- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Letters

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Probing Green’s Function Zeros by Cotunneling through Mott Insulators

Carl Lehmann1,2,*, Lorenzo Crippa2,3,4, Giorgio Sangiovanni2,3, and Jan Carl Budich1,2,5,†

  • *Contact author: Carl.Lehmann1@tu-dresden.de
  • †Contact author: jan.budich@tu-dresden.de
PDF

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 106303 – Published 4 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jnq4-sykq

Abstract

Quantum tunneling experiments have provided deep insights into basic excitations occurring as Green’s function poles in the realm of complex quantum matter. However, strongly correlated quantum materials also allow for Green’s functions zeros (GFZs) that may be seen as an antidote to the familiar poles and have so far largely eluded direct experimental study. Here, we propose and investigate theoretically how cotunneling through Mott insulators enables direct access to the shadow band structure of GFZs. In particular, we derive an effective Hamiltonian for the GFZ that is shown to govern the cotunneling amplitude and reveal fingerprints of many-body correlations clearly distinguishing the GFZ structure from the underlying free Bloch band structure of the system. Our perturbative analytical results are corroborated by numerical data in the framework of both exact diagonalization and matrix product state simulations for a one-dimensional model system consisting of a Su-Schrieffer-Heeger-Hubbard model coupled to two single-level quantum dots.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (80)

  1. S. Datta, Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems, Cambridge Studies in Semiconductor Physics and Microelectronic Engineering (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1995).
  2. D. A. Ryndyk, R. Gutiérrez, B. Song, and G. Cuniberti, Green function techniques in the treatment of quantum transport at the molecular scale, in Energy Transfer Dynamics in Biomaterial Systems, edited by I. Burghardt, V. May, D. A. Micha, and E. R. Bittner (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009), pp. 213–335.
  3. T. Ihn, Semiconductor Nanostructures: Quantum States and Electronic Transport (Oxford University Press, New York, 2009).
  4. W. G. van der Wiel, S. De Franceschi, J. M. Elzerman, T. Fujisawa, S. Tarucha, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Electron transport through double quantum dots, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 1 (2002).
  5. V. Anisimov and Y. Izyumov, Electronic Structure of Strongly Correlated Materials (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010), p. 291.
  6. A. Avella and F. Mancini, Strongly Correlated Systems: Theoretical Methods (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011), p. 464.
  7. M. Qin, T. Schäfer, S. Andergassen, P. Corboz, and E. Gull, The Hubbard model: A computational perspective, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 13, 275 (2022).
  8. D. P. Arovas, E. Berg, S. A. Kivelson, and S. Raghu, The Hubbard model, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 13, 239 (2022).
  9. P. Barthelemy and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Quantum dot systems: A versatile platform for quantum simulations, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 525, 808 (2013).
  10. J. M. Nichol, Quantum-dot spin chains, in Entanglement in Spin Chains: From Theory to Quantum Technology Applications, edited by A. Bayat, S. Bose, and H. Johannesson (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022), pp. 505–538.
  11. T. Hensgens, T. Fujita, L. Janssen, X. Li, C. J. Van Diepen, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, S. Das Sarma, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Quantum simulation of a Fermi–Hubbard model using a semiconductor quantum dot array, Nature (London) 548, 70 (2017).
  12. H. Qiao, Y. P. Kandel, S. K. Manikandan, A. N. Jordan, S. Fallahi, G. C. Gardner, M. J. Manfra, and J. M. Nichol, Conditional teleportation of quantum-dot spin states, Nat. Commun. 11, 3022 (2020).
  13. M. Pustilnik and L. Glazman, Kondo effect in quantum dots, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 16, R513 (2004).
  14. Q. Wang, S. L. D. ten Haaf, I. Kulesh, D. Xiao, C. Thomas, M. J. Manfra, and S. Goswami, Triplet correlations in Cooper pair splitters realized in a two-dimensional electron gas, Nat. Commun. 14, 4876 (2023).
  15. M. Banerjee, M. Heiblum, V. Umansky, D. E. Feldman, Y. Oreg, and A. Stern, Observation of half-integer thermal Hall conductance, Nature (London) 559, 205 (2018).
  16. Y. Kasahara, T. Ohnishi, Y. Mizukami, O. Tanaka, S. Ma, K. Sugii, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, J. Nasu, Y. Motome, T. Shibauchi, and Y. Matsuda, Majorana quantization and half-integer thermal quantum Hall effect in a Kitaev spin liquid, Nature (London) 559, 227 (2018).
  17. H. Bartolomei, M. Kumar, R. Bisognin, A. Marguerite, J.-M. Berroir, E. Bocquillon, B. Plaçais, A. Cavanna, Q. Dong, U. Gennser, Y. Jin, and G. Fève, Fractional statistics in anyon collisions, Science 368, 173 (2020).
  18. J. Nakamura, S. Liang, G. C. Gardner, and M. J. Manfra, Direct observation of anyonic braiding statistics, Nat. Phys. 16, 931 (2020).
  19. I. Dzyaloshinskii, Some consequences of the Luttinger theorem: The Luttinger surfaces in non-Fermi liquids and Mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B 68, 085113 (2003).
  20. T. D. Stanescu, P. Phillips, and T.-P. Choy, Theory of the Luttinger surface in doped Mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B 75, 104503 (2007).
  21. S. Sakai, Y. Motome, and M. Imada, Evolution of electronic structure of doped Mott insulators: Reconstruction of poles and zeros of Green’s function, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 056404 (2009).
  22. S. Sakai, Y. Motome, and M. Imada, Doped high-Tc cuprate superconductors elucidated in the light of zeros and poles of the electronic Green’s function, Phys. Rev. B 82, 134505 (2010).
  23. K. B. Dave, P. W. Phillips, and C. L. Kane, Absence of Luttinger’s theorem due to zeros in the single-particle Green function, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 090403 (2013).
  24. A. Rosch, Breakdown of Luttinger’s theorem in two-orbital Mott insulators, Eur. Phys. J. B 59, 495 (2007).
  25. V. Gurarie, Single-particle Green’s functions and interacting topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 83, 085426 (2011).
  26. A. M. Essin and V. Gurarie, Bulk-boundary correspondence of topological insulators from their respective Green’s functions, Phys. Rev. B 84, 125132 (2011).
  27. S. Bollmann, C. Setty, U. F. P. Seifert, and E. J. König, Topological Green’s function zeros in an exactly solved model and beyond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 136504 (2024).
  28. J. Zhao, P. Mai, B. Bradlyn, and P. Phillips, Failure of topological invariants in strongly correlated matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 106601 (2023).
  29. C. Setty, F. Xie, S. Sur, L. Chen, M. G. Vergniory, and Q. Si, Electronic properties, correlated topology, and Green’s function zeros, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033235 (2024).
  30. L. Peralta Gavensky, S. Sachdev, and N. Goldman, Connecting the many-body Chern number to Luttinger’s theorem through Středa’s formula, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 236601 (2023).
  31. I. Pasqua, A. Blason, and M. Fabrizio, Exciton condensation driven by bound states of Green’s function zeros, Phys. Rev. B 110, 125144 (2024).
  32. A. Blason and M. Fabrizio, Unified role of Green’s function poles and zeros in correlated topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 108, 125115 (2023).
  33. N. Wagner, L. Crippa, A. Amaricci, P. Hansmann, M. Klett, E. J. König, T. Schäfer, D. D. Sante, J. Cano, A. J. Millis, A. Georges, and G. Sangiovanni, Mott insulators with boundary zeros, Nat. Commun. 14, 7531 (2023).
  34. N. Wagner, D. Guerci, A. J. Millis, and G. Sangiovanni, Edge zeros and boundary spinons in topological Mott insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 126504 (2024).
  35. J. C. Luaces, M. F. López, J. Bravo-Abad, and J. Merino, Topological strongly correlated phases in orthorhombic diamond lattice compounds, Phys. Rev. B 111, 165133 (2025).
  36. E. Pangburn, C. Pépin, and A. Banerjee, Topological charge excitations and Green’s function zeros in paramagnetic Mott insulator, arXiv:2412.13302.
  37. R. Schleser, T. Ihn, E. Ruh, K. Ensslin, M. Tews, D. Pfannkuche, D. C. Driscoll, and A. C. Gossard, Cotunneling-mediated transport through excited states in the Coulomb-blockade regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 206805 (2005).
  38. F. R. Braakman, P. Barthelemy, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Long-distance coherent coupling in a quantum dot array, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 432 (2013).
  39. R. Sánchez, G. Granger, L. Gaudreau, A. Kam, M. Pioro-Ladrière, S. A. Studenikin, P. Zawadzki, A. S. Sachrajda, and G. Platero, Long-range spin transfer in triple quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 176803 (2014).
  40. A. Bordin, X. Li, D. van Driel, J. C. Wolff, Q. Wang, S. L. D. ten Haaf, G. Wang, N. van Loo, L. P. Kouwenhoven, and T. Dvir, Crossed Andreev reflection and elastic cotunneling in three quantum dots coupled by superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056602 (2024).
  41. A. Ranni, F. Brange, E. T. Mannila, C. Flindt, and V. F. Maisi, Real-time observation of Cooper pair splitting showing strong non-local correlations, Nat. Commun. 12, 6358 (2021).
  42. J. Schindele, A. Baumgartner, R. Maurand, M. Weiss, and C. Schönenberger, Nonlocal spectroscopy of Andreev bound states, Phys. Rev. B 89, 045422 (2014).
  43. C.-X. Liu, G. Wang, T. Dvir, and M. Wimmer, Tunable superconducting coupling of quantum dots via Andreev bound states in semiconductor-superconductor nanowires, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 267701 (2022).
  44. J. C. Bayer, Electron transport through and in quantum dot arrays, Ph.D. thesis, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, 2024.
  45. G. D. Mahan, Green’s functions at finite temperatures, in Many-Particle Physics (Springer, Boston, MA, 1990), pp. 133–238.
  46. H. Bruus and K. Flensberg, Green’s functions, in Many-Body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics: An Introduction (Oxford University Press, New York, 2004), pp. 120–138.
  47. M. Fabrizio, Emergent quasiparticles at Luttinger surfaces, Nat. Commun. 13, 1561 (2022).
  48. J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Approximation methods, in Modern Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2020), pp. 288–370.

  49. Because of expansions of [1/(ω−ω0)] terms, our approximation breaks down at large energies ω≈U.

  50. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/jnq4-sykq for technical details, which includes Refs. [51–54].
  51. B. Zwiebach, Quantum physics III—Chapter 1 notes, lecture notes for MIT course 8.06 Quantum Physics III, Spring 2018, https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/8-06-quantum-physics-iii-spring-2018/a0889c5ca8a479c3e56c544d646fb770_MIT8_06S18ch1.pdf (2018).
  52. J. J. García Ripoll, Hamiltonian diagonalizations, in Quantum Information and Quantum Optics with Superconducting Circuits (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2022), pp. 270–276.
  53. I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, Rigorous results on valence-bond ground states in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 799 (1987).
  54. A. Amaricci, L. Privitera, F. Petocchi, M. Capone, G. Sangiovanni, and B. Trauzettel, Edge state reconstruction from strong correlations in quantum spin Hall insulators, Phys. Rev. B 95, 205120 (2017).

  55. That is the correct ground state toward the unperturbed limit and follows from degenerated perturbation theory.

  56. The correlation value is evaluated in the limit toward, not at, the atomic limit, making it generally nontrivial.

  57. P. W. Anderson, Theory of magnetic exchange interactions: Exchange in insulators and semiconductors, in Solid State Physics, edited by F. Seitz and D. Turnbull (Academic Press, New York, 1963), Vol. 14, pp. 99–214.
  58. E. Koch, ed., Exchange Mechanisms [Autumn School on Correlated Electrons: The Physics of Correlated Insulators, Metals, and Superconductors, Jülich (Germany)] (2017), https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840108.
  59. E. Pavarini, E. Koch, and P. Coleman, eds., Many-Body Physics: From Kondo to Hubbard, Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich. Reihe modeling and simulation, Vol. 5, Autumn School on Correlated Electrons, Jülich (Germany), 2015 (Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Zentralbibliothek, Verlag, Jülich, 2015).
  60. J. R. Schrieffer and P. A. Wolff, Relation between the Anderson and Kondo Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. 149, 491 (1966).
  61. S. Bravyi, D. P. DiVincenzo, and D. Loss, Schrieffer-Wolff transformation for quantum many-body systems, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 326, 2793 (2011).
  62. G. Bir and G. Pikus, Irreducible representations and classification of terms.normal modes. perturbation theory, in Symmetry and Strain-Induced Effects in Semiconductors, A Halsted Press book (Wiley, New York, 1974), pp. 125–140.

  63. More precise: the system-dot coupling γ and the dot potentials μL/R need to be smaller than the first excitation gap above the ground state of the central barrier.

  64. L. DiCarlo, H. J. Lynch, A. C. Johnson, L. I. Childress, K. Crockett, C. M. Marcus, M. P. Hanson, and A. C. Gossard, Differential charge sensing and charge delocalization in a tunable double quantum dot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 226801 (2004).
  65. L. Gaudreau, S. A. Studenikin, A. S. Sachrajda, P. Zawadzki, A. Kam, J. Lapointe, M. Korkusinski, and P. Hawrylak, Stability diagram of a few-electron triple dot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 036807 (2006).
  66. X. Wang, S. Yang, and S. Das Sarma, Quantum theory of the charge-stability diagram of semiconductor double-quantum-dot systems, Phys. Rev. B 84, 115301 (2011).
  67. N. L. Foulk and S. Das Sarma, Theory of charge stability diagrams in coupled quantum dot qubits, Phys. Rev. B 110, 205428 (2024).
  68. L. M. K. Vandersypen, J. M. Elzerman, R. N. Schouten, L. H. Willems van Beveren, R. Hanson, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Real-time detection of single-electron tunneling using a quantum point contact, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 4394 (2004).
  69. W. Lu, Z. Ji, L. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, and A. J. Rimberg, Real-time detection of electron tunnelling in a quantum dot, Nature (London) 423, 1476 (2003).
  70. R. Schleser, E. Ruh, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, D. C. Driscoll, and A. C. Gossard, Time-resolved detection of individual electrons in a quantum dot, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 2005 (2004).
  71. S. Gustavsson, R. Leturcq, B. Simovič, R. Schleser, T. Ihn, P. Studerus, K. Ensslin, D. C. Driscoll, and A. C. Gossard, Counting statistics of single electron transport in a quantum dot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 076605 (2006).
  72. S. Gustavsson, R. Leturcq, B. Simovič, R. Schleser, T. Ihn, P. Studerus, K. Ensslin, D. C. Driscoll, and A. C. Gossard, Counting statistics of single electron transport in a semiconductor quantum dot, in Advances in Solid State Physics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008), pp. 31–43.
  73. S. Gustavsson, R. Leturcq, M. Studer, I. Shorubalko, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, D. Driscoll, and A. Gossard, Electron counting in quantum dots, Surf. Sci. Rep. 64, 191 (2009).
  74. W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Soliton excitations in polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. B 22, 2099 (1980).
  75. U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 259 (2005).
  76. U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 326, 96 (2011).
  77. M. Yang and S. R. White, Time-dependent variational principle with ancillary Krylov subspace, Phys. Rev. B 102, 094315 (2020).
  78. S. Paeckel, T. Köhler, A. Swoboda, S. R. Manmana, U. Schollwöck, and C. Hubig, Time-evolution methods for matrix-product states, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 411, 167998 (2019).
  79. S. Goto and I. Danshita, Performance of the time-dependent variational principle for matrix product states in the long-time evolution of a pure state, Phys. Rev. B 99, 054307 (2019).
  80. F. Hofmann, T. Heinzel, D. A. Wharam, J. P. Kotthaus, G. Böhm, W. Klein, G. Tränkle, and G. Weimann, Single electron switching in a parallel quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B 51, 13872 (1995).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 106303– Published 4 September, 2025
  • Received 6 March 2025
  • Accepted 8 August 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Open access publication funded by the Max Planck Society.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation