Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Understanding familial capital and its implications for physics graduate programs

Geraldine L. Cochran1,*, Corey Ptak2, Jenna Tempkin3, Téa Boone4, Stella F. Nelson1, Sabrina R. Henige1, and Diana Sachmpazidi5

  • *Contact author: cochran.604@osu.edu

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020116 – Published 22 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/j9ry-jqp4

Abstract

In recent years, multiple physics education research studies were conducted with a goal of understanding and improving graduate education in physics. Using a variety of frameworks and methodologies, these studies have documented policies and practices in graduate programs and the results of these studies have influenced policies and practices within graduate physics programs. Through this paper, we seek to contribute to this growing body of literature by uplifting the experiences of graduate students who have participated in bridge programs and identifying the implications of our findings on the policies and practices of departments aimed at improving graduate students experiences. Drawing on data from a larger study aimed at understanding culture within departments with bridge programs and utilizing the community cultural wealth framework, we elucidate the concept of familial capital and offer suggestions for how physics graduate programs might alter policies and practices to better leverage this particular form of capital.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (57)

  1. B. Goldberg, G. Cochran, C. Henderson, M. Wittmann, D. Sachmpazidi, S. Woods, D. Codding, and E. Su, Inclusive graduate programs: An AGEP pilot in physics and astronomy, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. (2024), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024APS..MARS61009G/abstract.
  2. J. R. Posselt, T. E. Hernandez, G. L. Cochran, and C. W. Miller, Metrics first, diversity later? Making the short list and getting admitted to physics PhD programs, J. Women Minorities Sci. Eng. 25, 283 (2019).
  3. C. Miller, K. Stassun et al., A test that fails, Nature (London) 510, 303 (2014).
  4. N. T. Young, K. Tollefson, and M. D. Caballero, Making graduate admissions in physics more equitable, Phys. Today 76, No. 7, 40 (2023).
  5. J. P. Tempkin, G. L. Cochran, and T. Boone, Using community cultural wealth to understand experiences in physics bridge programs, presented at PER Conf. 2023, Sacramento, CA, 10.1119/perc.2023.pr.Tempkin.
  6. M. Ong, J. M. Smith, and L. T. Ko, Counterspaces for women of color in STEM higher education: Marginal and central spaces for persistence and success, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 55, 206 (2018).
  7. R. A. Miller, A. Vaccaro, E. W. Kimball, and R. Forester, “It’s dude culture”: Students with minoritized identities of sexuality and/or gender navigating STEM majors, J. Diversity Higher Educ. 14, 340 (2021).
  8. C. Tanenbaum, S. Cole, R. González, and M. Essoka, Who can succeed? How bridge to the doctorate programs are changing the conversation around admissions practices in STEM, Understanding Interv. 11, 1 (2020).
  9. D. Sachmpazidi, Research on equity in physics graduate education, in The International Handbook of Physics Education Research: Special Topics (AIP Publishing, 2023), Chap. 4, 10.1063/9780735425514_004.
  10. S. Traweek, Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988).
  11. A. L. Traxler, X. C. Cid, J. Blue, and R. Barthelemy, Enriching gender in physics education research: A binary past and a complex future, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 020114 (2016).
  12. F. N. Abdurrahman and A. Olmstead, Objectivity, culturelessness, and apoliticism: How cultural beliefs prevent the advancement of equity in astronomy graduate programs, presented at PER Conf. 2021, Virtual Conference, 10.1119/perc.2021.pr.Abdurrahman.
  13. N. T. Young and M. D. Caballero, Physics graduate record exam does not help applicants “stand out”, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 17, 010144 (2021).
  14. N. T. Young, K. Tollefson, R. G. Zegers, and M. D. Caballero, Rubric-based holistic review: A promising route to equitable graduate admissions in physics, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18, 020140 (2022).
  15. N. T. Young, N. Verboncoeur, D. C. Lam, and M. D. Caballero, Rubric-based holistic review represents a change from traditional graduate admissions approaches in physics, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 19, 010134 (2023).
  16. G. Potvin, D. Chari, and T. Hodapp, Investigating approaches to diversity in a national survey of physics doctoral degree programs: The graduate admissions landscape, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13, 020142 (2017).
  17. D. Chari and G. Potvin, Understanding the importance of graduate admissions criteria according to prospective graduate students, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 023101 (2019).
  18. J. R. Posselt, Disciplinary logics in doctoral admissions: Understanding patterns of faculty evaluation, J. Higher Educ. 86, 807 (2015).
  19. G. L. Cochran, T. Hodapp, and E. E. Brown, Identifying barriers to ethnic/racial minority students’ participation in graduate physics, presented at PER Conf. 2017, Cincinnati, OH, 10.1119/perc.2017.pr.018.
  20. D. Sachmpazidi, Investigating the Relationship between Departmental Support Structures, Self-Efficacy and Intention to Persist: An Examination of Students’ Experience in 19 Physics Graduate Programs across the United States, Western Michigan University, 2021, https://www.proquest.com/docview/2640990949?pq-origsite=gscholar&openview=true&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses.
  21. L. M. Owens, B. M. Zwickl, S. V. Franklin, and C. W. Miller, Physics GRE requirements create uneven playing field for graduate applicants, presented at PER Conf. 2020, Virtual Conference, 10.1119/perc.2020.pr.Owens.
  22. C. W. Miller, B. M. Zwickl, J. R. Posselt, R. T. Silvestrini, and T. Hodapp, Typical physics Ph.D. admissions criteria limit access to underrepresented groups but fail to predict doctoral completion, Sci. Adv. 5, eaat7550 (2019).
  23. R. S. Barthelemy, M. Swirtz, S. Garmon, E. H. Simmons, K. Reeves, M. L. Falk, W. Deconinck, E. A. Long, and T. J. Atherton, LGBT+ physicists: Harassment, persistence, and uneven support, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18, 010124 (2022).
  24. F. N. Abdurrahman, Black holes: Finding them, building instruments that help you look, and how systemic racism can prevent you from doing any of that, University of California, Berkeley, 2021, https://www.proquest.com/docview/2572617614?fromopenview=true&pq-origsite=gscholar&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses.
  25. K. Rosa and F. M. Mensah, Educational pathways of black women physicists: Stories of experiencing and overcoming obstacles in life, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 020113 (2016).
  26. IGEN, An NSF inlcudes alliance, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018nsf....1834516M/abstract [Accessed June 27, 2024].
  27. S. Broyles, R. W. Riley, S. P. Robinson, and J. E. Griffith, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data Systems (U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, 2019).
  28. A. L. Rudolph, K. Holley-Bockelmann, and J. Posselt, PhD bridge programmes as engines for access, diversity and inclusion, Nat. Astron. 3, 1080 (2019).
  29. First Generation Students in Higher Education (Postsecondary National Policy Institute, 2018), https://pnpi.org/factsheets/first-generation-students/.
  30. T. Hodapp and K. S. Woodle, A bridge between undergraduate and doctoral degrees, Phys. Today 70, No. 2, 50 (2017).
  31. K. G. Stassun, A. Burger, and S. E. Lange, The Fisk-Vanderbilt Masters-to-Ph.D. Bridge Program: A model for broadening participation of underrepresented groups in the physical sciences through effective partnerships with minority-serving institutions, J. Geosci. Educ. 58, 135 (2010).
  32. A. L. Rudolph, Cal-Bridge: Creating pathways to the PhD for underrepresented students in physics and astronomy, Phys. Today 72, No. 10, 50 (2019).
  33. Graduate Student Induction Manual (The American Physical Society, 2017).
  34. R. Sowell, T. Zhang, N. Bell, and K. Redd, Ph.D. Completion and Attrition: Analysis of Baseline Data (Council of Graduate Schools, Washington, DC, 2008), p. 123, https://cgsnet.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/phd_completion_and_attrition_analysis_of_baseline_demographic_data-2.pdf.
  35. R. Gámez, B. W.-L. Packard, and T. M. Chavous, Graduate bridge programs as nepantla for minoritized students in STEM: Navigating challenges with non-bridge peers and faculty, J. Diversity Higher Educ. 15, 37 (2022).
  36. P. Bourdieu, The forms of capital, in The Sociology of Economic Life (Routledge, London, 2018), pp. 78–92.
  37. T. J. Yosso, Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth, Race Ethn. Educ. 8, 69 (2005).
  38. B. A. Burt and J. T. Johnson, Origins of early STEM interest for black male graduate students in engineering: A community cultural wealth perspective, Sch. Sci. Math. 118, 257 (2018).
  39. C. A. G. Mwangi, (Re)examining the role of family and community in college access and choice: A metasynthesis, Rev. High. Educ. 39, 123 (2015).
  40. S. R. Harper, An anti-deficit achievement framework for research on students of color in STEM, New Dir. Inst. Res. 2010, 63 (2010).
  41. F. Lung, G. Potvin, G. Sonnert, and P. M. Sadler, The effect of immigration status on physics identity and physical science career intentions, AIP Conf. Proc. 1413, 259 (2012), https://www.per-central.org/items/detail.cfm?ID=11860.
  42. F. Lung, G. Potvin, G. Sonnert, and P. M. Sadler, Welcome to America, welcome to college: Comparing the effects of immigrant generation and college generation on physical science and engineering career, AIP Conf. Proc. 1513, 270 (2013), https://www.per-central.org/items/detail.cfm?ID=12831.
  43. A. D. Robertson, W. T. Hairston, and R. E. Scherr, Belonging, success, access, and disruption: Physics faculty goals for inclusive learning environments, presented at PER Conf. 2018, Washington, DC, 10.1119/perc.2018.pr.Robertson.
  44. K. Rainey, M. H. Dancy, R. Mickelson, E. Stearns, and S. Moller, STEM majors’ perceptions of racism and sexism in STEM, presented at PER Conf. 2017, Cincinnati, OH, 10.1119/perc.2017.pr.077.
  45. F. N. Abdurrahman, D. Sachmpazidi, R. P. Dalka, and C. Turpen, A case study of tensions in student-faculty partnerships for departmental change work, presented at PER Conf. 2023, Sacramento, CA, 10.1119/perc.2023.pr.Abdurrahman.
  46. C. Kepple, M. Tilahun, N. Matti, and K. Coble, Pedagogy training for the development of GTA mindsets and inclusive teaching practices, resented at PER Conf. 2020, Virtual Conference, 10.1119/perc.2020.pr.Kepple.
  47. C. Mathis, A. R. Daane, B. Rodriguez, J. Hernandez, and T. Huynh, How instructors can view knowledge to implement culturally relevant pedagogy, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 19, 010105 (2023).
  48. K. Tran, A. M. Barrera, K. Coble, M. Arreguin, M. Harris, A. Macha-Lopez, M. Perez, and A. Eroy-Reveles, Cultivating cultural capitals in introductory algebra-based physics through reflective journaling, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18, 020139 (2022).
  49. G. L. Cochran, M. Boveda, and C. Prescod-Weinstein, Intersectionality in STEM education research, in Handbook of Research on STEM Education (Routledge, New York, 2020), pp. 257–266, https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429021381-24/intersectionality-stem-education-research-geraldine-cochran-mildred-boveda-chanda-prescod-weinstein.
  50. L. McCall, The complexity of intersectionality, Signs 30, 1771 (2005).
  51. S. Jamshed, Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation, J. Basic Clin. Pharm. 5, 87 (2014), https://www.jbclinpharm.org/articles/qualitative-research-methodinterviewing-and-observation.html.
  52. L. E. Koelsch, Reconceptualizing the member check interview, Int. J. Qual. Methods 12, 168 (2013).
  53. G. L. Cochran, S. Nelson, and S. Henige, Identifying and leveraging community cultural wealth in physics bridge programs, in Resources of the Equity in Graduate Education Consortium (Equity in Graduate Education Consortium, 2024), https://equitygraded.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Identifying-and-Leveraging-Community-Cultural-Wealth-in-Physics-Bridge-Programs.pdf.
  54. S. M. Ravitch and M. Riggan, Reason & Rigor: How Conceptual Frameworks Guide Research (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2016).
  55. G. Cochran, Demystifying and defending diversity, equity, and inclusion, EPJ Web Conf. 296, 01011 (2024).
  56. G. L. Cochran, S. Hyater-Adams, M. Rodriguez, X. C. Cid, D. Sachmpazidi, K. Rosa, and R. S. Barthelemy, Racial equity in physics education research, Nat. Phys. 20, 336 (2024).
  57. J. Georgas, K. Mylonas, T. Bafiti, Y. H. Poortinga, S. Christakopoulou, C. Kagitcibasi, K. Kwak, B. Ataca, J. Berry, S. Orung et al., Functional relationships in the nuclear and extended family: A 16-culture study, Int. J. Psychol. 36, 289 (2001).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation