Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Superlinear Hall angle and carrier mobility from non-Boltzmann magnetotransport in the spatially disordered Yukawa-Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model on a square lattice

Davide Valentinis1,2,*, Jörg Schmalian1,2, Subir Sachdev3,4, and Aavishkar A. Patel4,5

  • *Contact author: davide.valentinis@kit.edu

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013299 – Published 18 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/32ts-qh8d

Abstract

Exact numerical results for the dc magnetoconductivity tensor of the two-dimensional spatially disordered Yukawa-Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (2D-YSYK) model on a square lattice, at first order in applied perpendicular magnetic field, are obtained from the self-consistent disorder-averaged solution of the 2D-YSYK saddle-point equations. This system describes fermions endowed with a Fermi surface and coupled to a bosonic scalar field through spatially random Yukawa interactions. The resulting local and energy-dependent fermionic self-energies are employed in the Kubo formalism to calculate the longitudinal and Hall conductivities, the Hall coefficient, the carrier mobility, and the cotangent of the Hall angle, at fixed fermion density. From the interplay between YSYK interactions and square-lattice embedding, and the non-Boltzmann frequency-dependent self-energies, we find nontrivial evolution of the magnetotransport coefficients as a function of temperature and YSYK interaction strength, notably a superlinear evolution of the Hall-angle cotangent and the inverse carrier mobility with temperature, concomitant with linear-in-temperature resistivity, in an extended crossover regime above the low-temperature marginal Fermi liquid ground state. Our model and results provide a controlled theoretical framework to interpret magnetotransport experiments, at linear order in applied magnetic field, in strange-metal phases found in strongly correlated solid-state electron systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (137)

  1. D. Chowdhury, A. Georges, O. Parcollet, and S. Sachdev, Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models and beyond: Window into non-Fermi liquids, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 035004 (2022).
  2. P. W. Phillips, N. E. Hussey, and P. Abbamonte, Stranger than metals, Science 377, eabh4273 (2022).
  3. We use the term “strange metal” only for those metals whose resistivity is smaller than the quantum unit (h/e2 in d=2 spatial dimensions). When the linear-in-T resistivity of the metal is larger than the quantum unit, the system is a “bad metal.”
  4. R. A. Cooper, Y. Wang, B. Vignolle, O. Lipscombe, S. M. Hayden, Y. Tanabe, T. Adachi, Y. Koike, M. Nohara, H. Takagi, C. Proust, and N. E. Hussey, Anomalous criticality in the electrical resistivity of La2−xSrxCuO4, Science 323, 603 (2009).
  5. P. Giraldo-Gallo, J. Galvis, Z. Stegen, K. A. Modic, F. Balakirev, J. Betts, X. Lian, C. Moir, S. Riggs, J. Wu, A. T. Bollinger, X. He, I. Božović, B. J. Ramshaw, R. D. McDonald, G. S. Boebinger, and A. Shekhter, Scale-invariant magnetoresistance in a cuprate superconductor, Science 361, 479 (2018).
  6. B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, From quantum matter to high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxides, Nature (London) 518, 179 (2015).
  7. G. Grissonnanche, Y. Fang, A. Legros, S. Verret, F. Laliberté, C. Collignon, J. Zhou, D. Graf, P. A. Goddard, L. Taillefer, and B. J. Ramshaw, Linear-in temperature resistivity from an isotropic Planckian scattering rate, Nature (London) 595, 667 (2021).
  8. R. Romero III, H. T. Yi, S. Oh, and N. Armitage, Planckian scattering and parallel conduction channels in the iron chalcogenide superconductors FeTe1−xSex, arXiv:2505.00623.
  9. J. Bruin, H. Sakai, R. Perry, and A. P. Mackenzie, Similarity of scattering rates in metals showing T-linear resistivity, Science 339, 804 (2013).
  10. D. v. d. Marel, H. Molegraaf, J. Zaanen, Z. Nussinov, F. Carbone, A. Damascelli, H. Eisaki, M. Greven, P. Kes, and M. Li, Quantum critical behaviour in a high-Tc superconductor, Nature (London) 425, 271 (2003).
  11. D. van der Marel, F. Carbone, A. Kuzmenko, and E. Giannini, Scaling properties of the optical conductivity of Bi-based cuprates, Ann. Phys. 321, 1716 (2006).
  12. B. Michon, C. Berthod, C. W. Rischau, A. Ataei, L. Chen, S. Komiya, S. Ono, L. Taillefer, D. van der Marel, and A. Georges, Reconciling scaling of the optical conductivity of cuprate superconductors with Planckian resistivity and specific heat, Nat. Commun. 14, 3033 (2023).
  13. H. Park, S.-S. Lee, G. D. Gu, and J. Hwang, Quantum criticality in cuprate superconductors revealed by optical conductivity measurement, arXiv:2509.19675.
  14. B. Michon, C. Girod, S. Badoux, J. Kačmarčík, Q. Ma, M. Dragomir, H. Dabkowska, B. Gaulin, J.-S. Zhou, S. Pyon, T. Takayama, H. Takagi, S. Verret, N. Doiron-Leyraud, C. Marcenat, L. Taillefer, and T. Klein, Thermodynamic signatures of quantum criticality in cuprate superconductors, Nature (London) 567, 218 (2019).
  15. H. v. Löhneysen, T. Pietrus, G. Portisch, H. G. Schlager, A. Schröder, M. Sieck, and T. Trappmann, Non-Fermi-liquid behavior in a heavy-fermion alloy at a magnetic instability, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3262 (1994).
  16. O. Trovarelli, C. Geibel, S. Mederle, C. Langhammer, F. M. Grosche, P. Gegenwart, M. Lang, G. Sparn, and F. Steglich, YbRh2Si2: Pronounced non-Fermi-liquid effects above a low-lying magnetic phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 626 (2000).
  17. A. Schröder, G. Aeppli, R. Coldea, M. Adams, O. Stockert, H. Löhneysen, E. Bucher, R. Ramazashvili, and P. Coleman, Onset of antiferromagnetism in heavy-fermion metals, Nature (London) 407, 351 (2000).
  18. J. Paglione, M. A. Tanatar, D. G. Hawthorn, E. Boaknin, R. W. Hill, F. Ronning, M. Sutherland, L. Taillefer, C. Petrovic, and P. C. Canfield, Field-induced quantum critical point in CeCoIn5, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 246405 (2003).
  19. Y. Tokiwa, E. D. Bauer, and P. Gegenwart, Zero-field quantum critical point in CeCoIn5, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 107003 (2013).
  20. L. Fang, H. Luo, P. Cheng, Z. Wang, Y. Jia, G. Mu, B. Shen, I. I. Mazin, L. Shan, C. Ren, and H.-H. Wen, Roles of multiband effects and electron-hole asymmetry in the superconductivity and normal-state properties of Ba(Fe1−xCox)2As2, Phys. Rev. B 80, 140508 (2009).
  21. J. C. Palmstrom, P. Walmsley, J. A. Straquadine, M. E. Sorensen, S. T. Hannahs, D. H. Burns, and I. R. Fisher, Comparison of temperature and doping dependence of elastoresistivity near a putative nematic quantum critical point, Nat. Commun. 13, 1011 (2022).
  22. S. Cai, J. Zhao, N. Ni, J. Guo, R. Yang, P. Wang, J. Han, S. Long, Y. Zhou, Q. Wu, X. Qiu, T. Xiang, R. J. Cava, and L. Sun, The breakdown of both strange metal and superconducting states at a pressure-induced quantum critical point in iron-pnictide superconductors, Nat. Commun. 14, 3116 (2023).
  23. Z. Liu, H. Mao, Y. Nakajima, J. Paglione, Z. Yin, and S. Borisenko, Flat band induced quantum criticality in a nonsuperconducting iron pnictide, Phys. Rev. B 109, 075103 (2024).
  24. N. Doiron-Leyraud, P. Auban-Senzier, S. René de Cotret, C. Bourbonnais, D. Jérome, K. Bechgaard, and L. Taillefer, Correlation between linear resistivity and Tc in the Bechgaard salts and the pnictide superconductor Ba(Fe1−xCox)2As2, Phys. Rev. B 80, 214531 (2009).
  25. R. Lyu, Z. Tuchfeld, N. Verma, H. Tian, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, C. N. Lau, M. Randeria, and M. Bockrath, Strange metal behavior of the Hall angle in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 103, 245424 (2021).
  26. Y. Xia, Z. Han, J. Zhu, Y. Zhang, P. Knüppel, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Simulating high-temperature superconductivity in moiré WSe2, arXiv:2508.02662.
  27. T. Valla, A. Fedorov, P. Johnson, B. Wells, S. Hulbert, Q. Li, G. Gu, and N. Koshizuka, Evidence for quantum critical behavior in the optimally doped cuprate Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ, Science 285, 2110 (1999).
  28. S. H. Naqib and R. S. Islam, Possible quantum critical behavior revealed by the critical current density of hole doped high-Tc cuprates in comparison to heavy fermion superconductors, Sci. Rep. 9, 14856 (2019).
  29. P. R. Mandal, T. Sarkar, and R. L. Greene, Anomalous quantum criticality in the electron-doped cuprates, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 5991 (2019).
  30. A. Legros, S. Benhabib, W. Tabis, F. Laliberté, M. Dion, M. Lizaire, B. Vignolle, D. Vignolles, H. Raffy, Z. Li, P. Auban-Senzier, N. Doiron-Leyraud, P. Fournier, D. Colson, L. Taillefer, and C. Proust, Universal T-linear resistivity and Planckian dissipation in overdoped cuprates, Nat. Phys. 15, 142 (2019).
  31. I. M. Hayes, R. D. McDonald, N. P. Breznay, T. Helm, P. J. Moll, M. Wartenbe, A. Shekhter, and J. G. Analytis, Scaling between magnetic field and temperature in the high-temperature superconductor BaFe2 (As1−xPx)2, Nat. Phys. 12, 916 (2016).
  32. J. Ayres, M. Berben, M. Čulo, Y.-T. Hsu, E. van Heumen, Y. Huang, J. Zaanen, T. Kondo, T. Takeuchi, J. Cooper, C. Putzke, S. Friedemann, A. Carrington, and N. E. Hussey, Incoherent transport across the strange-metal regime of overdoped cuprates, Nature (London) 595, 661 (2021).
  33. A. Legros, K. W. Post, P. Chauhan, D. G. Rickel, X. He, X. Xu, X. Shi, I. Božović, S. A. Crooker, and N. P. Armitage, Evolution of the cyclotron mass with doping in La2−xSrxCuO4, Phys. Rev. B 106, 195110 (2022).
  34. T. R. Chien, Z. Z. Wang, and N. P. Ong, Effect of Zn impurities on the normal-state Hall angle in single-crystal YBa2Cu3−xZnxO7−δ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2088 (1991).
  35. J. M. Harris, Y. F. Yan, and N. P. Ong, Experimental test of the T2 law for the Hall angle from Tc to 500 K in oxygen-reduced YBa2Cu3O6+x crystals, Phys. Rev. B 46, 14293 (1992).
  36. T. Manako, Y. Kubo, and Y. Shimakawa, Transport and structural study of Tl2Ba2CuO6+δ single crystals prepared by the KCl flux method, Phys. Rev. B 46, 11019 (1992).
  37. A. Carrington, A. P. Mackenzie, C. T. Lin, and J. R. Cooper, Temperature dependence of the Hall angle in single-crystal YBa2(Cu1−xCox)3O7−δ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2855 (1992).
  38. A. P. Mackenzie, N. E. Hussey, A. J. Diver, S. R. Julian, Y. Maeno, S. Nishizaki, and T. Fujita, Hall effect in the two-dimensional metal Sr2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B 54, 7425 (1996).
  39. D. Matthey, S. Gariglio, B. Giovannini, and J.-M. Triscone, Hall effect in underdoped GdBa2Cu3O7−δ thin films: Evidence for a crossover line in the pseudogap regime, Phys. Rev. B 64, 024513 (2001).
  40. P. Li, F. F. Balakirev, and R. L. Greene, High-field Hall resistivity and magnetoresistance of electron-doped Pr2−xCexCuO4−δ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 047003 (2007).
  41. Y. Nakajima, H. Shishido, H. Nakai, T. Shibauchi, K. Behnia, K. Izawa, M. Hedo, Y. Uwatoko, T. Matsumoto, R. Settai, Y. Ōnuki, H. Kontani, and Y. Matsuda, Non-Fermi liquid behavior in the magnetotransport of CeMIn5 (M: Co and Rh): Striking similarity between quasi two-dimensional heavy fermion and high-Tc cuprates, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 024703 (2007).
  42. R. H. Liu, G. Wu, T. Wu, D. F. Fang, H. Chen, S. Y. Li, K. Liu, Y. L. Xie, X. F. Wang, R. L. Yang, L. Ding, C. He, D. L. Feng, and X. H. Chen, Anomalous transport properties and phase diagram of the FeAs-based SmFeAsO1−xFx superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 087001 (2008).
  43. J. Kokalj, N. E. Hussey, and R. H. McKenzie, Transport properties of the metallic state of overdoped cuprate superconductors from an anisotropic marginal Fermi liquid model, Phys. Rev. B 86, 045132 (2012).
  44. W. K. Huang, S. Hosoi, M. Čulo, S. Kasahara, Y. Sato, K. Matsuura, Y. Mizukami, M. Berben, N. E. Hussey, H. Kontani, T. Shibauchi, and Y. Matsuda, Non-Fermi liquid transport in the vicinity of the nematic quantum critical point of superconducting FeSe1−xSx, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033367 (2020).
  45. N. P. Ong, Geometric interpretation of the weak-field Hall conductivity in two-dimensional metals with arbitrary Fermi surface, Phys. Rev. B 43, 193 (1991).
  46. N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539 (2010).
  47. J. Bok and J. Bouvier, Hall effect in the normal state of high-Tc cuprates, Physica C 408-410, 242 (2004).
  48. M. Blake and A. Donos, Quantum critical transport and the Hall angle in holographic models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 021601 (2015).
  49. N. Chagnet, S. Arend, F. Balm, M. Janse, J. Saldi, and K. Schalm, Natural anomalous cyclotron response in a hydrodynamic local quantum critical metal in a periodic potential, arXiv:2409.11095.
  50. To see the mapping of finite-momentum modes to Eqs. (8), assume for simplicity a quadratic boson dispersion, (ωq⃗)2=(mb0)2+Kq2, so that the momentum-integrated boson propagator is D(iΩn)=∫dq⃗(2π)21(Ωn)2+(mb0)2+Kq2−Π(iΩn).If we now modify the dispersion to (ωq⃗)2=(mb0)2+K(q−Q)2 with the characteristic finite momentum Q⃗, the propagator given in the above equation can still be written as D(iΩn)=∫dq⃗(2π)21(Ωn)2+(m̃b0)2+Kq2−2KQq−Π(iΩn), with a reparametrized bare boson mass (m̃b0)2=(mb0)2+KQ2.
  51. C. Li, D. Valentinis, A. A. Patel, H. Guo, J. Schmalian, S. Sachdev, and I. Esterlis, Strange metal and superconductor in the two-dimensional Yukawa-Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 186502 (2024).
  52. G. Morpurgo, L. Rademaker, C. Berthod, and T. Giamarchi, Hall response of locally correlated two-dimensional electrons at low density, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013112 (2024).
  53. G. Morpurgo, C. Berthod, and T. Giamarchi, Universal low-density power laws of the dc conductivity and Hall constant in the self-consistent Born approximation, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 033038 (2025).
  54. Y. Ando and T. Murayama, Nonuniversal power law of the Hall scattering rate in a single-layer cuprate Bi2Sr2−xLaxCuO6, Phys. Rev. B 60, R6991 (1999).
  55. By charge density, here we denote the product of the electric charge e and the fermion density n, calculated in accordance with Eqs. (17) or (19). This measure of carrier density is independent from the existence of well-defined electronic quasiparticles, and it also holds for our 2D-YSYK strongly interacting problem.
  56. D. van der Marel, Anomalous behaviour of the chemical potential in superconductors with a low density of charge carriers, Physica C 165, 35 (1990).
  57. D. Valentinis, D. van der Marel, and C. Berthod, BCS superconductivity near the band edge: Exact results for one and several bands, Phys. Rev. B 94, 024511 (2016).
  58. D. Valentinis, D. van der Marel, and C. Berthod, Rise and fall of shape resonances in thin films of BCS superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 94, 054516 (2016).
  59. D. Valentinis, S. Gariglio, A. Fête, J.-M. Triscone, C. Berthod, and D. van der Marel, Modulation of the superconducting critical temperature due to quantum confinement at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface, Phys. Rev. B 96, 094518 (2017).
  60. J. Schmalian, M. Langer, S. Grabowski, and K. H. Bennemann, Self-consistent summation of many-particle diagrams on the real frequency axis and its application to the FLEX approximation, Comput. Phys. Commun. 93, 141 (1996).
  61. A. A. Patel, H. Guo, I. Esterlis, and S. Sachdev, Universal theory of strange metals from spatially random interactions, Science 381, 790 (2023).
  62. H. Guo, D. Valentinis, J. Schmalian, S. Sachdev, and A. A. Patel, Cyclotron resonance and quantum oscillations of critical Fermi surfaces, Phys. Rev. B 109, 075162 (2024).
  63. M. Kohler, Zur magnetischen widerstandsänderung reiner metalle, Ann. Phys. 424, 211 (1938).
  64. D. R. Hofstadter, Energy levels and wave functions of Bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B 14, 2239 (1976).
  65. C. M. Varma, P. B. Littlewood, S. Schmitt-Rink, E. Abrahams, and A. E. Ruckenstein, Phenomenology of the normal state of Cu-O high-temperature superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1996 (1989).
  66. J. Chen, X. Guo, C. Boyd, S. Bettler, C. Kengle, D. Chaudhuri, F. Hoveyda, A. Husain, J. Schneeloch, G. Gu, P. Phillips, B. Uchoa, T.-C. Chiang, and P. Abbamonte, Consistency between reflection momentum-resolved electron energy loss spectroscopy and optical spectroscopy measurements of the long-wavelength density response of Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x, Phys. Rev. B 109, 045108 (2024).
  67. G. D. Mahan, Many-Particle Physics (Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, 2000).
  68. C. Berthod, Spectroscopic Probes of Quantum Matter (IOP Publishing, Bristol, 2018), pp. 2053–2563.
  69. A. Georges, O. Parcollet, and S. Sachdev, Mean field theory of a quantum Heisenberg spin glass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 840 (2000).
  70. A. Georges, O. Parcollet, and S. Sachdev, Quantum fluctuations of a nearly critical Heisenberg spin glass, Phys. Rev. B 63, 134406 (2001).
  71. O. Parcollet and A. Georges, Non-Fermi-liquid regime of a doped Mott insulator, Phys. Rev. B 59, 5341 (1999).
  72. P. B. Allen and R. C. Dynes, Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors reanalyzed, Phys. Rev. B 12, 905 (1975).
  73. R. Combescot, Strong-coupling limit of Eliashberg theory, Phys. Rev. B 51, 11625 (1995).
  74. D. Valentinis, G. A. Inkof, and J. Schmalian, Correlation between phase stiffness and condensation energy across the non-Fermi to Fermi-liquid crossover in the Yukawa-Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model on a lattice, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043007 (2023).
  75. D. Valentinis, G. A. Inkof, and J. Schmalian, BCS to incoherent superconductivity crossover in the Yukawa-Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model on a lattice, Phys. Rev. B 108, L140501 (2023).
  76. J. T. Heath and R. Boyack, Universal scaling relations in electron-phonon superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 216002 (2025).
  77. C. Putzke, S. Benhabib, W. Tabis, J. Ayres, Z. Wang, L. Malone, S. Licciardello, J. Lu, T. Kondo, T. Takeuchi, N. E. Hussey, J. R. Cooper, and A. Carrington, Reduced Hall carrier density in the overdoped strange metal regime of cuprate superconductors, Nat. Phys. 17, 826 (2021).
  78. I. Esterlis, H. Guo, A. A. Patel, and S. Sachdev, Large-N theory of critical Fermi surfaces, Phys. Rev. B 103, 235129 (2021).
  79. H. Guo, A. A. Patel, I. Esterlis, and S. Sachdev, Large-N theory of critical Fermi surfaces. II. Conductivity, Phys. Rev. B 106, 115151 (2022).
  80. D. Hauck, M. J. Klug, I. Esterlis, and J. Schmalian, Eliashberg equations for an electron–phonon version of the Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev model: Pair breaking in non-Fermi liquid superconductors, Ann. Phys. 417, 168120 (2020).
  81. I. Esterlis and J. Schmalian, Cooper pairing of incoherent electrons: An electron-phonon version of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. B 100, 115132 (2019).
  82. The quantity σαβ(ω) in Eq. (10) can be equally understood as the q=0 value, σαβ(ω)=σαβ(q⃗,ω)|q=0, of the nonlocal conductivity tensor σαβ(q⃗,ω)=∫dr⃗∫−∞+∞dtσαβ(r⃗,t)e−iq⃗·r⃗−ωt written in Fourier space of transferred momentum q⃗ and frequency ω, or as the total, spatially integrated conductivity σαβ(ω)=∫dr⃗∫−∞+∞dtσαβ(r⃗,t)eiωt, as also stems from the above equation.
  83. S. A. Hartnoll, P. K. Kovtun, M. Müller, and S. Sachdev, Theory of the Nernst effect near quantum phase transitions in condensed matter and in dyonic black holes, Phys. Rev. B 76, 144502 (2007).
  84. C. Berthod, J. Mravlje, X. Deng, R. Žitko, D. van der Marel, and A. Georges, Non-Drude universal scaling laws for the optical response of local Fermi liquids, Phys. Rev. B 87, 115109 (2013).
  85. F. Ferrari and F. I. Schaposnik Massolo, Phases of melonic quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. D 100, 026007 (2019).
  86. R. L. Smit, D. Valentinis, J. Schmalian, and P. Kopietz, Quantum discontinuity fixed point and renormalization group flow of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033089 (2021).
  87. Notice that the zero-temperature Hall coefficient, as given by Eq. (1), is RH(0)(0)=1/(|e|n) only in the semiclassical regime at low density, where the chemical potential approaches the band edge [52]. Away from this band-edge limit, |RH(0)|<|RH(0)|. This is consistent with the expectation that band-structure effects reduce the Hall constant in the semiclassical approximation [45].
  88. P. W. Anderson, Hall effect in the two-dimensional Luttinger liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2092 (1991).
  89. P. W. Anderson, The Theory of Superconductivity in the High-Tc Cuprate Superconductors (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1997).
  90. P. M. Bonetti, M. Christos, A. Nikolaenko, A. A. Patel, and S. Sachdev, Critical quantum liquids and the cuprate high temperature superconductors, arXiv:2508.20164.
  91. F. F. Assaad and M. Imada, Hall coefficient for the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3868 (1995).
  92. W. O. Wang, J. K. Ding, B. Moritz, E. W. Huang, and T. P. Devereaux, DC Hall coefficient of the strongly correlated Hubbard model, npj Quantum Mater. 5, 51 (2020).
  93. T. Pruschke, M. Jarrell, and J. Freericks, Anomalous normal-state properties of high-Tc superconductors: Intrinsic properties of strongly correlated electron systems?, Adv. Phys. 44, 187 (1995).
  94. A. A. Markov, G. Rohringer, and A. N. Rubtsov, Robustness of the topological quantization of the Hall conductivity for correlated lattice electrons at finite temperatures, Phys. Rev. B 100, 115102 (2019).
  95. J. Vučičević and R. Žitko, Electrical conductivity in the Hubbard model: Orbital effects of magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 104, 205101 (2021).
  96. I. Khait, S. Bhattacharyya, A. Samanta, and A. Auerbach, Hall anomalies of the doped Mott insulator, npj Quantum Mater. 8, 75 (2023).
  97. S. A. Hartnoll and A. Karch, Scaling theory of the cuprate strange metals, Phys. Rev. B 91, 155126 (2015).
  98. G.-A. Inkof, K. Schalm, and J. Schmalian, Quantum critical Eliashberg theory, the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev superconductor and their holographic duals, npj Quantum Mater. 7, 56 (2022).
  99. V. C. Stangier, D. E. Sheehy, and J. Schmalian, Strong-coupling superconductivity near Gross-Neveu quantum criticality in Dirac systems, Phys. Rev. B 113, 085119 (2026).
  100. A. A. Patel, R. A. Davison, and A. Levchenko, Hydrodynamic flows of non-Fermi liquids: Magnetotransport and bilayer drag, Phys. Rev. B 96, 205417 (2017).
  101. B. Goutéraux and A. Shukla, Beyond Drude transport in hydrodynamic metals, Phys. Rev. B 109, 165153 (2024).
  102. Y.-L. Wang, X.-H. Ge, and S.-J. Sin, Linear-T resistivity from spatially random vector coupling, Phys. Rev. B 111, 115135 (2025).
  103. Y.-L. Wang, Y.-K. Han, X.-H. Ge, and S.-J. Sin, Hall angle of a spatially random vector model, Phys. Rev. B 112, 035121 (2025).
  104. E. E. Aldape, T. Cookmeyer, A. A. Patel, and E. Altman, Solvable theory of a strange metal at the breakdown of a heavy Fermi liquid, Phys. Rev. B 105, 235111 (2022).
  105. S. G. Kaplan, S. Wu, H.-T. S. Lihn, H. D. Drew, Q. Li, D. B. Fenner, J. M. Phillips, and S. Y. Hou, Normal state ac Hall effect in YBa2Cu3O7 thin films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 696 (1996).
  106. B. Parks, S. Spielman, and J. Orenstein, High-frequency Hall effect in the normal state of YBa2Cu3O7, Phys. Rev. B 56, 115 (1997).
  107. M. Grayson, L. B. Rigal, D. C. Schmadel, H. D. Drew, and P.-J. Kung, Spectral measurement of the Hall angle response in normal state cuprate superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 037003 (2002).
  108. D. C. Schmadel, G. S. Jenkins, J. J. Tu, G. D. Gu, H. Kontani, and H. D. Drew, Infrared Hall conductivity in optimally doped Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ: Drude behavior examined by experiment and fluctuation-exchange-model calculations, Phys. Rev. B 75, 140506 (2007).
  109. G. S. Jenkins, D. C. Schmadel, A. B. Sushkov, G. D. Gu, H. Kontani, and H. D. Drew, Terahertz Hall measurements on optimally doped single-crystal Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x, Phys. Rev. B 82, 094518 (2010).
  110. Y. Hatsuda, H. Katsura, and Y. Tachikawa, Hofstadter's butterfly in quantum geometry, New J. Phys. 18, 103023 (2016).
  111. D. Ginsberg and J. Manson, The Hall effect in Y Ba2Cu3O7−δ and other high-temperature superconductors, Appl. Supercond. 2, 623 (1994).
  112. D. M. Ginsberg and J. T. Manson, Sign reversal of the Hall effect in untwinned single-crystal superconducting YBa2Cu3O7−δ, Phys. Rev. B 51, 515 (1995).
  113. S. Ullah and A. T. Dorsey, Effect of fluctuations on the transport properties of type-II superconductors in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 44, 262 (1991).
  114. A. T. Dorsey, Vortex motion and the Hall effect in type-II superconductors: A time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory approach, Phys. Rev. B 46, 8376 (1992).
  115. N. B. Kopnin, B. I. Ivlev, and V. A. Kalatsky, The flux-flow Hall effect in type II superconductors. An explanation of the sign reversal, J. Low Temp. Phys. 90, 1 (1993).
  116. D. Valentinis, RADAR4KIT, Superlinear Hall angle and carrier mobility from non-Boltzmann magnetotransport in the spatially disordered Yukawa-Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model on a square lattice - DATA (2026), https://dx.doi.org/10.35097/0cn5ptee2frgzws2.
  117. T. Azeyanagi, F. Ferrari, and F. I. S. Massolo, Phase diagram of planar matrix quantum mechanics, tensor, and Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 061602 (2018).
  118. A. A. Patel, M. J. Lawler, and E.-A. Kim, Coherent superconductivity with a large gap ratio from incoherent metals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 187001 (2018).
  119. A. A. Patel and S. Sachdev, Theory of a Planckian metal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 066601 (2019).
  120. H. Wang, A. L. Chudnovskiy, A. Gorsky, and A. Kamenev, Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev superconductivity: Quantum Kuramoto and generalized Richardson models, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033025 (2020).
  121. N. Sorokhaibam, Phase transition and chaos in charged SYK model, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 055.
  122. S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin-fluid ground state in a random quantum Heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993).
  123. J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D 94, 106002 (2016).
  124. X.-Y. Song, C.-M. Jian, and L. Balents, Strongly correlated metal built from Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 216601 (2017).
  125. L. Grunwald, SYK approach to non-Fermi Liquids and Incoherent Superconductivity, Ph.D. thesis, University of Aachen, 2022.
  126. For (z+μ)2=±(z+μ) in the complex plane, with z∈C, we pick the “principal branch” (z+μ)2=(z+μ).
  127. H. E. Fettis, On the reciprocal modulus relation for elliptic integrals, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 1, 524 (1970).
  128. DLMF, NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, edited by F. W. J. Olver, A. B. Olde Daalhuis, D. W. Lozier, B. I. Schneider, R. F. Boisvert, C. W. Clark, B. R. Miller, B. V. Saunders, H. S. Cohl, and M. A. McClain, release 1.2.4 of 2025-03-15, https://dlmf.nist.gov/.
  129. E. Kogan and G. Gumbs, Green's functions and DOS for some 2D lattices, Graphene 10, 1 (2021).
  130. A. A. Patel, J. McGreevy, D. P. Arovas, and S. Sachdev, Magnetotransport in a model of a disordered strange metal, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021049 (2018).
  131. J. Schmalian and P. G. Wolynes, Stripe glasses: Self-generated randomness in a uniformly frustrated system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 836 (2000).
  132. H. Westfahl, J. Schmalian, and P. G. Wolynes, Dynamical mean-field theory of quantum stripe glasses, Phys. Rev. B 68, 134203 (2003).
  133. Y. Gu, A. Kitaev, S. Sachdev, and G. Tarnopolsky, Notes on the complex Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2020) 157
  134. J. Kim, X. Cao, and E. Altman, Low-rank Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models, Phys. Rev. B 101, 125112 (2020).
  135. Y. Wang, Solvable strong-coupling quantum-dot model with a non-Fermi-liquid pairing transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 017002 (2020).
  136. D. Chowdhury and E. Berg, Intrinsic superconducting instabilities of a solvable model for an incoherent metal, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013301 (2020).
  137. P. Cha, N. Wentzell, O. Parcollet, A. Georges, and E.-A. Kim, Linear resistivity and Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK) spin liquid behavior in a quantum critical metal with spin-1/2 fermions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 18341 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation