- Open Access
Dimensional Reduction Is Supersymmetric at Three Loops
Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 191602 – Published 3 November, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/wqyz-ckqg
Abstract
We resolve the long-standing claim that regularization by dimensional reduction (DR) fails to preserve supersymmetry in supersymmetric Yang–Mills (SYM) theories at three loops. Earlier results reported a mismatch between the Yukawa and ghost-gluon functions in SYM, suggesting a breakdown of supersymmetry. We show that this discrepancy does not originate from DR itself but from subtleties in the treatment of the Clifford algebra. A corrected three-loop calculation restores full supersymmetric behavior, and we demonstrate that the same issue would first affect SYM only at five loops, consistent with existing four-loop results. Our findings confirm that DR preserves supersymmetry for , and 4 SYM through the loop orders examined.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (32)
- S. P. Martin, Adv. Ser. Dir. High Energy Phys. 18, 1 (1998).
- V. A. Novikov, M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B229, 381 (1983).
- L. V. Avdeev, O. V. Tarasov, and A. A. Vladimirov, Phys. Lett. 96B, 94 (1980).
- M. T. Grisaru, M. Rocek, and W. Siegel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1063 (1980).
- G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. B44, 189 (1972).
- C. G. Bollini and J. J. Giambiagi, Nuovo Cimento B 12, 20 (1972).
- W. Siegel, Phys. Lett. 84B, 193 (1979).
- W. Siegel, Phys. Lett. 94B, 37 (1980).
- L. V. Avdeev and O. V. Tarasov, Phys. Lett. 112B, 356 (1982).
- L. V. Avdeev, Phys. Lett. 117B, 317 (1982).
- V. N. Velizhanin, Nucl. Phys. B818, 95 (2009).
- V. Chestnov, High-precision computation of observables in supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory, Ph.D. thesis, Hamburg University, 2019.
- V. N. Velizhanin, Phys. Lett. B 696, 560 (2011).
- T. van Ritbergen, A. N. Schellekens, and J. A. M. Vermaseren, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 14, 41 (1999).
- M. Chakraborty and S.-O. Moch, arXiv:2604.10434.
- L. V. Avdeev and A. A. Vladimirov, Nucl. Phys. B219, 262 (1983).
- J. Davies, F. Herren, C. Poole, M. Steinhauser, and A. E. Thomsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 071803 (2020).
- C. Poole and A. E. Thomsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 041602 (2019).
- C. Poole and A. E. Thomsen, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2019) 055.
- A. A. Vladimirov, Theor. Math. Phys. 43, 417 (1980).
- K. G. Chetyrkin and F. V. Tkachov, Phys. Lett. 114B, 340 (1982).
- P. Nogueira, J. Comput. Phys. 105, 279 (1993).
- J. A. M. Vermaseren, arXiv:math-ph/0010025.
- J. Kuipers, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and J. Vollinga, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1453 (2013).
- B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, and J. Vermaseren, arXiv:1707.06453.
- B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, and J. A. M. Vermaseren, Comput. Phys. Commun. 253, 107198 (2020).
- T. van Ritbergen, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and S. A. Larin, Phys. Lett. B 400, 379 (1997).
- M. Czakon, Nucl. Phys. B710, 485 (2005).
- I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones, and K. L. Roberts, Z. Phys. C 63, 151 (1994).
- R. V. Harlander, D. R. T. Jones, P. Kant, L. Mihaila, and M. Steinhauser, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2006) 024.
- D. Stöckinger, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2005) 076.
- H. Bélusca-Maïto, A. Ilakovac, P. Kühler, M. Mador-Božinović, D. Stöckinger, and M. Weißwange, Symmetry 15, 622 (2023).