Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Kerr Black Hole Dynamics from an Extended Polyakov Action

N. Emil J. Bjerrum-Bohr1,2,*, Gang Chen1,2,†, Chenliang Su2,‡, and Tianheng Wang3,§

  • *Contact author: bjbohr@nbi.dk
  • †Contact author: gang.chen@nbi.ku.dk
  • ‡Contact author: chenliang.su@nbi.ku.dk
  • §Contact author: tianhengwang@snu.ac.kr

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 071601 – Published 19 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/k5g2-q38q

Abstract

We examine a hypersurface model for the classical dynamics of spinning black holes. Under specific, rigid geometric constraints, it reveals an intriguing solution resembling expectations for the Kerr Black hole three-point amplitude. We explore various generalizations of this formalism and outline potential avenues for applying it to analyze the attraction of spinning black holes.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (81)

  1. R. P. Kerr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 237 (1963).
  2. W. Israel, Phys. Rev. D 2, 641 (1970).
  3. M. Mathisson, Acta Phys. Polon. 6, 163 (1937).
  4. A. Papapetrou, Proc. R. Soc. A 209, 248 (1951).
  5. W. G. Dixon, Proc. R. Soc. A 314, 499 (1970).
  6. W. G. Dixon, Proc. R. Soc. A 319, 509 (1970).
  7. W. G. Dixon, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 277, 59 (1974).
  8. J. Vines, Classical Quantum Gravity 35, 084002 (2018).
  9. N. Arkani-Hamed, T.-C. Huang, and Y.-t. Huang, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 070.
  10. A. Guevara, A. Ochirov, and J. Vines, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2019) 056.
  11. M.-Z. Chung, Y.-T. Huang, J.-W. Kim, and S. Lee, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2019) 156.
  12. D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee, and D. O’Connell, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2019) 137.
  13. W.-M. Chen, M.-Z. Chung, Y.-t. Huang, and J.-W. Kim, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 148.
  14. A. Guevara, A. Ochirov, and J. Vines, Phys. Rev. D 100, 104024 (2019).
  15. N. Arkani-Hamed, Y.-t. Huang, and D. O’Connell, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2020) 046.
  16. R. Aoude, K. Haddad, and A. Helset, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 051.
  17. M.-Z. Chung, Y.-t. Huang, J.-W. Kim, and S. Lee, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 105.
  18. A. Guevara, B. Maybee, A. Ochirov, D. O’connell, and J. Vines, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 201.
  19. W.-M. Chen, M.-Z. Chung, Y.-t. Huang, and J.-W. Kim, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 148.
  20. A. Brandhuber, G. Chen, G. Travaglini, and C. Wen, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 118.
  21. D. Kosmopoulos and A. Luna, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 037.
  22. M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson, and P. Pichini, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2022) 156.
  23. Y. F. Bautista, A. Guevara, C. Kavanagh, and J. Vines, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 136.
  24. L. Cangemi, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson, A. Ochirov, P. Pichini, and E. Skvortsov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 221401 (2023).
  25. A. Ochirov and E. Skvortsov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 241601 (2022).
  26. P. H. Damgaard, K. Haddad, and A. Helset, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2019) 070.
  27. Z. Bern, A. Luna, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. D 104, 065014 (2021).
  28. J. Vines, J. Steinhoff, and A. Buonanno, Phys. Rev. D 99, 064054 (2019).
  29. B. Maybee, D. O’Connell, and J. Vines, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2019) 156.
  30. K. Haddad, Phys. Rev. D 105, 026004 (2022).
  31. Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos, A. Luna, R. Roiban, and F. Teng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 201402 (2023).
  32. R. Aoude, K. Haddad, and A. Helset, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 072.
  33. P. H. Damgaard, J. Hoogeveen, A. Luna, and J. Vines, Phys. Rev. D 106, 124030 (2022).
  34. N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, G. Chen, and M. Skowronek, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2023) 170.
  35. M. Bianchi, C. Gambino, and F. Riccioni, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 188.
  36. Y. F. Bautista, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084036 (2023).
  37. W.-M. Chen, M.-Z. Chung, Y.-t. Huang, and J.-W. Kim, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2022) 058.
  38. N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, G. Chen, and M. Skowronek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 191603 (2024).
  39. S. De Angelis, P. P. Novichkov, and R. Gonzo, Phys. Rev. D 110, L041502 (2024).
  40. A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, J. Gowdy, and G. Travaglini, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2024) 026.
  41. G. Chen and T. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2025) 213.
  42. G. Chen, J.-W. Kim, and T. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 111, L021701 (2025).
  43. A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, G. Travaglini, and P. Vives Matasan, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 039.
  44. G. Chen and N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, Proc. Sci. ICHEP2024 (2025) 793.
  45. L. Cangemi, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson, A. Ochirov, P. Pichini, and E. Skvortsov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 071601 (2024).
  46. N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, G. Chen, Y. Miao, and M. Skowronek, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 242.
  47. L. Bohnenblust, L. Cangemi, H. Johansson, and P. Pichini, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 261.
  48. Y. F. Bautista, Y.-T. Huang, and J.-W. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 111, 044043 (2025).
  49. D. Akpinar, F. Febres Cordero, M. Kraus, A. Smirnov, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 041602 (2025).
  50. A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, P. Pichini, G. Travaglini, and P. Vives Matasan, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 188.
  51. M. Levi and J. Steinhoff, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2015) 219.
  52. G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 048.
  53. G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2022) 027.
  54. F. Comberiati and L. de la Cruz, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 068.
  55. G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 201103 (2021).
  56. Z. Liu, R. A. Porto, and Z. Yang, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 012.
  57. G. U. Jakobsen and G. Mogull, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 141102 (2022).
  58. G. Menezes and M. Sergola, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 105.
  59. F. Febres Cordero, M. Kraus, G. Lin, M. S. Ruf, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 021601 (2023).
  60. F. Alessio and P. Di Vecchia, Phys. Lett. B 832, 137258 (2022).
  61. T. Scheopner and J. Vines, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 060.
  62. M. Ben-Shahar, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 108.
  63. J.-W. Kim and J. Steinhoff, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 042.
  64. G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and Y. Xu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151401 (2023).
  65. R. Gonzo and C. Shi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 221401 (2024).
  66. K. Haddad, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, and J. Plefka, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 019.
  67. G. Veneziano, Nuovo Cimento A 57, 190 (1968).
  68. L. Brink, P. Di Vecchia, and P. S. Howe, Phys. Lett. 65B, 471 (1976).
  69. S. Deser and B. Zumino, Phys. Lett. 65B, 369 (1976).
  70. A. M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. 103B, 207 (1981).
  71. J. Polchinski, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 96): Fields, Strings, and Duality (1996), pp. 293–356, arXiv:hep-th/9611050.
  72. R. Emparan, T. Harmark, V. Niarchos, and N. A. Obers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 191301 (2009).
  73. N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr and C. B. Jepsen, Phys. Rev. D 110, L081902 (2024).
  74. P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky, and M. M. Ivanov, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 180.
  75. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/k5g2-q38q for discussions on gravitational Compton amplitudes and alternative worldvolume metrics, and explicit examples of computed bending angles for various models.
  76. E. T. Newman and A. I. Janis, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 6, 915 (1965).
  77. J.-H. Kim, J.-W. Kim, and S. Lee, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 080.
  78. S. Mougiakakos and P. Vanhove, Phys. Rev. D 103, 026001 (2021).
  79. P. H. Damgaard and K. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 251603 (2024).
  80. S. Mougiakakos and P. Vanhove, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 111601 (2024).
  81. We thank Yuexiang Zhang for discussions on this point and for sharing his calculations for cross-checking.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation