- Open Access
Impact of outreach on physics student development: Quantitative results from a national survey
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020152 – Published 10 December, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/mj85-87vk
Abstract
This work reports results from the first national study of the impact of student facilitation of informal physics outreach programs on their physics identity, sense of belonging, and essential career skill development. Drawing on results from studies at a single institution with a well-established physics outreach program, a national survey was developed and distributed through the Society of Physics Students’ network to more than 5000 individuals. A total of 704 responses were received. Responses to closed-form questions on the survey were analyzed descriptively and using multiple regression analysis to evaluate the relationship between student participation in informal physics outreach programs and the constructs of interest. Results show that students’ engagement in outreach was linked to increased confidence in communicating their physics knowledge, as well as to the development of key career skills. Additionally, facilitating informal physics outreach programs was a modest but significant predictor of a stronger growth mindset and a greater sense of belonging within the field, which are known to contribute to student persistence in their major.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (82)
- K. L. Lewis, J. G. Stout, N. D. Finkelstein, S. J. Pollock, A. Miyake, G. L. Cohen, and T. A. Ito, Fitting in to move forward: Belonging, gender, and persistence in the physical sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pSTEM), Psychol. Women Q. 41, 420 (2017).
- D. S. Yeager, G. M. Walton, S. T. Brady, E. N. Akcinar, D. Paunesku, L. Keane, D. Kamentz, G. Ritter, A. Lee Duckworth, R. Urstein, E. M. Gomez, H. Rose Markus, G. L. Cohen, and Carol S. Dweck, Teaching a lay theory before college narrows achievement gaps at scale, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, E3341 (2016).
- M. James, E. Bertschinger, B. Beckford, T. Dobbins, S. Fries-Britt, S. Gates, J. Isler, M. Ong, A. Richardson, Q. Williams et al. (American Institute of Physics, 2020).
- J. L. Burnette, J. Billingsley, G. C. Banks, L. E. Knouse, C. L. Hoyt, J. M. Pollack, and S. Simon, A systematic review and meta-analysis of growth mindset interventions: For whom, how, and why might such interventions work?, Psychol. Bull. 149, 174 (2023).
- C. L. Williams, Q. Hirschi, C. S. Hulleman, and J. Roksa, Belonging in STEM: Growth mindset as a filter of contextual cues, Int. J. Community Wellbeing 4, 467 (2021).
- K. L. Lewis, J. G. Stout, S. J. Pollock, N. D. Finkelstein, and T. A. Ito, Fitting in or opting out: A review of key social-psychological factors influencing a sense of belonging for women in physics, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 020110 (2016).
- T. Dobbins, Bulletin of the American Physical Society (2020).
- G. M. Walton and G. L. Cohen, A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 92, 82 (2007).
- C. S. Dweck, From needs to goals and representations: Foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development, Psychol. Rev. 124, 689 (2017).
- D. S. Yeager, C. J. Bryan, J. J. Gross, J. S. Murray, D. Krettek Cobb, P. H. F. Santos, H. Gravelding, M. Johnson, and J. P. Jamieson, A synergistic mindsets intervention protects adolescents from stress, Nature (London) 607, 512 (2022).
- C. A. Hecht, A. G. Latham, R. E. Buskirk, D. R. Hansen, D. S. Yeager, and E. L. Dolan, Peer-modeled mindsets: An approach to customizing life sciences studying interventions, CBE Life Sci. Educ. 21, ar82 (2022).
- Z. Hazari, D. Chari, G. Potvin, and E. Brewe, The context dependence of physics identity: Examining the role of performance/competence, recognition, interest, and sense of belonging for lower and upper female physics undergraduates, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 57, 1583 (2020).
- Z. Hazari, G. Sonnert, P. M. Sadler, and M.-C. Shanahan, Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 47, 978 (2010).
- P. Heron and L. McNeil, Joint Task Force on Undergraduate Physics Programs (American Physical Society and the American Association of Physics Teachers, College Park, MD, 2016).
- M. Smith, C. Fracchiolla, S. Fleming, A. Dominguez, A. Lau, S. Greco, D. Lincoln, E. Katifori, W. Ratcliff, M. Longobardi et al., Informal science education and career advancement, arXiv:2112.10623.
- C. Rethman, J. Perry, J. P. Donaldson, D. Choi, and T. Erukhimova, Impact of informal physics programs on university student development: Creating a physicist, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 17, 020110 (2021).
- J. Randolph, J. Perry, J. P. Donaldson, C. Rethman, and T. Erukhimova, Female physics students gain from facilitating informal physics programs, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18, 020123 (2022).
- J. Perry, J. P. Donaldson, and T. Erukhimova, Comparing the impact of informal physics program on undergraduate versus graduate student facilitators, presented at PER Conf. 2021, Virtual Conference, Vol. 10, 10.1119/perc.2021.pr.Perry.
- C. Garrett, T. L. Erukhimova, J. D. Perry, and J. P. Donaldson, Broadening student learning through informal physics programs, presented at PER Conf. 2023, Sacramento, CA, 2023, pp. 108–113, 10.1119/perc.2023.pr.Garrett.
- K. Hinko and N. D. Finkelstein, Impacting university physics students through participation in informal science, AIP Conf. Proc. 1513, 178 (2013).
- O. Graur, Education and public outreach as an integral part of a scientist’s career, Am. J. Phys. 86, 725 (2018).
- A. I. Leshner, Outreach training needed, Science 315, 161 (2007).
- C. Fracchiolla, S. Hyater-Adams, N. Finkelstein, and K. Hinko, University physics students’ motivations and experiences in informal physics programs, presented at PER Conf. 2016, Sacramento, CA, 10.1119/perc.2016.pr.026, pp. 124–127.
- National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Science Education, and Committee on Successful Out-of-School STEM Learning, Identifying and Supporting Productive STEM Programs in Out-of-School Settings (National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2015).
- Researchers should reach beyond the science bubble, Nature (London) 542, 391 (2017).
- National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Science Education, Center for Education, and Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments, Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits, edited by Philip Bell, Bruce Lewenstein, Andrew W. Shouse, and Michael A. Feder (2009).
- L. Rainie, C. Funk, M. Anderson, and D. Page, How Scientists Engage the Public (Pew Research Center, Washington, DC, 2015).
- J. C. Besley, A. Dudo, and S. Yuan, Scientists’ views about communication objectives, Publ. Understand Sci. 27, 708 (2018).
- S. E. Brownell, J. V. Price, and L. Steinman, Science communication to the general public: Why we need to teach undergraduate and graduate students this skill as part of their formal scientific training, J. Undergrad. Neurosci. Educ. 12, E6 (2013).
- B. Prefontaine, C. Fracchiolla, M. Vasquez, and K. Hinko, Intense outreach: Experiences shifting university students’ identities, presented at PER Conf. 2018, Washington, DC, 10.1119/perc.2018.pr.Prefontaine.
- N. D. Finkelstein and L. Mayhew, Acting in our own self‐interests: Blending university and community in informal science education, AIP Conf. Proc. 1064, 19 (2008).
- K. A. Hinko, P. Madigan, E. Miller, and N. D. Finkelstein, Characterizing pedagogical practices of university physics students in informal learning environments, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 010111 (2016).
- C. Fracchiolla, B. Prefontaine, and K. Hinko, Community of practice approach for understanding identity development within informal physics programs, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16, 020115 (2020).
- Z. Hazari, P. M. Sadler, and G. Sonnert, The science identity of college students: Exploring the intersection of gender, race, and ethnicity, J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 42, 82 (2013).
- T. Sauncy, K. Redmond, and R. Czujko, The AIP career pathways project, AIP Conf. Proc. 1697, 120014 (2015).
- A. Bunshaft, J. Curtis-Fink, A. Gerstein, D. Boyington, T. Edwards, and C. Jacobson, STEM connector’s STEM innovation task force, https://stemconnector.org/legalis-online-kaszinok/ (2015).
- G. Quan, B. Gutmann, J. Corbo, B. Pollard, and C. Turpen, The access network: Cultivating equity and student leadership in STEM, presented at PER Conf. Proc. 2019, Provo, UT, pp. 482–487, 10.1119/perc.2019.pr.Quan.
- T. Perez, J. Cromley, and A. Kaplan, The role of identity development, values, and costs in college STEM retention, J. Educ. Psychol. 106, 315 (2014).
- V. Sawtelle, E. Brewe, and L. H. Kramer, Exploring the relationship between self-efficacy and retention in introductory physics, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 49, 1096 (2012).
- J. P. Zwolak, R. Dou, E. A. Williams, and E. Brewe, Students’ network integration as a predictor of persistence in introductory physics courses, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13, 010113 (2017).
- H. Thiry, S. L. Laursen, and A.-B. Hunter, What experiences help students become scientists? A comparative study of research and other sources of personal and professional gains for STEM undergraduates, J. Higher Educ. 82, 357 (2011).
- Z. Y. Kalender, E. Marshman, C. D. Schunn, T. J. Nokes-Malach, and C. Singh, Gendered patterns in the construction of physics identity from motivational factors, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 020119 (2019).
- S. Hyater-Adams, C. Fracchiolla, N. Finkelstein, and K. Hinko, Critical look at physics identity: An operationalized framework for examining race and physics identity, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 14, 010132 (2018).
- S. Hyater-Adams, C. Fracchiolla, T. Williams, N. Finkelstein, and K. Hinko, Deconstructing Black physics identity: Linking individual and social constructs using the critical physics identity framework, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 020115 (2019).
- E. W. Close, J. Conn, and H. G. Close, Becoming physics people: Development of integrated physics identity through the Learning Assistant experience, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 010109 (2016).
- P. W. Irving and E. C. Sayre, Becoming a physicist: The roles of research, mindsets, and milestones in upper-division student perceptions, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 11, 020120 (2015).
- D. F. Feldon, J. Peugh, B. E. Timmerman, M. A. Maher, M. Hurst, D. Strickland, J. A. Gilmore, and C. Stiegelmeyer, Graduate students’ teaching experiences improve their methodological research skills, Science 333, 1037 (2011).
- D. Drane, M. Micari, and G. Light, Students as teachers: Effectiveness of a peer-led STEM learning programme over 10 years, Educ. Res. Eval. 20, 210 (2014).
- V. Otero, S. Pollock, and N. Finkelstein, A physics department’s role in preparing physics teachers: The Colorado learning assistant model, Am. J. Phys. 78, 1218 (2010).
- J. D. Perry, T. L. Erukhimova, C. Garrett, T. Sauncy, J. P. Donaldson, S. White, J. Tyler, and R. L. Ivie, Exploring impacts of outreach on a national sample of undergraduate physics students, presented at PER Conf. 2024, Boston, MA, pp. 318–323, 10.1119/perc.2024.pr.Perry.
- J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge University Press, Boston, MA, 1991).
- J. Mezirow, An overview on transformative learning, in Contemporary Theories of Learning: Learning Theorists in Their Own Words (Routledge, Abingdon, 2009), pp. 90–105.
- R. Kegan, Contemporary Theories of Learning (Routledge, London, UK, 2018), pp. 29–45.
- A. Kaplan and J. K. Garner, A complex dynamic systems perspective on identity and its development: The dynamic systems model of role identity, Dev. Psychol. 53, 2036 (2017).
- See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/mj85-87vk for survey questions and factor loadings.
- G. Anderson and R. Ivie, African Americans & Hispanics Among Physics & Astronomy Faculty: Results from the 2012 Survey of Physics & Astronomy Degree-Granting Departments. Focus On (Statistical Research Center of the American Institute of Physics, Washington, DC, 2014).
- N. Fitzallen and N. R. Brown, Outcomes for engineering students delivering a STEM education and outreach programme, Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 42, 632 (2017).
- J. Garner, C. Haas, M. Alley, and A. Kaplan, The emergence of outreach ambassador role identities in undergraduate engineering students, J. STEM Outreach 1, 1 (2018).
- R. C. Tillinghast, D. C. Appel, C. Winsor, and M. Mansouri, Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) (IEEE, Princeton, NJ, 2020), pp. 1–20.
- J. Ufnar and V. Shepherd, The sustained scientist in the classroom partnership: A model for innovative STEM graduate training programs, J. STEM Outreach 4, 1 (2021).
- https://www.aip.org/statistics.
- T. A. Brown, M. T. Moore et al., Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling (2012), pp. 361–379.
- J. Brown, JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter (2009), Vol. 13.
- J. Weber, Mathematische Modellbildung und Videoanalyse zum Lernen der Newtonschen Dynamik im Vergleich (Logos Verlag Berlin, 2022).
- J. Vazquez-Abad, L. Winer, and J.-R. Derome, Why some stay: A study of factors contributing to persistence in undergraduate physics, McGill J. Educ. 32 (1997).
- C. Riegle-Crumb, C. Moore, and A. Ramos-Wada, Who wants to have a career in science or math? Exploring adolescents’ future aspirations by gender and race/ethnicity, Sci. Educ. 95, 458 (2011).
- https://www.aps.org/learning-center/statistics/diversity.
- H. Cheng, G. Potvin, R. Khatri, L. H. Kramer, R. M. Lock, and Z. Hazari, Examining physics identity development through two high school interventions, presented at PER Conf. 2018, Washington, DC (2018), 10.1119/perc.2018.pr.Cheng.
- C. Good, A. Rattan, and C. S. Dweck, Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 102, 700 (2012).
- A. Master, S. Cheryan, and A. N. Meltzoff, Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science, J. Educ. Psychol. 108, 424 (2016).
- S. Bedford, Growth mindset and motivation: A study into secondary school science learning, Res. Pap. Educ. 32, 424 (2017).
- J. L. Burnette, C. L. Hoyt, V. M. Russell, B. Lawson, C. S. Dweck, and E. Finkel, A growth mind-set intervention improves interest but not academic performance in the field of computer science, Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 11, 107 (2020).
- E. Marshman, Z. Y. Kalender, C. Schunn, T. Nokes-Malach, and C. Singh, A longitudinal analysis of students’ motivational characteristics in introductory physics courses: Gender differences, Can. J. Phys. 96, 391 (2018).
- Z. Y. Kalender, E. Marshman, C. D. Schunn, T. J. Nokes-Malach, and C. Singh, Framework for unpacking students’ mindsets in physics by gender, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18, 010116 (2022).
- S. Kim, J. Yun, B. Schneider, M. Broda, C. Klager, and I.-C. Chen, The effects of growth mindset on college persistence and completion, J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 195, 219 (2022).
- E. M. Marshman, Z. Y. Kalender, T. Nokes-Malach, C. Schunn, and C. Singh, Gender, experience, and self-efficacy in introductory physics, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 020123 (2018).
- J. M. Nissen and J. T. Shemwell, Gender, experience, and self-efficacy in introductory physics, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 020105 (2016).
- Z. Y. Kalender, E. Marshman, T. J. Nokes-Malach, C. Schunn, and C. Singh, Motivational characteristics of underrepresented ethnic and racial minority students in introductory physics courses, presented at PER Conf. Proc. 2017, pp. 204–207, 10.1119/perc.2017.pr.046.
- D. Wilson, R. Bates, E. P. Scott, S. M. Painter, and J. Shaffer, Differences in self-efficacy among women and minorities, J. Women Minorities Sci. Eng. 21, 27 (2015).
- R. S. Barthelemy, M. Swirtz, S. Garmon, E. H. Simmons, K. Reeves, M. L. Falk, W. Deconinck, E. A. Long, and T. J. Atherton, LGBT+ physicists: Harassment, persistence, and uneven support, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18, 010124 (2022).
- L. D. Conlin, E. Kuo, and N. R. Hallinen, How null results can be significant for physics education research, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 020104 (2019).
- American Physical Society, Guide to community engagement and outreach, https://ep3guide.org/ (2025).