- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Physics Education Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Experimental skills for undergraduate career preparation in quantum information science and engineering

Shams El-Adawy1,2,*, A. R. Piña3, Benjamin M. Zwickl3, and H. J. Lewandowski1,2

  • *Contact author: shams.eladawy@colorado.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020117 – Published 12 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/56hq-4pns

Abstract

The growth of the quantum information science and engineering (QISE) industry has increased interest in how undergraduate programs prepare students for careers in this field. Prior research emphasizes the value of experiential learning as preparation for the quantum industry but lacks specificity regarding the experimental skills needed for positions available to bachelor’s degree graduates. In this study, we investigate the experimental skills associated with bachelor’s-level quantum industry positions through 44 semistructured interviews with quantum industry professionals. Guided by the American Association of Physics Teachers recommendations for the undergraduate physics laboratory curriculum, we characterize the experimental skills associated with positions described as requiring bachelor’s-level preparation and thematically synthesize them into four categories: instrumentation, computation and data analysis, experimental and project design, and communication and collaboration. We further examine how these skills cluster across role types and articulate them as learning goals to provide guidance for educators interested in aligning undergraduate instruction with the needs of students wanting to pursue a career in the quantum industry. Our findings suggest the need to emphasize the discussion of hardware in QISE theory courses, expand experimental training through instructional laboratories, and intentionally integrate professional skills in undergraduate QISE education.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (78)

  1. National Quantum Initiative, National quantum initiative (2018), http://quantum.gov/.
  2. M. Riedel, M. Kovacs, P. Zoller, J. Mlynek, and T. Calarco, Europe’s quantum flagship initiative, Quantum. Sci. Technol. 4, 020501 (2019).
  3. P. Knight and I. Walmsley, UK national quantum technology programme, Quantum. Sci. Technol. 4, 040502 (2019).
  4. National Science and Technology Council, Subcommittee on Quantum Information Science, Quantum information science and technology workforce development national strategic plan (2022), https://www.quantum.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/QIST-Natl-Workforce-Plan.pdf.
  5. UNESCO–United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, International year of quantum science and technology (2025), https://www.unesco.org/en/years/quantum-science-technology.
  6. J. Zhao, L. Kotamäki, G. Crossman, V. Vijayakumar, B. Castanon, and A. Kasry, The quantum moment: A global report; outcomes of the international year of quantum science and technology, UNESCO Report, 2026, 10.54677/NTNB6257.
  7. M. F. J. Fox, B. M. Zwickl, and H. J. Lewandowski, Preparing for the quantum revolution: What is the role of higher education?, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16, 020131 (2020).
  8. F. Greinert, M. S. Ubben, I. N. Dogan, D. Hilfert-Rüppell, and R. Müller, Advancing quantum technology workforce: Industry insights into qualification and training needs, Eur. Phys. J. Quantum Technol. 11, 82 (2024).
  9. S. El-Adawy, A. R. Piña, B. M. Zwickl, and H. J. Lewandowski, Industry perspectives on projected quantum workforce needs, in 2025 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, Washington, DC, August 6–7, 2025 (2025), 10.1119/perc.2025.pr.El-Adawy.
  10. A. Pina, S. El-Adawy, H. Lewandowski, and B. M. Zwickl, Categorization of roles in the quantum industry, arXiv:2511.11820.
  11. A. Piña, S. El-Adawy, M. Verostek, B. T. Boyle, M. Cacheiro, M. Lawler, N. Pradeep, E. Watts, C. G. West, H. Lewandowski et al., Landscape of quantum information science and engineering education: From physics foundations to interdisciplinary frontiers, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020131 (2025).
  12. J. C. Meyer, G. Passante, S. J. Pollock, and B. R. Wilcox, Introductory quantum information science coursework at US institutions: Content coverage, Eur. Phys. J. Quantum Technol. 11, 16 (2024).
  13. C. D. Aiello, D. D. Awschalom, H. Bernien, T. Brower, K. R. Brown, T. A. Brun, J. R. Caram, E. Chitambar, R. Di Felice, K. M. Edmonds et al., Achieving a quantum smart workforce, Quantum Sci. Technol. 6, 030501 (2021).
  14. A. Asfaw, A. Blais, K. R. Brown, J. Candelaria, C. Cantwell, L. D. Carr, J. Combes, D. M. Debroy, J. M. Donohue, S. E. Economou et al., Building a quantum engineering undergraduate program, IEEE Trans. Ed. 65, 220 (2022).
  15. F. Greinert, R. Müller, P. Bitzenbauer, M. S. Ubben, and K.-A. Weber, Future quantum workforce: Competences, requirements, and forecasts, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 19, 010137 (2023).
  16. Quantum Economic Development Consortium (QED-C, Connecting the dots: Quantum learning through experiential activities and practice, SRI International, 2025, report published by the Quantum Economic Development Consortium (QED-C).
  17. S. El-Adawy, A. R. Piña, B. M. Zwickl, and H. J. Lewandowski, Insights from educators on building a more cohesive quantum information science and engineering education ecosystem, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020144 (2025).
  18. B. M. Zwickl, D. Hu, N. Finkelstein, and H. J. Lewandowski, Model-based reasoning in the physics laboratory: Framework and initial results, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 11, 020113 (2015).
  19. D. R. Dounas-Frazer and H. J. Lewandowski, The modelling framework for experimental physics: Description, development, and applications, Eur. J. Phys. 39, 064005 (2018).
  20. B. Cai, L. A. Mainhood, R. Groome, C. Laverty, and A. McLean, Student behavior in undergraduate physics laboratories: Designing experiments, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 17, 020109 (2021).
  21. D. R. Dounas-Frazer, K. L. Van De Bogart, M. K. R. Stetzer, and H. J. Lewandowski, Investigating the role of model-based reasoning while troubleshooting an electric circuit, Phys. Rev. Phys Educ. Res. 12, 010137 (2016).
  22. J. Kozminski, H. Lewandowski, N. Beverly, S. Lindaas, D. Deardorff, A. Reagan, R. Dietz, R. Tagg, M. EblenZayas, J. Williams et al., AAPT recommendations for the undergraduate physics laboratory curriculum, American Assoc. Phys. Teach. 29 (2014).
  23. J. R. Hoehn and H. Lewandowski, Investigating students’ views about the role of writing in physics lab classes, in Physics Education Research Conference 2020 (2020), pp. 216–221.
  24. B. L. Lewis, Surveying the state of writing education in physics and astronomy, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020146 (2025).
  25. C. Hughes, D. Finke, D.-A. German, C. Merzbacher, P. M. Vora, and H. J. Lewandowski, Assessing the needs of the quantum industry, IEEE Trans. Ed. 65, 592 (2022).
  26. J. C. Meyer, G. Passante, S. J. Pollock, and B. R. Wilcox, Today’s interdisciplinary quantum information classroom: Themes from a survey of quantum information science instructors, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18, 010150 (2022).
  27. K. A. Oliver, V. Borish, B. R. Wilcox, and H. J. Lewandowski, Education for expanding the quantum workforce: Students’ perceptions of the quantum industry in an upper-division physics capstone course, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010129 (2025).
  28. K. A. Oliver, V. Borish, B. Wilcox, and H. J. Lewandowski, Influence of an undergraduate quantum capstone course on students’ post-graduation careers, in Physics Education Research Conference 2025, Washington, DC (2025), pp. 338–343.
  29. E. Watts and B. Zwickl, Formation of students’ interests in quantum technology across stem majors, in Physics Education Research Conference 2025, Washington, DC (2025), pp. 441–446.
  30. J. C. Meyer, G. Passante, and B. Wilcox, Disparities in access to U.S. quantum information education, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 20, 010131 (2024).
  31. J. Kruse, M. Griston, and B. R. Wilcox, Characterization of upper-level undergraduate quantum mechanics courses in the U.S., Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020162 (2025).
  32. A. Buzzell, T. J. Atherton, and R. Barthelemy, Quantum mechanics curriculum in the U.S.: Quantifying the instructional time, content taught, and paradigms used, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010102 (2025).
  33. V. Borish and H. J. Lewandowski, Implementation and goals of quantum optics experiments in undergraduate instructional labs, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 19, 010117 (2023).
  34. Y. S. Sun, G. Shi, W. A. Scales, and P. Leigh-Mack, Exploring minority undergraduate students’ hands-on and research experiences in a summer QISE laboratory course, in 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (2025).
  35. M. Ivory, J. Balewski, A. Bettale, J. Brewer, R. Boren, D. Camps, L. Hackett, M. Juarez, A. Kononov, K.-H. Lee et al., QCAMP: A 4-week summer camp introducing high school students to quantum information science and technology, in 2025 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) (2025), Vol. 3, pp. 29–38.
  36. E. Etkina, A. Karelina, M. Ruibal-Villasenor, D. Rosengrant, R. Jordan, and C. E. Hmelo-Silver, Design and reflection help students develop scientific abilities: Learning in introductory physics laboratories, J. Learn. Sci. 19, 54 (2010).
  37. B. R. Wilcox and H. J. Lewandowski, Developing skills versus reinforcing concepts in physics labs: Insight from a survey of students’ beliefs about experimental physics, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13, 010108 (2017).
  38. N. G. Holmes, B. Keep, and C. E. Wieman, Developing scientific decision making by structuring and supporting student agency, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16, 010109 (2020).
  39. J. R. Hoehn and H. J. Lewandowski, Framework of goals for writing in physics lab classes, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16, 010125 (2020).
  40. C. Walsh, H. J. Lewandowski, and N. G. Holmes, Skills-focused lab instruction improves critical thinking skills and experimentation views for all students, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18, 010128 (2022).
  41. V. Borish, J. R. Hoehn, and H. J. Lewandowski, Student engagement with modeling in multiweek student-designed lab projects, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18, 020135 (2022).
  42. B. R. Wilcox and H. J. Lewandowski, Students’ views about the nature of experimental physics, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13, 020110 (2017).
  43. K. L. Van De Bogart, D. R. Dounas-Frazer, H. J. Lewandowski, and M. K. R. Stetzer, Investigating the role of socially mediated metacognition during collaborative troubleshooting of electric circuits, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13, 020116 (2017).
  44. A. Karelina and E. Etkina, Acting like a physicist: Student approach study to experimental design, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 020106 (2007).
  45. D. R. Dounas-Frazer, J. T. Stanley, and H. J. Lewandowski, Student ownership of projects in an upper-division optics laboratory course: A multiple case study of successful experiences, Phys. Rev Phys. Educ. Res. 13, 020136 (2017).
  46. Z. Y. Kalender, E. Stump, K. Hubenig, and N. G. Holmes, Restructuring physics labs to cultivate sense of student agency, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 17, 020128 (2021).
  47. B. R. Wilcox and H. J. Lewandowski, Open-ended versus guided laboratory activities: Impact on students’ beliefs about experimental physics, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 020132 (2016).
  48. Q. Liu and H. J. Lewandowski, Students’ views of experimental physics after participating in lab courses with open-ended activities, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020151 (2025).
  49. J. T. Stanley and H. J. Lewandowski, Recommendations for the use of notebooks in upper-division physics lab courses, Am. J. Phys. 86, 45 (2018).
  50. J. R. Hoehn and H. J. Lewandowski, Incorporating writing in advanced lab projects: A multiple case-study analysis, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16, 020161 (2020).
  51. I. Etikan, Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling, Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat. 5, 1 (2016).
  52. C. Parker, S. Scott, and A. Geddes, Snowball sampling, in SAGE Research Methods Foundations (2019).
  53. Quantum Economic Development Consortium (QED-C, Quantum economic development consortium (QED-C)—enabling the quantum ecosystem, https://quantumconsortium.org/.
  54. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/56hq-4pns for the list of interview protocol questions.
  55. Gotranscript: 100% human transcription in 140+ languages, https://gotranscript.com/.
  56. V. Braun and V. Clarke, Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77 (2006).
  57. A. R. Piña, S. El-Adawy, H. J. Lewandowski, and B. M. Zwickl, Industry insights into quantum knowledge needed for the quantum information science and engineering workforce, in Physics Education Research Conference 2025, Washington, DC (2025), pp. 350–355.
  58. N. G. Holmes and E. M. Smith, Operationalizing the AAPT learning goals for the lab, Phys. Teach. 57, 296 (2019).
  59. B. M. Zwickl, J. Olivera, K. N. Martin, and K. M. Winans, Preparing students for physics-intensive careers in optics and photonics, in Physics Education Research Conference 2015, College Park, MD (2015), pp. 391–394.
  60. A. E. Leak, S. L. Rothwell, J. Olivera, B. Zwickl, J. Vosburg, and K. N. Martin, Examining problem solving in physics-intensive Ph. D. research, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13, 020101 (2017).
  61. A. E. Leak, Z. Santos, E. Reiter, B. M. Zwickl, and K. N. Martin, Hidden factors that influence success in the optics workforce, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 14, 010136 (2018).
  62. D. Hu, K. Chen, A. E. Leak, N. T. Young, B. Santangelo, B. M. Zwickl, and K. N. Martin, Characterizing mathematical problem solving in physics-related workplaces using epistemic games, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 020131 (2019).
  63. American Association of Colleges and Universities, The agility imperative: How employers view preparation for an uncertain future (2025).
  64. B. M. Zwickl, N. Finkelstein, and H. J. Lewandowski, The process of transforming an advanced lab course: Goals, curriculum, and assessments, Am. J. Phys. 81, 63 (2013).
  65. N. G. Holmes and H. J. Lewandowski, Investigating the landscape of physics laboratory instruction across North America, Phys Rev Phys Educ Res 16, 020162 (2020).
  66. A. Werth, C. G. West, and H. J. Lewandowski, Impacts on student learning, confidence, and affect in a remote, large-enrollment, course-based undergraduate research experience in physics, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18, 010129 (2022).
  67. A. Werth, C. G. West, N. Sulaiman, and H. J. Lewandowski, Enhancing students’ views of experimental physics through a course-based undergraduate research experience, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 19, 020151 (2023).
  68. R. L. Merritt and H. J. Lewandowski, Physics instructor views on course-based undergraduate research experiences (cures), in Physics Education Research Conference 2024, Boston, MA (2024), pp. 293–299.
  69. M. Kretchmer, R. L. Merritt, and H. J. Lewandowski, Exploring student beliefs of traditional physics laboratory coursework in relation to authentic research, in Physics Education Research Conference 2024 (2024), pp. 230–236.
  70. R. L. Merritt, M. Kretchmer, and H. J. Lewandowski, Student perspectives on “successful science” in a physics CURE and traditional lab course, Physics Education Research Conference 2025, Washington, DC (2025), pp. 276–281.
  71. J. R. Hoehn, M. F. J. Fox, A. Werth, V. Borish, and H. J. Lewandowski, Remote advanced lab course: A case study analysis of open-ended projects, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 17, 020111 (2021).
  72. E. Tufino, S. Oss, and M. Alemani, Using Jupyter notebooks to foster computational skills and professional practice in an introductory physics lab course, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2950, 012022 (2025).
  73. C. Lusignan, A. McGowan, and B. Zwickl, Instructional goals and decisions when integrating computation into physics labs, in Integrating Computing into the Undergraduate Physics Curriculum (2025), p. 6, 10.1088/978-0-7503-5372-4ch6.
  74. C. Lusignan, A. McGowan, and B. Zwickl, Case studies of integrating computation into physics lab courses, in Integrating Computing into the Undergraduate Physics Curriculum (2025), p. 7, 10.1088/978-0-7503-5372-4ch7.
  75. K. Foote and S. Martino, Implementing investigative labs and writing intensive reports in large university physics courses, Phys. Teach. 56, 466 (2018).
  76. E. M. Smith and N. G. Holmes, Evaluating instructional labs’ use of deliberate practice to teach critical thinking skills, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16, 020150 (2020).
  77. A. Werth, K. Oliver, C. G. West, and H. J. Lewandowski, Assessing student engagement with teamwork in an online, large-enrollment course-based undergraduate research experience in physics, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18, 020128 (2022).
  78. G. P. Wiggins and J. McTighe, Understanding by design (expanded 2nd ed.), in Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (2008), Vol. 370.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020117– Published 12 August, 2026
  • Received 14 April 2026
  • Accepted 14 July 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation