Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Reduced-order structure-property linkages for stochastic metamaterials

Hooman Danesh1,2,*, Maruthi Annamaraju2, Tim Brepols1, Stefanie Reese1,3, and Surya R. Kalidindi2

  • *Contact author: hooman.danesh@rwth-aachen.de

Phys. Rev. Materials 9, 075201 – Published 21 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/8zzt-4b7z

Abstract

The capabilities of additive manufacturing have facilitated the design and production of mechanical metamaterials with diverse unit cell geometries. Establishing linkages between the vast design space of unit cells and their effective mechanical properties is critical for the efficient design and performance evaluation of such metamaterials. However, physics-based simulations of metamaterial unit cells across the entire design space are computationally expensive, necessitating a materials informatics framework to efficiently capture complex structure-property relationships. In this work, principal component analysis of two-point correlation functions is performed to extract the salient features from a large dataset of randomly generated 2D metamaterials. Physics-based simulations are performed using a fast Fourier transform (FFT)-based homogenization approach to efficiently compute the homogenized effective elastic stiffness across the extensive unit cell designs. Subsequently, Gaussian process regression is used to generate reduced-order surrogates, mapping unit cell designs to their homogenized effective elastic constants. It is demonstrated that the adopted workflow enables a high-value low-dimensional representation of the voluminous stochastic metamaterial dataset, facilitating the construction of robust structure-property maps. Finally, an uncertainty-based active learning framework is utilized to train a surrogate model with a significantly smaller number of data points compared to the original full dataset. It is shown that a dataset as small as 0.61% of the entire dataset is sufficient to generate accurate and robust structure-property maps.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (99)

  1. C. Lu, M. Hsieh, Z. Huang, C. Zhang, Y. Lin, Q. Shen, F. Chen, and L. Zhang, Architectural design and additive manufacturing of mechanical metamaterials: A review, Engineering 17, 44 (2022).
  2. Z. Chen, Y.-T. Lin, H. Salehi, Z. Che, Y. Zhu, J. Ding, B. Sheng, R. Zhu, and P. Jiao, Advanced fabrication of mechanical metamaterials based on micro/nanoscale technology, Adv. Engn, Mater. 25, 2300750 (2023).
  3. J. Chen, J. Chen, H. Wang, L. He, B. Huang, S. Dadbakhsh, and P. Bartolo, Fabrication and development of mechanical metamaterials via additive manufacturing for biomedical applications: A review, Int. J. Extreme Manuf. 7, 012001 (2025).
  4. A. H. Tajalsir, K. B. Mustapha, and T. Ibn-Mohammed, Numerical and random forest modelling of the impact response of hierarchical auxetic structures, Mater. Today Commun. 31, 103797 (2022).
  5. S. Luan, E. Chen, J. John, and S. Gaitanaros, A data-driven framework for structure-property correlation in ordered and disordered cellular metamaterials, Sci. Adv. 9, eadi1453 (2023).
  6. I. Ben-Yelun, G. Gómez-Carano, F. J. San Millán, M. Á. Sanz, F. J. Montáns, and L. Saucedo-Mora, GAM: General auxetic metamaterial with tunable 3D auxetic behavior using the same unit cell boundary connectivity, Materials 16, 3473 (2023).
  7. H. Danesh, D. Di Lorenzo, F. Chinesta, S. Reese, and T. Brepols, FFT-based surrogate modeling of auxetic metamaterials with real-time prediction of effective elastic properties and swift inverse design, Mater. Des. 248, 113491 (2024).
  8. A. Mishra, LatticeML: A data-driven application for predicting the effective young modulus of high temperature graph based architected materials, Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 19, 3899 (2025).
  9. L. Wang, Y.-C. Chan, F. Ahmed, Z. Liu, P. Zhu, and W. Chen, Deep generative modeling for mechanistic-based learning and design of metamaterial systems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 372, 113377 (2020).
  10. P. P. Meyer, C. Bonatti, T. Tancogne-Dejean, and D. Mohr, Graph-based metamaterials: Deep learning of structure-property relations, Mater. Des. 223, 111175 (2022).
  11. J.-H. Bastek and D. M. Kochmann, Inverse design of nonlinear mechanical metamaterials via video denoising diffusion models, Nat Mach Intell 5, 1466 (2023).
  12. L. Xiao, G. Shi, and W. Song, Machine learning predictions on the compressive stress–strain response of lattice-based metamaterials, Int. J. Solids Struct. 300, 112893 (2024).
  13. Y. Liu, W. Huang, Z. Wang, J. Zhang, and J. Liu, Machine learning-based mechanical performance prediction and design of lattice structures, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 294, 110230 (2025).
  14. X. Zheng, X. Zhang, T.-T. Chen, and I. Watanabe, Deep learning in mechanical metamaterials: from prediction and generation to inverse design, Adv. Mater. 35, 2302530 (2023).
  15. G. Cerniauskas, H. Sadia, and P. Alam, Machine intelligence in metamaterials design: A review, Oxf. Open Mater. 4, itae001 (2024).
  16. J. Song, J. Lee, N. Kim, and K. Min, Artificial intelligence in the design of innovative metamaterials: A comprehensive review, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 25, 225 (2024).
  17. D. Lee, W. Chen, L. Wang, Y.-C. Chan, and W. Chen, Data-driven design for metamaterials and multiscale systems: A review, Adv. Mater. 36, 2305254 (2024).
  18. M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys. 378, 686 (2019).
  19. G. E. Karniadakis, I. G. Kevrekidis, L. Lu, P. Perdikaris, S. Wang, and L. Yang, Physics-informed machine learning, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 422 (2021).
  20. A. S. Krishnapriyan, A. Gholami, S. Zhe, R. M. Kirby, and M. W. Mahoney, Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networks, in Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS '21) (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA, 2021), pp. 26548–26560.
  21. S. Wang, X. Yu, and P. Perdikaris, When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspective, J. Comput. Phys. 449, 110768 (2022).
  22. S. Cuomo, V. S. Di Cola, F. Giampaolo, G. Rozza, M. Raissi, and F. Piccialli, Scientific machine learning through physics–informed neural networks: Where we are and what's next, J. Sci. Comput. 92, 88 (2022).
  23. A. Farea, O. Yli-Harja, and F. Emmert-Streib, Understanding physics-informed neural networks: Techniques, applications, trends, and challenges, AI 5, 1534 (2024).
  24. M. Seeger, Gaussian processes for machine learning, Int. J. Neural Syst. 14, 69 (2004).
  25. C. K. I. Williams and C. E. Rasmussen, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2006).
  26. E. Schulz, M. Speekenbrink, and A. Krause, A tutorial on Gaussian process regression: Modelling, exploring, and exploiting functions, J. Math. Psychol. 85, 1 (2018).
  27. J. Wang, An intuitive tutorial to gaussian process regression, Comput. Sci. Eng. 25, 4 (2023).
  28. Y. Wang, W. Zhao, G. Zhou, and C. Wang, Analysis and parametric optimization of a novel sandwich panel with double-V auxetic structure core under air blast loading, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 142-143, 245 (2018).
  29. Y. Wang, W. Zhao, G. Zhou, Q. Gao, and C. Wang, Optimization of an auxetic jounce bumper based on Gaussian process metamodel and series hybrid GA-SQP algorithm, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 57, 2515 (2018).
  30. H. Song, E. Park, H. J. Kim, C.-I. Park, T.-S. Kim, Y. Y. Kim, and S. Ryu, Free-form optimization of pattern shape for improving mechanical characteristics of a concentric tube, Mater. Des. 230, 111974 (2023).
  31. A. Challapalli, J. Konlan, and G. Li, Inverse machine learning discovered metamaterials with record high recovery stress, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 244, 108029 (2023).
  32. R. Bostanabad, Y.-C. Chan, L. Wang, P. Zhu, and W. Chen, Globally approximate gaussian processes for big data with application to data-driven metamaterials design, J. Mech. Des. 141, 111402 (2019).
  33. L. Wang, Y.-C. Chan, Z. Liu, P. Zhu, and W. Chen, Data-driven metamaterial design with laplace-beltrami spectrum as “shape-dna”, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 61, 2613 (2020).
  34. T. Xue, T. J. Wallin, Y. Menguc, S. Adriaenssens, and M. Chiaramonte, Machine learning generative models for automatic design of multi-material 3D printed composite solids, Extreme Mech. Lett. 41, 100992 (2020).
  35. C. Morris, L. Bekker, M. R. Haberman, and C. C. Seepersad, Design exploration of reliably manufacturable materials and structures with applications to negative stiffness metamaterials and microstereolithography, J. Mech. Des. 140, 111415 (2018).
  36. A. du Plessis, I. Yadroitsava, and I. Yadroitsev, Effects of defects on mechanical properties in metal additive manufacturing: A review focusing on x-ray tomography insights, Mater. Des. 187, 108385 (2020).
  37. L. Xiao, X. Xu, W. Song, and M. Hu, A multi-cell hybrid approach to elevate the energy absorption of micro-lattice materials, Materials 13, 4083 (2020).
  38. K. Dastani, M. R. Movahhedy, H. Yu, S. Khodaygan, L. Zhang, and M. Y. Wang, Effect of geometric deviations on the strength of additively manufactured ultralight periodic shell-based lattices, Eng. Fail. Anal. 150, 107328 (2023).
  39. E. Cuan-Urquizo and R. G. Silva, Fused filament fabrication of cellular, lattice and porous mechanical metamaterials: A review, Virtual Phys. Prototyping 18, e2224300 (2023).
  40. L. Germain, C. A. Fuentes, A. W. van Vuure, A. des Rieux, and C. Dupont-Gillain, 3D-printed biodegradable gyroid scaffolds for tissue engineering applications, Mater. Des. 151, 113 (2018).
  41. S. R. Kalidindi, S. R. Niezgoda, and A. A. Salem, Microstructure informatics using higher-order statistics and efficient data-mining protocols, JOM 63, 34 (2011).
  42. S. R. Kalidindi, Hierarchical Materials Informatics: Novel Analytics for Materials Data (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2015).
  43. S. R. Kalidindi, Feature engineering of material structure for AI-based materials knowledge systems, J. Appl. Phys. 128, 041103 (2020).
  44. S. Li and E. Sitnikova, Representative Volume Elements and Unit Cells: Concepts, Theory, Applications and Implementation (Woodhead Publishing, Duxford, 2019).
  45. D. B. Brough, D. Wheeler, and S. R. Kalidindi, Materials knowledge systems in python—A data science framework for accelerated development of hierarchical materials, Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innovation 6, 36 (2017).
  46. Y. C. Yabansu, V. Rehn, J. Hötzer, B. Nestler, and S. R. Kalidindi, Application of gaussian process autoregressive models for capturing the time evolution of microstructure statistics from phase-field simulations for sintering of polycrystalline ceramics, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 27, 084006 (2019).
  47. A. Marshall and S. R. Kalidindi, Autonomous development of a machine-learning model for the plastic response of two-phase composites from micromechanical finite element models, JOM 73, 2085 (2021).
  48. Y. C. Yabansu, P. Altschuh, J. Hötzer, M. Selzer, B. Nestler, and S. R. Kalidindi, A digital workflow for learning the reduced-order structure-property linkages for permeability of porous membranes, Acta Mater. 195, 668 (2020).
  49. S. Hashemi, B. Ganapathysubramanian, S. Casey, J. Su, and S. R. Kalidindi, Feature engineering for microstructure-property mapping in organic photovoltaics, Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innovation 11, 352 (2022).
  50. D. M. de Oca Zapiain, E. Popova, F. Abdeljawad, J. W. Foulk, S. R. Kalidindi, and H. Lim, Reduced-order microstructure-sensitive models for damage initiation in two-phase composites, Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innovation 7, 97 (2018).
  51. Y. C. Yabansu, P. Steinmetz, J. Hötzer, S. R. Kalidindi, and B. Nestler, Extraction of reduced-order process-structure linkages from phase-field simulations, Acta Mater. 124, 182 (2017).
  52. M. I. Latypov and S. R. Kalidindi, Data-driven reduced order models for effective yield strength and partitioning of strain in multiphase materials, J. Comput. Phys. 346, 242 (2017).
  53. M. I. Latypov, L. S. Toth, and S. R. Kalidindi, Materials knowledge system for nonlinear composites, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 346, 180 (2019).
  54. H. F. Al-Harbi, G. Landi, and S. R. Kalidindi, Multi-scale modeling of the elastic response of a structural component made from a composite material using the materials knowledge system, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 20, 055001 (2012).
  55. D. T. Fullwood, B. L. Adams, and S. R. Kalidindi, A strong contrast homogenization formulation for multi-phase anisotropic materials, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 56, 2287 (2008).
  56. S. R. Niezgoda, D. T. Fullwood, and S. R. Kalidindi, Delineation of the space of 2-point correlations in a composite material system, Acta Mater. 56, 5285 (2008).
  57. D. T. Fullwood, S. R. Niezgoda, B. L. Adams, and S. R. Kalidindi, Microstructure sensitive design for performance optimization, Prog. Mater. Sci. 55, 477 (2010).
  58. S. R. Niezgoda, Y. C. Yabansu, and S. R. Kalidindi, Understanding and visualizing microstructure and microstructure variance as a stochastic process, Acta Mater. 59, 6387 (2011).
  59. S. R. Niezgoda, A. K. Kanjarla, and S. R. Kalidindi, Novel microstructure quantification framework for databasing, visualization, and analysis of microstructure data, Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innovation 2, 54 (2013).
  60. C. Suh, A. Rajagopalan, X. Li, and K. Rajan, The application of principal component analysis to materials science data, Data Sci. J. 1, 19 (2002).
  61. R. Bro and A. K. Smilde, Principal component analysis, Anal. Methods 6, 2812 (2014).
  62. I. T. Jolliffe and J. Cadima, Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 374, 20150202 (2016).
  63. B. Settles, Active learning literature survey (2009), http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/60660.
  64. H. Liu, B. Yucel, B. Ganapathysubramanian, S. R. Kalidindi, D. Wheeler, and O. Wodo, Active learning for regression of structure-property mapping: The importance of sampling and representation, Digit. Discov. 3, 1997 (2024).
  65. M. O. Buzzy, D. M. de Oca Zapiain, A. P. Generale, S. R. Kalidindi, and H. Lim, Active learning for the design of polycrystalline textures using conditional normalizing flows, Acta Mater. 284, 120537 (2025).
  66. O. Ozbayram, D. Olsen, M. Annamaraju, A. E. Robertson, A. Venkatraman, S. R. Kalidindi, M. Zhou, and L. Graham-Brady, Batch active learning for microstructure-property relations in energetic materials, Mech. Mater. 205, 105308 (2025).
  67. D. D. Lewis, A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers: Corrigendum and additional data, Acm Sigir Forum 29, 13 (1995).
  68. P. Fernandez-Zelaia, Y. C. Yabansu, and S. R. Kalidindi, A comparative study of the efficacy of local/global and parametric/nonparametric machine learning methods for establishing structure-property linkages in high-contrast 3D elastic composites, Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innovation 8, 67 (2019).
  69. J.-H. Bastek and D. M. Kochmann, Inverse-design of nonlinear mechanical metamaterials via video denoising diffusion models: dataset and model checkpoints, ETHZ Research Collection (2023), URL: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000629716.
  70. S. Lucarini, L. Cobian, A. Voitus, and J. Segurado, Adaptation and validation of FFT methods for homogenization of lattice based materials, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 388, 114223 (2022).
  71. H. Moulinec and P. Suquet, A fast numerical method for computing the linear and nonlinear mechanical properties of composites, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 318, 1417 (1994).
  72. H. Moulinec and P. Suquet, A numerical method for computing the overall response of nonlinear composites with complex microstructure, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 157, 69 (1998).
  73. M. Schneider, A review of nonlinear FFT-based computational homogenization methods, Acta Mech. 232, 2051 (2021).
  74. S. Lucarini, M. V. Upadhyay, and J. Segurado, FFT based approaches in micromechanics: Fundamentals, methods and applications, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 30, 023002 (2022).
  75. H. Danesh, T. Brepols, and S. Reese, Challenges in two-scale computational homogenization of mechanical metamaterials, PAMM 23, e202200139 (2023).
  76. J. C. Michel, H. Moulinec, and P. Suquet, A computational scheme for linear and non-linear composites with arbitrary phase contrast, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 52, 139 (2001).
  77. S. Brisard and L. Dormieux, Fft-based methods for the mechanics of composites: A general variational framework, Comput. Mater. Sci. 49, 663 (2010).
  78. V. Monchieta and G. Bonneta, A polarization-based fft iterative scheme for computing the effective properties of elastic composites with arbitrary contrast, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 89, 1419 (2012).
  79. M. Schneider, F. Ospald, and M. Kabel, Computational homogenization of elasticity on a staggered grid, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 105, 693 (2016).
  80. J. Vondřejc, J. Zeman, and I. Marek, An FFT-based galerkin method for homogenization of periodic media, Comput. Math. Appl. 68, 156 (2014).
  81. J. Vondřejc, J. Zeman, and I. Marek, Guaranteed upper–lower bounds on homogenized properties by FFT-based Galerkin method, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 297, 258 (2015).
  82. F. Willot, Fourier-based schemes for computing the mechanical response of composites with accurate local fields, C.R. Mec. 343, 232 (2015).
  83. M. El Fallaki Idrissi, F. Praud, V. Champaney, F. Chinesta, and F. Meraghni, Multiparametric modeling of composite materials based on non-intrusive pgd informed by multiscale analyses: Application for real-time stiffness prediction of woven composites, Compos. Struct. 302, 116228 (2022).
  84. C. Gierden, J. Kochmann, J. Waimann, B. Svendsen, and S. Reese, A review of Fe-FFT-based two-scale methods for computational modeling of microstructure evolution and macroscopic material behavior, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 29, 4115 (2022).
  85. A. Cecen, T. Fast, and S. R. Kalidindi, Versatile algorithms for the computation of 2-point spatial correlations in quantifying material structure, Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innovation 5, 1 (2016).
  86. D. T. Fullwood, S. R. Niezgoda, and S. R. Kalidindi, Microstructure reconstructions from 2-point statistics using phase-recovery algorithms, Acta Mater. 56, 942 (2008).
  87. T. Brepols, S. Wulfinghoff, and S. Reese, Gradient-extended two-surface damage-plasticity: Micromorphic formulation and numerical aspects, Int. J. Plast. 97, 64 (2017).
  88. T. Brepols, S. Wulfinghoff, and S. Reese, A gradient-extended two-surface damage-plasticity model for large deformations, Int. J. Plast. 129, 102635 (2020).
  89. A. Venkatraman, D. M. de Oca Zapiain, and S. R. Kalidindi, Reduced-order models for ranking damage initiation in dual-phase composites using Bayesian neural networks, JOM 72, 4359 (2020).
  90. D. M. Kochmann, J. B. Hopkins, and L. Valdevit, Multiscale modeling and optimization of the mechanics of hierarchical metamaterials, MRS Bull. 44, 773 (2019).
  91. H. Danesh, L. Heußen, F. J. Montáns, S. Reese, and T. Brepols, A two-scale computational homogenization approach for elastoplastic truss-based lattice structures, Results Eng. 25, 103976 (2025).
  92. A. P. Generale, A. E. Robertson, C. Kelly, and S. R. Kalidindi, Inverse stochastic microstructure design, Acta Mater. 271, 119877 (2024).
  93. Z. Yang, Y. C. Yabansu, D. Jha, W.-k. Liao, A. N. Choudhary, S. R. Kalidindi, and A. Agrawal, Establishing structure-property localization linkages for elastic deformation of three-dimensional high contrast composites using deep learning approaches, Acta Mater. 166, 335 (2019).
  94. A. Harandi, H. Danesh, K. Linka, S. Reese, and S. Rezaei, SPiFOL: A spectral-based physics-informed finite operator learning for prediction of mechanical behavior of microstructures, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 203, 106219 (2025).
  95. C. Kelly and S. R. Kalidindi, Thermodynamically-informed iterative neural operators for heterogeneous elastic localization, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 441, 117939 (2025).
  96. T. Fast and S. R. Kalidindi, Formulation and calibration of higher-order elastic localization relationships using the MKS approach, Acta Mater. 59, 4595 (2011).
  97. Y. C. Yabansu, D. K. Patel, and S. R. Kalidindi, Calibrated localization relationships for elastic response of polycrystalline aggregates, Acta Mater. 81, 151 (2014).
  98. D. M. de Oca Zapiain and S. R. Kalidindi, Localization models for the plastic response of polycrystalline materials using the material knowledge systems framework, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 27, 074008 (2019).
  99. H. Danesh, M. Annamaraju, T. Brepols, S. Reese, and S. Kalidindi, Reduced-order structure-property linkages for stochastic metamaterials (dataset), Zenodo (2025), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15302946.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation