Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Exploring physics teacher identity: Pathways toward equitable instruction among teachers

Clausell Mathis

Jomo Mutegi

Turhan Carroll

Maya Patel

Andrea Wooley

  • Department of Workforce Education and Instructional Technology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020123 – Published 8 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qmv3-jwm2

Abstract

Physics teacher identity encompasses teachers’ beliefs and views toward being a physics teacher. Physics teacher identity is influenced by teachers’ perspectives on physics teaching and learning. Previous studies on teacher identity in general suggest that the construct is complex and malleable. Studies further suggest that it influences instructional methods, student engagement, and classroom environment. However, within physics education, there has yet to be an examination of how physics teacher identity influences “equitable” teaching approaches. This qualitative study sought to identify various dimensions of physics teacher identity and its implications for physics education research. We interviewed secondary and postsecondary physics teachers (n=10) from different regions of the country with varying years of experience. We searched for consistent themes regarding the influence of physics teacher identity on equitable instruction using a conceptual framework that examines conceptions of self, others, knowledge, and pedagogy. Findings showed that teachers held a variety of conceptions of self and others, while many struggled to describe their conceptions of knowledge and pedagogy. Our findings are significant for physics teachers, educators, and researchers aiming to employ equitable teaching strategies. Ultimately, this study fostered a deeper understanding of the relationship between physics teacher identity and equitable instruction.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (34)

  1. D. Beijaard, P. C. Meijer, and N. Verloop, Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity, Teach. Teach. Educ. 20, 107 (2004).
  2. T. Van Lankveld et al., Developing a teacher identity in the university context: A systematic review of the literature, J. Higher Educ. Res. Dev. 36, 325 (2017).
  3. L. Avraamidou, Studying science teacher identity: Current insights and future research directions, Stud. Sci. Educ. 50, 2 (2014).
  4. C. Beauchamp and L. Thomas, Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education, Cambridge J. Educ. 39, 175 (2009).
  5. J. L. Chen and F. M. Mensah, Teaching contexts that influence elementary preservice teachers’ teacher and science teacher identity development, J. Sci. Teach. Educ. 29, 420 (2018).
  6. J. Y. Hong, Pre-service and beginning teachers’ professional identity and its relation to dropping out of the profession, Teach. Teach. Educ. 26, 1530 (2010).
  7. S. F. Akkerman and P. C. Meijer, A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity, Teach. Teach. Educ. 27, 308 (2011).
  8. L. Eicher, Science teacher identity development throughout a yearlong clinical placement and into the first year of teaching, Doctoral dissertation, Clemson University, 2021.
  9. T. K. Carroll et al., Facilitator STEM teacher identity development via online informal STEM education during the (COVID)-19 era, Career Tech. Educ. Res. 48, 1 (2023).
  10. C. Kavrayici, Evaluation of the factors affecting teacher identity development of pre-service teachers: A mixed method study, Eurasian J. Educ. Res. 20, 1 (2020).
  11. M. Varelas, R. House, and S. Wenzel, Beginning teachers immersed into science: Scientist and science teacher identities, Sci. Educ. 89, 492 (2005).
  12. A. L. Luehmann, Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation, Sci. Educ. 91, 822 (2007).
  13. A. J. Rodriguez and D. Morrison, Expanding and enacting transformative meanings of equity, diversity and social justice in science education, Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ. 14, 265 (2019).
  14. A. Szostkowski and B. Upadhyay, Looking forward by looking back: Equity in science education as socially just and morally healing action, Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ. 14, 335 (2019).
  15. K. Schenkel, A. C. Barton, E. Tan, C. R. Nazar, and M. D. G. D. Flores, Framing equity through a closer examination of critical science agency, Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ. 14, 309 (2019).
  16. G. Ladson-Billings, Matchmaking: The dynamics of high school tracking decisions, Am. Educ. Res. J. 32, 3 (1995).
  17. J. W. Mutegi, D. Smith-Mutegi, and N. Lewis, Fostering expansive and connective sensemaking with preservice secondary science teachers, J. Teach. Educ. 33, 888 (2022).
  18. J. L. Berger and K. Lêvan, Emotional intelligence and professional identity of student teachers during practicum, Educ. Stud. Math. 45, 2 (2019).
  19. J. L. Chen and F. M. Mensah, Teaching contexts that influence elementary preservice teachers’ teacher and science teacher identity development, J. Sci. Teach. Educ. 29, 420 (2018).
  20. J. L. Chen and F. M. Mensah, Toward socially just science teaching through professional development: The science teacher identity development and agency of two elementary teachers of color, Sci. Educ. 106, 385 (2022).
  21. A. J. Rodriguez, S. Tolbert, and S. L. Mark, Qualitatively recognizing the dimensions of student environmental identity development within the classroom context, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 61, 3 (2024).
  22. J. B. Underwood and F. M. Mensah, Disentangling the meaning of STEM: Implications for science education and science teacher education, J. Sci. Teach. Educ. 29, 1 (2018).
  23. N. Mockler, Discussing discussion: A video club in the service of math teachers’ national board preparation, Teach. Teach. Educ. 17, 5 (2011).
  24. A. G. Thompson, Teachers’ Beliefs and Conceptions: A Synthesis of the Research (National Council of Mathematics, 1992).
  25. E. Parsons, Positionality of African Americans and a theoretical accommodation of it: Rethinking science education research, Sci. Educ. 92, 1127 (2008).
  26. J. W. Mutegi and L. O. Momanyi, Windows and mirrors: Three images of the US science curriculum as reflected through Kenya’s Jua Kali, Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ. 15, 861 (2020).
  27. T. Nkrumah and J. W. Mutegi, Exploring racial equity in the science education journal review process, Sci. Educ. 106, 1249 (2022).
  28. J. W. Mutegi and M. N. Atwater, Theorizing racism to advance science education research for people of African descent, Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ. 17, 211 (2022).
  29. J. Davis, V. R. Bannister, and J. W. Mutegi, Hip-hop and mathematics: A critical review of schooling hip-hop: Expanding hip-hop based education across the curriculum, J. Urban Math. Educ. 7, 96 (2014).
  30. J. W. Mutegi, J. A. Phelps-Moultrie, and V. R. P. Bannister, The snare of systemic racism and other challenges confronting hip-hop-based pedagogy, Teach. Coll. Rec. 120, 1 (2018).
  31. J. W. Mutegi, C. H. Morton, and L. K. Etienne, Reconceptualizing science education for learners of African descent, in Centering Race in the STEM Education of African American K-12 Learners (Peter Lang Group, New York, NY, 2019), pp. 71–93, https://www.peterlang.com/document/1057550.
  32. M. Bang, B. Brown, A. Calabrese Barton, A. S. Rosebery, and B. Warren, Toward more equitable learning in science, in Helping Students Make Sense of the World Using Next Generation Science and Engineering Practices (National Science Teachers Association, 2017), pp. 33–58.
  33. A. Anderson, B. Aronson, and S. Ellison, Assessing systemic inequity: Teacher perspectives, solutions, and “radical possibilities”, Urban Rev. 54, 113 (2022).
  34. C. Mathis, A. Daane, B. Rodriguez, J. Hernandez, and T. Huynh, How instructors can view knowledge to implement culturally relevant pedagogy, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 19, 010105 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation