, Energetic electron enhancements near the dayside magnetopause: Outward radial transport due to asymmetric drift-orbit bifurcation, Geophys. Res. Lett. 52, e2025GL116514 (2025).
  53. R. C. Wentworth, W. M. MacDonald, and S. F. Singer, Lifetimes of trapped radiation belt particles determined by Coulomb scattering, Phys. Fluids 2, 499 (1959).
  54. M. Walt, The effects of atmospheric collisions on geomagnetically trapped electrons, J. Geophys. Res. 69, 3947 (1964).
  55. B. Abel and R. M. Thorne, Electron scattering loss in Earth’s inner magnetosphere: 1. Dominant physical processes, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 103, 2385 (1998).
  56. R. S. Selesnick, Atmospheric scattering and decay of inner radiation belt electrons, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 117, 2012JA017793 (2012).
  57. A. J. Kavanagh, G. Lu, E. F. Donovan, G. D. Reeves, F. Honary, J. Manninen, and T. J. Immel, Energetic electron precipitation during sawtooth injections, Ann. Geophys. 25, 1199 (2007).
  58. C. Gabrielse, E. Spanswick, A. Artemyev, Y. Nishimura, A. Runov, L. Lyons, V. Angelopoulos, D. L. Turner, G. D. Reeves, R. McPherron, and E. Donovan, Utilizing the Heliophysics/Geospace System Observatory to understand particle injections: Their scale sizes and propagation directions, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 124, 5584 (2019).
  59. M. Schulz and L. J. Lanzerotti, Particle Diffusion in the Radiation Belts, Physics and Chemistry in Space (Springer, Berlin, 1974).
  60. J. G. Roederer, Dynamics of Geomagnetically Trapped Radiation, Physics and Chemistry in Space (Springer, Berlin, 1970), Vol. 2.
  61. L. R. Lyons, R. M. Thorne, and C. F. Kennel, Pitch-angle diffusion of radiation belt electrons within the plasmasphere, J. Geophys. Res. 77, 3455 (1972).
  62. While exact analytical solutions can be obtained for equatorially trapped particles, approximate expressions are also available for particles confined close to the equatorial plane, where v≃v⊥, λ≪1 (so that sinλ≃λ and cosλ≃1). In the general case, however, one must first determine the mirror latitude λm as a function of the equatorial pitch angle αeq, and subsequently evaluate numerically the integrals appearing in Eqs. (3) and (4). Tabulated numerical evaluations and accurate analytical fits for the bounce and drift frequencies as functions of pitch angle in a dipole field are available in the literature (e.g., Ref. [63]) and may be used to bypass explicit numerical integration.
  63. D. A. Hamlin, R. Karplus, R. C. Vik, and K. M. Watson, Mirror and azimuthal drift frequencies for geomagnetically trapped particles, J. Geophys. Res. 66, 1 (1961).
  64. M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables (Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1968), Vol. 55.
  65. A. Osmane, J. K. Sandhu, T. Elsden, O. Allanson, and L. Turc, Radial diffusion driven by spatially localized ULF waves in the Earth’s magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 130, e2024JA033393 (2025).
  66. A. Osmane, E. Roussos, and P. Kollmann, Phase-space synchronization driven by moon-magnetosphere coupling in gas giants, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 131, e2025JA034451 (2026).
  67. S. D. Walton, S. Lejosne, and S. G. Claudepierre, The global characteristics of electrons near the inner edge of the inner radiation belt, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 129, e2024JA032883 (2024).
  68. B. H. Mauk, N. J. Fox, S. G. Kanekal, R. L. Kessel, D. G. Sibeck, and A. Ukhorskiy, Science objectives and rationale for the Radiation Belt Storm Probes mission, Space Sci. Rev. 179, 3 (2013).
  69. J. S. Bendat and A. G. Piersol, Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics (Wiley, New York, 2010), 4th ed.
  70. Y. Miyoshi, I. Shinohara, T. Takashima, H. Usui, S. Torii, K. Asamura, N. Higashio, T. Mitani, Y. Kazama, A. Matsuoka, et al., The Arase (ERG) satellite: Exploring the inner magnetosphere, Earth, Planets and Space 70, 101 (2018).
  71. Here, “effective viscosity” refers to the observational consequence of phase mixing: Sampling of spatially localized structures leads to a progressive smoothing of the measured signal, analogous to the action of viscosity on gradients in a fluid. This analogy is purely kinematic and does not imply any underlying dissipation.
  72. S. Lejosne, J. M. Albert, and D. Ratliff, Characteristic times for radiation belt drift phase mixing, Front. Astron. Space Sci. 11, 1385472 (2024).
  73. This assumption is well justified for energetic and relativistic electrons in the Earth’s radiation belts, where gradient and curvature drifts dominate over convection-driven E×B motion. Its extension to other regimes, such as the ring current in the Earth’s magnetosphere or energetic particle populations at giant planets, may require the explicit inclusion of convective and corotation electric fields, which introduce azimuthal asymmetries in the drift motion.
  74. We might add that eigenfunctions of order n, associated with large eigenvalues, decay much faster than the characteristic pitch-angle diffusion time, by a factor proportional to π2(1+2n)2, and therefore act to rapidly smooth small-scale structures [76]. In particular, they may contribute to efficiently damp high-m modes in the distribution function, which according to the von Mises representations are already smaller by a factor ψm≪1 for large m values. It should thus be stressed that the observational phase-mixing effects described here can appear significantly enhanced in the presence of pitch-angle diffusion.
  75. A. V. Artemyev, D. Mourenas, X. J. Zhang, O. Agapitov, A. I. Neishtadt, D. L. Vainchtein, A. A. Vasiliev, X. Zhang, Q. Ma, J. Bortnik, and V. V. Krasnoselskikh, Nonlinear resonant interactions of radiation belt electrons with intense whistler-mode waves, Space Sci. Rev. 221, 18 (2025).
  76. J. Albert and Y. Shprits, Estimates of lifetimes against pitch angle diffusion, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 71, 1647 (2009).
  77. A notable exception is provided by nonlinear scattering of relativistic electrons by electromagnetic ion-cyclotron waves [78, 79], which can produce rapid pitch-angle evolution under specific conditions.
  78. V. S. Grach, A. V. Artemyev, A. G. Demekhov, X.-J. Zhang, J. Bortnik, V. Angelopoulos, R. Nakamura, E. Tsai, C. Wilkins, and O. W. Roberts, Relativistic electron precipitation by EMIC waves: Importance of nonlinear resonant effects, Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL099994 (2022).
  79. D. Mourenas, A. V. Artemyev, X.-J. Zhang, and V. Angelopoulos, Impact of EMIC waves on electron flux dropouts measured by GPS spacecraft: Insights from ELFIN, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 129, e2024JA032984 (2024).
  80. A natural extension of this work is to follow Lejosne [72] and incorporate the effects of finite energy and temporal resolution on the spatially localized injections described by Eq. (22). This would, for example, enable a quantitative assessment of whether particle injections with a given energy and MLT extent, quantified by the parameter κ, can be resolved by specific instruments.
  81. O. Agapitov, D. Mourenas, A. Artemyev, G. Hospodarsky, and J. Bonnell, Time scales for electron quasi-linear diffusion by lower-band chorus waves: The effects of ωpe/ωce dependence on geomagnetic activity, Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 6178 (2019).
  82. H. J. Allison, Y. Y. Shprits, I. S. Zhelavskaya, D. Wang, and A. G. Smirnov, Gyroresonant wave-particle interactions with chorus waves during extreme depletions of plasma density in the Van Allen radiation belts, Sci. Adv. 7, eabc0380 (2021).
  83. It should be stressed that drift resonance also produces phase mixing, but on a timescale set by the inverse bounce frequency within the trapping island, distinct from the drift-phase-mixing timescale (see, e.g., Ref. [86] and references therein). Extending the present framework to drift-resonant interactions would also require accounting for wave properties—such as wave-packet size, amplitude, and polarisation—and thus warrants a dedicated study.
  84. D. J. Southwood and M. G. Kivelson, Charged particle behavior in low-frequency geomagnetic pulsations 1. Transverse waves, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 86, 5643 (1981).
  85. A. W. Degeling, R. Rankin, and S. R. Elkington, Convective and diffusive ULF wave driven radiation belt electron transport, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 116, A12217 (2011).
  86. A. Artemyev, X. An, D. Vainchtein, R. Rankin, X. Zhou, L. Li, and X.-J. Zhang, Electron resonant interaction with coherent ULF waves: Hamiltonian approach, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 129, e2023JA032178 (2024).
  87. One might argue that the steep radial gradients generated by ballistic motion could enable rapid radial diffusion. However, such gradients also enhance the efficiency of linear wave-particle interactions, whose response scales with the background gradient. As a result, the fine-scale structure produced by ballistic motion is expected to be modified on timescales shorter than those required for a consistent quasilinear (Fokker-Planck) description of radial diffusion to apply.
  88. L. Li, X.-Z. Zhou, Y. Omura, Q.-G. Zong, R. Rankin, X.-R. Chen, Y. Liu, C. Yue, and S.-Y. Fu, Drift resonance between particles and compressional toroidal ULF waves in dipole magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 126, e2020JA028842 (2021).
  89. X.-Z. Zhou, L. Li, Y. Omura, and Q.-G. Zong, The linear and nonlinear resonant interactions between ultra-low-frequency waves and magnetospheric particles, Rev. Mod. Plasma Phys. 9, 12 (2025).
  90. S. R. Elkington, M. K. Hudson, and A. A. Chan, Acceleration of relativistic electrons via drift-resonant interaction with toroidal-mode Pc-5 ULF oscillations, Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 3273 (1999).
  91. P. H. Diamond, S.-I. Itoh, and K. Itoh, Modern Plasma Physics: Physical Kinetics of Turbulent Plasmas (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2010).
  92. A. Osmane and S. Lejosne, Radial diffusion of planetary radiation belts’ particles by fluctuations with finite correlation time, Astrophys. J. 912, 142 (2021).
  93. P. Riley and R. A. Wolf, Comparison of diffusion and particle drift descriptions of radial transport in the Earth’s inner magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 97, 16865 (1992).
  94. A. Y. Ukhorskiy, B. J. Anderson, K. Takahashi, and N. A. Tsyganenko, Impact of ULF oscillations in solar wind dynamic pressure on the outer radiation belt electrons, Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, 2005GL024380 (2006).
  95. Z.-G. Li, I. R. Mann, L. G. Ozeke, L. Olifer, and A. W. Degeling, ULF wave transport of relativistic electrons in the Van Allen belts: Criteria for transition to radial diffusion, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 129, e2024JA032537 (2024).
  96. We reiterate that in the present model, the electric field E and nonadiabatic processes are neglected. Moreover, for the axisymmetric dipole geometry considered here, one has b·(∇×b)=0, so the Baños correction for guiding centers [98], which is often ignored, but can be significant in the presence of parallel currents, here vanishes and the first adiabatic invariant is exactly conserved for our magnetic field model, dμ/dt=0, to guiding-center order [97].
  97. R. Hazeltine, Recursive derivation of drift-kinetic equation, Plasma Phys. 15, 77 (1973).
  98. A. Baños Jr., The guiding centre approximation in lowest order, J. Plasma Phys. 1, 305 (1967).
  99. H. Zhao, T. E. Sarris, X. Li, D. O’Brien, R. Chen, Y. Mei, Z. Xiang, and D. N. Baker, Quantifying radial diffusion rate through multi-MeV electron drift oscillations driven by broadband ULF waves: A case study of the September 2019 geomagnetic storm, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 131, e2025JA034549 (2026).
  100. T. P. O’Brien, J. C. Green, A. J. Halford, B. P. Kwan, S. G. Claudepierre, and L. G. Ozeke, Drift phase structure implications for radiation belt transport, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 127, e2022JA030331 (2022).
  101. G. D. Reeves, J.-F. Ripoll, L. W. Blum, C. M. Cully, C. A. Colpitts, M. Cosmides, S. S. Elliot, R. Ghaffari, A. D. Greeley, R. B. Horne, et al., Multi-platform observations of the radial penetration of substorm injected electrons and subsequent slot-filling event, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 130, e2025JA034329 (2025).
  102. R. M. Thorne, Radiation belt dynamics: The importance of wave-particle interactions, Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, 2010GL044990 (2010).
  103. H.-J. Kim and A. A. Chan, Fully adiabatic changes in storm time relativistic electron fluxes, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 102, 22107 (1997).
  104. J. Green and M. Kivelson, Relativistic electrons in the outer radiation belt: Differentiating between acceleration mechanisms, J. Geophys. Res. 109, A03213 (2004).
  105. Y. Chen, G. Reeves, and R. Friedel, The energization of relativistic electrons in the outer Van Allen radiation belt, Nat. Phys. 3, 614 (2007).
  106. A. Y. Drozdov, H. J. Allison, Y. Y. Shprits, M. Usanova, A. Saikin, and D. Wang, Depletions of multi-MeV electrons and their association to minima in phase space density, Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2021GL097620 (2022).
  107. M. M. H. Kalliokoski, M. G. Henderson, S. K. Morley, E. K. J. Kilpua, A. Osmane, L. Olifer, D. L. Turner, A. N. Jaynes, H. George, S. Hoilijoki, L. Turc, and M. Palmroth, Outer radiation belt flux and phase space density response to sheath regions: Van Allen probes and GPS observations, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 128, e2022JA030708 (2023).
  108. A. N. Hensley, H. George, M. Kalliokoski, and L. Olifer, Extremely rapid radiation belt electron losses across the magnetopause, Front. Astron. Space Sci. 12, 1694836 (2025).
  109. M. Andriopoulou, E. Roussos, N. Krupp, C. Paranicas, M. Thomsen, S. Krimigis, M. K. Dougherty, and K.-H. Glassmeier, A noon-to-midnight electric field and nightside dynamics in Saturn’s inner magnetosphere, using microsignature observations, Icarus 220, 503 (2012).
  110. P. Kollmann, E. Roussos, C. Paranicas, N. Krupp, C. M. Jackman, E. Kirsch, and K.-H. Glassmeier, Energetic particle phase space densities at Saturn: Cassini observations and interpretations, J. Geophys. Res. 116, A05222 (2011).
  111. E. Roussos, P. Kollmann, N. Krupp, C. Paranicas, K. Dialynas, N. Sergis, D. G. Mitchell, D. C. Hamilton, and S. M. Krimigis, Drift-resonant, relativistic electron acceleration at the outer planets: Insights from the response of Saturn’s radiation belts to magnetospheric storms, Icarus 305, 160 (2018).
  112. J. F. Carbary, S. M. Krimigis, and W. H. Ip, Energetic particle microsignatures of Saturn’s satellites, J. Geophys. Res. 88, 8947 (1983).
  113. D. L. Turner, S. Raptis, A. Osmane, A. Egan, G. Clark, T. Nordheim, L. Regoli, and A. Y. Ukhorskiy, Universal energy limits of radiation belts in planetary and brown dwarf magnetospheric systems, Sci. Adv. 12, eaea4945 (2026).
  114. A. Der Kiureghian and O. Ditlevsen, Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Struct. Saf. 31, 105 (2009).
  115. S. K. Morley, J. P. Sullivan, M. G. Henderson, J. B. Blake, and D. N. Baker, The global positioning system constellation as a space weather monitor: Comparison of electron measurements with Van Allen Probes data, Space Weather 14, 76 (2016).
  116. V. Angelopoulos, E. Tsai, L. Bingley, C. Shaffer, D. L. Turner, A. Runov, W. Li, J. Liu, A. V. Artemyev, X. J. Zhang, et al., The ELFIN mission, Space Sci. Rev. 216, 103 (2020).
  117. X. Li, Unveiling energetic particle dynamics in the near-Earth environment from CubeSat missions, AGU Adv. 5, e2024AV001256 (2024).
  118. H. J. Allison, R. B. Horne, S. A. Glauert, and G. Del Zanna, Determination of the equatorial electron differential flux from observations at low Earth orbit, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 123, 9574 (2018).
  119. W. Sun, X.-J. Zhang, A. V. Artemyev, D. Mourenas, S. K. Morley, V. Angelopoulos, S. Kasahara, Y. Miyoshi, A. Matsuoka, T. Mitani, S. Yokota, T. Hori, K. Keika, T. Takashima, M. Teramoto, I. Shinohara, and K. Yamamoto, ELFIN-GPS comparison of energetic electron fluxes: Modeling low-altitude electron flux mapping to the equatorial magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 129, e2024JA033155 (2024).
  120. A. M. Castillo Tibocha, J. de Wiljes, Y. Y. Shprits, and N. A. Aseev, Reconstructing the dynamics of the outer electron radiation belt by means of the standard and ensemble Kalman filter with the VERB-3D code, Space Weather 19, e2020SW002672 (2021).
  121. E. Camporeale, G. J. Wilkie, A. Y. Drozdov, and J. Bortnik, Data-driven discovery of Fokker-Planck equation for the Earth’s radiation belts electrons using physics-informed neural networks, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 127, e2022JA030377 (2022).
  122. D. W. Longcope, Topological methods for the analysis of solar magnetic fields, Living Rev. Sol. Phys. 2, 7 (2005).
  123. P. O. Vandervoort, The relativistic motion of a charged particle in an inhomogeneous electromagnetic field, Ann. Phys. 10, 401 (1960).
  124. R. Hazeltine, The Framework of Plasma Physics, Physical Sciences (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2004).
  125. D. T. Son and M. Stephanov, Relativistic guiding-center motion: Action principle, kinetic theory and hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 145201 (2024).
  126. Particles near the loss cone can irreversibly be lost due to wave-particle interactions, and as explained in more detail below, the bounce-averaging procedure would prove inadequate for equatorial pitch angles near the loss cone if the distribution function is altered within one bounce period.
  127. The measurement cadence of particle fluxes is typically very short, on the order of ∼10s or less, though operational space weather products can be distributed at 1–5 min resolution. The corresponding Nyquist limit is therefore unlikely to impose a practical restriction in the present context. Indeed, as shown in the following section, the dominant limitation arises not from aliasing due to chirping, but from a more severe loss of coherence associated with phase mixing. Nevertheless, the above result implies that over sufficiently long times, even the low-m modes will appear to increase in frequency, and may eventually become unresolvable within a finite-resolution measurement.
  128. S. R. Kamaletdinov, A. V. Artemyev, A. I. Neishtadt, and V. Angelopoulos, Charged particle cross-field transport due to geometric jumps of adiabatic invariant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 065202 (2025).
  129. C. C. Chaston, Driving Earth’s outer radiation belt with Alfvénic turbulence, Geophys. Res. Lett. 52, e2025GL115125 (2025).
  130. L. W. Blum and A. W. Breneman, Observations of radiation belt losses due to cyclotron wave-particle interactions, in The Dynamic Loss of Earth’s Radiation Belts, edited by A. N. Jaynes and M. E. Usanova (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2020), pp. 49–98.
  131. C. Kennel and F. Engelmann, Velocity space diffusion from weak plasma turbulence in a magnetic field, Phys. Fluids 9, 2377 (1966).
  132. G. S. Cunningham, Resolution of a few problems in the application of quasilinear theory to calculating diffusion coefficients in heliophysics, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 128, e2023JA031703 (2023).
  133. D. Summers, B. Ni, and N. P. Meredith, Timescales for radiation belt electron acceleration and loss due to resonant wave-particle interactions: 2. Evaluation for VLF chorus, ELF hiss, and electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 112, A04207 (2007).
  134. D. Mourenas, A. V. Artemyev, J.-F. Ripoll, O. V. Agapitov, and V. V. Krasnoselskikh, Timescales for electron quasi-linear diffusion by parallel and oblique lower-band chorus waves, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 117, A06234 (2012).
  135. J. M. Albert, Nonlinear interaction of outer zone electrons with VLF waves, Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 116 (2002).
  136. J. Bortnik, R. M. Thorne, and U. S. Inan, Nonlinear interaction of energetic electrons with large amplitude chorus, Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, 2008GL035500 (2008).
  137. X. Tao, J. Bortnik, J. M. Albert, and R. M. Thorne, Comparison of bounce-averaged quasi-linear diffusion coefficients for parallel propagating whistler mode waves with test particle simulations, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 117, A10205 (2012).
  138. A. Osmane, L. B. Wilson, III, L. Blum, and T. I. Pulkkinen, On the connection between microbursts and nonlinear electronic structures in planetary radiation belts, Astrophys. J. 816, 51 (2016).
  139. X.-J. Zhang, O. Agapitov, A. V. Artemyev, D. Mourenas, V. Angelopoulos, W. S. Kurth, J. W. Bonnell, and G. B. Hospodarsky, Phase decoherence within intense chorus wave packets constrains the efficiency of nonlinear resonant electron acceleration, Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL089807 (2020).
  140. T. P. O’Brien, Y. Shprits, and M. Moldwin, Eigenmode analysis of pitch-angle diffusion of energetic electrons in the outer zone, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 70, 1738 (2008).
  141. O. Allanson, T. Elsden, C. Watt, and T. Neukirch, Weak turbulence and quasilinear diffusion for relativistic wave-particle interactions via a Markov approach, Front. Astron. Space Sci. 8, 805699 (2022).
  142. A. V. Artemyev, A. I. Neishtadt, A. A. Vasiliev, and D. Mourenas, Long-term evolution of electron distribution function due to nonlinear resonant interaction with whistler mode waves, J. Plasma Phys. 84, 905840206 (2018).
  143. W. E. Boyce, R. C. DiPrima, and D. B. Meade, Elementary Differential Equations (John Wiley & Sons, USA, 2017).
  144. M. Masujima, Applied Mathematical Methods in Theoretical Physics (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Weinheim, 2009), Chap. 1, pp. 1–29.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 033104– Published 24 July, 2026
  • Received 23 April 2026
  • Accepted 6 July 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation