- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Hybridization of the amplitude mode in a confined fermionic superfluid

C. R. Cabrera1,2,*, R. Henke1, L. Broers3, J. Skulte2,3, H. P. Ojeda Collado2,3, H. Biss1,2, L. Mathey1,2,3, and H. Moritz1,2,†

  • *Contact author: cesar.cabrera@physik.uni-hamburg.de
  • †Contact author: hennning.moritz@physik.uni-hamburg.de
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 7, L032018 – Published 17 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5cv2-f4ng

Abstract

In phase transitions, spontaneous symmetry breaking results in a nonzero order parameter and two collective excitations: the Goldstone and the amplitude mode. These modes, which define key properties of superconductors and fermionic superfluids, are well understood in homogeneous systems. However, their behavior under strong confinement remains largely unexplored, particularly when their excitation energy becomes comparable to the imposed discrete level spacing. In this scenario, hybridization between different collective modes is expected to take place. Here, we show how the amplitude mode hybridizes with a spatial mode in a confined fermionic superfluid. Using lattice modulation spectroscopy, we observe the evolution of the mode throughout the entire crossover from the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) state to Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) of molecules. In the BCS regime, the excitation energy is located at twice the pairing gap, then gradually becomes an in-gap excitation in the strongly correlated regime. Further to the BEC limit, the excitation energy approaches twice the level spacing. The spectral weight of this mode vanishes when approaching the superfluid critical temperature. Our experimental results are in excellent agreement with an effective field theory, providing strong evidence that amplitude oscillations hybridize with and eventually transform into breathing oscillations of the order parameter. The strong modification of the excitation spectrum reveals how confinement and finite-size effects impact fundamental modes of symmetry-broken states.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (52)

  1. J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, Theory of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. 108, 1175 (1957).
  2. P. W. Anderson, Theory of dirty superconductors, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 11, 26 (1959).
  3. J. M. Blatt and C. J. Thompson, Shape resonances in superconducting thin films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 332 (1963).
  4. A. A. Shanenko, M. D. Croitoru, M. Zgirski, F. M. Peeters, and K. Arutyunov, Size-dependent enhancement of superconductivity in Al and Sn nanowires: Shape-resonance effect, Phys. Rev. B 74, 052502 (2006).
  5. B. Abeles, R. W. Cohen, and G. W. Cullen, Enhancement of superconductivity in metal films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 632 (1966).
  6. S. Bose and P. Ayyub, A review of finite size effects in quasi-zero dimensional superconductors, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 116503 (2014).
  7. D. Pekker and C. M. Varma, Amplitude/Higgs modes in condensed matter physics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 269 (2015).
  8. R. Shimano and N. Tsuji, Higgs mode in superconductors, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 103 (2020).
  9. A. Korolyuk, J. J. Kinnunen, and P. Törmä, Density response of a trapped Fermi gas: A crossover from the pair vibration mode to the Goldstone mode, Phys. Rev. A 84, 033623 (2011).
  10. A. Korolyuk, J. J. Kinnunen, and P. Törmä, Collective excitations of a trapped Fermi gas at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. A 89, 013602 (2014).
  11. J. Hertkorn, F. Böttcher, M. Guo, J. N. Schmidt, T. Langen, H. P. Büchler, and T. Pfau, Fate of the amplitude mode in a trapped dipolar supersolid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 193002 (2019).
  12. J. Bjerlin, S. M. Reimann, and G. M. Bruun, Few-Body precursor of the Higgs mode in a Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 155302 (2016).
  13. R. Sooryakumar and M. V. Klein, Raman scattering by superconducting-gap excitations and their coupling to charge-density waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 660 (1980).
  14. R. Matsunaga, N. Tsuji, H. Fujita, A. Sugioka, K. Makise, Y. Uzawa, H. Terai, Z. Wang, H. Aoki, and R. Shimano, Light-induced collective pseudospin precession resonating with Higgs mode in a superconductor, Science 345, 1145 (2014).
  15. M.-A. Méasson, Y. Gallais, M. Cazayous, B. Clair, P. Rodière, L. Cario, and A. Sacuto, Amplitude Higgs mode in the 2H-NbSe2 superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 89, 060503 (2014).
  16. D. Sherman, U. S. Pracht, B. Gorshunov, S. Poran, J. Jesudasan, M. Chand, P. Raychaudhuri, M. Swanson, N. Trivedi, A. Auerbach, M. Scheffler, A. Frydman, and M. Dressel, The Higgs mode in disordered superconductors close to a quantum phase transition, Nat. Phys. 11, 188 (2015).
  17. U. Bissbort, S. Götze, Y. Li, J. Heinze, J. S. Krauser, M. Weinberg, C. Becker, K. Sengstock, and W. Hofstetter, Detecting the amplitude mode of strongly interacting lattice bosons by Bragg scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 205303 (2011).
  18. M. Endres, T. Fukuhara, D. Pekker, M. Cheneau, P. Schauss, C. Gross, E. Demler, S. Kuhr, and I. Bloch, The ‘Higgs’ amplitude mode at the two-dimensional superfluid/Mott insulator transition, Nature (London) 487, 454 (2012).
  19. J. Léonard, A. Morales, P. Zupancic, T. Donner, and T. Esslinger, Monitoring and manipulating Higgs and Goldstone modes in a supersolid quantum gas, Science 358, 1415 (2017).
  20. A. Behrle, T. Harrison, J. Kombe, K. Gao, M. Link, J.-S. Bernier, C. Kollath, and M. Köhl, Higgs mode in a strongly interacting fermionic superfluid, Nat. Phys. 14, 781 (2018).
  21. P. Dyke, S. Musolino, H. Kurkjian, D. J. M. Ahmed-Braun, A. Pennings, I. Herrera, S. Hoinka, S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, V. E. Colussi, and C. J. Vale, Higgs oscillations in a unitary Fermi superfluid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 223402 (2024).
  22. A. Kell, M. Breyer, D. Eberz, and M. Köhl, Exciting the higgs mode in a strongly interacting fermi gas by interaction modulation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 150403 (2024).
  23. L. Bayha, M. Holten, R. Klemt, K. Subramanian, J. Bjerlin, S. M. Reimann, G. M. Bruun, P. M. Preiss, and S. Jochim, Observing the emergence of a quantum phase transition shell by shell, Nature (London) 587, 583 (2020).
  24. J. Skulte, L. Broers, J. G. Cosme, and L. Mathey, Vortex and soliton dynamics in particle-hole-symmetric superfluids, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 043109 (2021).
  25. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/5cv2-f4ng for additional details on the experimental implementation, including the extraction of the response function, the determination of the pairing gap, and the role of finite temperature effects. We also provide a detailed derivation of the effective field theory, along with the procedure for determining its free parameters to enable direct comparison with our experimental observations.
  26. K. Hueck, N. Luick, L. Sobirey, J. Siegl, T. Lompe, and H. Moritz, Two-dimensional homogeneous Fermi gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 060402 (2018).
  27. D. S. Petrov and G. V. Shlyapnikov, Interatomic collisions in a tightly confined Bose gas, Phys. Rev. A 64, 012706 (2001).
  28. J. Levinsen and M. M. Parish, Strongly interacting two-dimensional Fermi gases, Annual Review Cold Atoms Molecules 1 (2015).
  29. A. V. Turlapov and M. Yu Kagan, Fermi-to-Bose crossover in a trapped quasi-2D gas of fermionic atoms, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 383004 (2017).
  30. G. Veeravalli, E. Kuhnle, P. Dyke, and C. J. Vale, Bragg spectroscopy of a strongly interacting Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 250403 (2008).
  31. S. Hoinka, P. Dyke, M. G. Lingham, J. J. Kinnunen, G. M. Bruun, and C. J. Vale, Goldstone mode and pair-breaking excitations in atomic Fermi superfluids, Nat. Phys. 13, 943 (2017).
  32. L. Sobirey, N. Luick, M. Bohlen, H. Biss, H. Moritz, and T. Lompe, Observation of superfluidity in a strongly correlated two-dimensional Fermi gas, Science, 372, 844 (2021).
  33. H. Biss, L. Sobirey, N. Luick, M. Bohlen, J. J. Kinnunen, G. M. Bruun, T. Lompe, and H. Moritz, Excitation spectrum and superfluid gap of an ultracold Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 100401 (2022).
  34. L. Salasnich, Condensate fraction of a two-dimensional attractive Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. A 76, 015601 (2007).
  35. H. Shi, S. Chiesa, and S. Zhang, Ground-state properties of strongly interacting Fermi gases in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. A 92, 033603 (2015).
  36. R. Verresen, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Avoided quasiparticle decay from strong quantum interactions, Nat. Phys. 15, 750 (2019).
  37. J. Lorenzana and G. Seibold, Long-lived Higgs modes in strongly correlated condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 026501 (2024).
  38. T. Cea, C. Castellani, G. Seibold, and L. Benfatto, Nonrelativistic dynamics of the amplitude (Higgs) mode in superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 157002 (2015).
  39. T. Cea, C. Castellani, and L. Benfatto, Nonlinear optical effects and third-harmonic generation in superconductors: Cooper pairs versus Higgs mode contribution, Phys. Rev. B 93, 180507 (2016).
  40. H. Kurkjian, S. N. Klimin, J. Tempere, and Y. Castin, Pair-breaking collective branch in BCS superconductors and superfluid Fermi gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 093403 (2019).
  41. H. Kurkjian, J. Tempere, and S. N. Klimin, Linear response of a superfluid fermi gas inside its pair-breaking continuum, Sci. Rep. 10, 11591 (2020).
  42. C. Vaswani, J. H. Kang, M. Mootz, L. Luo, X. Yang, C. Sundahl, D. Cheng, C. Huang, R. H. J. Kim, Z. Liu, Y. G. Collantes, E. E. Hellstrom, I. E. Perakis, C. B. Eom, and J. Wang, Light quantum control of persisting Higgs modes in iron-based superconductors, Nat. Commun. 12, 258 (2021).
  43. S. Hannibal, P. Kettmann, M. D. Croitoru, A. Vagov, V. M. Axt, and T. Kuhn, Quench dynamics of an ultracold Fermi gas in the BCS regime: Spectral properties and confinement-induced breakdown of the Higgs mode, Phys. Rev. A 91, 043630 (2015).
  44. S. Hannibal, P. Kettmann, M. D. Croitoru, V. M. Axt, and T. Kuhn, Dynamical vanishing of the order parameter in a confined Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer Fermi gas after an interaction quench, Phys. Rev. A 97, 013619 (2018).
  45. H. P. O. Collado, N. Defenu, and J. Lorenzana, Engineering Higgs dynamics by spectral singularities, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023011 (2023).
  46. T. Nakayama, I. Danshita, T. Nikuni, and S. Tsuchiya, Fano resonance through Higgs bound states in tunneling of Nambu-Goldstone modes, Phys. Rev. A 92, 043610 (2015).
  47. T. Nakayama and S. Tsuchiya, Perfect transmission of Higgs modes via antibound states, Phys. Rev. A 100, 063612 (2019).
  48. A. J. Leggett, Number-phase fluctuations in two-band superconductors, Prog. Theor. Phys. 36, 901 (1966).
  49. H. Krull, N. Bittner, G. S. Uhrig, D. Manske, and A. P. Schnyder, Coupling of Higgs and Leggett modes in non-equilibrium superconductors, Nat. Commun. 7, 11921 (2016).
  50. F. Giorgianni, T. Cea, C. Vicario, C. P. Hauri, W. K. Withanage, X. Xi, and L. Benfatto, Leggett mode controlled by light pulses, Nat. Phys. 15, 341 (2019).
  51. K. G. Jackson, C. J. Dale, J. Maki, K. G. S. Xie, B. A. Olsen, D. J. M. Ahmed-Braun, S. Zhang, and J. H. Thywissen, Emergent s-wave interactions between identical fermions in quasi-one-dimensional geometries, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021013 (2023).
  52. C. J. Dale, K. G. S. Xie, K. Pond Grehan, S. Zhang, J. Maki, and J. H. Thywissen, Emergent s-wave interactions in orbitally active quasi-two-dimensional fermi gases, Phys. Rev. A 110, L051302 (2024).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 7, L032018– Published 17 July, 2025
  • Received 27 August 2024
  • Revised 6 March 2025
  • Accepted 29 May 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation