Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Ultrafast demagnetization dynamics of 4f antiferromagnets

Maryna Pankratova1,2,3,*, Vladislav Borisov2,3, Danny Thonig2,4, Rohit Pathak2, Yoav William Windsor5,6, Laurenz Rettig5, Olle Eriksson2,3, Arthur Ernst7,8,9, and Anders Bergman2,3

  • *Contact author: maryna.pankratova@his.se, maryna.pankratova@ physics.uu.se

Phys. Rev. Materials 9, 094408 – Published 18 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rjvq-qs9x

Abstract

We study the ultrafast demagnetization dynamics of LnRh2Si2 (Ln=Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho) antiferromagnets after excitation by a laser pulse, using a combination of density functional theory and atomistic spin and spin-lattice dynamics simulations. In the first step, we calculate the Heisenberg interactions using the magnetic force theorem and compare two approaches, where the 4f states of the rare earths are treated as frozen core states or as valence states with added correlation corrections. We find marked quantitative differences in terms of predicted Curie temperature for most of the systems, especially for those with a large orbital moment of the rare-earth cations. This can be attributed to the importance of indirect interactions of the 4f states through the Si states, which depends on the binding energy of the 4f states and coexists with Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida–type interactions mediated by the conduction states. However, qualitatively both approaches agree in terms of the predicted antiferromagnetic ordering at low temperature, which is in line with previous experiments. In the second step, the atomistic dynamics simulations are used in combination with a heat-conserving two-temperature model, which allows for the calculation of spin and electronic temperatures during the magnetization dynamics simulations. Our simulations demonstrate that despite quite different demagnetization times, magnetization dynamics of all studied LnRh2Si2 antiferromagnets exhibit similar two-step behavior, in particular the first fast drop followed by slower demagnetization. In addition, we observe that the demagnetization amplitude depends linearly on laser fluence, for low fluences, something that is also in agreement with experimental observations. We also investigate the impact of lattice dynamics on ultrafast demagnetization using coupled atomistic spin-lattice dynamics simulations and the heat-conserving three-temperature model, which confirm the linear dependence of magnetization on laser fluence. The microscopic mechanisms behind these behaviors are investigated in detail.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (43)

  1. E. Beaurepaire, J.-C. Merle, A. Daunois, and J.-Y. Bigot, Ultrafast spin dynamics in ferromagnetic nickel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4250 (1996).
  2. M. Pankratova, I. P. Miranda, D. Thonig, M. Pereiro, E. Sjöqvist, A. Delin, O. Eriksson, and A. Bergman, Heat-conserving three-temperature model for ultrafast demagnetization in nickel, Phys. Rev. B 106, 174407 (2022).
  3. D. Zahn, F. Jakobs, Y. W. Windsor, H. Seiler, T. Vasileiadis, T. A. Butcher, Y. Qi, D. Engel, U. Atxitia, J. Vorberger, and R. Ernstorfer, Lattice dynamics and ultrafast energy flow between electrons, spins, and phonons in a 3d ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023032 (2021).
  4. T. Griepe and U. Atxitia, Evidence of electron-phonon mediated spin flip as driving mechanism for ultrafast magnetization dynamics in 3d ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 107, L100407 (2023).
  5. B. Frietsch, A. Donges, R. Carley, M. Teichmann, J. Bowlan, K. Döbrich, K. Carva, D. Legut, P. M. Oppeneer, U. Nowak, and M. Weinelt, The role of ultrafast magnon generation in the magnetization dynamics of rare-earth metals, Sci. Adv. 6, eabb1601 (2020).
  6. M. Teichmann, B. Frietsch, K. Döbrich, R. Carley, and M. Weinelt, Transient band structures in the ultrafast demagnetization of ferromagnetic gadolinium and terbium, Phys. Rev. B 91, 014425 (2015).
  7. M. Pankratova, I. Miranda, M. Pereiro, E. Sjöqvist, A. Delin, P. Scheid, O. Eriksson, and A. Bergman, Coupled atomistic spin-lattice simulations of ultrafast demagnetization in 3d ferromagnets, Sci. Rep. 14, 8138 (2024).
  8. Q. Remy, Ultrafast magnetization reversal in ferromagnetic spin valves: An s−d model perspective, Phys. Rev. B 107, 174431 (2023).
  9. D. Gupta, M. Pankratova, M. Riepp, M. Pereiro, B. Sanyal, S. Ershadrad, M. Hehn, N. Pontius, C. Schüßler-Langeheine, N. Bergeard et al., Tuning ultrafast demagnetization with ultrashort spin polarized currents in multi-sublattice ferrimagnets, Nat. Commun. 16, 3097 (2025).
  10. Y. W. Windsor, S.-E. Lee, D. Zahn, V. Borisov, D. Thonig, K. Kliemt, A. Ernst, C. Schüßler-Langeheine, N. Pontius, U. Staub et al., Exchange scaling of ultrafast angular momentum transfer in 4f antiferromagnets, Nat. Mater. 21, 514 (2022).
  11. S.-E. Lee, Y. W. Windsor, D. Zahn, A. Kraiker, K. Kummer, K. Kliemt, C. Krellner, C. Schüßler-Langeheine, N. Pontius, U. Staub, D. V. Vyalikh, A. Ernst, and L. Rettig, Controlling 4f antiferromagnetic dynamics via itinerant electronic susceptibility, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043019 (2024).
  12. S.-E. Lee, Y. W. Windsor, A. Fedorov, K. Kliemt, C. Krellner, C. Schüßler-Langeheine, N. Pontius, M. Wolf, U. Atxitia, D. V. Vyalikh et al., Robust magnetic order upon ultrafast excitation of an antiferromagnet, Adv. Mater. Inter. 9, 2201340 (2022).
  13. N. Thielemann-Kühn, D. Schick, N. Pontius, C. Trabant, R. Mitzner, K. Holldack, H. Zabel, A. Föhlisch, and C. Schüßler-Langeheine, Ultrafast and energy-efficient quenching of spin order: Antiferromagnetism beats ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 197202 (2017).
  14. J. H. Mentink, J. Hellsvik, D. V. Afanasiev, B. A. Ivanov, A. Kirilyuk, A. V. Kimel, O. Eriksson, M. I. Katsnelson, and T. Rasing, Ultrafast spin dynamics in multisublattice magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 057202 (2012).
  15. J. M. Wills and B. R. Cooper, Synthesis of band and model hamiltonian theory for hybridizing cerium systems, Phys. Rev. B 36, 3809 (1987).
  16. J. Wills et al., Full-Potential Electronic Structure Method (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2010), p. 167.
  17. M. Geilhufe, S. Achilles, M. A. Köbis, M. Arnold, I. Mertig, W. Hergert, and A. Ernst, Numerical solution of the relativistic single-site scattering problem for the Coulomb and the Mathieu potential, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 27, 435202 (2015).
  18. M. Hoffmann, A. Ernst, W. Hergert, V. N. Antonov, W. A. Adeagbo, M. R. Geilhufe, and H. Ben Hamed, Magnetic and electronic properties of complex oxides from first-principles, Phys. Status Solidi B 257, 1900671 (2020).
  19. V. I. Anisimov, J. Zaanen, and O. K. Andersen, Band theory and mott insulators: Hubbard U instead of stoner I, Phys. Rev. B 44, 943 (1991).
  20. A. I. Liechtenstein, M. I. Katsnelson, V. P. Antropov, and V. A. Gubanov, Local spin density functional approach to the theory of exchange interactions in ferromagnetic metals and alloys, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 67, 65 (1987).
  21. A. Szilva, Y. Kvashnin, E. A. Stepanov, L. Nordström, O. Eriksson, A. I. Lichtenstein, and M. I. Katsnelson, Quantitative theory of magnetic interactions in solids, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 035004 (2023).
  22. B. Skubic, J. Hellsvik, L. Nordström, and O. Eriksson, A method for atomistic spin dynamics simulations: Implementation and examples, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 315203 (2008).
  23. L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Theory of the dispersion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bodies, Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 8, 153 (1935).
  24. T. Gilbert, A phenomenological theory of damping in ferromagnetic materials, IEEE Trans. Magn. 40, 3443 (2004).
  25. A. Secchi, A. I. Lichtenstein, and M. I. Katsnelson, Magnetic interactions in strongly correlated systems: Spin and orbital contributions, Ann. Phys. 360, 61 (2015).
  26. O. Eriksson, A. Bergman, L. Bergqvist, and J. Hellsvik, Atomistic Spin Dynamics: Foundations and Applications (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2017).
  27. P.-W. Ma, S. L. Dudarev, A. A. Semenov, and C. H. Woo, Temperature for a dynamic spin ensemble, Phys. Rev. E 82, 031111 (2010).
  28. L. Bergqvist and A. Bergman, Realistic finite temperature simulations of magnetic systems using quantum statistics, Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 013802 (2018).
  29. B. Frietsch, J. Bowlan, R. Carley, M. Teichmann, S. Wienholdt, D. Hinzke, U. Nowak, K. Carva, P. M. Oppeneer, and M. Weinelt, Disparate ultrafast dynamics of itinerant and localized magnetic moments in gadolinium metal, Nat. Commun. 6, 8262 (2015).
  30. J. Hellsvik, D. Thonig, K. Modin, D. Iuşan, A. Bergman, O. Eriksson, L. Bergqvist, and A. Delin, General method for atomistic spin-lattice dynamics with first-principles accuracy, Phys. Rev. B 99, 104302 (2019).
  31. K. Mishra, A. Ciuciulkaite, M. Zapata-Herrera, P. Vavassori, V. Kapaklis, T. Rasing, A. Dmitriev, A. Kimel, and A. Kirilyuk, Ultrafast demagnetization in a ferrimagnet under electromagnetic field funneling, Nanoscale 13, 19367 (2021).
  32. U. Atxitia, O. Chubykalo-Fesenko, J. Walowski, A. Mann, and M. Münzenberg, Evidence for thermal mechanisms in laser-induced femtosecond spin dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 81, 174401 (2010).
  33. S. Jana, R. S. Malik, Y. O. Kvashnin, I. L. M. Locht, R. Knut, R. Stefanuik, I. Di Marco, A. N. Yaresko, M. Ahlberg, J. Åkerman, R. Chimata, M. Battiato, J. Söderström, O. Eriksson, and O. Karis, Analysis of the linear relationship between asymmetry and magnetic moment at the M edge of 3d transition metals, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013180 (2020).
  34. K. Momma and F. Izumi, Vesta 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272 (2011).
  35. K. Kliemt and C. Krellner, Single crystal growth and characterization of GdRh2Si2, J. Cryst. Growth 419, 37 (2015).
  36. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
  37. A. Togo, Y. Inoue, and I. Tanaka, Phonon structure of titanium under shear deformation along {101¯2} twinning mode, Phys. Rev. B 102, 024106 (2020).
  38. G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).
  39. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  40. G. Kotliar, S. Y. Savrasov, K. Haule, V. S. Oudovenko, O. Parcollet, and C. A. Marianetti, Electronic structure calculations with dynamical mean-field theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 865 (2006).
  41. A. Liechtenstein, V. I. Anisimov, and J. Zaanen, Density-functional theory and strong interactions: Orbital ordering in Mott-Hubbard insulators, Phys. Rev. B 52, R5467(R) (1995).
  42. M. Güttler, A. Generalov, M. Otrokov, K. Kummer, K. Kliemt, A. Fedorov, A. Chikina, S. Danzenbächer, S. Schulz, E. V. Chulkov et al., Robust and tunable itinerant ferromagnetism at the silicon surface of the antiferromagnet GdRh2Si2, Sci. Rep. 6, 24254 (2016).
  43. R. Cardias, A. Szilva, A. Bergman, I. D. Marco, M. I. Katsnelson, A. I. Lichtenstein, L. Nordström, A. B. Klautau, O. Eriksson, and Y. O. Kvashnin, The bethe-slater curve revisited; new insights from electronic structure theory, Sci. Rep. 7, 4058 (2017).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation