Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Unfolding of exotic near-threshold structure and decay dynamics in B17

A. Volya1,*, S. M. Wang (王思敏)2,3,†, M. Płoszajczak4,‡, and Z. C. Xu (许志成)2,3,§

  • *Contact author: avolya@fsu.edu
  • †Contact author: wangsimin@fudan.edu.cn
  • ‡Contact author: marek.ploszajczak@ganil.fr
  • §Contact author: xuzhicheng@fudan.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013125 – Published 4 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/1mt3-jbf1

Abstract

Neutron-rich boron isotopes provide a valuable testing ground for threshold-driven structure and reaction phenomena, including halo formation and exotic decay modes. In particular, the structure of B17 and its relation to unbound B16 are of special interest. The B16 nucleus is slightly unbound by approximately 50 keV, while B17 is bound with a neutron separation energy of about 1.4–1.6 MeV. The observation of a 1640 keV γ ray in B17, which we argue originates from a 1/2− excited state, points to a remarkable situation in which γ decay and two-neutron decay can compete. We analyze and identify the main reasons for the competition: L=2 emission of the neutron pair and structural realignment driven by the proximity of the one-body threshold, in particular the nearby s-wave neutron decay channel. The decay is a unique near-threshold L=2 process in which multiple structural components contribute, each with coexisting direct and virtual sequential amplitudes whose interference governs the observables. Because threshold dynamics, continuum coupling, and interference of multiple quantum pathways are universal, closely related scenarios arise in ultracold atoms near Feshbach resonances, few-body atomic and molecular breakups, mesoscopic and photonic open systems, and other areas where open-quantum-system effects impact observables. We employ advanced theoretical models to study this first-of-its-kind case and provide a coherent theoretical perspective based on configuration interaction and complex-energy formalisms that incorporate both reaction continuum and structural effects near threshold.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (57)

  1. I. Rotter and J. P. Bird, A review of progress in the physics of open quantum systems: Theory and experiment, Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 114001 (2015).
  2. I. Mukha, E. Roeckl, L. Batist, A. Blazhev, J. Doring, H. Grawe, L. Grigorenko, M. Huyse, Z. Janas, R. Kirchner, M. La Commara, C. Mazzocchi, S. L. Tabor, and P. Van Duppen, Proton-proton correlations observed in two-proton radioactivity of Ag94, Nature (London) 439, 298 (2006).
  3. Z. Kohley, T. Baumann, D. Bazin, G. Christian, P. A. DeYoung, J. E. Finck, N. Frank, M. Jones, E. Lunderberg, B. Luther, S. Mosby, T. Nagi, J. K. Smith, J. Snyder, A. Spyrou, and M. Thoennessen, Study of two-neutron radioactivity in the decay of O26, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 152501 (2013).
  4. Y. Kondo, N. Achouri, H. Falou, et al., First observation of O28, Nature (London) 620, 965 (2023).
  5. R. J. Charity, et al., Strong evidence for N9 and the limits of existence of atomic nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 172501 (2023).
  6. G. Gamow, Zur Quantentheorie des Atomkernes, Z. Phys. 51, 204 (1928).
  7. E. P. Wigner, On the behavior of cross sections near thresholds, Phys. Rev. 73, 1002 (1948).
  8. G. Breit, Energy dependence of reactions at thresholds, Phys. Rev. 107, 1612 (1957).
  9. F. C. Barker, A model for nuclear threshold levels, Proc. Phys. Soc. 84, 681 (1964).
  10. N. Michel, W. Nazarewicz, and M. Płoszajczak, Threshold effects in multichannel coupling and spectroscopic factors in exotic nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 75, 031301(R) (2007).
  11. N. Michel, W. Nazarewicz, M. Płoszajczak, and T. Vertse, Shell model in the complex energy plane, J. Phys. G 36, 013101 (2009).
  12. J. P. L. Fernandez, N. Michel, and M. Płoszajczak, Clusterization in nuclear states at the edge of stability, EPJ Web Conf. 311, 00016 (2024).
  13. J. P. L. Fernandez, Collective phenomena at the particle emission thresholds, Ph.D. thesis, Normandie Université, 2023.
  14. H. Feshbach, Unified theory of nuclear reactions, Ann. Phys. (NY) 5, 357 (1958).
  15. U. Fano, Effects of configuration interaction on intensities and phase shifts, Phys. Rev. 124, 1866 (1961).
  16. T. Köhler, K. Góral, and P. S. Julienne, Production of cold molecules via magnetically tunable Feshbach resonances, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 1311 (2006).
  17. C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1225 (2010).
  18. C. R. Hoffman, B. P. Kay, and J. P. Schiffer, Neutron s states in loosely bound nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 89, 061305(R) (2014).
  19. R. Kalpakchieva, H. Bohlen, W. von Oertzen, B. Gebauer, M. von Lucke-Petsch, T. Massey, A. Ostrowski, T. Stolla, M. Wilpert, and T. Wilpert, Spectroscopy of B13, B14, B15 and B16 using multi-nucleon transfer reactions, Eur. Phys. J. A 7, 451 (2000).
  20. R. Kanungo, et al., Excited states in neutron rich boron isotopes, Phys. Lett. B 608, 206 (2005).
  21. R. A. Kryger, A. Azhari, J. Brown, J. Caggiano, M. Hellström, J. H. Kelley, B. M. Sherrill, M. Steiner, and M. Thoennessen, Upper limit of the lifetime of B16, Phys. Rev. C 53, 1971 (1996).
  22. F. M. Marqués, et al., Structure beyond the dripline in the boron isotopes 16,18,20,21B, JPS Conf. Proc., 6, 020002 (2015).
  23. N. Mozumdar, Search for near-threshold multi-neutron resonances with (p,2p) reactions in neutron-rich nuclei at R3B, Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, 2025.
  24. Z. H. Yang, et al., Quasifree neutron knockout reaction reveals a small s-orbital component in the Borromean nucleus B17, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 082501 (2021).
  25. H. T. Fortune, Resonances in B16, Phys. Rev. C 97, 024328 (2018).
  26. Z. H. Yang, et al., Helium-helium clustering states in Be12, Phys. Rev. C 91, 024304 (2015).
  27. M. Wang, G. Audi, A. H. Wapstra, F. G. Kondev, M. MacCormick, X. Xu, and B. Pfeiffer, The Ame2012 atomic mass evaluation, Chin. Phys. C 36, 1603 (2012).
  28. Evaluated nuclear structure data file (ENSDF), http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/ensdf/.
  29. Y. Kondo, et al., In-beam γ-ray spectroscopy of neutron-rich boron isotopes B15,17 via inelastic scattering on C12, Phys. Rev. C 71, 044611 (2005).
  30. J. Gibelin, États résonants de noyaux loin de la stabilité, HDR thesis, Université de Caen Normandie, 2018.
  31. J. Okołowicz, M. Płoszajczak, and W. Nazarewicz, Convenient location of a near-threshold proton-emitting resonance in B11, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 042502 (2020).
  32. A. Volya, M. Barbui, V. Z. Goldberg, and G. V. Rogachev, Superradiance in alpha clustered mirror nuclei, Commun. Phys. 5, 322 (2022).
  33. N. Michel, W. Nazarewicz, M. Płoszajczak, and K. Bennaceur, Gamow shell model description of neutron-rich nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 042502 (2002).
  34. N. Michel and M. Płoszajczak, Gamow Shell Model, The Unified Theory of Nuclear Structure and Reactions, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer, Cham, 2021), Vol. 983.
  35. C. Yuan, T. Suzuki, T. Otsuka, F. Xu, and N. Tsunoda, Shell-model study of boron, carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen isotopes with a monopole-based universal interaction, Phys. Rev. C 85, 064324 (2012).
  36. R. S. Lubna, K. Kravvaris, S. L. Tabor, V. Tripathi, A. Volya, E. Rubino, J. M. Allmond, B. Abromeit, L. T. Baby, and T. C. Hensley, Structure of Cl38 and the quest for a comprehensive shell model interaction, Phys. Rev. C 100, 034308 (2019).
  37. R. S. Lubna, K. Kravvaris, S. L. Tabor, V. Tripathi, E. Rubino, and A. Volya, Evolution of the N=20 and 28 shell gaps and two-particle-two-hole states in the FSU interaction, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043342 (2020).
  38. B. S. Hu, Q. Wu, J. G. Li, Y. Z. Ma, Z. H. Sun, N. Michel, and F. R. Xu, An ab-initio Gamow shell model approach with a core, Phys. Lett. B 802, 135206 (2020).
  39. Z. C. Xu, S. Zhang, J. G. Li, S. L. Jin, Q. Yuan, Z. H. Cheng, N. Michel, and F. R. Xu, Complex valence-space effective operators for observables: The Gamow-Teller transition, Phys. Rev. C 108, L031301 (2023).
  40. A. Volya, Physics of unstable nuclei: From structure to sequential decays, EPJ Web Conf. 38, 03003 (2012).
  41. J. D. Bowman, A. M. Poskanzer, R. G. Korteling, and G. W. Butler, Detection of neutron-excess isotopes of low-Z elements produced in high-energy nuclear reactions, Phys. Rev. C 9, 836 (1974).
  42. J. L. Lecouey, N. A. Orr, F. M. Marqués, N. L. Achouri, J. C. Angélique, B. A. Brown, F. Carstoiu, W. N. Catford, N. M. Clarke, M. Freer, B. R. Fulton, S. Grévy, F. Hanappe, K. L. Jones, M. Labiche, R. C. Lemmon, A. Ninane, E. Sauvan, K. M. Spohr, and L. Stuttgé, Single-proton removal reaction study of 16B, Phys. Lett. B 672, 6 (2009).
  43. S. M. Wang, N. Michel, W. Nazarewicz, and F. R. Xu, Structure and decays of nuclear three-body systems: The Gamow coupled-channel method in Jacobi coordinates, Phys. Rev. C 96, 044307 (2017).
  44. S. M. Wang, W. Nazarewicz, R. J. Charity, and L. G. Sobotka, Nucleon-nucleon correlations in the extreme oxygen isotopes, J. Phys. G 49, 10LT02 (2022).
  45. S. M. Wang, W. Nazarewicz, R. J. Charity, and L. G. Sobotka, Structure and decay of the extremely proton-rich nuclei O11,12, Phys. Rev. C 99, 054302 (2019).
  46. T. Berggren, On the use of resonant states in eigenfunction expansions of scattering and reaction amplitudes, Nucl. Phys. A 109, 265 (1968).
  47. J.-M. Sparenberg and D. Baye, Supersymmetry between phase-equivalent coupled-channel potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3802 (1997).
  48. M. Pfützner, I. Mukha, and S. M. Wang, Two-proton emission and related phenomena, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 132, 104050 (2023).
  49. L. Zhou, D. Q. Fang, S. M. Wang, and Y. G. Ma, Recent progress in two-proton radioactivity, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 33, 105 (2022).
  50. S. M. Wang and W. Nazarewicz, Fermion pair dynamics in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 142501 (2021).
  51. Y. Kondo, et al., Nucleus O26: A barely unbound system beyond the drip line, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 102503 (2016).
  52. K. Hebeler, S. K. Bogner, R. J. Furnstahl, A. Nogga, and A. Schwenk, Improved nuclear matter calculations from chiral low-momentum interactions, Phys. Rev. C 83, 031301(R) (2011).
  53. S. R. Stroberg, J. D. Holt, A. Schwenk, and J. Simonis, Ab initio limits of atomic nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 022501 (2021).
  54. T. Miyagi, S. R. Stroberg, P. Navrátil, K. Hebeler, and J. D. Holt, Converged ab initio calculations of heavy nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 105, 014302 (2022).
  55. G. Hagen, M. Hjorth-Jensen, and N. Michel, Gamow shell model and realistic nucleon-nucleon interactions, Phys. Rev. C 73, 064307 (2006).
  56. S. Zhang, F. R. Xu, J. G. Li, B. S. Hu, Z. H. Cheng, N. Michel, Y. Z. Ma, Q. Yuan, and Y. H. Zhang, Ab initio descriptions of A=16 mirror nuclei with resonance and continuum coupling, Phys. Rev. C 108, 064316 (2023).
  57. D. R. Thompson, M. Lemere, and Y. C. Tang, Systematic investigation of scattering problems with the resonating-group method, Nucl. Phys. A 286, 53 (1977).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation