- Open Access
Hybrid sampling approach to machine-learning potentials for gas adsorption: Hydrogen adsorption in MOF-303
Phys. Rev. Materials 10, 105401 – Published 5 October, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/d5b5-66b6
Abstract
Porous materials such as metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are widely studied for applications in catalysis and gas adsorption, including carbon dioxide capture and hydrogen storage for energy and environmental challenges. Accurate simulation of gas adsorption in these materials remains challenging because most approaches rely on force fields (FFs), which lack first-principles accuracy. Here, we present a hybrid sampling approach, complemented by an active-learning-style refinement step, for generating machine-learning potentials (MLPs) tailored for grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations of gas adsorption. The training dataset combines snapshots from FF-based GCMC sampling, evaluated by single-point density functional theory (DFT) calculations, with trajectories from DFT-based molecular dynamics (MD). We demonstrate this approach for hydrogen adsorption in MOF-303, achieving accurate energy and force evaluation, as well as robust GCMC simulation including on-the-fly quantum corrections for nuclei. The MLP-based calculation also revealed four primary and four secondary adsorption sites formed near N, O, C, and –OH motifs, highlighting the material's structural heterogeneity and adsorption behavior. The resulting MLPs enable calculation of adsorption isotherms, isosteric heat values, and diffusion coefficients across temperatures. This hybrid-sampling framework bridges DFT-level accuracy and larger-scale simulation capability than MD, and can in principle be applied to other porous materials and gas types to support the design of materials for gas storage and separation.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (55)
- H. Li, M. Eddaoudi, M. O'Keeffe, and O. M. Yaghi, Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal-organic framework, Nature (London) 402, 276 (1999).
- O. M. Yaghi, M. O'Keeffe, N. W. Ockwig, H. K. Chae, M. Eddaoudi, and J. Kim, Reticular synthesis and the design of new materials, Nature (London) 423, 705 (2003).
- H. Furukawa, K. E. Cordova, M. O'Keeffe, and O. M. Yaghi, The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks, Science 341, 1230444 (2013).
- M. Eddaoudi, J. Kim, N. Rosi, D. Vodak, J. Wachter, M. O'Keeffe, and O. M. Yaghi, Systematic design of pore size and functionality in isoreticular MOFs and their application in methane storage, Science 295, 469 (2002).
- G. Maurin, C. Serre, A. Cooper, and G. Férey, The new age of MOFs and of their porous-related solids, Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 3104 (2017).
- W. Temmerman, R. Goeminne, K. S. Rawat, and V. Van Speybroeck, Computational modeling of reticular materials: The past, the present, and the future, Adv. Mater. 37, 2412005 (2025).
- N. Hanikel, X. Pei, S. Chheda, H. Lyu, W. Jeong, J. Sauer, L. Gagliardi, and O. M. Yaghi, Evolution of water structures in metal-organic frameworks for improved atmospheric water harvesting, Science 374, 454 (2021).
- Z. Wang, F. Wang, Y. Luo, Y. Liu, Y. Wang, F. Wang, Y. Jin, and C. Xia, The Ag (I) coordination in Ag-MOF-303 enhanced the adsorption and separation capabilities for , Separat. Purific. Technol. 360, 131219 (2025).
- H. Kim, S. Jee, J. Park, M. Jung, R. Muhammad, K. Choi, and H. Oh, High selectivity performance in MOF-303 under ambient pressure for potential industrial applications, Sep. Purif. Technol. 325, 124660 (2023).
- E. Knight, A. Gillespie, M. Prosniewski, D. Stalla, E. Dohnke, T. Rash, P. Pfeifer, and C. Wexler, Determination of the enthalpy of adsorption of hydrogen in activated carbon at room temperature, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45, 15541 (2020).
- L. J. Murray, M. Dinca, and J. R. Long, Hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworks, Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 1294 (2009).
- K. Cousins and R. Zhang, Highly porous organic polymers for hydrogen fuel storage, Polymers 11, 690 (2019).
- H. Daglar, H. C. Gulbalkan, G. O. Aksu, and S. Keskin, Computational simulations of metal–organic frameworks to enhance adsorption applications, Adv. Mater. 37, 2405532 (2025).
- S. L. Mayo, B. D. Olafson, and W. A. Goddard, DREIDING: A generic force field for molecular simulations, J. Phys. Chem. 94, 8897 (1990).
- L.-C. Lin, K. Lee, L. Gagliardi, J. B. Neaton, and B. Smit, Force-field development from electronic structure calculations with periodic boundary conditions: Applications to gas adsorption in metal-organic frameworks, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10, 1477 (2014).
- R. Mercado, B. Vlaisavljevich, L.-C. Lin, K. Lee, Y. Lee, J. A. Mason, D. J. Xiao, M. I. Gonzalez, M. T. Kapelewski, J. B. Neaton, and B. Smit, Polarizable force fields for and adsorption in M-MOF-74 (M = Mg, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Zn), J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 12590 (2016).
- J. Borycz, L.-C. Lin, E. D. Bloch, J. Kim, A. L. Dzubak, R. Maurice, D. Semrouni, K. Lee, B. Smit, and L. Gagliardi, A theoretical study of hydrogen storage in metal-organic frameworks: binding in various types of pores, J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 12230 (2014).
- M. Fischer, J. R. Gomes, and M. Jorge, Computational approaches to study adsorption in MOFs with unsaturated metal sites, Mol. Simul. 40, 537 (2014).
- J. L. Belof, A. C. Stern, M. Eddaoudi, and B. Space, On the mechanism of hydrogen storage in a metal-organic framework material, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 15202 (2007).
- D. M. Franz, Z. E. Dyott, K. A. Forrest, A. Hogan, T. Pham, and B. Space, Simulations of hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and small hydrocarbon sorption in a nitrogen-rich rht-metal–organic framework, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 1761 (2018).
- A. Samanta, T. Furuta, and J. Li, A theoretical study of hydrogen storage in metal-organic frameworks: binding in various types of pores, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 084714 (2006).
- M. Dixit, T. A. Maark, and S. Pal, Ab initio and periodic DFT investigation of hydrogen storage on light metal–decorated MOF–5, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 36, 10816 (2011).
- M. Fischer, DFT-based evaluation of porous metal formates for the storage and separation of small molecules, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 219, 249 (2016).
- J. Schmidt, M. R. G. Marques, S. Botti, and M. A. L. Marques, Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science, npj Comput. Mater. 5, 83 (2019).
- O. T. Unke, S. Chmiela, H. E. Sauceda, M. Gastegger, I. Poltavsky, K. T. Schütt, A. Tkatchenko, and K. R. Müller, Machine learning force fields, Chem. Rev. 121, 10142 (2021).
- J. Behler, Four generations of high-dimensional neural network potentials, Chem. Rev. 121, 10037 (2021).
- M. Eckhoff and J. Behler, From molecular fragments to the bulk: Development of a neural network potential for MOF-5, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 3793 (2019).
- S. K. Achar, J. J. Wardzala, L. Bernasconi, L. Zhang, and J. K. Johnson, Combined deep learning and classical potential approach for modeling diffusion in UiO-66, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18, 3593 (2022).
- R. Goeminne, L. Vanduyfhuys, V. Van Speybroeck, and T. Verstraelen, DFT-quality adsorption simulations in metal–organic frameworks enabled by machine learning potentials, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 6313 (2023).
- S. Liu, R. Dupuis, D. Fan, S. Benzaria, M. Bonneau, P. Bhatt, M. Eddaoudi, and G. Maurin, Machine learning potential for modelling adsorption/diffusion in MOFs with open metal sites, Chem. Sci. 15, 5294 (2024).
- J. Klarbring and A. Walsh, Na vacancy-driven phase transformation and fast ion conduction in W-doped from machine learning force fields, Chem. Mater. 36, 9406 (2024).
- See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/d5b5-66b6 for containing the DREIDING force-field parameters, the training-data distributions and parity plots of MLP against AIMD, and additional uptake and isosteric-heat results. It further contains the adsorption-site searches, the DFT-D3 and MLP vibrational frequencies, structural and dynamical analyses, and Appendix A on modifications to the GCMC algorithm.
- A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolintineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in 't Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M. J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, and S. J. Plimpton, LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales, Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022).
- P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).
- G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993).
- G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996).
- J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
- S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu, J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).
- S. Batzner, A. Musaelian, L. Sun, M. Geiger, J. P. Mailoa, M. Kornbluth, N. Molinari, T. E. Smidt, and B. Kozinsky, (E3)-equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic potentials, Nat. Commun. 13, 2453 (2022).
- Y. Park, J. Kim, S. Hwang, and S. Han, Scalable parallel algorithm for graph neural network interatomic potentials in molecular dynamics simulations, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 20, 4857 (2024).
- A. Hjorth Larsen, J. J. Mortensen, J. Blomqvist, I. E. Castelli, R. Christensen, M. Dułak, J. Friis, M. N. Groves, B. Hammer, C. Hargus, et al., The atomic simulation environment—A Python library for working with atoms, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 273002 (2017).
- R. P. Feynman and A. R. Hibbs, Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965).
- R. P. Feynman, Statistical Mechanics: A Set of Lectures (W. A. Benjamin, Reading, Massachusetts, 1972), Sec. 3.5
- J. I. Siepmann and D. Frenkel, Configurational bias Monte Carlo: A new sampling scheme for flexible chains, Mol. Phys. 75, 59 (1992).
- S. E. Bambalaza, H. W. Langmi, R. Mokaya, N. M. Musyoka, J. Ren, and L. E. Khotseng, Compaction of a zirconium metal–organic framework (UiO-66) for high density hydrogen storage applications, J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 23569 (2018).
- L. Sarkisov, R. Bueno-Perez, M. Sutharson, and D. Fairen-Jimenez, Materials informatics with PoreBlazer v4.0 and the CSD MOF database, Chem. Mater. 32, 9849 (2020).
- B. Widom, Some topics in the theory of fluids, J. Chem. Phys. 39, 2808 (1963).
- D. R. Galimberti and J. Sauer, Chemically accurate vibrational free energies of adsorption from density functional theory molecular dynamics: Alkanes in zeolites, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 5849 (2021).
- M. E. Tuckerman, Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Molecular Simulation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2023).
- D. J. Wales and J. P. K. Doye, Global optimization by basin-hopping and the lowest energy structures of Lennard–Jones clusters, J. Phys. Chem. A 101, 5111 (1997).
- D. J. Wales, Energy Landscapes: Applications to Clusters, Biomolecules and Glasses (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2003).
- A. E. Abu EL-Maaty, M. A. Abdalla, M. Essalhi, M. M. Abdelnaby, M. M. Mahmoud, M. A. Habib, M. Antar, and R. Ben-Mansour, Kinetics of water adsorption in metal-organic framework (MOF-303) for adsorption cooling application, Energy Convers. Manage.: X 24, 100694 (2024).
- O. M. Yaghi and J. Yang, Porous aluminum pyrazoledicarboxylate frameworks (2021), US Patent 11,014,068, https://patentscope2.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2019010102&_cid=JP1-MTMINR-64949-1.
- F. Salles, D. I. Kolokolov, H. Jobic, G. Maurin, P. L. Llewellyn, T. Devic, C. Serre, and G. Ferey, Adsorption and diffusion of in the MOF type systems MIL-47(V) and MIL-53(Cr): A combination of microcalorimetry and QENS experiments with molecular simulations, J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 7802 (2009).
- K. Sau, Hybrid sampling approach to machine-learning potentials for gas adsorption: Hydrogen adsorption in MOF-303 [Dataset], Zenodo, 2026, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22030358.