Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Resummation of Universal Tails in Gravitational Waveforms

Mikhail M. Ivanov1,2,*, Yue-Zhou Li3,†, Julio Parra-Martinez4,‡, and Zihan Zhou3,§

  • *Contact author: ivanov99@mit.edu
  • †Contact author: liyuezhou@princeton.edu
  • ‡Contact author: julio@ihes.fr
  • §Contact author: zihanz@princeton.edu

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 141401 – Published 30 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jzd1-qzkt

Abstract

We present a formula for the universal anomalous scaling of the multipole moments of a generic gravitating source in classical general relativity. We derive this formula in two independent ways using effective field theory methods. First, we use the absorption of low-frequency gravitational waves by a black hole to identify the total multipole scaling dimension as the renormalized angular momentum of black hole perturbation theory. More generally, we show that the anomalous dimension is determined by phase shifts of gravitational waves elastically scattering off generic source multipole moments, which reproduces the renormalized angular momentum in the particular case of black holes. The effective field theory approach thus clarifies the role of the renormalized angular momentum in the multipole expansion. The universality of the point particle effective description of compact gravitating systems further allows us to extract the universal part of the anomalous dimension, which is the same for any object, including black holes, neutron stars, and binary systems. As an application, we propose a novel resummation of the universal short-distance logarithms (“tails”) in the gravitational waveform of binary systems, which may improve the modeling of signals from current and future gravitational wave experiments.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (109)

  1. J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 074001 (2015).
  2. F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 024001 (2015).
  3. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
  4. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. X 9, 031040 (2019).
  5. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021).
  6. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. D 109, 022001 (2024).
  7. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), Phys. Rev. X 13, 041039 (2023).
  8. T. Akutsu et al. (KAGRA Collaboration), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 05A102 (2021).
  9. L. Blanchet and T. Damour, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 320, 379 (1986).
  10. L. Blanchet, Proc. R. Soc. A 409, 383 (1987).
  11. I. Z. Rothstein, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 46, 1726 (2014).
  12. W. D. Goldberger, Effective field theory for compact binary dynamics, in Handbook of Quantum Gravity (Springer, Singapore, 2023).
  13. W. D. Goldberger, in 2022 Snowmass Summer Study (2022), arXiv:2206.14249.
  14. R. A. Porto, Phys. Rep. 633, 1 (2016).
  15. G. Kälin and R. A. Porto, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 106.
  16. G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 048.
  17. C. Cheung, I. Z. Rothstein, and M. P. Solon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 251101 (2018).
  18. D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee, and D. O’Connell, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2019) 137.
  19. Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 206.
  20. Z. Bern, A. Luna, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. D 104, 065014 (2021).
  21. A. Buonanno, M. Khalil, D. O’Connell, R. Roiban, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, in Snowmass 2021 (2022), arXiv:2204.05194.
  22. C. Cheung, J. Parra-Martinez, I. Z. Rothstein, N. Shah, and J. Wilson-Gerow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 091402 (2024).
  23. D. Kosmopoulos and M. P. Solon, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 125.
  24. N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Plante, and P. Vanhove, J. Phys. A 55, 443014 (2022).
  25. A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, S. De Angelis, J. Gowdy, and G. Travaglini, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2023) 048.
  26. A. Herderschee, R. Roiban, and F. Teng, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2023) 004.
  27. A. Elkhidir, D. O’Connell, M. Sergola, and I. A. Vazquez-Holm, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 272.
  28. A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg, and I. Vazquez-Holm, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2023) 126.
  29. S. Caron-Huot, M. Giroux, H. S. Hannesdottir, and S. Mizera, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 139.
  30. A. Buonanno and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D 59, 084006 (1999).
  31. A. Buonanno and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D 62, 064015 (2000).
  32. W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Rev. D 73, 104029 (2006).
  33. W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Rev. D 73, 104030 (2006).
  34. R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. D 77, 064026 (2008).
  35. W. D. Goldberger, J. Li, and I. Z. Rothstein, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 053.
  36. E. Poisson, Phys. Rev. D 57, 5287 (1998).
  37. R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. D 73, 104031 (2006).
  38. S. Marsat, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 085008 (2015).
  39. M. Levi and J. Steinhoff, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2015) 059.
  40. M. Levi and J. Steinhoff, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2015) 219.
  41. N. V. Krishnendu, K. G. Arun, and C. K. Mishra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 091101 (2017).
  42. N. V. Krishnendu, C. K. Mishra, and K. G. Arun, Phys. Rev. D 99, 064008 (2019).
  43. H. S. Chia and T. D. P. Edwards, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2020) 033.
  44. H. S. Chia, T. D. P. Edwards, R. N. George, A. Zimmerman, A. Coogan, K. Freese, C. Messick, and C. N. Setzer, arXiv:2211.00039.
  45. Z. Lyu, M. LaHaye, H. Yang, and B. Bonga, Phys. Rev. D 109, 064081 (2024).
  46. These are to be distinguished from conservative tail logarithms that arise in the binding energy and angular momentum of the binary [47, 48], e.g., in Eq. (S17).

  47. W. D. Goldberger, A. Ross, and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Rev. D 89, 124033 (2014).
  48. L. Blanchet, S. Foffa, F. Larrouturou, and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev. D 101, 084045 (2020).
  49. W. D. Goldberger and A. Ross, Phys. Rev. D 81, 124015 (2010).
  50. K. S. Thorne, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 299 (1980).
  51. P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky, and M. M. Ivanov, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 038.
  52. D. Glazer, A. Joyce, M. J. Rodriguez, L. Santoni, A. R. Solomon, and L. F. Temoche, arXiv:2412.21090.
  53. L. Blanchet, Classical Quantum Gravity 15, 113 (1998); 22, 3381(E) (2005).
  54. G. L. Almeida, S. Foffa, and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev. D 104, 084095 (2021).
  55. D. Trestini and L. Blanchet, Phys. Rev. D 107, 104048 (2023).
  56. A. Edison and M. Levi, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 161.
  57. A. Edison, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 016.
  58. M. M. Ivanov, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and Z. Zhou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 131401 (2024).
  59. A. Einstein, Phys. Z. 18, 121 (1917).
  60. S. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 1114 (1972).
  61. S. A. Teukolsky, Astrophys. J. 185, 635 (1973).
  62. S. Teukolsky and W. Press, Astrophys. J. 193, 443 (1974).
  63. S. Mano and E. Takasugi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 97, 213 (1997).
  64. S. Mano, H. Suzuki, and E. Takasugi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 96, 549 (1996).
  65. S. Mano, H. Suzuki, and E. Takasugi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 95, 1079 (1996).
  66. M. Sasaki and H. Tagoshi, Living Rev. Relativity 6, 6 (2003).
  67. G. Aminov, A. Grassi, and Y. Hatsuda, Ann. Henri Poincare 23, 1951 (2022).
  68. G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D. P. Lichtig, and A. Tanzini, Phys. Rev. D 105, 044047 (2022).
  69. G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D. Panea Lichtig, and A. Tanzini, Commun. Math. Phys. 397, 635 (2023).
  70. Y. F. Bautista, G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, A. Tanzini, and Z. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 109, 084071 (2024).
  71. S. Chakrabarti, T. Delsate, and J. Steinhoff, arXiv:1304.2228.
  72. H. S. Chia, Phys. Rev. D 104, 024013 (2021).
  73. S. A. Teukolsky, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 124006 (2015).
  74. T. Damour, in Les Houches Summer School on Gravitational Radiation, edited by N. Deruelle and T. Piran (1982).
  75. T. Damour and A. Nagar, Phys. Rev. D 80, 084035 (2009).
  76. T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farese, Phys. Rev. D 58, 042001 (1998).
  77. T. Damour and O. M. Lecian, Phys. Rev. D 80, 044017 (2009).
  78. T. Binnington and E. Poisson, Phys. Rev. D 80, 084018 (2009).
  79. B. Kol and M. Smolkin, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2012) 010.
  80. L. Hui, A. Joyce, R. Penco, L. Santoni, and A. R. Solomon, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2021) 052.
  81. P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky, and M. M. Ivanov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 101101 (2021).
  82. P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky, and M. M. Ivanov, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 175.
  83. P. Charalambous and M. M. Ivanov, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 222.
  84. L. Hui, A. Joyce, R. Penco, L. Santoni, and A. R. Solomon, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2022) 032.
  85. M. M. Ivanov and Z. Zhou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 091403 (2023).
  86. Switching from ∑cnεn to ∑c˜nεn takes into account that the renormalized multipoles absorb some scheme-dependent finite loop parts.

  87. S. Caron-Huot, M. Correia, G. Isabella, and M. Solon, arXiv:2503.13593.
  88. S. Caron-Huot and M. Wilhelm, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2016) 010.
  89. M. V. S. Saketh, Z. Zhou, and M. M. Ivanov, Phys. Rev. D 109, 064058 (2024).
  90. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/jzd1-qzkt for the relevant discussions of the renormalized angular momentum includes Refs. [58,63–66,68–70,91–95], and for the relevant discussions of the waveform includes Refs. [55,96–101].
  91. F. Fucito, J. F. Morales, and R. Russo, Phys. Rev. D 111, 044054 (2025).
  92. A. Castro, J. M. Lapan, A. Maloney, and M. J. Rodriguez, Phys. Rev. D 88, 044003 (2013).
  93. A. Castro, J. M. Lapan, A. Maloney, and M. J. Rodriguez, Classical Quantum Gravity 30, 165005 (2013).
  94. Z. Nasipak, Classical Quantum Gravity 42, 165001 (2025).
  95. D. Bini and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D 89, 064063 (2014).
  96. T. Damour and A. Nagar, Phys. Rev. D 77, 024043 (2008).
  97. T. Damour, B. R. Iyer, and A. Nagar, Phys. Rev. D 79, 064004 (2009).
  98. T. Damour and A. Nagar, Phys. Rev. D 76, 064028 (2007).
  99. G. Faye, L. Blanchet, and B. R. Iyer, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 045016 (2015).
  100. L. Blanchet, G. Faye, Q. Henry, F. Larrouturou, and D. Trestini, Phys. Rev. D 108, 064041 (2023).
  101. L. Bernard, L. Blanchet, G. Faye, and T. Marchand, Phys. Rev. D 97, 044037 (2018).
  102. L. Blanchet and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D 37, 1410 (1988).
  103. A. Parnachev and K. Sen, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 289.
  104. D. Akpinar, V. del Duca, and R. Gonzo, arXiv:2504.02025.
  105. Y. Pan, A. Buonanno, R. Fujita, E. Racine, and H. Tagoshi, Phys. Rev. D 83, 064003 (2011); 87, 109901(E) (2013).
  106. L. Pompili et al., Phys. Rev. D 108, 124035 (2023).
  107. H. Asada and T. Futamase, Phys. Rev. D 56, R6062 (1997).
  108. E. Poisson, Phys. Rev. D 103, 064023 (2021).
  109. E. Poisson, Phys. Rev. D 104, 104062 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation