Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Nonlinear Faraday Rotation of Light Polarization in Time-Reversal-Invariant Materials

Falko Pientka1 and Inti Sodemann Villadiego2

  • 1Institut für Theoretische Physik, Goethe-Universität, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • 2Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Leipzig, Brüderstraße 16, 04103 Leipzig, Germany

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 056901 – Published 6 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/grjy-22gq

Abstract

We investigate the propagation of electromagnetic waves through materials displaying a nonlinear Hall effect. The coupled Maxwell-Boltzmann equations for traveling waves can be mapped onto ordinary differential equations that resemble those for the motion of a pendulum. In the weakly nonlinear regime relevant for most experiments, we find that the polarization of light displays a Faraday-like rotation when it propagates inside a metal above its plasma frequency. In contrast to the conventional Faraday effect, however, the polarization direction swings back and forth around the direction of Berry dipole vector as the light beam traverses the material. This occurs concomitantly with an oscillation of its degree of polarization, with a characteristic frequency that increases linearly with the intensity of the traveling wave. These effects could be observed by measuring thickness-dependent Faraday rotations in materials displaying the nonlinear Hall effect.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (34)

  1. V. I. Belinicher and B. I. Sturman, Sov. Phys. Usp. 23, 199 (1980).
  2. V. Belinicher, E. Ivchenko, and B. Sturman, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 83, 649 (1982).
  3. R. von Baltz and W. Kraut, Phys. Rev. B 23, 5590 (1981).
  4. C. Aversa and J. E. Sipe, Phys. Rev. B 52, 14636 (1995).
  5. S. M. Young and A. M. Rappe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 116601 (2012).
  6. T. Morimoto and N. Nagaosa, Sci. Adv. 2, e1501524 (2016).
  7. T. Rangel, B. M. Fregoso, B. S. Mendoza, T. Morimoto, J. E. Moore, and J. B. Neaton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 067402 (2017).
  8. A. M. Cook, B. M. Fregoso, F. De Juan, S. Coh, and J. E. Moore, Nat. Commun. 8, 14176 (2017).
  9. T. Morimoto, M. Nakamura, M. Kawasaki, and N. Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 267401 (2018).
  10. D. Kumar, C.-H. Hsu, R. Sharma, T.-R. Chang, P. Yu, J. Wang, G. Eda, G. Liang, and H. Yang, Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 421 (2021).
  11. L. K. Shi, O. Matsyshyn, Justin C. Song, and I. S. Villadiego, Phys. Rev. B 107, 125151 (2023).
  12. Y. Onishi and L. Fu, Phys. Rev. B 110, 075122 (2024).
  13. T. G. Rappoport, T. A. Morgado, S. Lannebère, and M. G. Silveirinha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 076901 (2023).
  14. P. Makushko, S. Kovalev, Y. Zabila, I. Ilyakov, A. Ponomaryov, A. Arshad, G. L. Prajapati, T. V. de Oliveira, J.-C. Deinert, P. Chekhonin et al., Natl. Electron. Rev. 7, 207 (2024).
  15. E. Deyo, L. Golub, E. Ivchenko, and B. Spivak, arXiv:0904.1917.
  16. J. E. Moore and J. Orenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 026805 (2010).
  17. I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 216806 (2015).
  18. C. Ortix, Adv. Quantum Technol. 4, 2100056 (2021).
  19. A. Bandyopadhyay, N. B. Joseph, and A. Narayan, Mater. Today Electron. 8, 100101 (2024).
  20. L. Vorob’ev, JETP Lett. 29, 441 (1979).
  21. V. Shalygin, A. Sofronov, L. Vorob’ev, and Farbshtein, Phys. Solid State 54, 2362 (2012).
  22. S. S. Tsirkin, P. A. Puente, and I. Souza, Phys. Rev. B 97, 035158 (2018).
  23. E. J. König, M. Dzero, A. Levchenko, and D. A. Pesin, Phys. Rev. B 99, 155404 (2019).
  24. C. X. Yu and J. Liu, Phys. Rev. A 90, 043834 (2014).
  25. K. Kang, T. Li, E. Sohn, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Nat. Mater. 18, 324 (2019).
  26. Q. Ma, S.-Y. Xu, H. Shen, D. MacNeill, V. Fatemi, T.-R. Chang, A. M. Mier Valdivia, S. Wu, Z. Du, C.-H. Hsu et al., Nature (London) 565, 337 (2019).
  27. T. Ma, H. Chen, K. Yananose, X. Zhou, L. Wang, R. Li, Z. Zhu, Z. Wu, Q.-H. Xu, J. Yu et al., Nat. Commun. 13, 5465 (2022).
  28. Notice that in this geometry the magnetic field produces an out-of-plane Lorentz force along z^ and, therefore, does not affect the dynamics.

  29. O. Matsyshyn and I. Sodemann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 246602 (2019).
  30. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/grjy-22gq for details of the derivations for traveling and transmitted stationary waves, and for a comparison with the ordinary Faraday effect.
  31. D. M. Fradkin, Prog. Theor. Phys. 37, 798 (1967).
  32. L. Zhou, K. Xu, A. Zubair, A. D. Liao, W. Fang, F. Ouyang, Y.-H. Lee, K. Ueno, R. Saito, T. Palacios et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 11892 (2015).
  33. Y. Sun, J. Zhang, Z. Ma, C. Chen, J. Han, F. Chen, X. Luo, Y. Sun, and Z. Sheng, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 102102 (2017).
  34. A. Kapitulnik, J. Xia, E. Schemm, and A. Palevski, New J. Phys. 11, 055060 (2009).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation