- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Materials

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Magnetic domains in ultrathin, bulk-like and proximity-coupled europium oxide

Seema*, Moumita Kundu, Paul Rosenberger, Henrik Jentgens, Ulrich Nowak, and Martina Müller†

  • *Contact author: seema.seema@uni-konstanz.de
  • †Contact author: martina.mueller@uni-konstanz.de
PDF

Phys. Rev. Materials 9, 084410 – Published 22 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/hscs-4sy1

Abstract

The control of electron spins in materials that are simultaneously ferromagnetic and insulating opens up a wealth of quantum phenomena in spin-based electronics. Thin films of europium oxide (EuO) are ideal for the generation and manipulation of spin-polarized states, but so far, there are no experimental literature reports on the magnetic domain patterns of EuO. However, at these microscopic length scales, magnetic relaxation between the remanent and demagnetized states takes place in any spintronic device. This relaxation process involves the displacement of magnetic domain walls and can therefore be strongly influenced by the film's structure and thickness. Here, we present an investigation of the temperature-dependent behavior of magnetic domains and hysteresis in bulk-like (25 nm) and ultrathin (3 nm) EuO films. Magneto-optical Kerr microscopy is used, a technique that is a valuable tool for exploring microscopic features such as spin dynamics and magnetic domain walls. Significant Kerr rotation in EuO led to high-contrast magnetic domain images in thick films, facilitating the observation of domain dynamics. The Curie temperature (TC) and coercivity show thickness-dependent variations. The analysis and comparison of hysteresis loops and domain imaging in EuO and EuO/Co reveal proximity effect-induced antiferromagnetic coupling of both layers. To elucidate the magnetization reversal dynamics in EuO, micromagnetic simulations using MuMax3 were performed below and above TC. This comprehensive approach was designed to comprehend the impact of magnetism and magnetic proximity effects in EuO on the micromagnetic scale, potentially extending its magnetic ordering beyond TC.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (48)

  1. A. Taroni, Nat. Mater. 12, 282 (2013).
  2. A. S. Borukhovich and A. V. Troshin, Europium Monoxide, Springer Series in Materials Science, Vol. 265 (Springer, Cham, 2018).
  3. S. S. P. Parkin, M. Hayashi, and L. Thomas, Science 320, 190 (2008).
  4. C. Caspers, A. Gloskovskii, M. Gorgoi, C. Besson, M. Luysberg, K. Z. Rushchanskii, M. Ležaić, C. S. Fadley, W. Drube, and M. Müller, Sci. Rep. 6, 22912 (2016).
  5. M. Müller, M. Luysberg, and C. M. Schneider, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 142503 (2011).
  6. V. N. Kats, L. A. Shelukhin, P. A. Usachev, D. V. Averyanov, I. A. Karateev, O. E. Parfenov, A. N. Taldenkov, A. M. Tokmachev, V. G. Storchak, and V. V. Pavlov, Nanoscale 15, 2828 (2023).
  7. S. Pappas, P. Poulopoulos, B. Lewitz, A. Straub, A. Goschew, V. Kapaklis, F. Wilhelm, A. Rogalev, and P. Fumagalli, Sci. Rep. 3, 1333 (2013).
  8. P. G. Steeneken, L. H. Tjeng, I. Elfimov, G. A. Sawatzky, G. Ghiringhelli, N. B. Brookes, and D.-J. Huang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 047201 (2002).
  9. Y. Ohuchi, Y. Kozuka, M. Uchida, K. Ueno, A. Tsukazaki, and M. Kawasaki, Phys. Rev. B 91, 245115 (2015).
  10. T. Heider, T. Gerber, O. Köksal, M. Eschbach, E. Młyńczak, P. Lömker, P. Gospodaric, M. Gehlmann, M. Plötzing, R. Pentcheva, L. Plucinski, C. M. Schneider, and M. Müller, Phys. Rev. B 106, 054424 (2022).
  11. G. M. Prinz, T. Gerber, A. Lorke, and M. Müller, Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 202401 (2016).
  12. B. Song, M. Wang, X. Wang, Y. Sui, and J. Tang, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 496, 165900 (2020).
  13. P. M. S. Monteiro, P. J. Baker, A. Ionescu, C. H. W. Barnes, Z. Salman, A. Suter, T. Prokscha, and S. Langridge, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 217208 (2013).
  14. A. Schmehl, V. Vaithyanathan, A. Herrnberger, S. Thiel, C. Richter, M. Liberati, T. Heeg, M. Röckerath, L. F. Kourkoutis, S. Mühlbauer, P. Böni, D. A. Muller, Y. Barash, J. Schubert, Y. Idzerda, J. Mannhart, and D. G. Schlom, Nat. Mater. 6, 882 (2007).
  15. H. Miyazaki, H. J. Im, K. Terashima, S. Yagi, M. Kato, K. Soda, T. Ito, and S. Kimura, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 232503 (2010).
  16. A. Melville, T. Mairoser, A. Schmehl, D. E. Shai, E. J. Monkman, J. W. Harter, T. Heeg, B. Holländer, J. Schubert, K. M. Shen, J. Mannhart, and D. G. Schlom, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 222101 (2012).
  17. R. Sutarto, S. G. Altendorf, B. Coloru, M. Moretti Sala, T. Haupricht, C. F. Chang, Z. Hu, C. Schüßler-Langeheine, N. Hollmann, H. Kierspel, J. A. Mydosh, H. H. Hsieh, H.-J. Lin, C. T. Chen, and L. H. Tjeng, Phys. Rev. B 80, 085308 (2009).
  18. P. Rosenberger, M. Kundu, A. Gloskovskii, C. Schlueter, U. Nowak, and M. Müller, Sci. Rep. 14, 21586 (2024).
  19. J. Łażewski, M. Sternik, P. T. Jochym, J. Kalt, S. Stankov, A. I. Chumakov, J. Göttlicher, R. Rüffer, T. Baumbach, and P. Piekarz, Inorg. Chem. 60, 9571 (2021).
  20. J. Greiner and G. Fan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 9, 27 (1966).
  21. R. Schiller and W. Nolting, Solid State Commun. 110, 121 (1999).
  22. M. Müller, G.-X. Miao, and J. S. Moodera, J. Appl. Phys. 105, 07C917 (2009).
  23. M. Matsubara, A. Schmehl, J. Mannhart, D. G. Schlom, and M. Fiebig, Phys. Rev. B 81, 214447 (2010).
  24. D. Mönkebüscher, P. Rosenberger, F. Mertens, R. Adam, C. M. Schneider, U. Parlak, M. Müller, and M. Cinchetti, Adv. Mater. Interfaces 10, 2300236 (2023).
  25. P. Lömker and M. Müller, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 061401(R) (2019).
  26. P. Rosenberger and M. Müller, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 044404 (2022).
  27. W. Guo, A. B. Posadas, S. Lu, D. J. Smith, and A. A. Demkov, J. Appl. Phys. 124, 235301 (2018).
  28. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/hscs-4sy1 for experimental details and multimedia.
  29. R. Schäfer, in Handbook of Magnetism and Advanced Magnetic Materials, edited by J. M. D. Coey and S. S. Parkin (Springer, Cham, 2021), pp. 391–434.
  30. A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia-Sanchez, and B. Van Waeyenberge, AIP Adv. 4, 107133 (2014).
  31. J. De Clercq, J. Leliaert, and B. Van Waeyenberge, J. Phys. D 50, 425002 (2017).
  32. J. Adler, C. Holm, and W. Janke, Physica A 201, 581 (1993).
  33. S. Selzer, Ph.D. thesis, Universität Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany, 2021.
  34. J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, J. Mulkers, J. De Clercq, M. V. Milošević, and B. Van Waeyenberge, J. Phys. D 51, 123002 (2018).
  35. L. He and C. Chen, Phys. Rev. B 75, 184424 (2007).
  36. J. Schindelin, I. Arganda-Carreras, E. Frise, V. Kaynig, M. Longair, T. Pietzsch, S. Preibisch, C. Rueden, S. Saalfeld, B. Schmid, J.-Y. Tinevez, D. J. White, V. Hartenstein, K. Eliceiri, P. Tomancak, and A. Cardona, Nat. Methods 9, 676 (2012).
  37. A. Melville, T. Mairoser, A. Schmehl, T. Birol, T. Heeg, B. Holländer, J. Schubert, C. J. Fennie, and D. G. Schlom, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 062404 (2013).
  38. G. Miao, G. Xiao, and A. Gupta, Phys. Rev. B 71, 094418 (2005).
  39. A. Dourlat, V. Jeudy, C. Testelin, F. Bernardot, K. Khazen, C. Gourdon, L. Thevenard, L. Largeau, O. Mauguin, and A. Lemaître, J. Appl. Phys. 102, 023913 (2007).
  40. P. Jensen and K. Bennemann, Surf. Sci. Rep. 61, 129 (2006).
  41. P. Poulopoulos and K. Baberschke, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11, 9495 (1999).
  42. F. Lin, X. Cheng, L. Chen, and S. B. Sinnott, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 101, 4783 (2018).
  43. G. Busch and F. Lévy, Phys. Lett. A 27, 37 (1968).
  44. B. E. Argyle and N. Miyata, Phys. Rev. 171, 555 (1968).
  45. R. Plass, N. C. Bartelt, and G. L. Kellogg, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, 4227 (2002).
  46. C. Spezzani, F. Vidal, R. Delaunay, M. Eddrief, M. Marangolo, V. H. Etgens, H. Popescu, and M. Sacchi, Sci. Rep. 5, 8120 (2015).
  47. R. Breitwieser, M. Marangolo, J. Lüning, N. Jaouen, L. Joly, M. Eddrief, V. H. Etgens, and M. Sacchi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 122508 (2008).
  48. A. G. Swartz, J. Ciraldo, J. J. I. Wong, Y. Li, W. Han, T. Lin, S. Mack, J. Shi, D. D. Awschalom, and R. K. Kawakami, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 112509 (2010).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Materials 9, 084410– Published 22 August, 2025
  • Received 8 May 2024
  • Accepted 10 June 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation