Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Spin currents in crystals with spin-orbit coupling: Multiband effects in an effective Hamiltonian formalism

Kirill V. Samokhin1,*, Manfred Sigrist2, and Mark H. Fischer3

  • *Contact author: kirill.samokhin@brocku.ca

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013216 – Published 26 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/2nmp-8gdx

Abstract

When focusing on a few essential bands in an effective description of a material to calculate observable quantities, the respective operators have to be adjusted accordingly. Ignoring contributions arising from integrating out remote bands can lead to qualitatively wrong results. We present a detailed analysis of the interband mixing effects on spin currents. Specifically, we calculate the intrinsic spin current in a time-reversal invariant noncentrosymmetric crystal in the presence of electron-lattice spin-orbit coupling. Starting from formally exact microscopic expressions, we derive the spin-current operator restricted to one or more essential bands by iterative elimination of the contributions from distant bands. We show that the standard definition of the spin-current operator in terms of the group velocity obtained from an effective band Hamiltonian cannot be justified using a microscopic theory. The modified expression for the spin-current operator contains additional terms, which dominate the equilibrium spin current in a uniform crystal. We show that the magnitude of these additional terms can considerably exceed the spin current obtained using the standard definition.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (67)

  1. I. Žutić, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Spintronics: Fundamentals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323 (2004).
  2. D. Bercioux and P. Lucignano, Quantum transport in Rashba spin–orbit materials: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 106001 (2015).
  3. A. Avsar, H. Ochoa, F. Guinea, B. Özyilmaz, B. J. van Wees, and I. J. Vera-Marun, Spintronics in graphene and other two-dimensional material, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 021003 (2020).
  4. M. I. D’yakonov and V. I. Perel, Possibility of orienting electron spins with current, JETP Lett. 13, 467 (1971).
  5. J. E. Hirsch, Spin Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1834 (1999).
  6. S. Murakami, N. Nagaosa, and S.-C. Zhang, Dissipationless quantum spin current at room temperature, Science 301, 1348 (2003).
  7. J. Sinova, D. Culcer, Q. Niu, N. A. Sinitsyn, T. Jungwirth, and A. H. MacDonald, Universal intrinsic spin Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 126603 (2004).
  8. H.-A. Engel, E. I. Rashba, and B. I. Halperin, Theory of spin Hall effects in semiconductors, in Handbook of Magnetism and Advanced Magnetic Materials, edited by H. Kronmüller and S. Parkin (Wiley, New York, 2007).
  9. J. Sinova, S. O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C. H. Back, and T. Jungwirth, Spin Hall effects, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1213 (2015).
  10. E. I. Rashba, Spin currents in thermodynamic equilibrium: The challenge of discerning transport currents, Phys. Rev. B 68, 241315(R) (2003).
  11. A. Droghetti, I. Rungger, A. Rubio, and I. V. Tokatly, Spin-orbit induced equilibrium spin currents in materials, Phys. Rev. B 105, 024409 (2022).
  12. E. B. Sonin, Equilibrium spin currents in the Rashba medium, Phys. Rev. B 76, 033306 (2007).
  13. E. B. Sonin, Spin currents and spin superfluidity, Adv. Phys. 59, 181 (2010).
  14. E. B. Sonin, Proposal for measuring mechanically equilibrium spin currents in the Rashba medium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 266602 (2007).
  15. J. E. Hirsch, Overlooked contribution to the Hall effect in ferromagnetic metals, Phys. Rev. B 60, 14787 (1999).
  16. Q.-F. Sun, H. Guo, and J. Wang, Spin-current-induced electric field, Phys. Rev. B 69, 054409 (2004).
  17. Following the considerable precedent, see, e.g., Ref. [10], we use the dimensionless Pauli matrices instead of the spin angular momentum operators (ℏ/2)σ̂ in all definitions of the spin observables.
  18. I. V. Tokatly, Equilibrium spin currents: Non-Abelian gauge invariance and color diamagnetism in condensed matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 106601 (2008).
  19. R. Winkler, Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Two-Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems (Springer, Berlin, 2003).
  20. L. C. Lew Yan Voon and M. Willatzen, The k·p Method: Electronic Properties of Semiconductors (Springer, Berlin, 2009).
  21. E. I. Rashba and V. I. Sheka, Symmetry of energy bands in crystals of wurtzite type: II. Symmetry of bands with spin-orbit interaction included, Fiz. Tverd. Tela: Collected Papers 2, 162 (1959); G. Bihlmayer, O. Rader, and R. Winkler, Focus on the Rashba effect, New J. Phys. 17, 050202 (2015).
  22. E. O. Kane, Band structure of indium antimonide, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1, 249 (1957).
  23. L. C. Lew Yan Voon, M. Willatzen, M. Cardona, and N. E. Christensen, Terms linear in k in the band structure of wurtzite-type semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 53, 10703 (1996).
  24. L. Petersen and P. Hedegård, A simple tight-binding model of spin–orbit splitting of sp-derived surface states, Surf. Sci. 459, 49 (2000).
  25. N. Verma, P. J. W. Moll, T. Holder, and R. Queiroz, Quantum geometry: Revisiting electronic scales in quantum matter, preprint, arxiv:2504.07173.
  26. J. Yu, B. A. Bernevig, R. Queiroz, E. Rossi, P. Törmä, and B.-J. Yang, Quantum geometry in quantum materials, npj Quantum Mater. 10, 101 (2025).
  27. Yu A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, Properties of a 2D electron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy, JETP Lett. 39, 78 (1984).
  28. A. Manchon, H. C. Koo, J. Nitta, S. M. Frolov, and R. A. Duine, New perspectives for Rashba spin–orbit coupling, Nat. Mater. 14, 871 (2015).
  29. G. Dresselhaus, Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures, Phys. Rev. 100, 580 (1955).
  30. M. Smidman, M. B. Salamon, H. Q. Yuan, and D. F. Agterberg, Superconductivity and spin–orbit coupling in non-centrosymmetric materials: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 036501 (2017).
  31. K. V. Samokhin, On the pseudospin description of the electron Bloch bands, Ann. Phys. (NY) 407, 179 (2019).
  32. G. L. Bir and G. E. Pikus, Symmetry and Strain-Induced Effects in Semiconductors (Wiley, New York, 1974).
  33. J. M. Luttinger and W. Kohn, Motion of electrons and holes in perturbed periodic fields, Phys. Rev. 97, 869 (1955).
  34. C. Kittel, Quantum Theory of Solids (Wiley, New York, 1987).
  35. S. Peotta and P. Törmä, Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands, Nat. Commun. 6, 8944 (2015).
  36. L. Liang, T. I. Vanhala, S. Peotta, T. Siro, A. Harju, and P. Törmä, Band geometry, Berry curvature, and superfluid weight, Phys. Rev. B 95, 024515 (2017).
  37. J. R. Schrieffer and P. A.Wolff, Relation between the Anderson and Kondo Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. 149, 491 (1966).
  38. In a 2D noncentrosymmetric crystal, the lattice potential U(x,y,z) is periodic in x and y, but confining in z. The mirror reflection symmetry z→−z is absent, i.e., U(x,y,z)≠U(x,y,−z).
  39. J. Pereiro, A. Petrovic, C. Panagopoulos, and I. Božović, Interface superconductivity: History, development and prospects, Phys. Express 1, 208 (2011).
  40. S. Gariglio, M. Gabay, J. Mannhart, and J.-M. Triscone, Interface superconductivity, Physica C 514, 189 (2015).
  41. J. Liu, X. Qian, and L. Fu, Crystal field effect induced topological crystalline insulators in monolayer IV–VI semiconductors, Nano Lett. 15, 2657 (2015).
  42. P. Z. Hanakata, A. S. Rodin, A. Carvalho, H. S. Park, D. K. Campbell, and A. H. Castro Neto, Two-dimensional square buckled Rashba lead chalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 96, 161401(R) (2017).
  43. T. Zhang, P. Cheng, W.-J. Li, Y.-J. Sun, G. Wang, X.-G. Zhu, K. He, L. Wang, X. Ma, X. Chen, Y. Wang, Y. Liu, H.-Q. Lin, J.-F. Jia, and Q.-K. Xue, Superconductivity in one-atomic-layer metal films grown on Si(111), Nat. Phys. 6, 104 (2010).
  44. J.-F. Ge, Z.-L. Liu, C. Liu, C.-L. Gao, D. Qian, Q.-K. Xue, Y. Liu, and J.-F. Jia, Superconductivity above 100 K in single-layer FeSe films on doped SrTiO3, Nat. Mater. 14, 285 (2015).
  45. D. Huang and J. E. Hoffman, Monolayer FeSe on SrTiO3, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 8, 311 (2017).
  46. M. Ben Shalom, M. Sachs, D. Rakhmilevitch, A. Palevski, and Y. Dagan, Tuning spin-orbit coupling and superconductivity at the SrTiO3/LaAlO3 interface: A magnetotransport study, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 126802 (2010).
  47. A. D. Caviglia, M. Gabay, S. Gariglio, N. Reyren, C. Cancellieri, and J.-M. Triscone, Tunable Rashba spin-orbit interaction at oxide interfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 126803 (2010).
  48. Edited by E. Bauer and M. Sigrist, Noncentrosymmetric Superconductors: Introduction and Overview, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 847 (Springer, Heidelberg, 2012).
  49. M. Lax, Symmetry Principles in Solid State and Molecular Physics (Dover Publications, New York, 2001).
  50. M. Salluzzo, J. C. Cezar, N. B. Brookes, V. Bisogni, G. M. De Luca, C. Richter, S. Thiel, J. Mannhart, M. Huijben, A. Brinkman, G. Rijnders, and G. Ghiringhelli, Orbital reconstruction and the two-dimensional electron gas at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 166804 (2009).
  51. P. Delugas, A. Filippetti, V. Fiorentini, D. I. Bilc, D. Fontaine, and P. Ghosez, Spontaneous 2-dimensional carrier confinement at the n-type SrTiO3/LaAlO3 interface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 166807 (2011).
  52. For the sake of simpler expressions, we represent the dispersion of ɛ2(k) as isotropic, which corresponds to the situation where all other orbitals are infinitely remote in energy. This approximation has no influence on our conclusions.
  53. E. O. Kane, Energy band structure in p-type germanium and silicon, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1, 82 (1956).
  54. M. S. Bahramy, R. Arita, and N. Nagaosa, Origin of giant bulk Rashba splitting: Application to BiTeI, Phys. Rev. B 84, 041202(R) (2011).
  55. Y. Kim, R. M. Lutchyn, and C. Nayak, Origin and transport signatures of spin-orbit interactions in one- and two-dimensional SrTiO3-based heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 87, 245121 (2013).
  56. K. V. Shanavas, Z. S. Popović, and S. Satpathy, Theoretical model for Rashba spin-orbit interaction in d electrons, Phys. Rev. B 90, 165108 (2014).
  57. J. Fu, P. H. Penteado, D. R. Candido, G. J. Ferreira, D. P. Pires, E. Bernardes, and J. C. Egues, Spin-orbit coupling in wurtzite heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 101, 134416 (2020).
  58. V. A. Sablikov, A. A. Sukhanov, and Y. Y. Tkach, Equilibrium edge spin currents in two-dimensional electron systems with spin-orbit interaction, Phys. Rev. B 78, 153302 (2008).
  59. A. H. C. Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 (2009).
  60. K. S. Novoselov, A. Mishchenko, A. Carvalho, and A. H. Castro Neto, 2D materials and van der Waals heterostructures, Science 353, aac9439 (2016).
  61. J. Linder and J. W. A. Robinson, Superconducting spintronics, Nat. Phys. 11, 307 (2015).
  62. M. Eschrig, Spin-polarized supercurrents for spintronics: A review of current progress, Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 104501 (2015).
  63. J. J. He, K. Hiroki, K. Hamamoto, and N. Nagaosa, Spin supercurrent in two-dimensional superconductors with Rashba spin-orbit interaction, Commun. Phys. 2, 128 (2019).
  64. In some systems, e.g., in semiconductor heterostructures, inversion symmetry can also be broken by an applied electric field. Our theory can be straightforwardly extended to such cases.
  65. V. P. Mineev and G. E. Volovik, Electric dipole moment and spin supercurrent in superfluid He3, J. Low Temp. Phys. 89, 823 (1992).
  66. J. Fröhlich and U. M. Studer, Gauge invariance and current algebra in nonrelativistic many-body theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 733 (1993).
  67. B. W. A. Leurs, Z. Nazario, D. I. Santiago, and J. Zaanen, Non-Abelian hydrodynamics and the flow of spin in spin–orbit coupled substances, Ann. Phys. (NY) 323, 907 (2008).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation