Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Seamlessly joining length scales: From atomistic thermal graphs to anisotropic continuum conductivity

C. Ugwumadu*

D. A. Drabold

R. M. Tutchton

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, Nanoscale & Quantum Phenomena Institute, Ohio University, Ohio 45701, USA

  • *Contact author: cugwumadu@lanl.gov

Phys. Rev. Materials 10, 053804 – Published 21 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/pfdp-s7ql

Abstract

Thermal transport in complex solids is governed by local structure, defects, and anisotropy, yet most continuum models still rely on oversimplified and homogenized conductivities. Here, we bridge atomistic and continuum descriptions by building finite element (FE) models directly from the site-projected thermal conductivity (SPTC), an atomic-level decomposition of the Green–Kubo thermal conductivity. We introduce a toolkit, the “Simulator Collection for Atomic-to-Continuum Scales (SCACS)”, which uses a graph neural network to predict SPTC on large atomic structures, coarse-grains these fields into anisotropic conductivity tensors, and embeds them into the heat-flow FE equation with a customized, anisotropy-aware adaptive mesh refinement scheme. Applied to silicon nanostructures, the resulting FE models act as representative volume elements, reproduce bulk conductivities, and capture interfacial and defect-driven anisotropy while maintaining thermodynamic consistency. Additionally, SCACS predicts experimental conductance trends and fields. This work demonstrates a general route for transferring atomistic transport information into device-scale thermal simulations with physics-based approximations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (84)

  1. M. Hu and Z. Yang, Perspective on multi-scale simulation of thermal transport in solids and interfaces, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 23, 5680 (2021).
  2. O. C. Zienkiewicz, R. L. Taylor, and J. Z. Zhu, The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals, 6th ed. (Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Amsterdam, 2005).
  3. I. Gitman, H. Askes, and L. Sluys, Representative volume: Existence and size determination, Eng. Fract. Mech. 74, 2518 (2007).
  4. J. Yvonnet, Computational Homogenization of Heterogeneous Materials with Finite Elements (Springer, New York, 2019), Vol. 258.
  5. C. Ugwumadu, W. Downs, C. O'Brien, R. Thapa, R. Olson III, B. Wisner, M. Ali, J. Trembly, Y. Al-Majali, and D. Drabold, Atomistic-to-continuum modeling of carbon foam: A new approach to finite element simulation, Carbon 229, 119506 (2024).
  6. I. Babuska and B. Szabo, On the rates of convergence of the finite element method, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 18, 323 (1982).
  7. Y. Yang, M. Yan, Z. Zhang, D. Hao, X. Chen, and W. Chen, Steady-state and transient thermal stress analysis using a polygonal finite element method, Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 251, 104413 (2025).
  8. J. Chen, M. Zhang, H. Wang, and L. Li, Evaluation of thermal conductivity of asphalt concrete with heterogeneous microstructure, Appl. Therm. Eng. 84, 368 (2015).
  9. T. Meng, C. Peng, R. Wang, and Z. Cai, Experimental and finite element analysis of thermal conductivity in Cu matrix composites reinforced with surface-modified Kovar particles, Mater. Chem. Phys. 333, 130392 (2025).
  10. K. Xu, D. Z. Huang, and E. Darve, Learning constitutive relations using symmetric positive definite neural networks, J. Comput. Phys. 428, 110072 (2021).
  11. X.-L. Peng, M. Fathidoost, B. Lin, Y. Yang, and B.-X. Xu, What can machine learning help with microstructure-informed materials modeling and design? MRS Bull. 50, 61 (2025).
  12. M. Li, L. Dai, and Y. Hu, Machine learning for harnessing thermal energy: From materials discovery to system optimization, ACS Energy Lett. 7, 3204 (2022).
  13. S. Keshav, J. Herb, and F. Fritzen, Spectral normalization and voigt–reuss net: A universal approach to microstructure-property forecasting with physical guarantees, GAMM-Mitteilungen 48, e70005 (2025).
  14. R. W. Lewis, P. Nithiarasu, and K. N. Seetharamu, Steady state heat conduction in one dimension, in Fundamentals of the Finite Element Method for Heat and Fluid Flow (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2004), Chap. 3, pp. 38–101.
  15. D. Basaula, M. Daeipour, L. Kuna, J. Mangeri, B. Feygelson, and S. Nakhmanson, Towards modeling thermoelectric properties of anisotropic polycrystalline materials, Acta Mater. 228, 117743 (2022).
  16. M. O. R. Siddiqui and D. Sun, Finite element analysis of thermal conductivity and thermal resistance behaviour of woven fabric, Comput. Mater. Sci. 75, 45 (2013).
  17. M. Kamiński and P. Ostrowski, Homogenization of heat transfer in fibrous composite with stochastic interface defects, Compos. Struct. 261, 113555 (2021).
  18. M. O. H. Schutzeichel, T. Kletschkowski, and H. P. Monner, Microscale thermal modelling of multifunctional composite materials made from polymer electrolyte coated carbon fibres including homogenization and model reduction strategies, Appl. Mechan. 2, 739 (2021).
  19. J. M. Powers, On the necessity of positive semi-definite conductivity and Onsager reciprocity in modeling heat conduction in anisotropic media, J. Heat Transfer 126, 670 (2004).
  20. G. R. Barrenechea, V. John, and P. Knobloch, Finite element methods respecting the discrete maximum principle for convection-diffusion equations, SIAM Rev. 66, 3 (2024).
  21. V. L. Deringer, N. Bernstein, G. Csányi, C. Ben Mahmoud, M. Ceriotti, M. Wilson, D. A. Drabold, and S. R. Elliott, Origins of structural and electronic transitions in disordered silicon, Nature (London) 589, 59 (2021).
  22. J. D. Morrow and V. L. Deringer, Indirect learning and physically guided validation of interatomic potential models, J. Chem. Phys. 157, 104105 (2022).
  23. A. P. Bartók, M. C. Payne, R. Kondor, and G. Csányi, Gaussian approximation potentials: The accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 136403 (2010).
  24. N. Lubbers, J. S. Smith, and K. Barros, Hierarchical modeling of molecular energies using a deep neural network, J. Chem. Phys. 148, 241715 (2018).
  25. I. Batatia, P. Benner, Y. Chiang, A. M. Elena, D. P. Kovács, J. Riebesell, X. R. Advincula, M. Asta, M. Avaylon, W. J. Baldwin, et al., A foundation model for atomistic materials chemistry, J. Chem. Phys. 163, 184110 (2025).
  26. R. Kubo, M. Yokota, and S. Nakajima, Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes. II. Response to thermal disturbance, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 12, 1203 (1957).
  27. M. S. Green, Markoff random processes and the statistical mechanics of time‐dependent phenomena. II. irreversible processes in fluids, J. Chem. Phys. 22, 398 (1954).
  28. P. K. Schelling, S. R. Phillpot, and P. Keblinski, Comparison of atomic-level simulation methods for computing thermal conductivity, Phys. Rev. B 65, 144306 (2002).
  29. J. Kang and L.-W. Wang, First-principles Green-Kubo method for thermal conductivity calculations, Phys. Rev. B 96, 020302(R) (2017).
  30. Y. Zeng, J. T. Avritte, and J. Dong, Generalized Langevin equation theory of thermal conduction across material interfaces, Phys. Status Solidi B 258, 2000454 (2021).
  31. D. McQuarrie, Statistical Mechanics, University Science Books (Harper and Row, New York, 1997).
  32. F. Müller-Plathe, A simple nonequilibrium molecular dynamics method for calculating the thermal conductivity, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 6082 (1997).
  33. Y. Zhou and M. Hu, Quantitatively analyzing phonon spectral contribution of thermal conductivity based on nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations. II. From time Fourier transform, Phys. Rev. B 92, 195205 (2015).
  34. E. J. Maginn, R. A. Messerly, D. J. Carlson, D. R. Roe, and J. R. Elliot, Best practices for computing transport properties 1. Self-diffusivity and viscosity from equilibrium molecular dynamics, Living J. Comput. Mol. Sci. 1, 6324 (2018).
  35. D. A. Broido, M. Malorny, G. Birner, N. Mingo, and D. A. Stewart, Intrinsic lattice thermal conductivity of semiconductors from first principles, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 231922 (2007).
  36. Y. K. Koh and D. G. Cahill, Frequency dependence of the thermal conductivity of semiconductor alloys, Phys. Rev. B 76, 075207 (2007).
  37. F. Yang and C. Dames, Mean free path spectra as a tool to understand thermal conductivity in bulk and nanostructures, Phys. Rev. B 87, 035437 (2013).
  38. J. M. Larkin and A. J. H. McGaughey, Thermal conductivity accumulation in amorphous silica and amorphous silicon, Phys. Rev. B 89, 144303 (2014).
  39. L. Lindsay, First principles Peierls-Boltzmann phonon thermal transport: A topical review, Nanoscale Microscale Thermophys. Eng. 20, 67 (2016).
  40. P. B. Allen and J. L. Feldman, Thermal conductivity of glasses: Theory and application to amorphous Si, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 645 (1989).
  41. P. B. Allen and J. L. Feldman, Thermal conductivity of disordered harmonic solids, Phys. Rev. B 48, 12581 (1993).
  42. C. Ugwumadu, A. Gautam, Y. G. Lee, and D. A. Drabold, Mapping thermal conductivity at the atomic scale: A step toward the thermal design of materials, Phys. Status Solidi B 263, e202500316 (2026).
  43. A. Gautam, Y. G. Lee, C. Ugwumadu, K. Nepal, S. Nakhmanson, and D. A. Drabold, Site-projected thermal conductivity: Application to defects, interfaces, and homogeneously disordered materials, Phys. Status Solidi (RRL) 19, 2400306 (2025).
  44. C. Ugwumadu, D. A. Drabold, and R. M. Tutchton, Effects of galactic irradiation on thermal and electronic transport in tungsten, Phys. Status Solidi B 262, 2500109 (2025).
  45. K. Nepal, A. Gautam, R. Hussein, K. Konstantinou, S. Elliott, C. Ugwumadu, and D. Drabold, Electronic and thermal properties of the phase-change memory material, Ge2Sb2Te5, and results from spatially resolved transport calculations, Solid State Sci. 173, 108182 (2026).
  46. M. S. Alnaes, A. Logg, K. B. Ølgaard, M. E. Rognes, and G. N. Wells, Unified Form Language: A domain-specific language for weak formulations of partial differential equations, ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 40, 1 (2014).
  47. I. A. Baratta, J. P. Dean, J. S. Dokken, M. Habera, J. S. Hale, C. N. Richardson, M. E. Rognes, M. W. Scroggs, N. Sime, and G. N. Wells, DOLFINx: The next generation FEniCS problem solving environment, Zenodo (2023), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10447666.
  48. L. D. Dalcin, R. R. Paz, P. A. Kler, and A. Cosimo, Parallel distributed computing using Python, Adv. Water Resour. 34, 1124 (2011).
  49. W. Bangerth, I. Kim, D. Sheen, and J. Yim, On hanging node constraints for nonconforming finite elements using the Douglas–Santos–Sheen–Ye element as an example, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 55, 1719 (2017).
  50. S. Uma, A. McConnell, M. Asheghi, K. Kurabayashi, and K. Goodson, Temperature-dependent thermal conductivity of undoped polycrystalline silicon layers, Int. J. Thermophys. 22, 605 (2001).
  51. M. R. Abel, T. L. Wright, W. P. King, and S. Graham, Thermal metrology of silicon microstructures using Raman spectroscopy, IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol. 30, 200 (2007).
  52. A. I. Hochbaum, R. Chen, R. D. Delgado, W. Liang, E. C. Garnett, M. Najarian, A. Majumdar, and P. Yang, Enhanced thermoelectric performance of rough silicon nanowires, Nature (London) 451, 163 (2008).
  53. A. I. Boukai, Y. Bunimovich, J. Tahir-Kheli, J.-K. Yu, W. A. Goddard Iii, and J. R. Heath, Silicon nanowires as efficient thermoelectric materials, Nature (London) 451, 168 (2008).
  54. H. Takeuchi, R. Yokogawa, K. Takahashi, K. Komori, T. Morimoto, Y. Yamashita, N. Sawamoto, and A. Ogura, Thermal conductivity characteristics in polycrystalline silicon with different average sizes of grain and nanostructures in the grains by UV Raman spectroscopy, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 59, 075501 (2020).
  55. B. L. Davis and M. I. Hussein, Nanophononic metamaterial: Thermal conductivity reduction by local resonance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 055505 (2014).
  56. R. J. Hardy, Energy-flux operator for a lattice, Phys. Rev. 132, 168 (1963).
  57. C. Ugwumadu, R. Thapa, K. Nepal, A. Gautam, Y. Al-Majali, J. Trembly, and D. A. Drabold, Self-assembly and the properties of micro-mesoporous carbon, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 20, 1753 (2024).
  58. A. P. Bartók, R. Kondor, and G. Csányi, On representing chemical environments, Phys. Rev. B 87, 184115 (2013).
  59. Identify diamond structure, OVITO.
  60. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/pfdp-s7ql for additional details on the SPTC graph network, the masking procedure used to generate FE models with voids, and the atomic and FE model datasets discussed in the paper.
  61. P. Ranganathan, R. Aggarwal, and C. Pramesh, Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Odds versus risk, Perspect. Clin. Res. 6, 222 (2015).
  62. B. J. B. S. Haldane, The estimation and significance of the logarithm of a ratio of frequencies, Ann. Human Genetics 20, 309 (1956).
  63. F. J. Anscombe, On estimating binomial response relations, Biometrika 43, 461 (1956).
  64. T. F. Gonzalez, Clustering to minimize the maximum intercluster distance, Theor. Comput. Sci. 38, 293 (1985).
  65. W. Hu, B. Liu, J. Gomes, M. Zitnik, P. Liang, V. Pande, and J. Leskovec, Strategies for pre-training graph neural networks, in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2020).
  66. GiNeConv, PyTorch Geometric.
  67. C. Ugwumadu, D. A. Drabold, and R. M. Tutchton, Seamlessly joining length scales: From atomistic thermal graphs to anisotropic continuum conductivity [data set], Zenodo (2026), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18474574.
  68. W. Dörfler, A convergent adaptive algorithm for Poisson's equation, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 33, 1106 (1996).
  69. E. Isotta, S. Jiang, R. Bueno-Villoro, R. Nagahiro, K. Maeda, D. A. Mattlat, A. R. Odufisan, A. Zevalkink, J. Shiomi, S. Zhang, et al., Heat transport at silicon grain boundaries, Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2405413 (2024).
  70. A. Ben Amor, D. Djomani, M. Fakhfakh, S. Dilhaire, L. Vincent, and S. Grauby, Si and Ge allotrope heterostructured nanowires: Experimental evaluation of the thermal conductivity reduction, Nanotechnology 30, 375704 (2019).
  71. L. Vincent, D. Djomani, M. Fakfakh, C. Renard, B. Belier, D. Bouchier, and G. Patriarche, Shear-driven phase transformation in silicon nanowires, Nanotechnology 29, 125601 (2018).
  72. G. S. Doerk, C. Carraro, and R. Maboudian, Single nanowire thermal conductivity measurements by Raman thermography, ACS Nano 4, 4908 (2010).
  73. R. Hill, On constitutive macro-variables for heterogeneous solids at finite strain, Proc. R. Soc. London A 326, 131 (1972).
  74. J. Mandel, Plasticite Classique et Viscoplasticite, CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences (Springer, 1972).
  75. G. R. Ramos, T. dos Santos, and R. Rossi, An extension of the Hill–Mandel principle for transient heat conduction in heterogeneous media with heat generation incorporating finite RVE thermal inertia effects, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 111, 553 (2017).
  76. L. A. Rosset, D. A. Drabold, and V. L. Deringer, Signatures of paracrystallinity in amorphous silicon from machine-learning-driven molecular dynamics, Nat. Commun. 16, 2360 (2025).
  77. P. Hirel, Atomsk: A tool for manipulating and converting atomic data files, Comput. Phys. Commun. 197, 212 (2015).
  78. A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolintineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in ‘t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. Dac Nguyen, et al., LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales, Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022).
  79. E. Perez, F. Strub, H. De Vries, V. Dumoulin, and A. Courville, FiLM: Visual reasoning with a general conditioning layer, in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) Press, Palo Alto, California USA, 2018), Vol. 32.
  80. D. Hendrycks and K. Gimpel, Gaussian error linear units (GELUs), arXiv:1606.08415.
  81. I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter, Decoupled weight decay regularization, arXiv:1711.05101.
  82. T. Akiba, S. Sano, T. Yanase, T. Ohta, and M. Koyama, Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework, in Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2019).
  83. C. G. Broyden and M. T. Vespucci, The Krylov aspects, in Krylov Solvers for Linear Algebraic Systems, Studies in Computational Mathematics (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2004), Chap. 4, Vol. 11, pp. 77–103.
  84. J. Ahrens, B. Geveci, and C. Law, ParaView: An end-user tool for large data visualization, in Visualization Handbook (Elesvier, Amsterdam, 2005).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation