Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Beta-Delayed Neutron Emission of N=84 Cd132

M. Madurga1, Z. Y. Xu1, R. Grzywacz1, M. R. Mumpower2,3,4, A. N. Andreyev5, G. Benzoni6, M. J. G. Borge7, C. Costache8, I. Cox1 et al.

S. Cupp9, B. Dimitrov10, P. Van Duppen11, L. M. Fraile12,7, S. Franchoo13, H. Fynbo14, B. Gonsalves15, A. Gottardo13, P. T. Greenless15, A. Gross9, C. J. Gross16, L. J. Harkness-Brennan17, M. Huyse11, D. S. Judson17, S. Kisyov8, K. Kolos18, J. Konki15, J. Kurcewicz7, I. Lazarus19, R. Lică7, L. Lynch7, M. Lund14, N. Marginean8, R. Marginean8, C. Mihai8, I. Marroquin20, C. Mazzocchi21, D. Mengoni22, A. I. Morales23, E. Nacher23, A. Negret8, R. D. Page17, S. Pascu8, S. V. Paulauskas1, A. Perea20, M. Piersa-Siłkowska1,12,21, V. Pucknell19, P. Rahkila15, E. Rapisarda7, F. Rotaru8, C. Sotty11, S. Taylor1, O. Tengblad20, V. Vedia12, D. Verney13, R. Wadsworth5, N. Warr17,24, and H. de Witte11

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
  • 2Obsidian Research, Fort Wayne, Indiana 46835, USA
  • 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, USA
  • 4Computational and Artificial Intelligence Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
  • 5School of Physics, Engineering and Technology, University of York, North Yorkshire YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
  • 6Dipartimento di Fisica and INFN, Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy
  • 7CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
  • 8“Horia Hulubei” National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, RO-077125 Bucharest, Romania
  • 9Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
  • 10Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy, BAS, Sofia, Bulgaria
  • 11Instituut voor Kern- en Stralingsfysica, K.U. Leuven, BE-3001 Leuven, Belgium
  • 12Grupo de Física Nuclear, EMFTEL and IPARCOS, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
  • 13Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, 91405 Orsay, France
  • 14Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
  • 15Department of Physics, P.O. Box 64, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
  • 16Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, USA
  • 17Department of Physics, Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZE, United Kingdom
  • 18Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
  • 19STFC Daresbury, Daresbury, Warrington WA4 4AD, United Kingdom
  • 20Instituto de Estructura de la Materia, CSIC, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
  • 21Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Warszawa PL 00-681, Poland
  • 22INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Padova, Italy
  • 23Instituto de Física Corpuscular, CSIC Universidad de Valencia, E-46071 Valencia, Spain
  • 24Institut für Kernphysik, Universität zu Köln, 50937 Köln, Germany

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 232504 – Published 11 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/z93q-9g6y

Abstract

Using the time-of-flight technique, we measured the beta-delayed neutron emission of Cd132. From our large-scale shell model (LSSM) calculation using the N3LO interaction [, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 022501 (2023)], we suggest the decay is dominated by the transformation of a neutron in the g7/2 orbital, deep below the Fermi surface, into a proton in the g9/2 orbital. We compare the beta-decay half-lives and neutron branching ratios of nuclei with Z<50 and N≥82 obtained with our LSSM with those of leading “global” models such as finite-range droplet model (FRDM). Our calculations match known half-lives and neutron branching ratios well and suggest that current leading models overestimate the yet-to-be-measured half-lives. Our model, backed by the Cd132 decay data presented here, offers robust predictive power for nuclei of astrophysical interest such as r-process waiting points.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (41)

  1. M. R. Mumpower, R. Surman, G. C. McLaughlin, and A. Aprahamian, The impact of individual nuclear properties on r-process nucleosynthesis, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 86, 86 (2016).
  2. M. R. Mumpower, T. M. Sprouse, J. M. Miller, K. A. Lund, J. C. Garcia, N. Vassh, G. C. McLaughlin, and R. Surman, Nuclear uncertainties associated with the nucleosynthesis in ejecta of a black hole accretion disk, Astrophys. J. 970, 173 (2024).
  3. K. L. Jones et al., The magic nature of 132Sn explored through the single-particle states of 133Sn, Nature (London) 465, 454 (2010).
  4. F. Nowacki, A. Obertelli, and A. Poves, The neutron-rich edge of the nuclear landscape: Experiment and theory, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 120, 86 (2021).
  5. H. Watanabe et al., Isomers in 128Pd and 126Pd: Evidence for a robust shell closure at the neutron magic number 82 in exotic palladium isotopes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 152501 (2013).
  6. V. H. Phong et al., Observation of a μs isomer in In4913485: Proton-neutron coupling “southeast” of Sn5013282, Phys. Rev. C 100, 011302 (2019).
  7. J. M. Allmond et al., Electromagnetic moments of radioactive 136Te and the emergence of collectivity 2p⨁2n outside of double-magic 132Sn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 092503 (2017).
  8. T. J. Gray et al., Early signal of emerging nuclear collectivity in neutron-rich 129Sb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 032502 (2020).
  9. P. Möller, M. R. Mumpower, T. Kawano, and W. D. Myers, Nuclear properties for astrophysical and radioactive-ion-beam applications (II), At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 125, 1 (2019).
  10. I. N. Borzov, Self-consistent approach to beta decay and delayed neutron emission, Phys. At. Nucl. 79, 910 (2017).
  11. G. Lorusso et al., β-decay half-lives of 110 neutron-rich nuclei across the N=82 shell gap: Implications for the mechanism and universality of the astrophysical r Process, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 192501 (2015).
  12. P. Möller, B. Pfeiffer, and K.-L. Kratz, New calculations of gross β-decay properties for astrophysical applications: Speeding-up the classical r process, Phys. Rev. C 67, 055802 (2003).
  13. O. Hall et al., β-delayed neutron emission of r-process nuclei at the N, Phys. Lett. B 816, 136266 (2021).
  14. V. H. Phong et al., β-delayed one and two neutron emission probabilities southeast of 132Sn and the odd-even systematics in r-process nuclide abundances, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 172701 (2022).
  15. Z. Y. Xu et al., 133In: A rosetta stone for decays of r-process nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 022501 (2023).
  16. P. Hoff et al. (ISOLDE Collaboration), Single-Neutron States in 133Sn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1020 (1996).
  17. M. Piersa et al. (IDS Collaboration), β decay of 133In: γ emission from neutron-unbound states in 133Sn, Phys. Rev. C 99, 024304 (2019).
  18. M. Piersa-Siłkowska et al. (IDS Collaboration), First β-decay spectroscopy of 135In and new β-decay branches of 134In, Phys. Rev. C 104, 044328 (2021).
  19. J. Taprogge et al., 1p3/2 proton-hole state in 132Sn and the shell structure along N=82 PY-2014/04/01, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 132501 (2014).
  20. A. Jungclaus et al., First observation of γ rays emitted from excited states south-east of 132Sn: The πg9/2−1⊗νf7/2 multiplet of 132In83, Phys. Rev. C 93, 041301 (2016).
  21. T. Kautzsch, W. B. Walters, M. Hannawald, K. L. Kratz, V. I. Mishin, V. N. Fedoseyev, W. Böhmer, Y. Jading, P. Van Duppen, B. Pfeiffer, A. Wöhr, P. Möller, I. Klöckl, V. Sebastian, U. Köster, M. Koizumi, J. Lettry, and H. L. Ravn (ISOLDE Collaboration), New states in heavy Cd isotopes and evidence for weakening of the N = 82 shell structure, Eur. Phys. J. A 9, 201 (2000).
  22. P. Hoff et al., Nuclear spectroscopy at 133Sn, Hyperfine Interact. 129, 141 (2000).
  23. J. Heideman et al. (IDS Collaboration), Evidence of nonstatistical neutron emission following β decay near doubly magic 132Sn, Phys. Rev. C 108, 024311 (2023).
  24. V. Mishin, V. Fedoseyev, H.-J. Kluge, V. Letokhov, H. Ravn, F. Scheerer, Y. Shirakabe, S. Sundell, and O. Tengblad, Chemically selective laser ion-source for the CERN-ISOLDE on-line mass separator facility, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 73, 550 (1993).
  25. W. A. Peters et al., Performance of the Versatile Array of Neutron Detectors at Low Energy (VANDLE), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 836, 122 (2016).
  26. M. Baginova, P. Vojtyla, and P. P. Povinec, Investigation of neutron interactions with Ge detectors, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 897, 22 (2018).
  27. B. Fogelberg, M. Hellström, D. Jerrestam, H. Mach, J. Blomqvist, A. Kerek, L. O. Norlin, and J. P. Omtvedt, Detailed Spectroscopy of the doubly closed shell nucleus 132Sn: first observation of octupole collectivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2413 (1994).
  28. H. Ohm, W. Rudolph, and K.-L. Kratz, Beta-delayed neutron emission following the decay of 17N, Nucl. Phys. A274, 45 (1976).
  29. L. Carraz, P. Hansen, A. Huck, B. Jonson, G. Klotz, A. Knipper, K. Kratz, C. Miéhé, S. Mattsson, G. Nyman, H. Ohm, A. Poskanzer, A. Poves, H. Ravn, C. Richard-Serre, A. Schröder, G. Walter, and W. Ziegert, The 49 K beta decay, Phys. Lett. B 109, 419 (1982).
  30. M. Wang, W. Huang, F. Kondev, G. Audi, and S. Naimi, The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references, Chin. Phys. C 45, 030003 (2021).
  31. D. R. Entem and R. Machleidt, Accurate charge-dependent nucleon-nucleon potential at fourth order of chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. C 68, 041001(R) (2003).
  32. C. Izzo et al., Mass measurements of neutron-rich indium isotopes for r-process studies, Phys. Rev. C 103, 025811 (2021).
  33. T. Marketin, L. Huther, and G. Martínez-Pinedo, Large-scale evaluation of β-decay rates of r-process nuclei with the inclusion of first-forbidden transitions, Phys. Rev. C 93, 025805 (2016).
  34. A. Ravlić, Y. Saito, and W. Nazarewicz, Large-scale calculations of β-decay rates and implications for r-process nucleosynthesis, Phys. Rev. C 113, 045802 (2026).
  35. E. M. Ney, J. Engel, T. Li, and N. Schunck, Global description of β− decay with the axially deformed Skyrme finite-amplitude method: Extension to odd-mass and odd-odd nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 102, 034326 (2020).
  36. N. Shimizu, T. Togashi, and Y. Utsuno, Gamow–Teller transitions of neutron-rich N = 82,81 nuclei by shell-model calculations, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 033D01 (2021).
  37. Q. Zhi, E. Caurier, J. J. Cuenca-García, K. Langanke, G. Martínez-Pinedo, and K. Sieja, Shell-model half-lives including first-forbidden contributions for r-process waiting-point nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 87, 025803 (2013).
  38. National Nuclear Data Center, Information extracted from the NuDat database, https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat/.
  39. I. N. Borzov,Beta-decay rates, Nucl. Phys. A777, 645 (2006).
  40. M. Hannawald, K.-L. Kratz, B. Pfeiffer, W. B. Walters, V. N. Fedoseyev, V. I. Mishin, W. F. Mueller, H. Schatz, J. Van Roosbroeck, U. Köster, V. Sebastian, and H. L. Ravn (ISOLDE Collaboration), Selective laser ionization of very neutron-rich cadmium isotopes: Decay properties of ​131Cd83 and ​132Cd84, Phys. Rev. C 62, 054301 (2000).
  41. N. Shimizu, T. Mizusaki, Y. Utsuno, and Y. Tsunoda, Thick-restart block Lanczos method for large-scale shell-model calculations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 244, 372 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation