Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Atmospheric water and graphite lubrication: Insights into surface intercalation and nanoscale confined spaces

Y. W. Sun1,*, T. Leiner2, D. Gehringer2, C. J. Humphreys1, D. J. Dunstan3,†, and D. Holec2,‡

  • *Contact author: yiwei.sun@qmul.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: d.dunstan@qmul.ac.uk
  • ‡Contact author: david.holec@unileoben.ac.at

Phys. Rev. Materials 10, 034002 – Published 5 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5z9j-qrhh

Abstract

The role of environmental water in graphite lubrication has generated conflicting observations and considerable confusion. Early hypotheses suggested water intercalation between graphene layers, but x-ray diffraction studies revealed no change in interlayer spacing with changing humidity. Conversely, recent Raman spectroscopy studies indicated water intercalation in bilayer graphene under humid conditions. To reconcile these discrepancies, we report density functional theory (DFT) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations coupled with a reinterpretation of experimental measurements. While DFT calculations reveal softer surface interlayers suggesting potential for water intercalation, MD simulations indicate that such intercalation requires a significant reduction in van der Waals interactions, beyond what surface-induced softening can achieve. Alternatively, if water does intercalate, it likely occurs between the surface layers where graphene interactions are over 80% weaker than in bulk graphite, making such intercalation plausible. Instead, we demonstrate that water forms clusters on the graphene surface, maintaining a stable two-atomic layer structure across a wide temperature range, emphasizing the importance of surface water adsorption. We therefore propose that the lubrication effect is primarily related to the graphene-water interface rather than the graphene-graphene interface. While we do not completely rule out water intercalation, our findings suggest that graphene-water interactions dominate lubrication. These results resolve previous discrepancies by highlighting the role of surface or near-surface water layers over bulk intercalation, underscoring the significance of molecular interactions at the graphene-water interface in confined nanoscale spaces.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (48)

  1. W. S. Brooks and D. S. Weaver, Lubrication by Lamellar Solids (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1967).
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA Scientific and Technical Reports: 1968, NASA Special Publication, Vol. SP-7033 (NASA, Washington, D.C., 1969).
  3. D. Ramadanoff and S. W. Glass, Wear of graphitic brushes at high altitudes, Trans. Am. Inst. Electr. Eng. 63, 825 (1944).
  4. N. Watanabe, H. Hayakawa, O. Yoshimoto, and T. Tojo, FY2000 ground-based research announcement for space utilization research report, Technical Report (Space Utilization Research, Tokyo, 2000).
  5. A. Qadir, Y. W. Sun, W. Liu, P. Goldberg Oppenheimer, Y. Xu, C. J. Humphreys, and D. J. Dunstan, Effect of humidity on the interlayer interaction of bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 99, 045402 (2019).
  6. T. Arif, G. Colas, and T. Filleter, Effect of humidity and water intercalation on the tribological behavior of graphene and graphene oxide, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 22537 (2018).
  7. R. Garcia, Interfacial liquid water on graphite, graphene, and 2D materials, ACS Nano 17, 51 (2023).
  8. C. Xu, Z. Ye, and P. Egberts, Intercalated water-induced hysteretic friction behavior of graphene, h-BN, and MoS2, Appl. Surf. Sci. 630, 157442 (2023).
  9. J. Liu, C.-Y. Lai, Y.-Y. Zhang, M. Chiesa, and S. T. Pantelides, Water wettability of graphene interplay between the interfacial water structure and the electronic structure, RSC Adv. 8, 16918 (2018).
  10. K. Verguts, K. Schouteden, C.-H. Wu, L. Peters, N. Vrancken, X. Wu, Z. Li, M. Erkens, C. Porret, C. Huyghebaert, C. Van Haesendonck, S. De Gendt, and S. Brems, Controlling water intercalation is key to a direct graphene transfer, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 37484 (2017).
  11. R. Richardson, The wear of metals by relatively soft abrasives, Wear 11, 245 (1968).
  12. R. E. McCoy, The use of graphite as a lubricant, Trans. ASME 67, 159 (1945).
  13. Y. Liu, K. Wang, Q. Xu, J. Zhang, Y. Hu, T. Ma, Q. Zheng, and J. Luo, Superlubricity between graphite layers in ultrahigh vacuum, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 43167 (2020).
  14. C. E. Morstein, A. Klemenz, M. Dienwiebel, and M. Moseler, Humidity-dependent lubrication of highly loaded contacts by graphite and a structural transition to turbostratic carbon, Nat. Commun. 13, 5958 (2022).
  15. T. H. Ly, D. Duong, Q. H. Ta, F. Yao, Q. Vu, H. Jeong, S. Chae, and Y. H. Lee, Nondestructive characterization of graphene defects, Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 5183 (2013).
  16. C. Gao, L. Bredell, D. Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf, and D. Makel, Micromechanics of MoS2 lubrication, Wear 162-164, 480 (1993).
  17. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
  18. G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).
  19. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  20. A. Tkatchenko, R. A. DiStasio, Jr., R. Car, and M. Scheffler, Accurate and efficient method for many-body van der Waals interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 236402 (2012).
  21. Y. W. Sun, D. Holec, Y. Xu, and D. J. Dunstan, Graphite under compression: Shift of layer breathing and shear modes frequencies with interlayer spacing, J. Phys. Commun. 2, 045004 (2018).
  22. Y. W. Sun, D. Holec, and D. J. Dunstan, Graphite under uniaxial compression along the axis: A parameter to relate out-of-plane strain to in-plane phonon frequency, Phys. Rev. B 92, 094108 (2015).
  23. Y. W. Sun, D. Holec, D. Gehringer, O. Fenwick, D. J. Dunstan, and C. J. Humphreys, Erratum: Unexpected softness of bilayer graphene and softening of A-A stacked graphene layers [Phys. Rev. B 101, 125421 (2020)], Phys. Rev. B 103, 119901(E) (2021).
  24. A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolintineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in 't Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M. J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, and S. J. Plimpton, LAMMPS—A flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales, Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022).
  25. K. Chenoweth, A. C. Van Duin, P. Persson, M.-J. Cheng, J. Oxgaard, and W. A. Goddard Iii, Development and application of a ReaxFF reactive force field for oxidative dehydrogenation on vanadium oxide catalysts, J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 14645 (2008).
  26. H. J. C. Berendsen, J. R. Grigera, and T. P. Straatsma, The missing term in effective pair potentials, J. Phys. Chem. 91, 6269 (1987).
  27. W. L. Jorgensen, J. Chandrasekhar, J. D. Madura, R. W. Impey, and M. L. Klein, Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water, J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926 (1983).
  28. J. L. F. Abascal and C. Vega, A general purpose model for the condensed phases of water: TIP4P/2005, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 234505 (2005).
  29. A. Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO—the open visualization tool, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18, 015012 (2010).
  30. W. Shinoda, M. Shiga, and M. Mikami, Rapid estimation of elastic constants by molecular dynamics simulation under constant stress, Phys. Rev. B 69, 134103 (2004).
  31. B. Alzyab, C. H. Perry, C. Zahopoulos, O. A. Pringle, and R. M. Nicklow, High-pressure neutron-scattering studies of graphite and stage-two graphite-SbCl5, Phys. Rev. B 38, 1544 (1988).
  32. P.-H. Tan, W.-P. Han, W.-J. Zhao, Z.-H. Wu, B.-S. Zhang, Y. K. Koh, L.-M. Xie, X. Li, J.-Z. Yang, J.-L. Kuo, et al., The shear mode of multilayer graphene, Nat. Mater. 11, 294 (2012).
  33. M. Hanfland, H. Beister, and K. Syassen, Graphite under pressure: Equation of state and first-order Raman modes, Phys. Rev. B 39, 12598 (1989).
  34. W. Wang, S. Dai, X. Li, J. Yang, D. J. Srolovitz, and Q. Zheng, Measurement of the cleavage energy of graphite, Nat. Commun. 6, 7853 (2015).
  35. S. Gravelle, C. Kamal, and L. Botto, Liquid exfoliation of multilayer graphene in sheared solvents: A molecular dynamics investigation, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 104701 (2020).
  36. H. Ma, X. Chen, Y. Wang, Y. Hui, Q. Zhao, J. Zhang, X. He, H. Tian, P. Xu, and J. Shao, Interfacial dynamics of graphene in water environments: Role of wettability and surface charges, Appl. Surf. Sci. 715, 164597 (2026).
  37. A. Akaishi, T. Yonemaru, and J. Nakamura, Formation of water layers on graphene surfaces, ACS Omega 2, 2184 (2017).
  38. X. Feng, S. Kwon, J. Y. Park, and M. Salmeron, Superlubric sliding of graphene nanoflakes on graphene, ACS Nano 7, 1718 (2013).
  39. J. Li, T. Gao, and J. Luo, Superlubricity of graphite induced by multiple transferred graphene nanoflakes, Adv. Sci. 5, 1700616 (2018).
  40. G. Wang, Z. Dai, Y. Wang, P. H. Tan, L. Liu, Z. Xu, Y. Wei, R. Huang, and Z. Zhang, Measuring interlayer shear stress in bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 036101 (2017).
  41. Y. W. Sun, D. J. Dunstan, M. A. Hartmann, and D. Holec, Nanomechanics of carbon nanotubes, Proc. Appl. Math. Mech. 13, 7 (2013).
  42. Y. J. Shin, R. Stromberg, R. Nay, H. Huang, A. T. S. Wee, H. Yang, and C. S. Bhatia, Frictional characteristics of exfoliated and epitaxial graphene, Carbon 49, 4070 (2011).
  43. W. Mason, Effect of dislocations on ultrasonic wave attenuation in metals, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 34, 903 (1955).
  44. J. M. Martin, C. Donnet, T. Le Mogne, and T. Epicier, Superlubricity of molybdenum disulphide, Phys. Rev. B 48, 10583 (1993).
  45. G. Levita, A. Cavaleiro, E. Molinari, T. Polcar, and M. C. Righi, Sliding properties of MoS2 layers: Load and interlayer orientation effects, J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 13809 (2014).
  46. H. Li, J. Wang, S. Gao, Q. Chen, L. Peng, K. Liu, and X. Wei, Superlubricity between MoS2 monolayers, Adv. Mater. 29, 1701474 (2017).
  47. T. Onodera, Y. Morita, A. Suzuki, M. Koyama, H. Tsuboi, N. Hatakeyama, A. Endou, H. Takaba, M. Kubo, F. Dassenoy, C. Minfray, L. Joly-Pottuz, J.-M. Martin, and A. Miyamoto, A computational chemistry study on friction of h-MoS2. Part I. Mechanism of single sheet lubrication, J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 16526 (2009).
  48. O. Jantschner, S. K. Field, D. Holec, A. Fian, D. Music, J. M. Schneider, K. Zorn, and C. Mitterer, Origin of temperature-induced low friction of sputtered Si-containing amorphous carbon coatings, Acta Mater. 82, 437 (2015).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation