Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

η and η′ Production in J/ψ Radiative Decays from Quantum Chromodynamics

Mischa Batelaan1,*, Jozef J. Dudek1,2,†, and Robert G. Edwards2,‡ (for the Hadron Spectrum Collaboration)

  • *Contact author: mbatelaan@wm.edu
  • †Contact author: dudek@jlab.org
  • ‡Contact author: edwards@jlab.org

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 161904 – Published 16 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/tdk2-bk8w

Abstract

We present a first principles calculation within quantum chromodynamics (QCD) of the radiative decays of the J/ψ into the light pseudoscalar mesons η and η′. Within a lattice computation we obtain the transition form factors as a function of photon virtuality from the timelike region, accessible experimentally via the “Dalitz” decay J/ψ→e+e−η(′), through to the real photon point corresponding to J/ψ→γη(′). This is the first calculation in lattice QCD with two (heavier than physical) degenerate flavors of light quark and a heavier strange quark, in which the η′ appears as the first excited state with pseudoscalar isoscalar quantum numbers. We access it reliably by using variationally optimized operators, the use of which also improves the purity of the J/ψ and η signals, reducing systematic uncertainties. High quality results at a large number of kinematic points are obtained in a typically noisy disconnected process by using a novel correlator averaging procedure. Our results show the expected enhanced production of the η′ over the η in this process, and suggest that the demonstrated lattice technology is suitable for future calculations considering processes in which light meson resonances are produced.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

η and η′ meson production in J/ψ radiative decays from lattice QCD

Mischa Batelaan, Jozef J. Dudek, and Robert G. Edwards (for the Hadron Spectrum Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 112, 074505 (2025)

Article Text

References (47)

  1. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 92, 052003 (2015); 93, 039906(E) (2016).
  2. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 98, 072003 (2018).
  3. A. Rodas, A. Pilloni, M. Albaladejo, C. Fernandez-Ramirez, V. Mathieu, and A. P. Szczepaniak (Joint Physics Analysis Center Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 80 (2022).
  4. A. V. Sarantsev, I. Denisenko, U. Thoma, and E. Klempt, Phys. Lett. B 816, 136227 (2021).
  5. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 192002 (2022); 130, 159901(E) (2023).
  6. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 108, 092002 (2023).
  7. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 99, 012006 (2019); 104, 099901(E) (2021).
  8. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 99, 012013 (2019).
  9. X. Jiang, F. Chen, Y. Chen, M. Gong, N. Li, Z. Liu, W. Sun, and R. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 061901 (2023).
  10. C. Shi, Y. Chen, X. Jiang, M. Gong, Z. Liu, and W. Sun, Chin. Phys. C 48, 113105 (2024).
  11. J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, B. Joo, M. J. Peardon, D. G. Richards, and C. E. Thomas, Phys. Rev. D 83, 111502(R) (2011).
  12. J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, P. Guo, and C. E. Thomas (Hadron Spectrum Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 88, 094505 (2013).
  13. M. Peardon, J. Bulava, J. Foley, C. Morningstar, J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, B. Joo, H.-W. Lin, D. G. Richards, and K. J. Juge (Hadron Spectrum Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 80, 054506 (2009).
  14. R. A. Briceño, J. J. Dudek, and L. Leskovec, Phys. Rev. D 104, 054509 (2021).
  15. R. A. Briceno, J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, C. J. Shultz, C. E. Thomas, and D. J. Wilson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 242001 (2015).
  16. R. A. Briceño, J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, C. J. Shultz, C. E. Thomas, and D. J. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 93, 114508 (2016); 105, 079902(E) (2022).
  17. A. Radhakrishnan, J. J. Dudek, and R. G. Edwards (Hadron Spectrum Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 106, 114513 (2022).
  18. F. G. Ortega-Gama, J. J. Dudek, and R. G. Edwards (Hadron Spectrum Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 110, 094505 (2024).
  19. C. Alexandrou, L. Leskovec, S. Meinel, J. Negele, S. Paul, M. Petschlies, A. Pochinsky, G. Rendon, and S. Syritsyn, Phys. Rev. D 98, 074502 (2018); 105, 019902(E) (2022).
  20. L. Leskovec, S. Meinel, M. Petschlies, J. Negele, S. Paul, and A. Pochinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 161901 (2025).
  21. M. Batelaan, J. J. Dudek, and R. G. Edwards (Hadron Spectrum Collaboration), companion paper, Phys. Rev. D 112, 074505 (2025).
  22. J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, M. J. Peardon, D. G. Richards, and C. E. Thomas, Phys. Rev. D 82, 034508 (2010).
  23. J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, and D. J. Wilson (Hadron Spectrum Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 93, 094506 (2016).
  24. R. A. Briceno, J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, and D. J. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 97, 054513 (2018).
  25. A. J. Woss, C. E. Thomas, J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, and D. J. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 100, 054506 (2019).
  26. L. Liu, G. Moir, M. Peardon, S. M. Ryan, C. E. Thomas, P. Vilaseca, J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, B. Joo, and D. G. Richards (Hadron Spectrum Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2012) 126.
  27. D. J. Wilson, C. E. Thomas, J. J. Dudek, and R. G. Edwards (Hadron Spectrum Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 241901 (2024).
  28. D. J. Wilson, C. E. Thomas, J. J. Dudek, and R. G. Edwards (Hadron Spectrum Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 109, 114503 (2024).
  29. J. Delaney, C. E. Thomas, and S. M. Ryan, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 230.
  30. C. Michael, Nucl. Phys. B259, 58 (1985).
  31. M. Luscher and U. Wolff, Nucl. Phys. B339, 222 (1990).
  32. J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, N. Mathur, and D. G. Richards, Phys. Rev. D 77, 034501 (2008).
  33. J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, and C. E. Thomas, Phys. Rev. D 86, 034031 (2012).
  34. W. I. Jay and E. T. Neil, Phys. Rev. D 103, 114502 (2021).
  35. C. E. Thomas, R. G. Edwards, and J. J. Dudek, Phys. Rev. D 85, 014507 (2012).
  36. For instance, description with F0e−Q2/16β2 gives βη=0.460(8)  GeV, βη′=0.463(10)  GeV with χ2/Ndof∼1 in each case.

  37. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  38. R. G. Edwards and B. Joo (SciDAC, LHPC, UKQCD Collaborations), Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 140, 832 (2005).
  39. M. A. Clark, R. Babich, K. Barros, R. C. Brower, and C. Rebbi, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 1517 (2010).
  40. R. Babich, M. A. Clark, and B. Joo, in SC 10 (Supercomputing 2010) New Orleans, Louisiana (2010), arXiv:1011.0024.
  41. K. Clark, B. Joo, A. Strelchenko, M. Cheng, A. Gambhir, and R. Brower, in Proceedings of SC 16 (Supercomputing 2016) Salt Lake City, Utah (2016), arXiv:1011.0024.
  42. B. Joó, D. Kalamkar, K. Vaidyanathan, M. Smelyanskiy, K. Pamnany, V. Lee, P. Dubey, and W. Watson, in Supercomputing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 7905, edited by J. Kunkel, T. Ludwig, and H. Meuer (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2013), pp. 40–54.
  43. B. Joó, mg_proto: A Multigrid Library for QCD, https://github.com/JeffersonLab/mg_proto/.
  44. J. C. Osborn, R. Babich, J. Brannick, R. C. Brower, M. A. Clark, S. D. Cohen, and C. Rebbi, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2010 (2010) 037 [arXiv:1011.2775].
  45. R. Babich, J. Brannick, R. C. Brower, M. A. Clark, T. A. Manteuffel, S. F. McCormick, J. C. Osborn, and C. Rebbi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 201602 (2010).
  46. https://www.csd3.cam.ac.uk/
  47. www.dirac.ac.uk

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation