Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

High-Temperature Limit Penalizing High-Frequency Quantum Fluctuations

Graeme Pleasance1,2,*, Erik Aurell3,†, and Francesco Petruccione1,2,4,‡

  • *Contact author: gpleasance1@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: eaurell@kth.se
  • ‡Contact author: petruccione@sun.ac.za

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 050405 – Published 29 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/kp9j-v4ss

Abstract

We revisit the Caldeira-Leggett model of quantum Brownian motion with Ohmic spectral density, and derive an additional contribution to the decoherence kernel in a new high-temperature limit at arbitrarily large cutoff frequency. This contribution reveals a novel mechanism for the classicalization of high-frequency quantum fluctuations. We further demonstrate that it leads to a Markovian master equation that is in guaranteed Lindblad form, and argue that this master equation describes the correct Markovian limit of quantum Brownian motion. Our approach considers in detail the behavior of the decoherence kernel at both the initial and final times of the process on the timescale of the bath memory.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (49)

  1. H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, New York, 2002).
  2. U. Weiss, Quantum Dissipative Systems (World Scientific, Singapore, 2011).
  3. E. Y. Wilner, H. Wang, M. Thoss, and E. Rabani, Phys. Rev. B 92, 195143 (2015).
  4. J. Leppäkangas, J. Braumüller, M. Hauck, J.-M. Reiner, I. Schwenk, S. Zanker, L. Fritz, A. V. Ustinov, M. Weides, and M. Marthaler, Phys. Rev. A 97, 052321 (2018).
  5. A. Caldeira and A. Leggett, Physica (Amsterdam) 121A, 587 (1983).
  6. A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 211 (1981).
  7. A. Caldeira and A. Leggett, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 149, 374 (1983).
  8. A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, M. P. A. Fisher, A. Garg, and W. Zwerger, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 1 (1987).
  9. W. G. Unruh and W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D 40, 1071 (1989).
  10. W. H. Zurek, S. Habib, and J. P. Paz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1187 (1993).
  11. J. P. Paz, S. Habib, and W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D 47, 488 (1993).
  12. M. Parikh, F. Wilczek, and G. Zahariade, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 29, 2042001 (2020).
  13. H. Kleinert, Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics, Statistics, Polymer Physics, and Financial Markets (World Scientific, Singapore, 2009).
  14. H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, Phys. Rev. A 63, 032102 (2001).
  15. G. Baym and T. Ozawa, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 3035 (2009).
  16. R. Feynman and F. Vernon, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 24, 118 (1963).
  17. J. T. Stockburger and C. H. Mak, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 4983 (1999).
  18. J. T. Stockburger and C. H. Mak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2657 (1998).
  19. J. T. Stockburger and H. Grabert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 170407 (2002).
  20. L. Diósi, Physica (Amsterdam) 199A, 517 (1993).
  21. L. Diósi, Europhys. Lett. 22, 1 (1993).
  22. J. Halliwell and A. Zoupas, Phys. Rev. D 52, 7294 (1995).
  23. S. Gao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3101 (1997).
  24. G. W. Ford and R. F. O’Connell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3376 (1999).
  25. B. Vacchini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1374 (2000).
  26. F. Petruccione and B. Vacchini, Phys. Rev. E 71, 046134 (2005).
  27. Here, we denote by S′(R) the space of tempered distributions over R—the continuous dual of the space of Schwartz functions S(R).

  28. See Supplemental Material http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/kp9j-v4ss for further details on the derivation of Eq. (6), and evaluation of the end terms of the decoherence functional Sr[ΔX].
  29. M. Xu, V. Vadimov, M. Krug, J. T. Stockburger, and J. Ankerhold, arXiv:2307.16790.
  30. M. Xu and J. Ankerhold, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. (2025).
  31. H. Dekker, Phys. Rev. A 16, 2126 (1977).
  32. H. Dekker, Phys. Rep. 80, 1 (1981).
  33. V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 17, 821 (1976).
  34. G. Lindblad, Commun. Math. Phys. 48, 119 (1976).
  35. The “eff” subscript on Heff indicates that under a microscopic derivation of Eq. (17), the Hamiltonian contribution can contain additional Lamb shifts and/or frequency renormalization terms not in H^S.

  36. E. Aurell, R. Kawai, and K. Goyal, J. Phys. A 53, 275303 (2020).
  37. R. Alicki and K. Lendi, Quantum Dynamical Semigroups and Applications (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007).
  38. G. Dvali, G. F. Giudice, C. Gomez, and A. Kehagias, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2011) 108.
  39. G. Homa, J. Z. Bernád, and L. Lisztes, Eur. Phys. J. D 73, 53 (2019).
  40. B. L. Hu, J. P. Paz, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 45, 2843 (1992).
  41. W. T. Strunz, Phys. Lett. A 224, 25 (1996).
  42. L. Diósi and W. T. Strunz, Phys. Lett. A 235, 569 (1997).
  43. L. Diósi, N. Gisin, and W. T. Strunz, Phys. Rev. A 58, 1699 (1998).
  44. T. Yu, Phys. Rev. A 69, 062107 (2004).
  45. W. T. Strunz and T. Yu, Phys. Rev. A 69, 052115 (2004).
  46. L. Diósi and L. Ferialdi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 200403 (2014).
  47. L. Ferialdi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 120402 (2016).
  48. L. Ferialdi, Phys. Rev. A 95, 052109 (2017).
  49. L. Diósi, Europhys. Lett. 30, 63 (1995).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation