- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Coherent control of ionization via stabilization by resonant pulse pairs

Edvin Olofsson1, Evan Lovelle Fulton2, Rezvan Tahouri1, Mattias Bertolino1,3, Jean Marcel Ngoko Djiokap2, and Jan Marcus Dahlström1,*

  • *Contact author: marcus.dahlstrom@fysik.lu.se
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013199 – Published 23 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/4s8v-32r8

Abstract

We study the nonlinear and resonant process of two-photon ionization of atoms (He and H) in a pump-probe scheme. The pump pulse prepares the quantum system in a superposition of the ground state and an excited bound state. By varying the phase difference between the pulses, we show how it is possible to coherently control the dressed-state population during the probe pulse. Our main result is that for certain laser parameters, the control over the dressed-state population leads to strong control of the ionization probability during the probe pulse. The effect arises due to one of the dressed states becoming stabilized against ionization. Contrasting effects from circular and linear polarized pulses demonstrate how such “bound states in the continuum” are sensitive to the degeneracy of the coupled continuum.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (80)

  1. K. Amini, J. Biegert, F. Calegari, A. Chacón, M. F. Ciappina, A. Dauphin, D. K. Efimov, C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, K. Giergiel, P. Gniewek, et al., Symphony on strong field approximation, Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 116001 (2019).
  2. C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Nonperturbative calculation of transition amplitudes, in Atom–Photon Interactions (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1998), Chap. 3, pp. 165–255.
  3. M. Gavrila, Atomic stabilization in superintense laser fields, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 35, R147 (2002).
  4. M. V. Fedorov and O. V. Tikhonova, Strong-field short-pulse photoionization of Rydberg atoms Interference stabilization and distribution of the photoelectron density in space and time, Phys. Rev. A 58, 1322 (1998).
  5. M. Y. Ivanov, O. V. Tikhonova, and M. V. Fedorov, Semiclassical dynamics of strongly driven systems, Phys. Rev. A 58, R793 (1998).
  6. S. V. Popruzhenko, V. D. Mur, V. S. Popov, and D. Bauer, Strong Field Ionization Rate for Arbitrary Laser Frequencies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 193003 (2008).
  7. J. H. Eberly and K. C. Kulander, Atomic Stabilization by Super-Intense Lasers, Science 262, 1229 (1993).
  8. H. Zimmermann, S. Patchkovskii, M. Ivanov, and U. Eichmann, Unified Time and Frequency Picture of Ultrafast Atomic Excitation in Strong Laser Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 013003 (2017).
  9. T. Kjellsson, S. Selstø, and E. Lindroth, Relativistic ionization dynamics for a hydrogen atom exposed to superintense XUV laser pulses, Phys. Rev. A 95, 043403 (2017).
  10. B. L. Beers and L. Armstrong, Exact solution of a realistic model for two-photon ionization, Phys. Rev. A 12, 2447 (1975).
  11. M. Wollenhaupt, A. Assion, O. Bazhan, C. Horn, D. Liese, C. Sarpe-Tudoran, M. Winter, and T. Baumert, Control of interferences in an autlertownes doublet Symmetry of control parameters, Phys. Rev. A 68, 015401 (2003).
  12. E. Olofsson and J. M. Dahlström, Photoelectron signature of dressed-atom stabilization in an intense XUV field, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043017 (2023).
  13. E. Allaria, R. Appio, L. Badano, W. A. Barletta, S. Bassanese, S. G. Biedron, A. Borga, E. Busetto, D. Castronovo, P. Cinquegrana, et al., Highly coherent and stable pulses from the FERMI seeded free-electron laser in the extreme ultraviolet, Nat. Photonics 6, 699 (2012).
  14. S. Nandi, E. Olofsson, M. Bertolino, S. Carlström, F. Zapata, D. Busto, C. Callegari, M. Di Fraia, P. Eng-Johnsson, R. Feifel, et al., Observation of rabi dynamics with a short-wavelength free-electron laser, Nature (London) 608, 488 (2022).
  15. S. Nandi, A. Stenquist, A. Papoulia, E. Olofsson, L. Badano, M. Bertolino, D. Busto, C. Callegari, S. Carlström, M. B. Danailov et al., Generation of entanglement using a short-wavelength seeded free-electron laser, Sci. Adv. 10, eado0668 (2024).
  16. F. Richter, U. Saalmann, E. Allaria, M. Wollenhaupt, B. Ardini, A. Brynes, C. Callegari, G. Cerullo, M. Danailov, A. Demidovich, et al., Strong-field quantum control in the extreme ultraviolet domain using pulse shaping, Nature (London) 636, 337 (2024).
  17. U. Saalmann, S. K. Giri, and J. M. Rost, Adiabatic passage to the continuum Controlling ionization with chirped laser pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 153203 (2018).
  18. J. Von Neumann and E. P. Wigner, in The Collected Works of Eugene Paul Wigner, edited by A. S. Wightman (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1993), pp. 291–293.
  19. H. Friedrich and D. Wintgen, Physical realization of bound states in the continuum, Phys. Rev. A 31, 3964 (1985).
  20. K. L. Koshelev, Z. F. Sadrieva, A. A. Shcherbakov, Y. Kivshar, and A. A. Bogdanov, Bound states in the continuum in photonic structures, Phys. Usp. 66, 494 (2023).
  21. W. Domcke, Theory of resonance and threshold effects in electron-molecule collisions The projection-operator approach, Phys. Rep. 208, 97 (1991).
  22. L. V. Keldysh, Ionization in the Field of a Strong Electromagnetic Wave, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 20, 1307 (1965).
  23. F. H. M. Faisal, Multiple absorption of laser photons by atoms, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 6, L89 (1973).
  24. H. R. Reiss, Effect of an intense electromagnetic field on a weakly bound system, Phys. Rev. A 22, 1786 (1980).
  25. P. Agostini, F. Fabre, G. Mainfray, G. Petite, and N. K. Rahman, Free-Free Transitions Following Six-Photon Ionization of Xenon Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1127 (1979).
  26. M. Ferray, A. L’Huillier, X. F. Li, L. A. Lompre, G. Mainfray, and C. Manus, Multiple-harmonic conversion of 1064 nm radiation in rare gases, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 21, L31 (1988).
  27. T. Nubbemeyer, K. Gorling, A. Saenz, U. Eichmann, and W. Sandner, Strong-field tunneling without ionization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 233001 (2008).
  28. S. V. Popruzhenko, Quantum theory of strongfield frustrated tunneling, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 51, 014002 (2018).
  29. S. Hu, X. Hao, H. Lv, M. Liu, T. Yang, H. Xu, M. Jin, D. Ding, Q. Li, W. Li, W. Becker, and J. Chen, Quantum dynamics of atomic Rydberg excitation in strong laser fields, Opt. Express 27, 31629 (2019).
  30. E. Olofsson, S. Carlström, and J. M. Dahlström, Frustrated tunneling dynamics in ultrashort laser pulses, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 54, 154002 (2021).
  31. N. I. Shvetsov-Shilovski, S. P. Goreslavski, S. V. Popruzhenko, and W. Becker, Capture into rydberg states and momentum distributions of ionized electrons, Laser Phys. 19, 1550 (2009).
  32. L. Armstrong, B. L. Beers, and S. Feneuille, Resonant multiphoton ionization via the Fano autoionization formalism, Phys. Rev. A 12, 1903 (1975).
  33. C. Cohen-Tannoudji and S. Haroche, Absorption et diffusion de photons optiques par un atome en interaction avec des photons de radiofréquence, J. Phys. France 30, 153 (1969).
  34. C. R. Holt, M. G. Raymer, and W. P. Reinhardt, Time dependences of two-, three-, and four-photon ionization of atomic hydrogen in the ground 12S and metastable 22S states, Phys. Rev. A 27, 2971 (1983).
  35. M. Pont and M. Gavrila, Stabilization of atomic hydrogen in superintense, high-frequency laser fields of circular polarization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2362 (1990).
  36. P. Lambropoulos and P. Zoller, Autoionizing states in strong laser fields, Phys. Rev. A 24, 379 (1981).
  37. N. J. Kylstra and C. J. Joachain, Double poles of the S matrix in laser-assisted electron-atom scattering, Phys. Rev. A 57, 412 (1998).
  38. N. Harkema, C. Cariker, E. Lindroth, L. Argenti, and A. Sandhu, Autoionizing Polaritons in Attosecond Atomic Ionization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 023202 (2021).
  39. S. Yanez-Pagans, C. Cariker, M. Shaikh, L. Argenti, and A. Sandhu, Multipolariton control in attosecond transient absorption of autoionizing states, Phys. Rev. A 105, 063107 (2022).
  40. C. Cariker, S. Yanez-Pagans, N. Harkema, E. Lindroth, A. Sandhu, and L. Argenti, Autoionizing polaritons with the Jaynes-Cummings model, Phys. Rev. A 110, 063119 (2024).
  41. Bonian Dai and P. Lambropoulos, Laser-induced autoionizinglike behavior, population trapping, Phys. Rev. A 36, 5205 (1987).
  42. R. P. Feynman, F. L. Vernon, and R. W. Hellwarth, Geometrical representation of the Schrödinger equation for solving maser problems, J. Appl. Phys. 28, 49 (1957).
  43. L. Allen and J. H. Eberly, Optical Resonance and Two-Level Atoms (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1975).
  44. J. S. Howland, Stationary scattering theory for time-dependent Hamiltonians, Math. Ann. 207, 315 (1974).
  45. G. Yao and R. E. Wyatt, Stationary approaches for solving the Schrödinger equation with timedependent Hamiltonians, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 1904 (1994).
  46. A. Maquet, S.-I. Chu, and W. P. Reinhardt, Stark ionization in dc and ac fields An L2 complex-coordinate approach, Phys. Rev. A 27, 2946 (1983).
  47. S.-I. Chu and D. A. Telnov, Beyond the Floquet theorem generalized Floquet formalisms and quasienergy methods for atomic and molecular multiphoton processes in intense laser fields, Phys. Rep. 390, 1 (2004).
  48. J. H. Shirley, Solution of the Schrödinger equation with a Hamiltonian periodic in time, Phys. Rev. 138, B979 (1965).
  49. S.-I. Chu, Quasienergy formalism for intense field multiphoton ionization of atoms induced by circularly polarized radiation, Chem. Phys. Lett. 54, 367 (1978).
  50. A. Tip, Atoms in circularly polarised fields the dilation-analytic approach, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 16, 3237 (1983).
  51. T. Kjellsson Lindblom, O. I. Tolstikhin, and T. Morishita, Atomic Siegert states in a rotating electric field, Phys. Rev. A 104, 023110 (2021).
  52. J. Dubois, C. Lévêque, J. Caillat, R. Taïeb, U. Saalmann, and J.-M. Rost, Energy conservation law in strong-field photoionization by circularly polarized light, Phys. Rev. A 109, 013112 (2024).
  53. B. Simon, The definition of molecular resonance curves by the method of exterior complex scaling, Phys. Lett. A 71, 211 (1979).
  54. N. Moiseyev, Quantum theory of resonances calculating energies, widths and cross-sections by complex scaling, Phys. Rep. 302, 212 (1998).
  55. S. Graffi and K. Yajima, Exterior complex scaling and the ac-stark effect in a coulomb field, Commun. Math. Phys. 89, 277 (1983).
  56. J. S. Howland, Complex scaling of ac stark Hamiltonians, J. Math. Phys. 24, 1240 (1983).
  57. S. Graffi, V. Grecchi, and H. J. Silverstone, Resonances and convergence of perturbation theory for N-body atomic systems in external AC-electric field, Ann. I. H. P. Phys. Theor. 42, 215 (1985).
  58. J. B. Foresman, M. Head-Gordon, J. A. Pople, and M. J. Frisch, Toward a systematic molecular orbital theory for excited states, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 135 (1992).
  59. A. Dreuw and M. Head-Gordon, Single-Reference ab initio Methods for the Calculation of Excited States of Large Molecules, Chem. Rev. 105, 4009 (2005).
  60. K. L. Litvinenko, N. H. Le, B. Redlich, C. R. Pidgeon, N. V. Abrosimov, Y. Andreev, Z. Huang, and B. N. Murdin, The multi-photon induced Fano effect, Nat. Commun. 12, 454 (2021).
  61. E. Kyrölä, N levels and the continuum, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 19, 1437 (1986).
  62. U. Fano, Effects of configuration interaction on intensities and phase shifts, Phys. Rev. 124, 1866 (1961).
  63. M. F. Limonov, M. V. Rybin, A. N. Poddubny, and Y. S. Kivshar, Fano resonances in photonics, Nat. Photonics 11, 543 (2017).
  64. D. R. Hartree, The Calculation of Atomic Structures (Wiley, New York, 1957), Chap. 2.5.
  65. L. Greenman, P. J. Ho, S. Pabst, E. Kamarchik, D. A. Mazziotti, and R. Santra, Implementation of the time-dependent configuration-interaction singles method for atomic strong-field processes, Phys. Rev. A 82, 023406 (2010).
  66. F. Zapata, J. Vinbladh, A. Ljungdahl, E. Lindroth, and J. M. Dahlström, Relativistic time-dependent configuration-interaction singles method, Phys. Rev. A 105, 012802 (2022).
  67. R. Tahouri, A. Papoulia, S. Carlström, F. Zapata, and J. M. Dahlström, Relativistic treatment of hole alignment in noble gas atoms, Commun. Phys. 7, 344 (2024).
  68. M. Bertolino, S. Carlström, J. Peschel, F. Zapata, E. Lindroth, and J. M. Dahlström, Thomas-Reiche-Kuhn correction for truncated configuration-interaction spaces: Case of laserassisted dynamical interference, Phys. Rev. A 106, 043108 (2022).
  69. S. Carlström, M. Bertolino, J. M. Dahlström, and S. Patchkovskii, General time-dependent configuration-interaction singles. II. Atomic case, Phys. Rev. A 106, 042806 (2022).
  70. L. Tao and A. Scrinzi, Photo-electron momentum spectra from minimal volumes the timedependent surface flux method, New J. Phys. 14, 013021 (2012).
  71. V. Tulsky and D. Bauer, Qprop with faster calculation of photoelectron spectra, Comput. Phys. Commun. 251, 107098 (2020).
  72. X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, Y. Liao, Y. Chen, J. Liang, Q. Ke, M. Li, A. Csehi, and P. Lu, Effect of nonresonant states in near-resonant two-photon ionization of hydrogen, Phys. Rev. A 106, 063114 (2022).
  73. M. Wollenhaupt, A. Präkelt, C. Sarpe-Tudoran, D. Liese, and T. Baumert, Quantum control by selective population of dressed states using intense chirped femtosecond laser pulses, Appl. Phys. B 82, 183 (2006).
  74. M. Bertolino, Zonte, GitLab (2023), https://gitlab.com/mbertolino/zonte.
  75. A. Stenquist and J. M. Dahlström, Harnessing time symmetry to fundamentally alter entanglement in photoionization, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013270 (2025).
  76. A. Stenquist, J. N. Bruhnke, F. Zapata, and J. M. Dahlström, Entanglement transfer in a composite electron-ion-photon system, Rep. Prog. Phys. 88, 080502 (2025).
  77. E. L. Fulton and J. M. Ngoko Djiokap, Transformation by Rabi oscillation of the photoelectron momentum distribution produced by oppositely circularly polarized laser pulses, Phys. Rev. A 110, 063105 (2024).
  78. Y. Deng, Y. Liao, X. Zhang, M. Yu, P. Lu, and Y. Zhou, Control of Autler-Townes spectra by counter-rotating circularly polarized pulses, Phys. Rev. A 111, 023106 (2025).
  79. A. Stenquist, F. Zapata, E. Olofsson, Y. Liao, E. Svegborn, J. N. Bruhnke, C. Verdozzi, and J. M. Dahlström, Mollow-like Triplets in Ultrafast Resonant Absorption, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 063202 (2024).
  80. T. Sato, T. Teramura, and K. Ishikawa, Gauge-invariant formulation of time-dependent configuration interaction singles method, Appl. Sci. 8, 433 (2018).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013199– Published 23 February, 2026
  • Received 7 October 2025
  • Accepted 31 January 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by Bibsam.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation