- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Physics Education Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Motivating reflection in problem solving: Homework corrections in upper-division physics courses

Molly Griston* and Bethany R. Wilcox

  • *Contact author: molly.griston@colorado.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020113 – Published 30 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/ntvp-spkc

Abstract

Despite the recognition that reflection is an essential part of problem solving, it is often not emphasized in upper-division physics courses. In this paper, we discuss homework corrections (HWCs) as a pedagogical tool to motivate reflection on homework assignments. We focus on gaining a qualitative understanding of how students may engage with the process of homework corrections, considering potential impacts on content understanding, metacognitive skills, and affect. To do so, we present three comparative case studies to elucidate different aspects of student engagement with HWCs; we also present descriptive statistics of participation in HWCs. We find that HWCs can be a useful pedagogical tool, but more scaffolding may be necessary to support students in identifying and learning from their mistakes, even in upper-division courses.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (47)

  1. C. D. Zepeda, J. E. Richey, P. Ronevich, and T. J. Nokes-Malach, Direct instruction of metacognition benefits adolescent science learning, transfer, and motivation: An in vivo study, J. Educ. Psychol. 107, 954 (2015).
  2. S. Avargil, R. Lavi, and Y. J. Dori, Students’ metacognition and metacognitive strategies in science education, in Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education: Learning, Teaching and Assessment (2018), p. 33, 10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4
  3. F. Reif and J. I. Heller, Knowledge structure and problem solving in physics, Educ. Psychol. 17, 102 (1982).
  4. J. Tuminaro and E. F. Redish, Elements of a cognitive model of physics problem solving: Epistemic games, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 020101 (2007).
  5. J. L. Docktor, N. E. Strand, J. P. Mestre, and B. H. Ross, Conceptual problem solving in high school physics, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 11, 020106 (2015).
  6. A. E. Leak, S. L. Rothwell, J. Olivera, B. Zwickl, J. Vosburg, and K. N. Martin, Examining problem solving in physics-intensive Ph.D. research, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13, 020101 (2017).
  7. E. Burkholder, J. Miles, T. Layden, K. Wang, A. Fritz, and C. Wieman, Template for teaching and assessment of problem solving in introductory physics, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16, 010123 (2020).
  8. A. R. Mota, N. Didiş Körhasan, K. Miller, and E. Mazur, Homework as a metacognitive tool in an undergraduate physics course, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 010136 (2019).
  9. A. Reinhard, A. Felleson, P. C. Turner, and M. Green, Assessing the impact of metacognitive postreflection exercises on problem-solving skillfulness, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18, 010109 (2022).
  10. A. Mason and C. Singh, Do advanced physics students learn from their mistakes without explicit intervention?, Am. J. Phys. 78, 760 (2010).
  11. Q. Zhang and L. Fiorella, An integrated model of learning from errors, Educ. Psychol. 58, 18 (2023).
  12. H. L. Andrade, A critical review of research on student self-assessment, Front. Educ. 4, 87 (2019).
  13. E. Yerushalmi, C. Singh, B. S. Eylon, L. Hsu, C. Henderson, and L. McCullough, Physics learning in the context of scaffolded diagnostic tasks (I): The experimental setup, AIP Conf. Proc. 951, 27 (2007).
  14. C. Singh, E. Yerushalmi, and B. S. Eylon, Physics learning in the context of scaffolded diagnostic tasks (II): Preliminary results, AIP Conf. Proc. 951, 31 (2007).
  15. E. Cohen, A. Mason, C. Singh, and E. Yerushalmi, Identifying differences in diagnostic skills between physics students: Students’ self-diagnostic performance given alternative scaffolding, AIP Conf. Proc. 1064, 99 (2008).
  16. E. Yerushalmi, A. Mason, E. Cohen, and C. Singh, Effect of self-diagnosis on subsequent problem solving performance, AIP Conf. Proc. 1064, 53 (2008).
  17. E. Yerushalmi, A. Mason, E. Cohen, and C. Singh, Self-diagnosis, scaffolding and transfer in a more conventional introductory physics problem, AIP Conf. Proc. 1179, 23 (2009).
  18. A. Mason, E. Cohen, C. Singh, and E. Yerushalmi, Self-diagnosis, scaffolding and transfer: A tale of two problems, AIP Conf. Proc. 1179, 27 (2009).
  19. E. Yerushalmi, E. Cohen, A. Mason, and C. Singh, What do students do when asked to diagnose their mistakes? Does it help them? I. An atypical quiz context, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 020109 (2012).
  20. E. Yerushalmi, E. Cohen, A. Mason, and C. Singh, What do students do when asked to diagnose their mistakes? Does it help them? II. A more typical quiz context, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res 8, 020110 (2012).
  21. R. Safadi and E. Yerushalmi, Students’ self-diagnosis using worked-out examples, Creat. Educ. 04, 205 (2013).
  22. B. R. Brown, A. Mason, and C. Singh, Improving performance in quantum mechanics with explicit incentives to correct mistakes, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 010121 (2016).
  23. A. Mason, E. Yerushalmi, E. Cohen, and C. Singh, Learning from mistakes: The effect of students’ written self-diagnoses on subsequent problem solving, Phys. Teach. 54, 87 (2016).
  24. R. Safadi, Designing efficient self-diagnosis activities in the physics classroom, Phys. Teach. 55, 575 (2017).
  25. A. J. Mason and J. S. Colton, Reworking exam problems to incentivize improved performance in upper-division electrodynamics, presented at PER Conf. 2022, Grand Rapids, MI, 10.1119/perc.2022.pr.Mason.
  26. A. J. Mason, J. M. McCardell, P. A. White, and J. S. Colton, Improving performance in upper-division electricity and magnetism with explicit incentives to correct mistakes, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 19, 020104 (2023).
  27. G. Steuer, G. Rosentritt-Brunn, and M. Dresel, Dealing with errors in mathematics classrooms: Structure and relevance of perceived error climate, Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 38, 196 (2013).
  28. M. Griston and B. R. Wilcox, Homework corrections in upper-division physics courses: student and instructor motivations, presented at PER Conf. 2024, Boston, MA, 10.1119/perc.2024.pr.Griston.
  29. S. Salehi, Improving problem-solving through reflection, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, 2018.
  30. A. M. Price, C. J. Kim, E. W. Burkholder, A. V. Fritz, and C. E. Wieman, A detailed characterization of the expert problem-solving process in science and engineering: Guidance for teaching and assessment, CBE-Life Sci. Educ. 20, ar43 (2021).
  31. A. R. Warren, Impact of teaching students to use evaluation strategies, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 6, 020103 (2010).
  32. Z. Yan and G. T. Brown, A cyclical self-assessment process: Towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment, Assess. Eval. Higher Educ. 42, 1247 (2017).
  33. D. L. Butler and P. H. Winne, Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis, Rev. Educ. Res. 65, 245 (1995).
  34. D. Nicol, The power of internal feedback: Exploiting natural comparison processes, Assess. Eval. Higher Educ. 46, 756 (2021).
  35. M. T. H. Chi, Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models, in Advances in Instructional Psychology (Routledge, 2000), Vol. 5, pp. 161–238.
  36. J. Liu, Exploring the dynamic self-assessment process of students across different competency groups, Stud. Educ. Eval. 75, 101215 (2022).
  37. V. P. Dennen and K. J. Burner, The cognitive apprenticeship model in educational practice, in Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (Routledge, 2008), pp. 425–439.
  38. J. Metcalfe, Learning from errors, Annu. Rev. Psychol. 68, 465 (2017).
  39. S. C. Pan, F. Sana, J. Samani, J. Cooke, and J. A. Kim, Learning from errors: Students’ and instructors’ practices, attitudes, and beliefs, Memory 28, 1105 (2020).
  40. G. Steuer and M. Dresel, A constructive error climate as an element of effective learning environments, Psychol. Test. Assess. Model 57, 262 (2015), https://www.psychologie-aktuell.com/fileadmin/download/ptam/2-2015_20150624/08_Steuer.pdf
  41. C. Henderson and M. H. Dancy, Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 020102 (2007).
  42. M. Dancy and C. Henderson, Pedagogical practices and instructional change of physics faculty, Am. J. Phys. 78, 1056 (2010).
  43. S. J. Pollock and N. D. Finkelstein, Sustaining educational reforms in introductory physics, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 4, 010110 (2008).
  44. S. V. Chasteen, B. Wilcox, M. D. Caballero, K. K. Perkins, S. J. Pollock, and C. E. Wieman, Educational transformation in upper-division physics: The science education initiative model, outcomes, and lessons learned, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 11, 020110 (2015).
  45. S. Pollock, G. Passante, and H. Sadaghiani, Adaptable research-based materials for teaching quantum mechanics, Am. J. Phys. 91, 40 (2023).
  46. J. Saldaña, The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (SAGE publications Ltd, 2013).
  47. C. Wu, J. DeBoer, J. F. Rhoads, and E. Berger, Use of worked-example videos to support problem-solving: An analysis of student behavior, Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 30, 195 (2022).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020113– Published 30 July, 2025
  • Received 28 March 2025
  • Accepted 9 June 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation