Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Universality of Rényi Entropy in Conformal Field Theory

Yuya Kusuki1,2,3,*, Hirosi Ooguri4,5,†, and Sridip Pal4,‡

  • *Contact author: kusuki.yuya@phys.kyushu-u.ac.jp
  • †Contact author: ooguri@caltech.edu
  • ‡Contact author: sridip@caltech.edu

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 061603 – Published 5 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/fsg7-bs7q

Abstract

We use the thermal effective theory to prove that, for the vacuum state in any conformal field theory in d dimensions, the nth Rényi entropy SA(n) behaves as SA(n)=[f/(2πn)d−1][Area(∂A)/(d−2)εd−2](1+O(n)) in the n→0 limit when the boundary of the entanglement domain A is spherical with the UV cutoff ε. The theory dependence is encapsulated in the cosmological constant f in the thermal effective action. Using this result, we estimate the density of states for large eigenvalues of the modular Hamiltonian for the domain A. In two dimensions, we can use the hot spot idea, which describes the effective action in the high-temperature limit when the temperature is position-dependent, to derive more powerful formulas valid for arbitrary positive n. We discuss the difference between two and higher dimensions and clarify the applicability of the hot spot idea. We also use the thermal effective theory to derive an analog of the Cardy formula for boundary operators in higher dimensions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (46)

  1. J. L. Cardy, Nucl. Phys. B270, 186 (1986).
  2. B. Mukhametzhanov and A. Zhiboedov, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 261.
  3. B. Mukhametzhanov and S. Pal, SciPost Phys. 8, 088 (2020).
  4. S. Bhattacharyya, S. Lahiri, R. Loganayagam, and S. Minwalla, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2008) 054.
  5. N. Banerjee, J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Jain, S. Minwalla, and T. Sharma, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2012) 046.
  6. K. Jensen, M. Kaminski, P. Kovtun, R. Meyer, A. Ritz, and A. Yarom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 101601 (2012).
  7. N. Benjamin, J. Lee, H. Ooguri, and D. Simmons-Duffin, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 115.
  8. M. J. Kang, J. Lee, and H. Ooguri, Phys. Rev. D 107, 026021 (2023).
  9. E. Shaghoulian, Phys. Rev. D 94, 104044 (2016).
  10. L. Di Pietro and Z. Komargodski, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2014) 031.
  11. N. Benjamin, J. Lee, S. Pal, D. Simmons-Duffin, and Y. Xu, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 134.
  12. K. Allameh and E. Shaghoulian, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2025) 200.
  13. O. Diatlyk, H. Khanchandani, F. K. Popov, and Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 261601 (2024).
  14. P. Kravchuk, A. Radcliffe, and R. Sinha, arXiv:2406.04561.
  15. G. Cuomo, Y.-C. He, and Z. Komargodski, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 061.
  16. B. Banihashemi, E. Shaghoulian, and S. Shashi, arXiv:2503.17471.
  17. C. A. Agón, H. Casini, and P. J. Martinez, Phys. Rev. D 108, 105009 (2023).
  18. X. Dong, J. Kudler-Flam, and P. Rath, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 120.
  19. K. Ohmori and Y. Tachikawa, J. Stat. Mech. (2015) P04010.
  20. J. Cardy and E. Tonni, J. Stat. Mech. (2016) 123103.
  21. I. Affleck and A. W. W. Ludwig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 161 (1991).
  22. P. Calabrese and J. L. Cardy, J. Stat. Mech. (2004) P06002.
  23. H. Casini, M. Huerta, and R. C. Myers, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2011) 036.
  24. X. Dong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 251602 (2016).
  25. L. Bianchi, M. Meineri, R. C. Myers, and M. Smolkin, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2016) 076.
  26. L. Bianchi, S. Chapman, X. Dong, D. A. Galante, M. Meineri, and R. C. Myers, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2016) 180.
  27. S. Baiguera, L. Bianchi, S. Chapman, and D. A. Galante, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2022) 068.
  28. H. Casini, M. Huerta, J. M. Magán, and D. Pontello, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2020) 014.
  29. J. M. Magan, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 100.
  30. A. Belin, L.-Y. Hung, A. Maloney, S. Matsuura, R. C. Myers, and T. Sierens, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2013) 059.
  31. M. Goldstein and E. Sela, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 200602 (2018).
  32. J. Xavier, F. C. Alcaraz, and G. Sierra, Phys. Rev. B 98, 041106(R) (2018).
  33. P. Calabrese, J. Dubail, and S. Murciano, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 067.
  34. Y. Kusuki, S. Murciano, H. Ooguri, and S. Pal, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 216.
  35. Y. Kusuki and Z. Wei, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 108.
  36. P. Calabrese and A. Lefevre, Phys. Rev. A 78, 032329 (2008).
  37. V. Alba, P. Calabrese, and E. Tonni, J. Phys. A 51, 024001 (2018).
  38. S. Baiguera, S. Chapman, C. Northe, G. Policastro, and T. Schwartzman, arXiv:2411.00937.
  39. A. Belin, A. Maloney, and S. Matsuura, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2013) 050.
  40. C. A. Agón, H. Casini, and P. J. Martinez, arXiv:2503.08773.
  41. Y. Kusuki, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 161.
  42. T. Numasawa and I. Tsiares, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 156.
  43. L.-Y. Hung, R. C. Myers, M. Smolkin, and A. Yale, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2011) 047.
  44. A. E. Ingham, Ann. Math. 42, 1075 (1941).
  45. J. Korevaar, Tauberian Theory: A Century of Developments (Springer, New York, 2004).
  46. D. Das, S. Datta, and S. Pal, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2017) 183.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation