Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Optimal Distributions of Receptors on Arbitrarily Shaped Cell Surfaces

Daoning Wu (吴道宁)1,*, Sayun Mao (毛飒韵)1,2,*, and Jie Lin (林杰)3,4,†

  • 1Yuanpei College, Peking University, Beijing, China
  • 2Department of Computational Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095-1766, USA
  • 3Center for Quantitative Biology, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China
  • 4Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †Contact author: linjie@pku.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 208401 – Published 10 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/xklg-qy2t

Abstract

Efficient absorption of molecules through receptors on cell surfaces is crucial for various biological processes. While ubiquitous patterns of receptor distributions, including polar localization in rod-shaped cells, have been widely observed, the underlying evolutionary advantage of these patterns is unclear. In this Letter, we investigate how the spatial distribution of receptors on the cell surface affects the total flux entering the cell. We develop a numerical method that allows for the calculation of fluxes through all receptors using linear equations. Our calculations show that the flux through each receptor is spatially dependent for uniformly distributed receptors: the fluxes are highest near the poles in rod-shaped cells and near the invagination in defective spherical cells. Surprisingly, we show that the optimal receptor distribution on an arbitrarily shaped cell, which maximizes the total flux, is precisely the charge density distribution on an ideal conductor of the same shape, in agreement with numerical simulations. Our Letter unveils the evolutionary origin of receptor localizations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (35)

  1. J. Schlessinger, Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases, Cell 103, 211 (2000).
  2. Álvaro Ortega, I. B. Zhulin, and T. Krell, Sensory repertoire of bacterial chemoreceptors, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 81, e00033-17 (2017).
  3. J. Monod, The growth of bacterial cultures, Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 3, 371 (1949).
  4. A. Natarajan and F. Srienc, Dynamics of glucose uptake by single escherichia coli cells, Metab. Eng. 1, 320 (1999).
  5. M. H. Saler Jr and J. Reizer, The bacterial phosphotransferase system: New frontiers 30 years later, Mol. Microbiol. 13, 755 (1994).
  6. J. H. Tchieu, V. Norris, J. S. Edwards, and M. H. Saier, The complete phosphotransferase system in Escherichia coli, J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 3, 329 (2001).
  7. J. Deutscher, C. Francke, and P. W. Postma, How phosphotransferase system-related protein phosphorylation regulates carbohydrate metabolism in bacteria, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70, 939 (2006).
  8. T. Romantsov, S. Helbig, D. E. Culham, C. Gill, L. Stalker, and J. M. Wood, Cardiolipin promotes polar localization of osmosensory transporter prop in escherichia coli, Mol. Microbiol. 64, 1455 (2007).
  9. T. Romantsov, A. R. Battle, J. L. Hendel, B. Martinac, and J. M. Wood, Protein localization in escherichia coli cells: Comparison of the cytoplasmic membrane proteins ProP, LacY, ProW, AqpZ, MscS, and MscL, J. Bacteriol. 192, 912 (2010).
  10. L. Lopian, Y. Elisha, A. Nussbaum-Shochat, and O. Amster-Choder, Spatial and temporal organization of the E. coli pts components, EMBO J. 29, 3630 (2010).
  11. J. R. Maddock and L. Shapiro, Polar location of the chemoreceptor complex in the escherichia coli cell, Science 259, 1717 (1993).
  12. D. Kentner, S. Thiem, M. Hildenbeutel, and V. Sourjik, Determinants of chemoreceptor cluster formation in escherichia coli, Mol. Microbiol. 61, 407 (2006).
  13. D. Greenfield, A. L. McEvoy, H. Shroff, G. E. Crooks, N. S. Wingreen, E. Betzig, and J. Liphardt, Self-organization of the escherichia coli chemotaxis network imaged with super-resolution light microscopy, PLoS Biol. 7, e1000137 (2009).
  14. C. W. Jones and J. P. Armitage, Positioning of bacterial chemoreceptors, Trends Microbiol. 23, 247 (2015), special Issue: Microbial Translocation.
  15. M. Koler, E. Peretz, C. Aditya, T. Shimizu, and A. Vaknin, Long-term positioning and polar preference of chemoreceptor clusters in E. coli, Nat. Commun. 9, 4444 (2018).
  16. S. Govindarajan, Y. Elisha, K. Nevo-Dinur, and O. Amster-Choder, The general phosphotransferase system proteins localize to sites of strong negative curvature in bacterial cells, mBio 4, e00443-13 (2013).
  17. T.-Y. Lin and D. B. Weibel, Organization and function of anionic phospholipids in bacteria, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 100, 4255 (2016).
  18. K. S. Ramamurthi and R. Losick, Negative membrane curvature as a cue for subcellular localization of a bacterial protein, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 13541 (2009).
  19. W. Draper and J. Liphardt, Origins of chemoreceptor curvature sorting in escherichia coli, Nat. Commun. 8, 14838 (2017).
  20. R. Phillips, J. Kondev, J. Theriot, and H. Garcia, Physical Biology of the Cell (Garland Science, New York, NY, USA, 2012).
  21. M. Schwartz, The adsorption of coliphage lambda to its host: Effect of variations in the surface density of receptor and in phage-receptor affinity, J. Mol. Biol. 103, 521 (1976).
  22. H. C. Berg and E. M. Purcell, Physics of chemoreception, Biophys. J. 20, 193 (1977).
  23. M. Szenk, K. A. Dill, and A. M. R. de Graff, Why do fast-growing bacteria enter overflow metabolism? Testing the membrane real estate hypothesis, Cell Syst. 52, 95 (2017).
  24. R. Milo and R. Phillips, Cell Biology by the Numbers (Garland Science, New York, NY, USA, 2015).
  25. V. S. Vladimirov, Equations of Mathematical Physics (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1971).
  26. C. A. Brebbia and J. Dominguez, Boundary Elements: An Introductory Course, 2nd ed. (WIT Press/Computational Mechanics Publications; McGraw-Hill, Southampton, UK; Boston, USA; New York, USA, 1992).
  27. H. Antes, A Short Course on Boundary Element Methods (2010), lecture.
  28. C. Pechstein, Boundary element methods, https://www.numa.uni-linz.ac.at/teaching/lva/2013s/spezvo/bem13.pdf (2013).
  29. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/xklg-qy2t for details on numerical methods, derivations for spherical cells, and supplemental figures.
  30. Á. González, Measurement of areas on a sphere using fibonacci and latitude–longitude lattices, Math. Geosci. 42, 49 (2010).
  31. L. D. Landau, J. S. Bell, M. Kearsley, L. Pitaevskii, E. Lifshitz, and J. Sykes, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media (Elsevier, New York, 2013), Vol. 8.
  32. A. Acrivos and T. D. Taylor, Heat and mass transfer from single spheres in stokes flow, Phys. Fluids 5, 387 (1962).
  33. A. Alonso, R. G. Endres, and J. B. Kirkegaard, Local clustering and global spreading of receptors for optimal spatial gradient sensing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 158401 (2025).
  34. D. Wu, S. Mao, and J. Lin, Dataset, GitHub, https://github.com/wudaoning/receptor2025 (2025).
  35. W. B. Smythe, Static and dynamic electricity (Taylor & Francis, Bristol, PA, USA, 1989).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation