- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Materials

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Nanoindentation simulations for copper and tungsten with adaptive-precision potentials

David Immel

Matous Mrovec and Ralf Drautz

Godehard Sutmann*

  • *Contact author: g.sutmann@fz-juelich.de
PDF

Phys. Rev. Materials 9, 093805 – Published 26 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/2lkd-l6gt

Abstract

We perform nanoindentation simulations for both the prototypical face-centered cubic metal copper and the body-centered cubic metal tungsten with an adaptive-precision description of interaction potentials including different accuracy and computational costs. We combine both a computationally efficient embedded atom method (EAM) potential and a precise but computationally less efficient machine learning potential based on the atomic cluster expansion (ACE) into an adaptive precision (AP) potential tailored for the nanoindentation. The numerically more expensive ACE potential is employed selectively only in regions of the computational cell where high precision is required. The comparison with pure EAM and pure ACE simulations shows that for Cu, all potentials yield similar dislocation morphologies under the indenter with only small quantitative differences. In contrast, markedly different plasticity mechanisms are observed for W in simulations performed with the central-force EAM potential compared to results obtained using the ACE potential. ACE is able to describe accurately the angular character of bonding, which is in W due to its half-filled d band. All ACE-specific mechanisms are reproduced in the AP nanoindentation simulations, however, with a significant speedup of 20–30 times compared to the pure ACE simulations. Hence, the AP potential overcomes the performance gap between the precise ACE and the fast EAM potential by combining the advantages of both potentials.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (99)

  1. U. Landman, W. D. Luedtke, N. A. Burnham, and R. J. Colton, Atomistic mechanisms and dynamics of adhesion, nanoindentation, and fracture, Science 248, 454 (1990).
  2. W. G. Hoover, A. J. De Groot, C. G. Hoover, I. F. Stowers, T. Kawai, B. L. Holian, T. Boku, S. Ihara, and J. Belak, Large-scale elastic-plastic indentation simulations via nonequilibrium molecular dynamics, Phys. Rev. A 42, 5844 (1990).
  3. M. S. Daw, S. M. Foiles, and M. I. Baskes, The embedded-atom method: A review of theory and applications, Mater. Sci. Rep. 9, 251 (1993).
  4. M. W. Finnis and J. E. Sinclair, A simple empirical n-body potential for transition metals, Philos. Mag. A 50, 45 (1984).
  5. D. G. Pettifor, Bonding and Structure of Molecules and Solids (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995).
  6. M. Mrovec, D. Nguyen-Manh, D. G. Pettifor, and V. Vitek, Bond-order potential for molybdenum: Application to dislocation behavior, Phys. Rev. B 69, 094115 (2004).
  7. M. Mrovec, R. Gröger, A. G. Bailey, D. Nguyen-Manh, C. Elsässer, and V. Vitek, Bond-order potential for simulations of extended defects in tungsten, Phys. Rev. B 75, 104119 (2007).
  8. R. Gröger, A. G. Bailey, and V. Vitek, Multiscale modeling of plastic deformation of molybdenum and tungsten: I. Atomistic studies of the core structure and glide of 1/2〈111〉 screw dislocations at 0 K, Acta Mater. 56, 5401 (2008).
  9. A. G. Marinopoulos, V. Vitek, and A. E. Carlsson, Significance of non-central forces in atomistic studies of grain boundaries in bcc transition metals, Philos. Mag. A 72, 1311 (1995).
  10. C. C. Matthai, P. J. Grout, and N. H. March, Interatomic forces in the b.c.c. transition metals, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 42, 317 (1981).
  11. R. Gröger and V. Vitek, Directional versus central-force bonding in studies of the structure and glide of 1/2〈111〉 screw dislocations in bcc transition metals, Philos. Mag. 89, 3163 (2009).
  12. J. J. Möller, M. Mrovec, I. Bleskov, J. Neugebauer, T. Hammerschmidt, R. Drautz, C. Elsässer, T. Hickel, and E. Bitzek, {110} planar faults in strained bcc metals: Origins and implications of a commonly observed artifact of classical potentials, Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 093606 (2018).
  13. M. Rieth, S. L. Dudarev, S. M. Gonzalez de Vicente, J. Aktaa, T. Ahlgren, S. Antusch, D. E. J. Armstrong, M. Balden, N. Baluc, M.-F. Barthe et al., Recent progress in research on tungsten materials for nuclear fusion applications in europe, J. Nucl. Mater. 432, 482 (2013).
  14. R. A. Pitts, S. Carpentier, F. Escourbiac, T. Hirai, V. Komarov, A. S. Kukushkin, S. Lisgo, A. Loarte, M. Merola, R. Mitteau et al., Physics basis and design of the ITER plasma-facing components, J. Nucl. Mater. 415, S957 (2011).
  15. P. Jenuš, A. Abram, S. Novak, M. Kelemen, M. Peovnik, T. Schwarz-Selinger, and S. Markelj, Deuterium retention in tungsten, tungsten carbide and tungsten-ditungsten carbide composites, J. Nucl. Mater. 581, 154455 (2023).
  16. P. Hansson, Influence of the crystallographic orientation and thickness of thin copper coatings during nanoindentation, Eng. Fract. Mech. 150, 143 (2015).
  17. I. H. Sahputra, Temperature and indenter radius effects on mechanical properties of copper during nanoindentation: A molecular dynamic simulation study, Eur. Phys. J. B 94, 237 (2021).
  18. A. B. Shinde, A. Owhal, A. Sharma, P. Ranjan, T. Roy, and R. Balasubramaniam, Comparative analysis of mechanical properties for mono and poly-crystalline copper under nanoindentation insights from molecular dynamics simulations, Mater. Chem. Phys. 277, 125559 (2022).
  19. J. Huang, Y. Liu, X. Yu, Y. Huang, G. Liu, Z. Huang, and D. Fan, Nano mechanical property analysis of single crystal copper using Berkovich nano indenter and molecular dynamic simulation, Comput. Mater. Sci. 188, 110237 (2021).
  20. S. Goel, G. Cross, A. Stukowski, E. Gamsjäger, B. Beake, and A. Agrawal, Designing nanoindentation simulation studies by appropriate indenter choices: Case study on single crystal tungsten, Comput. Mater. Sci. 152, 196 (2018).
  21. F. J. Domínguez-Gutiérrez, P. Grigorev, A. Naghdi, J. Byggmästar, G. Y. Wei, T. D. Swinburne, S. Papanikolaou, and M. J. Alava, Nanoindentation of tungsten: From interatomic potentials to dislocation plasticity mechanisms, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 043603 (2023).
  22. Y. Hu, J. Xu, L. Su, X. Liu, Y. Zhang, S. Ding, R. Wang, and R. X. and, Nanoindentation characteristics of nanocrystalline tungsten via atomistic simulation, Philos. Mag. 103, 749 (2023).
  23. F. Zhu, J. Tao, J. Wu, F. Zhou, J. Chen, Y. Pei, L. Song, J. Wu, and D. Wang, Molecular dynamics simulation of the indentation behavior of tungsten with varying crystal orientations and Berkovich indenter orientations, Mater. Today Commun. 41, 110738 (2024).
  24. D. Xu, Z. Huang, L. Xu, G. Yin, Y. Lin, Q. Shen, and F. Chen, Enhancing surface strength of tungsten by gradient nano-grained structure, J. Appl. Phys. 135, 195101 (2024).
  25. T. Karafi, A. Tahiri, H. Chabba, M. Idiri, and B. Boubeker, Effect of grain-size in nanocrystalline tungsten on hardness and dislocation density: A molecular dynamics study, Crystals 13, 469 (2023).
  26. J. S. Smith, B. Nebgen, N. Mathew, J. Chen, N. Lubbers, L. Burakovsky, S. Tretiak, H. A. Nam, T. Germann, S. Fensin et al., Automated discovery of a robust interatomic potential for aluminum, Nat. Commun. 12, 1257 (2021).
  27. Y. Lysogorskiy, C. van der Oord, A. Bochkarev, S. Menon, M. Rinaldi, T. Hammerschmidt, M. Mrovec, A. Thompson, G. Csányi, C. Ortner et al., Performant implementation of the atomic cluster expansion (PACE) and application to copper and silicon, npj Comput. Mater. 7, 97 (2021).
  28. M. Hodapp, Machine learning is funny but physics makes the money: How machine-learning potentials can advance computer-aided materials design in metallurgy, Comput. Mater. Sci. 233, 112715 (2024).
  29. Y. Mishin, Machine-learning interatomic potentials for materials science, Acta Mater. 214, 116980 (2021).
  30. B. Mortazavi, Recent advances in machine learning-assisted multiscale design of energy materials, Adv. Energy Mater. 15, 2403876 (2025).
  31. M. A. Wood, M. A. Cusentino, B. D. Wirth, and A. P. Thompson, Data-driven material models for atomistic simulation, Phys. Rev. B 99, 184305 (2019).
  32. G. Nikoulis, J. Byggmästar, J. Kioseoglou, K. Nordlund, and F. Djurabekova, Machine-learning interatomic potential for W-Mo alloys, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 33, 315403 (2021).
  33. J. Byggmästar, K. Nordlund, and F. Djurabekova, Simple machine-learned interatomic potentials for complex alloys, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 083801 (2022).
  34. E. Cho, W.-J. Son, E. Cho, I. Jang, D. S. Kim, and K. Min, Atomistic insights into adhesion characteristics of tungsten on titanium nitride using steered molecular dynamics with machine learning interatomic potential, Sci. Rep. 13, 17145 (2023).
  35. J. Liu, J. Byggmästar, Z. Fan, P. Qian, and Y. Su, Large-scale machine-learning molecular dynamics simulation of primary radiation damage in tungsten, Phys. Rev. B 108, 054312 (2023).
  36. M. Qamar, M. Mrovec, Y. Lysogorskiy, A. Bochkarev, and R. Drautz, Atomic cluster expansion for quantum-accurate large-scale simulations of carbon, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 5151 (2023).
  37. W. G. Stark, C. van der Oord, I. Batatia, Y. Zhang, B. Jiang, G. Csányi, and R. J. Maurer, Benchmarking of machine learning interatomic potentials for reactive hydrogen dynamics at metal surfaces, Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 5, 030501 (2024).
  38. A. Warshel and M. Levitt, Theoretical studies of enzymic reactions: Dielectric, electrostatic and steric stabilization of the carbonium ion in the reaction of lysozyme, J. Mol. Biol. 103, 227 (1976).
  39. M. J. Buehler, A. C. T. van Duin, and W. A. Goddard, Multiparadigm modeling of dynamical crack propagation in silicon using a reactive force field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 095505 (2006).
  40. T. Kerdcharoen, K. R. Liedl, and B. M. Rode, A QM/MM simulation method applied to the solution of li+ in liquid ammonia, Chem. Phys. 211, 313 (1996).
  41. A. Heyden, H. Lin, and D. G. Truhlar, Adaptive partitioning in combined quantum mechanical and molecular mechanical calculations of potential energy functions for multiscale simulations, J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 2231 (2007).
  42. D. Immel, R. Drautz, and G. Sutmann, Adaptive-precision potentials for large-scale atomistic simulations, J. Chem. Phys. 162, 114119 (2025).
  43. F. Birks, T. D. Swinburne, and J. R. Kermode, Efficient and accurate spatial mixing of machine learned interatomic potentials for materials science, arXiv:2502.19081.
  44. L. Zhang, H. Wang, and W. E, Adaptive coupling of a deep neural network potential to a classical force field, J. Chem. Phys. 149, 154107 (2018).
  45. L. Böselt, M. Thürlemann, and S. Riniker, Machine learning in QM/MM molecular dynamics simulations of condensed-phase systems, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 2641 (2021).
  46. T. P. Remington, C. J. Ruestes, E. M. Bringa, B. A. Remington, C. H. Lu, B. Kad, and M. A. Meyers, Plastic deformation in nanoindentation of tantalum: A new mechanism for prismatic loop formation, Acta Mater. 78, 378 (2014).
  47. A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolintineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in 't Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen et al., LAMMPS: A flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales, Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022).
  48. H.-T. Luu, S.-L. Dang, T.-V. Hoang, and N. Gunkelmann, Molecular dynamics simulation of nanoindentation in Al and Fe: On the influence of system characteristics, Appl. Surf. Sci. 551, 149221 (2021).
  49. C. L. Kelchner, S. J. Plimpton, and J. C. Hamilton, Dislocation nucleation and defect structure during surface indentation, Phys. Rev. B 58, 11085 (1998).
  50. Y. Mishin, M. J. Mehl, D. A. Papaconstantopoulos, A. F. Voter, and J. D. Kress, Structural stability and lattice defects in copper: Ab initio, tight-binding, and embedded-atom calculations, Phys. Rev. B 63, 224106 (2001).
  51. A. Hernandez, A. Balasubramanian, F. Yuan, S. A. M. Mason, and T. Mueller, Fast, accurate, and transferable many-body interatomic potentials by symbolic regression, npj Comput. Mater. 5, 112 (2019).
  52. H. S. Huang, L. Q. Ai, A. C. T. van Duin, M. Chen, and Y. J. Lü, ReaxFF reactive force field for molecular dynamics simulations of liquid Cu and Zr metals, J. Chem. Phys. 151, 094503 (2019).
  53. D. Geissler, J. Freudenberger, A. Kauffmann, S. Martin, and D. Rafaja, Assessment of the thermodynamic dimension of the stacking fault energy, Philos. Mag. 94, 2967 (2014).
  54. E. M. Bringa, J. U. Cazamias, P. Erhart, J. Stölken, N. Tanushev, B. D. Wirth, R. E. Rudd, and M. J. Caturla, Atomistic shock Hugoniot simulation of single-crystal copper, J. Appl. Phys. 96, 3793 (2004).
  55. M.-C. Marinica, L. Ventelon, M. R. Gilbert, L. Proville, S. L. Dudarev, J. Marian, G. Bencteux, and F. Willaime, Interatomic potentials for modelling radiation defects and dislocations in tungsten, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 25, 395502 (2013).
  56. G. Bonny, P. Grigorev, and D. Terentyev, On the binding of nanometric hydrogen-helium clusters in tungsten, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26, 485001 (2014).
  57. W. H. Zhou, C. G. Zhang, Y. G. Li, and Z. Zeng, Transport, dissociation and rotation of small self-interstitial atom clusters in tungsten, J. Nucl. Mater. 453, 202 (2014).
  58. M. E. Stupak, M. G. Urazaliev, and V. V. Popov, Structure and energy of 〈110〉 symmetric tilt boundaries in polycrystalline tungsten, Phys. Met. Metallogr. 121, 797 (2020).
  59. N. C. Nguyen and A. Rohskopf, Proper orthogonal descriptors for efficient and accurate interatomic potentials, J. Comput. Phys. 480, 112030 (2023).
  60. S. Menon, Y. Lysogorskiy, J. Rogal, and R. Drautz, Automated free-energy calculation from atomistic simulations, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 103801 (2021).
  61. R. Dsouza, M. Poul, L. Huber, T. D. Swinburne, and J. Neugebauer, Sampling-free computation of finite temperature material properties in isochoric and isobaric ensembles using the mean-field anharmonic bond model, Phys. Rev. B 109, 064108 (2024).
  62. R. Namakian, D. Moldovan, and T. D. Swinburne, Temperature dependent stacking fault free energy profiles and partial dislocation separation in fcc Cu, Comput. Mater. Sci. 218, 111971 (2023).
  63. P. Thörnig, JURECA: Data centric and booster modules implementing the modular supercomputing architecture at Jülich supercomputing centre, J. Large-Scale Res. Facilities (JLSRF) 7, A182 (2021) [Translation: On the contact of elastic solids].
  64. H. Hertz, Ueber die Berührung fester elastischer Körper, J. Angew. Math. 1882, 156 (1882).
  65. C. J. Ruestes, A. Stukowski, Y. Tang, D. R. Tramontina, P. Erhart, B. A. Remington, H. M. Urbassek, M. A. Meyers, and E. M. Bringa, Atomistic simulation of tantalum nanoindentation: Effects of indenter diameter, penetration velocity, and interatomic potentials on defect mechanisms and evolution, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 613, 390 (2014).
  66. G. Ziegenhain, H. M. Urbassek, and A. Hartmaier, Influence of crystal anisotropy on elastic deformation and onset of plasticity in nanoindentation: A simulational study, J. Appl. Phys. 107, 061807 (2010).
  67. J. J. Vlassak and W. D. Nix, Indentation modulus of elastically anisotropic half spaces, Philos. Mag. A 67, 1045 (1993).
  68. J. J. Vlassak and W. D. Nix, Measuring the elastic properties of anisotropic materials by means of indentation experiments, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 42, 1223 (1994).
  69. J. Varillas Delgado, A molecular dynamics study of nanocontact plasticity and dislocation avalanches in FCC and BCC crystals, Ph.D. thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Departament de Ciència dels Materials i Enginyeria Metal·lúrgica, 2019.
  70. I. Muhammad, H. Fayyaz, R. Muhammad, and A. S. A., Dynamic characteristics of nanoindentation in Ni: A molecular dynamics simulation study, Chin. Phys. B 21, 116201 (2012).
  71. T.-H. Fang, S.-R. Jian, and D.-S. Chuu, Molecular dynamics analysis of effects of velocity and loading on the nanoindentation, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 41, L1328 (2002).
  72. A. Stukowski, V. V. Bulatov, and A. Arsenlis, Automated identification and indexing of dislocations in crystal interfaces, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 20, 085007 (2012).
  73. A. Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with ovitothe open visualization tool, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18, 015012 (2010).
  74. K. Durst, B. Backes, and M. Göken, Indentation size effect in metallic materials: Correcting for the size of the plastic zone, Scr. Mater. 52, 1093 (2005).
  75. Z. Wang, J. Zhang, A. Ma, A. Hartmaier, Y. Yan, and T. Sun, On the crystallographic anisotropy of plastic zone size in single crystalline copper under Berkovich nanoindentation, Mater. Today Commun. 25, 101314 (2020).
  76. C. Begau, J. Hua, and A. Hartmaier, A novel approach to study dislocation density tensors and lattice rotation patterns in atomistic simulations, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 60, 711 (2012).
  77. F. Shimizu, S. Ogata, and J. Li, Theory of shear banding in metallic glasses and molecular dynamics calculations, Mater. Trans. 48, 2923 (2007).
  78. F. J. Dominguez-Gutierrez, P. Grigorev, A. Naghdi, Q. Q. Xu, J. Byggmastar, G. Y. Wei, T. D. Swinburne, S. Papanikolaou, and M. J. Alava, Atomistic simulations of nanoindentation in single crystalline tungsten: The role of interatomic potentials, arXiv:2205.09165.
  79. A. P. Bartók, M. C. Payne, R. Kondor, and G. Csányi, Gaussian approximation potentials: The accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 136403 (2010).
  80. X. W. Zhou, R. A. Johnson, and H. N. G. Wadley, Misfit-energy-increasing dislocations in vapor-deposited CoFe/NiFe multilayers, Phys. Rev. B 69, 144113 (2004).
  81. J. J. Möller and E. Bitzek, BDA: A novel method for identifying defects in body-centered cubic crystals, MethodsX 3, 279 (2016).
  82. A. D. Naghdi, F. Pellegrini, E. Kkbenli, D. Massa, F. J. Dominguez-Gutierrez, E. Kaxiras, and S. Papanikolaou, Neural network interatomic potentials for open surface nano-mechanics applications, Acta Mater. 277, 120200 (2024).
  83. J. D. Honeycutt and H. C. Andersen, Molecular dynamics study of melting and freezing of small Lennard-Jones clusters, J. Phys. Chem. 91, 4950 (1987).
  84. J. Wang, Z. Zeng, C. R. Weinberger, Z. Zhang, T. Zhu, and S. X. Mao, In situ atomic-scale observation of twinning-dominated deformation in nanoscale body-centred cubic tungsten, Nat. Mater. 14, 594 (2015).
  85. J. Alcalá, R. Dalmau, O. Franke, M. Biener, J. Biener, and A. Hodge, Planar defect nucleation and annihilation mechanisms in nanocontact plasticity of metal surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 075502 (2012).
  86. S. Plimpton, Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1 (1995).
  87. https://github.com/lammps/lammps.
  88. P. G. Heighway, D. McGonegle, N. Park, A. Higginbotham, and J. S. Wark, Molecular dynamics simulations of grain interactions in shock-compressed highly textured columnar nanocrystals, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 083602 (2019).
  89. R. Halver, Adaptives Lastbalance-Verfahren für Gebietszerlegung in der Molekulardynamik, Master's thesis, FH Aachen University of Applied Sciences, 2010.
  90. R. Halver, S. Schulz, and G. Sutmann, ALL: A loadbalancing library, C++/Fortran library, https://gitlab.version.fz-juelich.de/SLMS/loadbalancing/-/releases.
  91. Berger and Bokhari, A partitioning strategy for nonuniform problems on multiprocessors, IEEE Trans. Comput. C-36, 570 (1987).
  92. J. F. Ziegler and J. P. Biersack, The stopping and range of ions in matter, in Treatise on Heavy-Ion Science, edited by D. Allan Bromley, Astrophysics, Chemistry, and Condensed Matter Vol. 6 (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1985), pp. 93–129.
  93. V. Blum, R. Gehrke, F. Hanke, P. Havu, V. Havu, X. Ren, K. Reuter, and M. Scheffler, Ab initio molecular simulations with numeric atom-centered orbitals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 2175 (2009).
  94. A. Stukowski, E. Fransson, M. Mock, and P. Erhart, Atomicrexa general purpose tool for the construction of atomic interaction models, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 25, 055003 (2017).
  95. J. P. Biersack and J. F. Ziegler, The stopping and range of ions in solids, in Ion Implantation Techniques, edited by Heiner Ryssel and Hans Glawischnig (Springer, Berlin, 1982), pp. 122–156.
  96. C. Björkas, K. Nordlund, and S. Dudarev, Modelling radiation effects using the ab initio based tungsten and vanadium potentials, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 267, 3204 (2009).
  97. A. H. Larsen, J. J. Mortensen, J. Blomqvist, I. E. Castelli, R. Christensen, M. Duak, J. Friis, M. N. Groves, B. Hammer, C. Hargus et al., The atomic simulation environment—A Python library for working with atoms, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 273002 (2017).
  98. S. H. Chen and B. N. Brockhouse, Lattice vibrations of tungsten, Solid State Commun. 2, 73 (1964).
  99. LAMMPS, LAMMPS documentation: fix balance command, https://docs.lammps.org/fix_balance.html.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Materials 9, 093805– Published 26 September, 2025
  • Received 19 May 2025
  • Accepted 30 July 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation