Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Explosive connectivity and mechanical rigidity in cubic lattice structures

Trenton Lau* and Gary P. T. Choi†

  • *Contact author: trentonlau@link.cuhk.edu.hk
  • †Contact author: ptchoi@cuhk.edu.hk

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 043134 – Published 6 November, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/1fr3-bbxr

Abstract

We study explosive connectivity and mechanical rigidity in three-dimensional cubic lattice structures under Achlioptas-type product-rule dynamics. Our work combines extensive numerical simulation with a theoretical framework based on rigorous finite-size scaling. Using massive-scale simulations up to L=192 (N≈7×106) with 20 000 independent realizations, we demonstrate that for k≥8, the peak susceptibility scales with an exponent of γ=1.000, and the maximum single-step jump stabilizes at a macroscopic fraction. This confirms that while the transition is continuous in the infinite thermodynamic limit, it exhibits the exact finite-size scaling signatures of a first-order discontinuity in finite physical systems. For rigidity, we discover numerically that for richly connected hosts, increasing the number of choices k optimally enhances the efficiency of rigidification. To explain this phenomenon, we propose a theoretical model centered on a conditional progress function that links an edge’s local product-rule score to its global mechanical utility. We show that while local rigidification efficiency monotonically increases, the global rigidity gap exhibits a “Goldilocks” minimum at intermediate k due to the emergence of maximally floppy, treelike components at large k. Altogether, our work provides new insights into the relationship between local dynamics and global connectivity and rigidity in cubic lattice structures via both theory and computation.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (69)

  1. D. Stauffer and A. Aharony, Introduction to Percolation Theory (Taylor & Francis, London, 2018).
  2. K. Christensen and N. R. Moloney, Complexity and Criticality (Imperial College Press, London, 2005), Vol. 1.
  3. M. Majewski and K. Malarz, Square lattice site percolation thresholds for complex neighbourhoods, Acta Phys. Pol. B 38, 2191 (2007).
  4. N. A. M. Araújo, P. Grassberger, B. Kahng, K. J. Schrenk, and R. M. Ziff, Recent advances and open challenges in percolation, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 223, 2307 (2014).
  5. Z. Xun and R. M. Ziff, Bond percolation on simple cubic lattices with extended neighborhoods, Phys. Rev. E 102, 012102 (2020).
  6. M. Meloni, M. J. Large, J. M. González Domínguez, S. Victor-Román, G. Fratta, E. Istif, O. Tomes, J. P. Salvage, C. P. Ewels, M. Pelaez-Fernandez, R. Arenal, A. Benito, W. K. Maser, A. A. K. King, P. M. Ajayan, S. P. Ogilvie, and A. B. Dalton, Explosive percolation yields highly-conductive polymer nanocomposites, Nat. Commun. 13, 6872 (2022).
  7. M. Sahimi, Applications of Percolation Theory, Applied Mathematical Sciences (Springer, Cham, 2023), Vol. 213.
  8. D. Achlioptas, R. M. D’Souza, and J. Spencer, Explosive percolation in random networks, Science 323, 1453 (2009).
  9. R. M. Ziff, Explosive growth in biased dynamic percolation on two-dimensional regular lattice networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 045701 (2009).
  10. R. A. da Costa, S. N. Dorogovtsev, A. V. Goltsev, and J. F. F. Mendes, Explosive percolation transition is actually continuous, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 255701 (2010).
  11. F. Radicchi and S. Fortunato, Explosive percolation: A numerical analysis, Phys. Rev. E 81, 036110 (2010).
  12. Y. S. Cho and B. Kahng, Suppression effect on explosive percolation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 275703 (2011).
  13. L. Yang and M. Li, Emergence of biconnected clusters in explosive percolation, Phys. Rev. E 110, 014122 (2024).
  14. O. Riordan and L. Warnke, Explosive percolation is continuous, Science 333, 322 (2011).
  15. H. K. Lee, B. J. Kim, and H. Park, Continuity of the explosive percolation transition, Phys. Rev. E 84, 020101(R) (2011).
  16. R. M. D’Souza and J. Nagler, Anomalous critical and supercritical phenomena in explosive percolation, Nat. Phys. 11, 531 (2015).
  17. R. M. D’Souza, J. Gómez-Gardeñes, J. Nagler, and A. Arenas, Explosive phenomena in complex networks, Adv. Phys. 68, 123 (2019).
  18. M. Li, J. Wang, and Y. Deng, Explosive percolation in finite dimensions, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033319 (2024).
  19. S. D. S. Reis, A. A. Moreira, and J. S. Andrade, Jr., Nonlocal product rules for percolation, Phys. Rev. E 85, 041112 (2012).
  20. W. Choi, H. Chae, S.-H. Yook, and Y. Kim, Dimensional dependence of phase transitions in explosive percolation, Phys. Rev. E 90, 022123 (2014).
  21. L. Asimow and B. Roth, The rigidity of graphs, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 245, 279 (1978).
  22. C. Moukarzel, An efficient algorithm for testing the generic rigidity of graphs in the plane, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 29, 8079 (1996).
  23. J. Cheng and M. Sitharam, Maxwell-independence: A new rank estimate for the 3-dimensional generic rigidity matroid, J. Comb. Theor. Ser. B 105, 26 (2014).
  24. D. J. Jacobs and B. Hendrickson, An algorithm for two-dimensional rigidity percolation: The pebble game, J. Comput. Phys. 137, 346 (1997).
  25. A. Lee and I. Streinu, Pebble game algorithms and sparse graphs, Discrete Math. 308, 1425 (2008).
  26. M. V. Chubynsky and M. F. Thorpe, Algorithms for three-dimensional rigidity analysis and a first-order percolation transition, Phys. Rev. E 76, 041135 (2007).
  27. R. Li and G. P. T. Choi, Explosive rigidity percolation in origami, Proc. R. Soc. A 481, 20240826 (2025).
  28. R. Li and G. P. T. Choi, Rigidity control of general origami structures, Commun. Phys. 9, 217 (2026).
  29. G. P. T. Choi, L. Liu, and L. Mahadevan, Explosive rigidity percolation in kirigami, Proc. R. Soc. A 479, 20220798 (2023).
  30. M. Li, J. Wang, and Y. Deng, Explosive percolation obeys standard finite-size scaling in an event-based ensemble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 147101 (2023).
  31. G. P. T. Choi, S. Chen, and L. Mahadevan, Control of connectivity and rigidity in prismatic assemblies, Proc. R. Soc. A 476, 20200485 (2020).
  32. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/1fr3-bbxr for Videos 1–9 and a file containing movie descriptions, additional details on theoretical analysis, and experimental results, which includes Refs. [33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50].
  33. J. A. Tropp, An introduction to matrix concentration inequalities, Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 8, 1 (2015).
  34. H. Duminil-Copin, Sharp threshold phenomena in statistical physics, Jpn. J. Math. 14, 1 (2019).
  35. W. Perkins, Searching for (sharp) thresholds in random structures: Where are we now? Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 62, 113 (2025).
  36. E. Friedgut and J. Bourgain, Sharp thresholds of graph properties, and the k-sat problem, J. Am. Math. Soc. 12, 1017 (1999).
  37. A. Lew, E. Nevo, Y. Peled, and O. E. Raz, Sharp threshold for rigidity of random graphs, Bull. London Math. Soc. 55, 490 (2023).
  38. M. Krivelevich, A. Lew, and P. Michaeli, Rigid partitions: From high connectivity to random graphs, J. Comb. Theor. Ser. B 175, 126 (2025).
  39. Y. Peled and N. Peleg, On the rigidity of random graphs in high-dimensional spaces, Eur. J. Comb. 139, 104460 (2027).
  40. M. Molloy and B. Reed, A critical point for random graphs with a given degree sequence, Random Struct. Algor. 6, 161 (1995).
  41. M. Molloy and B. Reed, The size of the giant component of a random graph with a given degree sequence, Combinator Probab. Comp. 7, 295 (1998).
  42. M. F. Thorpe and P. M. Duxbury, Rigidity Theory and Applications (Springer Science & Business Media, New York, NY, 2002).
  43. B. Bollobás, Random graphs, in Modern Graph Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Springer, New York, NY, 1998), Vol. 184, pp. 215–252.
  44. S. Boucheron, G. Lugosi, and P. Massart, Concentration Inequalities: A Nonasymptotic Theory of Independence (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013).
  45. Y. Xing and K. H. Johansson, Concentration in gossip opinion dynamics over random graphs, SIAM J. Control Optim. 62, 1521 (2024).
  46. R. Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019), Vol. 49.
  47. P. Grassberger, C. Christensen, G. Bizhani, S.-W. Son, and M. Paczuski, Explosive percolation is continuous, but with unusual finite size behavior, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 225701 (2011).
  48. H. Chae, S.-H. Yook, and Y. Kim, Explosive percolation on the Bethe lattice, Phys. Rev. E 85, 051118 (2012).
  49. Y. S. Cho, Explosive percolation on the Bethe lattice is ordinary, Eur. Phys. J. B 97, 58 (2024).
  50. M. Olvera-Cravioto, Strong couplings for static locally tree-like random graphs, J. Appl. Probab. 59, 1261 (2022).
  51. J. E. Graver, B. Servatius, and H. Servatius, Combinatorial Rigidity, Graduate Studies in Mathematics (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1993), Vol. 2.
  52. D. Garamvölgyi, S. J. Gortler, and T. Jordán, Globally rigid graphs are fully reconstructible, Forum Math. Sigma 10, e51 (2022).
  53. G. Laman, On graphs and rigidity of plane skeletal structures, J. Eng. Math. 4, 331 (1970).
  54. J. Cruickshank, B. Jackson, T. Jordán, and S.-I. Tanigawa, Rigidity of graphs and frameworks: A matroid theoretic approach, in Surveys in Combinatorics 2026, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, edited by A. Gagarin, R. Behrend, M. Lettington, and I. Aliev (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2026), Vol. 505, pp. 189–230.
  55. N. Javerzat and D. Notarmuzi, Fast algorithm for 2D rigidity percolation, Phys. Rev. X 16, 031032 (2026).
  56. M. Lu, Y. Song, Q. Shi, M. Li, and Y. Deng, Dynamic Monte Carlo study of rigidity percolation using an event-based ensemble approach, Phys. Rev. E 113, 064141 (2026).
  57. K. Binder, Finite size scaling analysis of Ising model block distribution functions, Z. Phys. B 43, 119 (1981).
  58. B. Efron, Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife, in Breakthroughs in Statistics, Springer Series in Statistics, edited by S. Kotz and N. L. Johnson (Springer, New York, NY, 1992), pp. 569–593.
  59. M. E. J. Newman and R. M. Ziff, Fast Monte Carlo algorithm for site or bond percolation, Phys. Rev. E 64, 016706 (2001).
  60. A. Goerdt, The giant component threshold for random regular graphs with edge faults, Theor. Comput. Sci. 259, 307 (2001).
  61. L. Lichev, D. Mitsche, and G. Perarnau, Percolation on dense random graphs with given degrees, J. Comb. Theor. Ser. B 167, 250 (2024).
  62. A. Lew, E. Nevo, Y. Peled, and O. E. Raz, Rigidity expander graphs, Combinatorica 45, 24 (2025).
  63. A. Frieze and M. Karoński, Introduction to Random Graphs (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015).
  64. K. Binder and D. P. Landau, Finite-size scaling at first-order phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 30, 1477 (1984).
  65. G. Lois, J. Blawzdziewicz, and C. S. O’Hern, Jamming transition and new percolation universality classes in particulate systems with attraction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 028001 (2008).
  66. P. S. Noerr, J. E. Zamora Alvarado, F. Golnaraghi, K. E. McCloskey, A. Gopinathan, and K. Dasbiswas, Optimal mechanical interactions direct multicellular network formation on elastic substrates, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2301555120 (2023).
  67. P. Mehta, M. Bukov, C.-H. Wang, A. G. Day, C. Richardson, C. K. Fisher, and D. J. Schwab, A high-bias, low-variance introduction to machine learning for physicists, Phys. Rep. 810, 1 (2019).
  68. R. Ghrist, Barcodes: The persistent topology of data, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 45, 61 (2008).
  69. T. Lau and G. P. T. Choi, Explosive connectivity and mechanical rigidity in cubic lattice structures, GitHub, 2026, https://github.com/garyptchoi/cubic-lattice-percolation.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation