Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Flavor Nonsinglet Splitting Functions at Four Loops in QCD: Fermionic Contributions

B. A. Kniehl1,*, S. Moch1,†, V. N. Velizhanin1,‡, and A. Vogt2,§

  • 1II. Institute for Theoretical Physics, Hamburg University, D-22761 Hamburg, Germany
  • 2Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, United Kingdom

  • *Contact author: bernd.kniehl@desy.de
  • †Contact author: sven-olaf.moch@desy.de
  • ‡Contact author: vitaly.velizhanin@desy.de
  • §Contact author: andreas.vogt@liverpool.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 071902 – Published 12 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/hkg5-88hr

Abstract

We have determined the fourth-order nf contributions to the two splitting functions governing the evolution of all flavor differences of quark distributions of hadrons in perturbative quantum chromodynamics with nf light flavors. The analytic forms of these functions are presented in both Mellin N space and momentum-fraction x space for a general gauge group. In the small-x limit double logarithms occur, but the small-x rise of both splitting functions is confined to extremely small-x values, x≲10−6. The large-x limit includes the nf-part of the four-loop quark virtual anomalous dimension. Using this result we obtain also the nf contributions to the corresponding gluonic quantity and the complete threshold-enhanced logarithms from soft-gluon emission for a large class of inclusive observables, including Higgs boson production in gluon-gluon fusion.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (65)

  1. S. Moch, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, Nucl. Phys. B688, 101 (2004).
  2. A. Vogt, S. Moch, and J. A. M. Vermaseren, Nucl. Phys. B691, 129 (2004).
  3. CERN Yellow Report, edited by A. Dainese et al. (CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 2019), Report No. CERN-2019-007, Vol. 7, 10.23731/CYRM-2019-007.
  4. R. Abdul Khalek et al., Nucl. Phys. A1026, 122447 (2022).
  5. G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, and A. Vogt, Phys. Lett. B 842, 137944 (2023).
  6. G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, and A. Vogt, Phys. Lett. B 846, 138215 (2023).
  7. G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, A. Pelloni, and A. Vogt, Phys. Lett. B 856, 138906 (2024).
  8. G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, A. Pelloni, and A. Vogt, Phys. Lett. B 860, 139194 (2025).
  9. S. Moch, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 041.
  10. J. A. Gracey, Phys. Lett. B 322, 141 (1994).
  11. J. Davies, A. Vogt, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, and J. Vermaseren, Nucl. Phys. B915, 335 (2017).
  12. A. Basdew-Sharma, A. Pelloni, F. Herzog, and A. Vogt, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 183.
  13. T. Gehrmann, A. von Manteuffel, V. Sotnikov, and T. Yang, Phys. Lett. B 849, 138427 (2024).
  14. J. Davies and A. Vogt, Phys. Lett. B 776, 189 (2018).
  15. B. A. Kniehl and V. N. Velizhanin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 131901 (2025).
  16. S. Moch, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, preprint Report No. DESY-25-047, LTH 1398 (2025).
  17. A. K. Lenstra, H. W. Lenstra, and L. Lovász, Math. Ann. 261, 515 (1982).
  18. The fplll development team, https://github.com/fplll/fplll.
  19. V. Ravindran, Nucl. Phys. B752, 173 (2006).
  20. L. J. Dixon, L. Magnea, and G. F. Sterman, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2008) 022.
  21. S. Moch and A. Vogt, Phys. Lett. B 680, 239 (2009).
  22. Z. Xu and H. X. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 176.
  23. G. Das, S. Moch, and A. Vogt, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 116.
  24. G. Das, S. Moch, and A. Vogt, Phys. Lett. B 807, 135546 (2020).
  25. T. Ahmed, A. H. Ajjath, P. Mukherjee, V. Ravindran, and A. Sankar, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 943 (2021).
  26. P. Nogueira, J. Comput. Phys. 105, 279 (1993).
  27. J. A. M. Vermaseren, arXiv:math-ph/0010025.
  28. J. Kuipers, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and J. Vollinga, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1453 (2013).
  29. B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, and J. Vermaseren, arXiv:1707.06453.
  30. T. van Ritbergen, A. N. Schellekens, and J. Vermaseren, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 14, 41 (1999).
  31. B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, and J. A. M. Vermaseren, Comput. Phys. Commun. 253, 107198 (2020).
  32. J. A. M. Vermaseren, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 14, 2037 (1999).
  33. The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, https://oeis.org/A001333 entry A001333.
  34. Y. L. Dokshitzer, G. Marchesini, and G. P. Salam, Phys. Lett. B 634, 504 (2006).
  35. B. Basso and G. P. Korchemsky, Nucl. Phys. B 775, 1 (2007),
  36. Y. L. Dokshitzer and G. Marchesini, Phys. Lett. B 646, 189 (2007).
  37. P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, and J. H. Kühn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 082002 (2017).
  38. F. Herzog, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2017) 090.
  39. T. Luthe, A. Maier, P. Marquard, and Y. Schröder, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 166.
  40. K. G. Chetyrkin, G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, and J. Vermaseren, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 179.
  41. The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, https://oeis.org/A005409 entry A005409.
  42. A. Vogt et al., Proc. Sci., LL2012 (2013) 004 [arXiv:1212.2932].
  43. V. N. Velizhanin, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 32, 1750213 (2017).
  44. J. Davies, C. H. Kom, S. Moch, and A. Vogt, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 135.
  45. J. M. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and B. Mistlberger, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2020) 018.
  46. A. von Manteuffel, E. Panzer, and R. M. Schabinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 162001 (2020).
  47. V. N. Velizhanin, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2010) 129.
  48. V. N. Velizhanin, Nucl. Phys. B864, 113 (2012).
  49. S. Moch, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, Nucl. Phys. B889, 351 (2014).
  50. G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, J. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, Phys. Lett. B 848, 138351 (2024).
  51. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/hkg5-88hr for full analytic expressions of γns(3),±, Pns(3),±, BI(4), and fI(4) for I=q,g,, as well as the coefficient functions c2,qDIS,(4,0), cqq¯DY,(4,0), and cggggF,(4,0). It also includes Refs. [52–54].
  52. T. Ahmed, M. Mahakhud, N. Rana, and V. Ravindran, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 112002 (2014).
  53. S. Moch and A. Vogt, Phys. Lett. B 631, 48 (2005).
  54. C. Anastasiou, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, E. Furlan, T. Gehrmann, F. Herzog, and B. Mistlberger, Phys. Lett. B 737, 325 (2014).
  55. E. Remiddi and J. A. M. Vermaseren, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15, 725 (2000).
  56. T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi, Comput. Phys. Commun. 141, 296 (2001).
  57. R. Gauld, Phys. Rev. D 100, 091301(R) (2019).
  58. M. H. Reno, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 73, 181 (2023).
  59. S. Moch, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, Phys. Lett. B 849, 138468 (2024).
  60. B. Agarwal, A. von Manteuffel, E. Panzer, and R. M. Schabinger, Phys. Lett. B 820, 136503 (2021).
  61. R. N. Lee, A. von Manteuffel, R. M. Schabinger, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov, and M. Steinhauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 212002 (2022).
  62. S. Moch, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, Phys. Lett. B 782, 627 (2018).
  63. P. Banerjee, P. K. Dhani, and V. Ravindran, Phys. Rev. D 98, 094016 (2018).
  64. C. Duhr, B. Mistlberger, and G. Vita, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 155.
  65. J. A. M. Vermaseren, A. Vogt, and S. Moch, Nucl. Phys. B724, 3 (2005).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation