Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Interface magnetism and anomalous Hall effect in La0.7Sr0.3MnO3/SrIrO3 bilayers

Andrea Peralta-Somoza1, Myoung Woo-Yoo2, Sandra Lopez1, Rafael Fuster1, Mariona Cabero3, José María Gonzalez-Calbet4, Javier Tornos1, Alberto Rivera1, Federico Mompeán5,6 et al.

Mar García-Hernández5,6, Timothy R. Charlton7, Brian J. Kirby8, Stephan Rosenkranz9, Daniel Haskel10, Yongseong Choi10, Joerg Strempfer10, Xiao Wang11, Zouhair Sefrioui1, Carlos León1,6, Javier E. Villegas12, Suzanne G. E. te Velthuis9, and Jacobo Santamaría1,6,*

  • *Contact author: jacsan@ucm.es

Phys. Rev. Materials 9, 124402 – Published 4 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qxn3-5327

Abstract

Epitaxial interfaces combining 3d and 5d transition metal oxides are a fertile playground to examine the interplay between topology and electron correlations. In this paper, we explore magnetism and transport of bilayers combining ferromagnetic La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 and the strong spin-orbit coupling material SrIrO3. We have found an interfacial magnetic proximity effect driving an intrinsic contribution to the anomalous Hall effect of topological origin. The interfacial proximity interaction is enabled by the Mn-O-Ir bonding reconstruction and depends on layer sequence. While bilayers with the La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 on top featuring a robust Mn magnetism at the interface show the intrinsic AHE contribution, it is absent in bilayers with the inverted layer sequence (SrIrO3 layer on top) showing strongly suppressed magnetism at the interface. These results illustrate the leading role of interfacial atomic reconstructions on the interplay between topology and correlations at 3d/5d oxide interfaces. This finding may be of interest in future oxide topological spintronics and spin-orbitronics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Collections

This article appears in the following collection:

Magnetic Phenomena at Oxide Interfaces: Fundamentals to Devices

The Editors of Physical Review Materials are pleased to present the Collection on Magnetic Phenomena at Oxide Interfaces, highlighting cutting-edge advances in oxide interface magnetism and its applications. The Collection is being guest-edited by Lucas Caretta from Brown University (USA) and Jacobo Santamaria from Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Spain). Every article published in this collection underwent a rigorous peer review process, adhering to the same high standards applied to all papers. The Physical Review Materials editorial team managed the peer review and made all editorial decisions.

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (65)

  1. Y. Tokura, M. Kawasaki, and N. Nagaosa, Emergent functions of quantum materials, Nat. Phys. 13, 1056 (2017).
  2. B. Keimer and J. E. Moore, The physics of quantum materials, Nat. Phys. 13, 1045 (2017).
  3. W. Witczak-Krempa, G. Chen, Y. B. Kim, and L. Balents, Correlated quantum phenomena in the strong spin-orbit regime, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 5, 57 (2013).
  4. A. Soumyanarayanan, N. Reyren, A. Fert, and C. Panagopoulos, Emergent phenomena induced by spin-orbit coupling at surfaces and interfaces, Nature (London) 539, 509 (2016).
  5. H. Boschker and J. Mannhart, Quantum-matter heterostructures, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 8, 145 (2017).
  6. J. Garcia-Barriocanal et al., Spin and orbital Ti magnetism at LaMnO3/SrTiO3 interfaces, Nat. Commun. 1, 82 (2010).
  7. F. A. Cuellar et al., Reversible electric-field control of magnetization at oxide interfaces, Nat. Commun. 5, 4215 (2014).
  8. F. Y. Bruno et al., Insight into spin transport in oxide heterostructures from interface-resolved magnetic mapping, Nat. Commun. 6, 6306 (2015).
  9. A. Gariglio, S. D. Caviglia, A. D. Triscone, and J. M. Gabay, A spin-orbit playground: Surfaces and interfaces of transition metal oxides, Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 12501 (2019).
  10. M. Bibes, J. E. Villegas, and A. Barthélèmy, Ultrathin oxide films and interfaces for electronics and spintronics, Adv. Phys. 60, 5 (2011).
  11. R. Ramesh and D. G. Schlom, Creating emergent phenomena in oxide superlattices, Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 257 (2019).
  12. M. Imada, A. Fujimori, and Y. Tokura, Metal-insulator transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 1039 (1998).
  13. S. J. Moon et al., Dimensionality-controlled insulator-metal transition and correlated metallic state in 5d transition metal oxides Srn+1IrnO3n+1 (n=1, 2, and ∞), Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 226402 (2008).
  14. B. J. Kim, H. Ohsumi, T. Komesu, S. Sakai, T. Morita, H. Takagi, and T. Arima, Phase-sensitive observation of a spin-orbital Mott state in Sr2IrO4, Science 323, 1329 (2009).
  15. J. Liu et al., Tuning the electronic properties of Jeff=1/2 Correlated semimetal in epitaxial perovskite SrIrO3, arXiv:1305.1732.
  16. Y. F. Nie et al., Interplay of spin-orbit interactions, dimensionality, and octahedral rotations in semimetallic SrIrO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 016401 (2015).
  17. D. J. Groenendijk et al., Spin-orbit semimetal SrIrO3 in the two-dimensional limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 256403 (2017).
  18. P. Schütz et al., Dimensionality-driven metal-insulator transition in spin-orbit-coupled SrIrO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 256404 (2017).
  19. F. Gallego et al., Reversible metal-insulator transition in SrIrO3 ultrathin layers by field effect control of inversion symmetry breaking, Commun. Mater. 4, 36 (2023).
  20. N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539 (2010).
  21. F. D. M. Haldane, Berry curvature on the Fermi surface: Anomalous Hall effect as a topological Fermi-liquid property, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 206602 (2004).
  22. S. Onoda, N. Sugimoto, and N. Nagaosa, Intrinsic versus extrinsic anomalous Hall effect in ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 126602 (2006).
  23. S. Onoda, N. Sugimoto, and N. Nagaosa, Quantum transport theory of anomalous electric, thermoelectric, and thermal Hall effects in ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 77, 165103 (2008).
  24. H. Chen, Q. Niu, and A. H. Macdonald, Anomalous Hall effect arising from noncollinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 017205 (2014).
  25. J. Kübler and C. Felser, Non-collinear antiferromagnets and the anomalous Hall effect, Europhys. Lett. 108, 67001 (2014).
  26. S. Nakatsuji, N. Kiyohara, and T. Higo, Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature, Nature (London) 527, 212 (2015).
  27. N. Kiyohara, T. Tomita, and S. Nakatsuji, Giant anomalous Hall effect in the chiral antiferromagnet Mn3Ge, Phys. Rev. Appl. 5, 064009 (2015).
  28. A. K. Nayak et al., Large anomalous Hall effect driven by a nonvanishing Berry curvature in the noncolinear antiferromagnet Mn3Ge, Sci. Adv. 2, e1501870 (2016).
  29. L. Šmejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakatsuji, and T. Jungwirth, Anomalous Hall antiferromagnets, Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 482 (2021).
  30. M. W. Yoo et al., Large intrinsic anomalous Hall effect in SrIrO3 induced by magnetic proximity effect, Nat. Commun. 12, 3283 (2021).
  31. M. Björck and G. Andersson, GenX: An extensible X-ray reflectivity refinement program utilizing differential evolution, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 1174 (2007).
  32. A. Glavic and M. Björck, GenX 3: The latest generation of an established tool, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 55, 1063 (2022).
  33. L. G. Parratt, Surface studies of solids by total reflection of x-rays, Phys. Rev. 95, 359 (1954).
  34. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/qxn3-5327 for supplemental figures.
  35. D. Yia et al., Atomic-scale control of magnetic anisotropy via novel spin-orbit coupling effect in La2/3Sr1/3MnO3/SrIrO3 superlattices, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6397 (2016).
  36. J. Nichols et al., Emerging magnetism and anomalous Hall effect in iridate-manganite heterostructures, Nat. Commun. 7, 12721 (2016).
  37. D. Yi et al., Tuning perpendicular magnetic anisotropy by oxygen octahedral rotations in (La1−xSrxMnO3)/(SrIrO3) superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 077201 (2017).
  38. Y. Li, L. Zhang, Q. Zhang, C. Li, T. Yang, Y. Deng, L. Gu, and D. Wu, Emergent topological Hall effect in La0.7Sr0.3MnO3/SrIrO3 heterostructures, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 21268 (2019).
  39. E. Skoropata et al., Interfacial tuning of chiral magnetic interactions for large topological Hall effects in LaMnO3/SrIrO3 heterostructures, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz3902 (2020).
  40. M. Matvejeff, T. Chikyow, and M. Lippmaa, Interface growth of La1.2Sr1.8Mn1.7Ru0.3O7 Ruddlesden-Popper films on SrTiO3, J. Cryst. Growth 311, 1201 (2009).
  41. Y. F. Nie et al., Atomically precise interfaces from non-stoichiometric deposition, Nat. Commun. 5, 4530 (2014).
  42. G. M. De Luca et al., Ubiquitous long-range antiferromagnetic coupling across the interface between superconducting and ferromagnetic oxides, Nat. Commun. 5, 5626 (2014).
  43. Y. Tokura, T. Arima, H. Takagi, S. Uchida, T. Ishigaki, H. Asano, R. Beyers, A. I. Nazzal, P. Lacorre, and J. B. Torrance, New double-sheet copper oxide compounds with BiO or TIO bilayers, Nature (London) 342, 890 (1989).
  44. M. Huvé, C. Martin, A. Maignan, C. Michel, G. Van Tendeloo, M. Hervieu, and B. Raveau, A new cuprate with mercury bilayers: The “2222” oxide Hg2−xMxBa2Pr2Cu2O10−δ (M = Cu, Pr), J. Solid State Chem. 114, 230 (1995).
  45. P. Fisher, S. Wang, M. Skowronski, P. A. Salvador, M. Snyder, and O. Maksimov, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 025290 (2007).
  46. N. M. Dawley, B. H. Goodge, W. Egger, M. Barone, L. F. Kourkoutis, and D. J. Keeble, Darrell G. Schlom Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 062901 (2020).
  47. J. Hemberger et al., Structural, magnetic, and electrical properties of single crystalline La1−xSrxMnO3 (0.4 < x < 0.85), Phys. Rev. B 66, 094410 (2002).
  48. O. Chmaissem et al., Structural and magnetic phase diagrams of La1−xSrxMnO3 and Pr1−ySryMnO3, Phys. Rev. B 67, 094431 (2003).
  49. A. K. Jaiswal et al., Direct observation of strong anomalous Hall effect and proximity-induced ferromagnetic state in SrIrO3, Adv. Mater. 34, 2109163 (2022).
  50. M. A. Laguna-Marco, D. Haskel, N. Souza-Neto, J. C. Lang, V. V. Krishnamurthy, S. Chikara, G. Cao, and M. Van Veenendaal, Orbital magnetism and spin-orbit effects in the electronic structure of BaIrO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 216407 (2010).
  51. S. Fujiyama, H. Ohsumi, T. Komesu, J. Matsuno, B. J. Kim, M. Takata, T. Arima, and H. Takagi, Two-dimensional heisenberg behavior of Jeff=1/2 isospins in the paramagnetic state of the spin-orbital mott insulator Sr2IrO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 247212 (2012).
  52. J. Matsuno, K. Ihara, S. Yamamura, H. Wadati, K. Ishii, V. V. Shankar, H. Y. Kee, and H. Takagi, Engineering a spin-orbital magnetic insulator by tailoring superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 247209 (2015).
  53. L. Hao et al., Two-dimensional Jeff = 1/2 antiferromagnetic insulator unraveled from interlayer exchange coupling in artificial perovskite iridate superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 027204 (2017).
  54. L. Hao et al., Giant magnetic response of a two-dimensional antiferromagnet, Nat. Phys. 14, 806 (2018).
  55. S. Okamoto, Magnetic interaction at an interface between manganite and other transition metal oxides, Phys. Rev. B 82, 024427 (2010).
  56. J. Salafranca and S. Okamoto, Unconventional proximity effect and inverse spin-switch behavior in a model manganite-cuprate-manganite trilayer system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 256804 (2010).
  57. Y. Lyanda-Geller et al., Charge transport in manganites: Hopping conduction, the anomalous Hall effect, and universal scaling, Phys. Rev. B 63, 184426 (2001).
  58. M. Bibes et al., Anisotropic magnetoresistance and anomalous Hall effect in manganite thin films, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17, 7332 (2005).
  59. W. J. Xu, B. Zhang, Z. X. Liu, Z. Wang, W. Li, Z. B. Wu, R. H. Yu, and X. X. Zhang, Anomalous Hall Effect in Fe/Gd Bilayers Europhys. Lett. 90, 27004 (2010).
  60. W. J. Xu, B. Zhang, Z. Wang, S. S. Chu, W. Li, Z. B. Wu, R. H. Yu, and X. X. Zhang, Scaling law of anomalous Hall effect in Fe/Cu bilayers, Eur. Phys. J. B 65, 233 (2008).
  61. Z. Fang, N. Nagaosa, K. S. Takahashi, A. Asamitsu, R. Mathieu, T. Ogasawara, H. Yamada, M. Kawasaki, Y. Tokura, and K. Terakura, The anomalous Hall effect and magnetic monopoles in momentum space, Science 302, 92 (2003).
  62. M. Lee, Y. Onose, Y. Tokura, and N. P. Ong, Hidden constant in the anomalous Hall effect of high-purity magnet MnSi, Phys. Rev. B 75, 172403 (2007).
  63. A. Neubauer, C. Pfleiderer, B. Binz, A. Rosch, R. Ritz, P. G. Niklowitz, and P. Böni, Topological Hall effect in the A phase of MnSi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 186602 (2009).
  64. N. J. Ghimire, A. S. Botana, J. S. Jiang, J. Zhang, Y. S. Chen, and J. F. Mitchell, Large anomalous Hall effect in the chiral-lattice antiferromagnet CoNb3S6, Nat. Commun. 9, 3280 (2018).
  65. J. Ye, Y. B. Kim, A. J. Millis, B. I. Shraiman, P. Majumdar, and Z. Teanovic, Berry phase theory of the anomalous Hall effect: Application to colossal magnetoresistance manganites, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3737 (1999).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation