Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Direct Measurement of Diffusion Coefficients: Evidence for Diffusive Stochastic Heating in Collisionless Plasmas

Tamar Ervin1,2,*, Trevor A. Bowen2, Alfred Mallet2, Philip A. Isenberg3, Kristopher G. Klein4, Stuart D. Bale1,2,5, Benjamin D. G. Chandran3, Roberto Livi2, Ali Rahmati2 et al.

Davin E. Larson2

  • *Contact author: tamarervin@berkeley.edu

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 065201 – Published 6 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/s4q4-v7rm

Abstract

Open questions in collisionless plasma dissipation can be addressed using space-based observations in different astrophysical environments, with implications for both astrophysical and laboratory plasma systems. We study a low-β, highly imbalanced, sub-Alfvénic stream observed by Parker Solar Probe (PSP) to identify and distinguish between signatures of stochastic heating (SH) and resonant heating (RH) by parallel ion cyclotron waves (∥-ICWs). Prior work studying this stream [Trevor A. Bowen et al., Stochastic heating in the sub-Alfvénic solar wind, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 255201 (2025)] showed that the SH rate, accounting for intermittency, matched the amplitude of the local energy transfer (LET) rate, while the RH rate did not. This comparison relied on a number of assumptions regarding the nature of the diffusive process and the calculation of the LET rate. We introduce a novel technique of inverting the proton guiding center equation to empirically measure velocity-space diffusion coefficients using three-dimensional proton velocity distribution functions, from the ion electrostatic analyzer (the Solar Probe Analyzer for Ions) on PSP. Measured diffusion coefficients are used to determine phase-space heating rates, leading to a calculation of a fully kinetic heating rate independent of assumptions made in prior work. We show that scale-dependent analytic expressions for SH via noncoherent fluctuations match the empirical measurements from PSP data, provided that we account for intermittency in the heating calculation. In contrast, the derived heating rates for SH that accounts for the effects of the helicity barrier and heating rates for RH via ∥-ICWs do not peak in the same region of velocity space as the empirical measurements, nor do they reach the required magnitude. Our approach provides novel methodology to uniquely identify and constrain heating processes in collisionless plasmas and shows evidence of a Fokker-Planck-like diffusive process in the near-Sun solar wind.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (61)

  1. G. F. Chew, M. L. Goldberger, and F. E. Low, The Boltzmann equation and the one-fluid hydromagnetic equations in the absence of particle collisions, Proc. R. Soc. A 236, 112 (1956).
  2. E. Marsch, R. Schwenn, H. Rosenbauer, K. H. Muehlhaeuser, W. Pilipp, and F. M. Neubauer, Solar wind protons: Three-dimensional velocity distributions and derived plasma parameters measured between 0.3 and 1 AU, J. Geophys. Res. 87, 52 (1982).
  3. Jia Huang et al., The temperature anisotropy and helium abundance features of Alfvénic slow solar wind observed by Parker Solar Probe, helios, and wind missions, Astrophys. J. Lett. 986, L28 (2025).
  4. John D. Richardson, Karolen I. Paularena, Alan J. Lazarus, and John W. Belcher, Radial evolution of the solar wind from IMP 8 to Voyager 2, Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 325 (1995).
  5. Lorenzo Matteini, Simone Landi, Petr Hellinger, Filippo Pantellini, Milan Maksimovic, Marco Velli, Bruce E. Goldstein, and Eckart Marsch, Evolution of the solar wind proton temperature anisotropy from 0.3 to 2.5 AU, Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L20105 (2007).
  6. Trevor A. Bowen, Tamar Ervin, Alfred Mallet, Benjamin D. G. Chandran, Nikos Sioulas, Philip A. Isenberg, Stuart D. Bale, Jonathan Squire, Kristopher G. Klein, and Oreste Pezzi, Stochastic heating in the sub-Alfvénic solar wind, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 255201 (2025).
  7. Benjamin D. G. Chandran, Alfvén-wave turbulence and perpendicular ion temperatures in coronal holes, Astrophys. J. 720, 548 (2010).
  8. Kristopher G. Klein and Benjamin D. G. Chandran, Evolution of the proton velocity distribution due to stochastic heating in the near-Sun solar wind, Astrophys. J. 820, 47 (2016).
  9. Alfred Mallet, Kristopher G. Klein, Benjamin D. G. Chandran, Tamar Ervin, and Trevor A. Bowen, Perpendicular ion heating in turbulence and reconnection: Magnetic moment breaking by coherent fluctuations, J. Plasma Phys. 92, E13 (2026).
  10. Steven R. Cranmer, Ion cyclotron wave dissipation in the solar corona: The summed effect of more than 2000 ion species, Astrophys. J. 532, 1197 (2000).
  11. Trevor A. Bowen, Benjamin D. G. Chandran, Jonathan Squire, Stuart D. Bale, Die Duan, Kristopher G. Klein, Davin Larson, Alfred Mallet, Michael D. McManus, Romain Meyrand, Jaye L. Verniero, and Lloyd D. Woodham, In situ signature of cyclotron resonant heating in the solar wind, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 165101 (2022).
  12. Trevor A. Bowen, Stuart D. Bale, Benjamin D. G. Chandran, Alexandros Chasapis, Christopher H. K. Chen, Thierry Dudok de Wit, Alfred Mallet, Romain Meyrand, and Jonathan Squire, Mediation of collisionless turbulent dissipation through cyclotron resonance, Nat. Astron. 8, 482 (2024).
  13. Daniel Vech, Alfred Mallet, Kristopher G. Klein, and Justin C. Kasper, Magnetic reconnection may control the ion-scale spectral break of solar wind turbulence, Astrophys. J. Lett. 855, L27 (2018).
  14. Daniel Verscharen, Kristopher G. Klein, and Bennett A. Maruca, The multi-scale nature of the solar wind, Living Rev. Solar Phys. 16, 5 (2019).
  15. Zade Johnston, Jonathan Squire, and Romain Meyrand, Unified phenomenology and test-particle simulations of ion heating in low-β plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 095201 (2025).
  16. Michael F. Zhang, Matthew W. Kunz, Jonathan Squire, and Kristopher G. Klein, Extreme heating of minor ions in imbalanced solar-wind turbulence, Astrophys. J. 979, 121 (2025).
  17. R. Meyrand, J. Squire, A. A. Schekochihin, and W. Dorland, On the violation of the zeroth law of turbulence in space plasmas, J. Plasma Phys. 87, 535870301 (2021).
  18. Jonathan Squire, Romain Meyrand, Matthew W. Kunz, Lev Arzamasskiy, Alexander A. Schekochihin, and Eliot Quataert, High-frequency heating of the solar wind triggered by low-frequency turbulence, Nat. Astron. 6, 715 (2022).
  19. Niranjana Shankarappa, Kristopher G. Klein, Mihailo M. Martinović, and Trevor A. Bowen, Estimated heating rates due to cyclotron damping of ion-scale waves observed by the Parker Solar Probe, Astrophys. J. 973, 20 (2024).
  20. Lev Arzamasskiy, Matthew W. Kunz, Benjamin D. G. Chandran, and Eliot Quataert, Hybrid-kinetic simulations of ion heating in Alfvénic turbulence, Astrophys. J. 879, 53 (2019).
  21. S. S. Cerri, L. Arzamasskiy, and M. W. Kunz, On stochastic heating and its phase-space signatures in low-beta kinetic turbulence, Astrophys. J. 916, 120 (2021).
  22. Sofiane Bourouaine and Benjamin D. G. Chandran, Observational test of stochastic heating in low-β fast-solar-wind streams, Astrophys. J. 774, 96 (2013).
  23. Mihailo M. Martinović, Kristopher G. Klein, and Sofiane Bourouaine, Radial evolution of stochastic heating in low-β solar wind, Astrophys. J. 879, 43 (2019).
  24. Mihailo M. Martinović et al., The enhancement of proton stochastic heating in the near-Sun solar wind, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 246, 30 (2020).
  25. N. J. Fox, M. C. Velli, S. D. Bale, R. Decker, A. Driesman, R. A. Howard, J. C. Kasper, J. Kinnison, M. Kusterer, D. Lario, M. K. Lockwood, D. J. McComas, N. E. Raouafi, and A. Szabo, The solar probe plus mission: Humanity’s first visit to our star, Space Sci. Rev. 204, 7 (2016).
  26. Philip A. Isenberg and Bernard J. Vasquez, Perpendicular ion heating by cyclotron resonant dissipation of turbulently generated kinetic Alfvén waves in the solar wind, Astrophys. J. 887, 63 (2019).
  27. Philip A. Isenberg and Bernard J. Vasquez, Preferential perpendicular heating of coronal hole minor ions by the Fermi mechanism, Astrophys. J. 668, 546 (2007).
  28. J. C. Kasper et al., Parker Solar Probe enters the magnetically dominated solar corona, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 255101 (2021).
  29. G. P. Zank, L.-L. Zhao, L. Adhikari, D. Telloni, J. C. Kasper, M. Stevens, A. Rahmati, and S. D. Bale, Turbulence in the sub-Alfvénic solar wind, Astrophys. J. Lett. 926, L16 (2022).
  30. L.-L. Zhao, G. P. Zank, D. Telloni, M. Stevens, J. C. Kasper, and S. D. Bale, The turbulent properties of the sub-Alfvénic solar wind measured by the Parker Solar Probe, Astrophys. J. Lett. 928, L15 (2022).
  31. Tamar Ervin, Kai Jaffarove, Samuel T. Badman, Jia Huang, Yeimy J. Rivera, and Stuart D. Bale, Characteristics and source regions of slow Alfvénic solar wind observed by Parker Solar Probe, Astrophys. J. 975, 156 (2024).
  32. Roberto Livi et al., The solar probe analyzer—ions on the Parker Solar Probe, Astrophys. J. 938, 138 (2022).
  33. Justin C. Kasper et al., Solar wind electrons alphas and protons (SWEAP) investigation: Design of the solar wind and coronal plasma instrument suite for solar probe plus, Space Sci. Rev. 204, 131 (2016).
  34. T. A. Bowen, S. D. Bale, J. W. Bonnell, T. Dudok de Wit, K. Goetz, K. Goodrich, J. Gruesbeck, P. R. Harvey, G. Jannet, A. Koval, R. J. MacDowall, D. M. Malaspina, M. Pulupa, C. Revillet, D. Sheppard, and A. Szabo, A merged search-coil and fluxgate magnetometer data product for Parker Solar Probe FIELDS, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 125, e27813 (2020).
  35. S. D. Bale et al., The FIELDS instrument suite for solar probe plus. Measuring the coronal plasma and magnetic field, plasma waves and turbulence, and radio signatures of solar transients, Space Sci. Rev. 204, 49 (2016).
  36. R. M. Kulsrud, MHD description of plasma, in Basic Plasma Physics: Selected Chapters, Handbook of Plasma Physics, edited by A. A. Galeev and R. N. Sudan (North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1983), Vol. 1, p. 1.
  37. Philip A. Isenberg, A hemispherical model of anisotropic interstellar pickup ions, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 4719 (1997).
  38. T. A. A. B, An introduction to the calculus of finite differences. By C. H. Richardson pp. VI, 142. 28s. 1954. (van Nostrand, New York; Macmillan, London), Math. Gaz. 39, 339 (1955).
  39. Pei-bai Zhou, Finite Difference Method (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1993), pp. 63–94, ISBN [Amazon][WorldCat], 10.1007/978-3-642-50319-1_3.
  40. Bernard J. Vasquez, Philip A. Isenberg, and Sergei A. Markovskii, Proton perpendicular heating in turbulence simulations: Determination of the velocity diffusion coefficient, Astrophys. J. 893, 71 (2020).
  41. A. Wole, M. Lobo, and K. Br. Ginting, The application of finite difference method on 2-d heat conductivity problem, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2017, 012009 (2021).
  42. Trevor A. Bowen, Ivan Y. Vasko, Stuart D. Bale, Benjamin D. G. Chandran, Alexandros Chasapis, Thierry Dudok de Wit, Alfred Mallet, Michael McManus, Romain Meyrand, Marc Pulupa, and Jonathan Squire, Extended cyclotron resonant heating of the turbulent solar wind, Astrophys. J. Lett. 972, L8 (2024).
  43. T. A. Bowen, B. D. G. Chandran, K. G. Klein, A. Mallet, S. D. Bale, J. Squire, and J. Verniero, Data-driven representations of ion-kinetic distribution functions, in 2023 XXXVth General Assembly and Scientific Symposium of the International Union of Radio Science (URSI GASS) (2023), p. 335, 10.23919/URSIGASS57860.2023.10265538.
  44. Richard L. Branham, The Singular Value Decomposition (Springer, New York, New York, 1990), pp. 199–232, ISBN [Amazon][WorldCat], 10.1007/978-1-4612-3362-6_8.
  45. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/s4q4-v7rm for a derivation of the empirical calculation made from the spacecraft observations. It provides additional information for how the calculation was carried out, specifically, an overview of the discretization of the expression and implementation of centered finite differences.
  46. Paul J. Coleman, Jr., Turbulence, viscosity, and dissipation in the solar-wind plasma, Astrophys. J. 153, 371 (1968).
  47. Eliot Quataert, Particle heating by Alfvénic turbulence in hot accretion flows, Astrophys. J. 500, 978 (1998).
  48. Robert J. Leamon, Charles W. Smith, Norman F. Ness, William H. Matthaeus, and Hung K. Wong, Observational constraints on the dynamics of the interplanetary magnetic field dissipation range, J. Geophys. Res. 103, 4775 (1998).
  49. Alexander A. Schekochihin and Steven C. Cowley, Turbulence and magnetic fields in astrophysical plasmas, in Magnetohydrodynamics: Historical Evolution and Trends, edited by S. Molokov, R. Moreau, and H. K. Moffatt (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2007), p. 85.
  50. I. Zhuravleva, E. Churazov, A. A. Schekochihin, S. W. Allen, P. Arévalo, A. C. Fabian, W. R. Forman, J. S. Sanders, A. Simionescu, R. Sunyaev, A. Vikhlinin, and N. Werner, Turbulent heating in galaxy clusters brightest in x-rays, Nature (London) 515, 85 (2014).
  51. Alfred Mallet, Kristopher G. Klein, Benjamin D. G. Chandran, Daniel Grošelj, Ian W. Hoppock, Trevor A. Bowen, Chadi S. Salem, and Stuart D. Bale, Interplay between intermittency and dissipation in collisionless plasma turbulence, J. Plasma Phys. 85, 175850302 (2019).
  52. Tamar Ervin, Aidan J. Nakhleh, and Srijan Bharati Das, The Sun as a driver of the inner heliosphere: Modern investigations of fundamental plasma processes, Nat. Commun. 17, 4184 (2026).
  53. Gregory G. Howes, The fundamental parameters of astrophysical plasma turbulence and its dissipation: Non-relativistic limit, J. Plasma Phys. 90, 905900504 (2024).
  54. Vladimir Zhdankin, Generalized entropy production in collisionless plasma flows and turbulence, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031011 (2022).
  55. Senbei Du, Gary P. Zank, Xiaocan Li, and Fan Guo, Energy dissipation and entropy in collisionless plasma, Phys. Rev. E 101, 033208 (2020).
  56. K. G. Klein and G. G. Howes, Measuring collisionless damping in heliospheric plasmas using field-particle correlations, Astrophys. J. Lett. 826, L30 (2016).
  57. Orlando M. Romeo, An interdisciplinary approach to novel in situ measurements of solar and planetary electrons and magnetic fields, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 2024, https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/interdisciplinary-approach-novel-situ/docview/3175813267/se-2.
  58. Jungyeon Cho and A. Lazarian, Simulations of electron magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, Astrophys. J. 701, 236 (2009).
  59. Kristopher G. Klein, Jean C. Perez, Daniel Verscharen, Alfred Mallet, and Benjamin D. G. Chandran, A modified version of Taylor’s hypothesis for solar probe plus observations, Astrophys. J. Lett. 801, L18 (2015).
  60. Rohit Chhiber, Arcadi V. Usmanov, William H. Matthaeus, Tulasi N. Parashar, and Melvyn L. Goldstein, Contextual predictions for Parker Solar Probe. II. Turbulence properties and Taylor hypothesis, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 242, 12 (2019).
  61. C. F. Kennel and F. Engelmann, Velocity space diffusion from weak plasma turbulence in a magnetic field, Phys. Fluids 9, 2377 (1966).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation