- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Electrorheoimaging of a nonequilibrium emulsion: Microstructures and multistate switchable viscosities

Majid Bahraminasr* and Anand Yethiraj†

  • Department of Physics and Physical Oceanography, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada A1B 3X7 and Department of Physics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1

  • *Contact author: mbahraminasr@mun.ca; m.bahraminasr@uoguelph.ca
  • †Contact author: ayethira@uoguelph.ca
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013231 – Published 2 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/416j-vpdj

Abstract

Complex fluids such as colloids and emulsions are ubiquitous in biopharmaceuticals, manufacturing, and the oil industry, but controlling their viscosity can pose a significant challenge. Low viscosities are ideal for mixing, high viscosities are helpful for pharmaceuticals, and switchable viscosities are useful for smart materials. One strategy to make multipurpose fluids is to make nonequilibrium modifications to the microstructure of colloids and emulsions using external fields, which can result in emergent changes in their rheological characteristics. We introduce an experimental technique, electrorheoimaging (ERI), which directly visualizes microstructure during rheological measurements while simultaneously applying an electric field. We also introduce a continuous phase that lowers electrohydrodynamic thresholds and enables experiments at modest field strengths, revealing behaviors previously inaccessible in laboratory settings. Using this combination of technique and material design, we observe shear-induced banding that only appears in the presence of electric depending on the frequency of the electric field, at either high or low shear rates. These microstructural transitions produce dramatic, reversible viscosity modulation—not only increases, but also decreases, including negative intrinsic viscosities. Frequency control enables instantaneous switching among multiple effective viscosities spanning a 30-fold range, establishing ERI as a powerful tool for probing and controlling rheology in field-responsive soft materials.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (63)

  1. D. R. Link, E. Grasland-Mongrain, A. Duri, F. Sarrazin, Z. Cheng, G. Cristobal, M. Marquez, and D. A. Weitz, Electric control of droplets in microfluidic devices, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 2556 (2006).
  2. J. D. Wehking, L. Chew, and R. Kumar, Droplet deformation and manipulation in an electrified microfluidic channel, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 054101 (2013).
  3. J. S. Eow, M. Ghadiri, A. O. Sharif, and T. J. Williams, Electrostatic enhancement of coalescence of water droplets in oil: A review of the current understanding, Chem. Eng. J. 84, 173 (2001).
  4. S. Mhatre, V. Vivacqua, M. Ghadiri, A. Abdullah, M. Al-Marri, A. Hassanpour, B. Hewakandamby, B. Azzopardi, and B. Kermani, Electrostatic phase separation: A review, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 96, 177 (2015).
  5. Y. Wu and R. L. Clark, Electrohydrodynamic atomization: A versatile process for preparing materials for biomedical applications, J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 19, 573 (2008).
  6. R. Allan and S. Mason, Particle behavior in shear and electric fields—Deformation and burst of fluid drops, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 267, 45 (1962).
  7. J. Melcher and G. Taylor, Electrohydrodynamics: A review of the role of interfacial shear stresses, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1, 111 (1969).
  8. D. Saville, Electrohydrodynamics: The Taylor-Melcher leaky dielectric model, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 29, 27 (1997).
  9. P. M. Vlahovska, Electrohydrodynamics of drops and vesicles, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 51, 305 (2019).
  10. S. Torza, R. Cox, and S. Mason, Electrohydrodynamic deformation and bursts of liquid drops, Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 269, 295 (1971).
  11. E. K. Zholkovskij, J. H. Masliyah, and J. Czarnecki, An electrokinetic model of drop deformation in an electric field, J. Fluid Mech. 472, 1 (2002).
  12. A. Varshney, S. Ghosh, S. Bhattacharya, and A. Yethiraj, Self organization of exotic oil-in-oil phases driven by tunable electrohydrodynamics, Sci. Rep. 2, 738 (2012).
  13. S. K. Tadavani and A. Yethiraj, Tunable hydrodynamics: A field-frequency phase diagram of a non-equilibrium order-to-disorder transition, Soft Matter 13, 7412 (2017).
  14. W. M. Winslow, Induced fibration of suspensions, J. Appl. Phys. 20, 1137 (1949).
  15. D. G. Klingenberg, F. V. Swol, and C. F. Zukoski, Structure and dynamics of electrorheological fluids, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 7888 (1989).
  16. Y. Z. Dong, Y. Seo, and H. J. Choi, Recent development of electro-responsive smart electrorheological fluids, Soft Matter 15, 3473 (2019).
  17. X.-D. Pan and G. H. McKinley, Characteristics of electrorheological responses in an emulsion system, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 195, 101 (1997).
  18. J.-W. Ha and S.-M. Yang, Rheological responses of oil-in-oil emulsions in an electric field, J. Rheol. 44, 235 (2000).
  19. J. E. Martin and A. Snezhko, Driving self-assembly and emergent dynamics in colloidal suspensions by time-dependent magnetic fields, Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 126601 (2013).
  20. C. Boissy, P. Atten, and J.-N. Foulc, On a negative electrorheological effect, J. Electrost. 35, 13 (1995).
  21. J. I. Kach, L. M. Walker, and A. S. Khair, Nonequilibrium structure formation in electrohydrodynamic emulsions, Soft Matter 19, 9179 (2023).
  22. J. C. Baygents, N. Rivette, and H. A. Stone, Electrohydrodynamic deformation and interaction of drop pairs, J. Fluid Mech. 368, 359 (1998).
  23. C. H. Meredith, P. G. Moerman, J. Groenewold, Y.-J. Chiu, W. K. Kegel, A. van Blaaderen, and L. D. Zarzar, Predator–prey interactions between droplets driven by non-reciprocal oil exchange, Nat. Chem. 12, 1136 (2020).
  24. M. L. de Almeida, N. D. S. Mendes, R. M. Charin, M. Nele, and F. W. Tavares, Electro-rheological investigation on W/O emulsions morphology under electric fields, J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 41, 1465 (2020).
  25. B. D. Chin and O. O. Park, Rheology and microstructures of electrorheological fluids containing both dispersed particles and liquid drops in a continuous phase, J. Rheol. 44, 397 (2000).
  26. A. Fernández, Response of an emulsion of leaky dielectric drops immersed in a simple shear flow: Drops more conductive than the suspending fluid, Phys. Fluids 20, 043303 (2008).
  27. P. M. Vlahovska, On the rheology of a dilute emulsion in a uniform electric field, J. Fluid Mech. 670, 481 (2011).
  28. S. Mandal, S. Sinha, A. Bandopadhyay, and S. Chakraborty, Drop deformation and emulsion rheology under the combined influence of uniform electric field and linear flow, J. Fluid Mech. 841, 408 (2018).
  29. S. Villa, P. Edera, M. Brizioli, V. Trappe, F. Giavazzi, and R. Cerbino, Quantitative rheo-microscopy of soft matter, Front. Phys. 10, 1013805 (2022).
  30. S. Aime, L. Ramos, J.-M. Fromental, G. Prevot, R. Jelinek, and L. Cipelletti, A stress-controlled shear cell for small-angle light scattering and microscopy, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87, 123907 (2016).
  31. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/416j-vpdj for additional experimental methods, rheology data, electroconvection, frequency dependence of EHD forces, and supporting movies.
  32. L. Marshall, C. F. Zukoski, and J. W. Goodwin, Effects of electric fields on the rheology of non-aqueous concentrated suspensions, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 85, 2785 (1989).
  33. J. Q. Feng and T. C. Scott, A computational analysis of electrohydrodynamics of a leaky dielectric drop in an electric field, J. Fluid Mech. 311, 289 (1996).
  34. G. K. Batchelor, The effect of Brownian motion on the bulk stress in a suspension of spherical particles, J. Fluid Mech. 83, 97 (1977).
  35. R. R. Pethig, Dielectrophoresis: Theory, Methodology and Biological Applications (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2017).
  36. T. B. Jones, Electromechanics of Particles (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1995).
  37. K. von Pfeil, M. D. Graham, D. J. Klingenberg, and J. F. Morris, Pattern formation in flowing electrorheological fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 188301 (2002).
  38. J. Cao, J. Huang, and L. Zhou, Structure of electrorheological fluids under an electric field and a shear flow: Experiment and computer simulation, J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 11635 (2006).
  39. J. S. Park and D. Saintillan, Dipolophoresis in large-scale suspensions of ideally polarizable spheres, J. Fluid Mech. 662, 66 (2010).
  40. C. Sorgentone, J. I. Kach, A. S. Khair, L. M. Walker, and P. M. Vlahovska, Numerical and asymptotic analysis of the three-dimensional electrohydrodynamic interactions of drop pairs, J. Fluid Mech. 914, A24 (2021).
  41. P. D. Olmsted, Perspectives on shear banding in complex fluids, Rheol. Acta 47, 283 (2008).
  42. S. M. Fielding, Complex dynamics of shear banded flows, Soft Matter 3, 1262 (2007).
  43. A. Montesi, A. A. Pena, and M. Pasquali, Vorticity alignment and negative normal stresses in sheared attractive emulsions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 058303 (2004).
  44. S. Caserta, M. Simeone, and S. Guido, Shear banding in biphasic liquid-liquid systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 137801 (2008).
  45. S. Caserta and S. Guido, Vorticity banding in biphasic polymer blends, Langmuir 28, 16254 (2012).
  46. S. Lin-Gibson, J. A. Pathak, E. H. Grulke, H. Wang, and E. K. Hobbie, Elastic flow instability in nanotube suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 048302 (2004).
  47. C. O. Osuji and D. A. Weitz, Highly anisotropic vorticity aligned structures in a shear thickening attractive colloidal system, Soft Matter 4, 1388 (2008).
  48. V. Grenard, N. Taberlet, and S. Manneville, Shear-induced structuration of confined carbon black gels: Steady-state features of vorticity-aligned flocs, Soft Matter 7, 3920 (2011).
  49. A. S. Negi and C. O. Osuji, New insights on fumed colloidal rheology—Shear thickening and vorticity-aligned structures in flocculating dispersions, Rheol. Acta 48, 871 (2009).
  50. A. Karppinen, T. Saarinen, J. Salmela, A. Laukkanen, M. Nuopponen, and J. Seppälä, Flocculation of microfibrillated cellulose in shear flow, Cellulose 19, 1807 (2012).
  51. M. P. Godfrin, F. Guo, I. Chakraborty, N. Heeder, A. Shukla, A. Bose, R. H. Hurt, and A. Tripathi, Shear-directed assembly of graphene oxide in aqueous dispersions into ordered arrays, Langmuir 29, 13162 (2013).
  52. Z. Varga, V. Grenard, S. Pecorario, N. Taberlet, V. Dolique, S. Manneville, T. Divoux, G. H. McKinley, and J. W. Swan, Hydrodynamics control shear-induced pattern formation in attractive suspensions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 12193 (2019).
  53. F. De Vita, M. E. Rosti, S. Caserta, and L. Brandt, Numerical simulations of vorticity banding of emulsions in shear flows, Soft Matter 16, 2854 (2020).
  54. S. K. Tadavani, J. R. Munroe, and A. Yethiraj, The effect of confinement on the electrohydrodynamic behavior of droplets in a microfluidic oil-in-oil emulsion, Soft Matter 12, 9246 (2016).
  55. M. Parthasarathy and D. J. Klingenberg, Electrorheology: Mechanisms and models, Mater. Sci. Eng.: R: Rep. 17, 57 (1996).
  56. H. Ma, W. Wen, W. Y. Tam, and P. Sheng, Frequency dependent electrorheological properties: Origin and bounds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2499 (1996).
  57. W. Y. Tam, G. H. Yi, W. Wen, H. Ma, M. M. T. Loy, and P. Sheng, New electrorheological fluid: Theory and experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2987 (1997).
  58. H. J. Choi, M. S. Cho, J. W. Kim, C. A. Kim, and M. S. Jhon, A yield stress scaling function for electrorheological fluids, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 3806 (2001).
  59. W. Wen, X. Huang, S. Yang, K. Lu, and P. Sheng, The giant electrorheological effect in suspensions of nanoparticles, Nat. Mater. 2, 727 (2003).
  60. W. Wen, X. Huang, and P. Sheng, Particle size scaling of the giant electrorheological effect, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 299 (2004).
  61. X. Huang, W. Wen, S. Yang, and P. Sheng, Mechanisms of the giant electrorheological effect, Solid State Commun. 139, 581 (2006).
  62. C. Jarzynski, Diverse phenomena, common themes, Nat. Phys. 11, 105 (2015).
  63. A. Varshney, S. Gohil, S. K. Tadavani, A. Yethiraj, S. Bhattacharya, and S. Ghosh, Large scale arrays of tunable microlenses, Lab. Chip 14, 1330 (2014).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013231– Published 2 March, 2026
  • Received 26 August 2025
  • Accepted 21 January 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation