Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Hadronic Vacuum Polarization for the Muon g−2 from Lattice QCD: Long-Distance and Full Light-Quark Connected Contribution

Alexei Bazavov1, Claude W. Bernard2, David A. Clarke3, Christine Davies4, Carleton DeTar3, Aida X. El-Khadra5,6, Elvira Gámiz7, Steven Gottlieb8, Anthony V. Grebe9 et al. (Fermilab Lattice, HPQCD, and MILC Collaborations)

Anthony V. Grebe9, Leon Hostetler8, William I. Jay10, Hwancheol Jeong8, Andreas S. Kronfeld9, Shaun Lahert3,*, Jack Laiho11, G. Peter Lepage12, Michael Lynch5,6,†, Andrew T. Lytle5,6, Craig McNeile13, Ethan T. Neil14, Curtis T. Peterson1, James N. Simone9, Jacob W. Sitison14,‡, Ruth S. Van de Water9, and Alejandro Vaquero3,15,16 (Fermilab Lattice, HPQCD, and MILC Collaborations)

  • *Contact author: shaun.lahert@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: ml11@illinois.edu
  • ‡Contact author: jacob.sitison@colorado.edu

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011901 – Published 1 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/d583-yhfs

Abstract

We present results for the dominant light-quark connected contribution to the long-distance window of the hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP) contribution to the muon g−2 from lattice quantum chromodynamics. Specifically, with a new determination of the lattice scale on MILC’s physical-mass HISQ ensembles, using the Ω− baryon mass, we obtain a result of aμll,LD(conn)=400.2(2.3)stat(3.7)syst[4.3]total×10−10. Summing this result with our recent determinations of the light-quark connected contributions to the short- and intermediate-distance windows, we obtain a subpercent precision determination of the light-quark-connected contribution to HVP of aμll(conn)=655.2(2.3)stat(3.9)syst[4.5]total×10−10. Finally, as a consistency check, we verify that an independent analysis of the full contribution is in agreement with the sum of individual windows. We discuss our future plans for improvements of our HVP calculations to meet the target precision of the Fermilab g−2 experiment.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (117)

  1. B. Abi et al. (Muon g-2 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 141801 (2021).
  2. D. P. Aguillard et al. (Muon g-2 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 161802 (2023).
  3. T. Aoyama et al., Phys. Rep. 887, 1 (2020).
  4. G. W. Bennett et al. (Muon g-2 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 73, 072003 (2006).
  5. M. Abe et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 053C02 (2019).
  6. J-PARC muon g−2/EDM experiment, https://g-2.kek.jp/.
  7. G. Colangelo et al., arXiv:2203.15810.
  8. K. Melnikov and A. Vainshtein, Phys. Rev. D 70, 113006 (2004).
  9. P. Masjuan and P. Sánchez-Puertas, Phys. Rev. D 95, 054026 (2017).
  10. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, M. Procura, and P. Stoffer, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2017) 161.
  11. M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, B. Kubis, S. Leupold, and S. P. Schneider, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 141.
  12. A. Gérardin, H. B. Meyer, and A. Nyffeler, Phys. Rev. D 100, 034520 (2019).
  13. J. Bijnens, N. Hermansson-Truedsson, and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, Phys. Lett. B 798, 134994 (2019).
  14. G. Colangelo, F. Hagelstein, M. Hoferichter, L. Laub, and P. Stoffer, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 101.
  15. V. Pauk and M. Vanderhaeghen, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 3008 (2014).
  16. I. Danilkin and M. Vanderhaeghen, Phys. Rev. D 95, 014019 (2017).
  17. F. Jegerlehner, The Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Muon (Springer, Cham, 2017), Vol. 274.
  18. M. Knecht, S. Narison, A. Rabemananjara, and D. Rabetiarivony, Phys. Lett. B 787, 111 (2018).
  19. G. Eichmann, C. S. Fischer, and R. Williams, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054015 (2020).
  20. P. Roig and P. Sánchez-Puertas, Phys. Rev. D 101, 074019 (2020).
  21. J. Leutgeb, J. Mager, and A. Rebhan, Phys. Rev. D 107, 054021 (2023).
  22. T. Blum, N. Christ, M. Hayakawa, T. Izubuchi, L. Jin, C. Jung, and C. Lehner (RBC Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 132002 (2020).
  23. E.-H. Chao, R. J. Hudspith, A. Gérardin, J. R. Green, H. B. Meyer, and K. Ottnad, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 651 (2021).
  24. J. Bijnens, N. Hermansson-Truedsson, L. Laub, and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2020) 203.
  25. J. Lüdtke and M. Procura, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1108 (2020).
  26. J. Bijnens, N. Hermansson-Truedsson, L. Laub, and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 240.
  27. M. Hoferichter and P. Stoffer, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 159.
  28. J. Leutgeb and A. Rebhan, Phys. Rev. D 104, 094017 (2021).
  29. M. Zanke, M. Hoferichter, and B. Kubis, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 106.
  30. I. Danilkin, M. Hoferichter, and P. Stoffer, Phys. Lett. B 820, 136502 (2021).
  31. G. Colangelo, F. Hagelstein, M. Hoferichter, L. Laub, and P. Stoffer, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 702 (2021).
  32. L. Cappiello, O. Catà, and G. D’Ambrosio, Phys. Rev. D 105, 056020 (2022).
  33. J. Bijnens, N. Hermansson-Truedsson, and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 167.
  34. M. Hoferichter, B. Kubis, and M. Zanke, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 209.
  35. J. Lüdtke, M. Procura, and P. Stoffer, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2023) 125.
  36. P. Colangelo, F. Giannuzzi, and S. Nicotri, Phys. Lett. B 840, 137878 (2023).
  37. M. Hoferichter, P. Stoffer, and M. Zillinger, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2024) 092.
  38. M. Hoferichter, P. Stoffer, and M. Zillinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 061902 (2025).
  39. M. Hoferichter, P. Stoffer, and M. Zillinger, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 121.
  40. J. Bijnens, N. Hermansson-Truedsson, and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 094.
  41. S. Holz, C. Hanhart, M. Hoferichter, and B. Kubis, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 434 (2022); 82, 1159(A) (2022).
  42. S. Holz, M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, and B. Kubis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 171902 (2025).
  43. J. Leutgeb, J. Mager, and A. Rebhan, arXiv:2411.10432.
  44. P. Colangelo, F. Giannuzzi, and S. Nicotri, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094036 (2024).
  45. E. J. Estrada, J. M. Márquez, D. Portillo-Sánchez, and P. Roig, arXiv:2411.07115.
  46. A. S. Miramontes, K. Raya, A. Bashir, P. Roig, and G. Paredes-Torres, arXiv:2411.02218.
  47. E. J. Estrada, S. Gonzàlez-Solís, A. Guevara, and P. Roig, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 203.
  48. N. Asmussen, E.-H. Chao, A. Gérardin, J. R. Green, R. J. Hudspith, H. B. Meyer, and A. Nyffeler, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2023) 040.
  49. E.-H. Chao, R. J. Hudspith, A. Gérardin, J. R. Green, and H. B. Meyer, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 664 (2022).
  50. T. Blum, N. Christ, M. Hayakawa, T. Izubuchi, L. Jin, C. Jung, C. Lehner, and C. Tu, Phys. Rev. D 111, 014501 (2025).
  51. A. Gérardin, W. E. A. Verplanke, G. Wang, Z. Fodor, J. N. Guenther, L. Lellouch, K. K. Szabo, and L. Varnhorst, Phys. Rev. D 111, 054511 (2025).
  52. C. Alexandrou et al. (Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 108, 094514 (2023).
  53. T. Lin, M. Bruno, X. Feng, L.-C. Jin, C. Lehner, C. Liu, and Q.-Y. Luo, arXiv:2411.06349.
  54. Z. Fodor, A. Gerardin, L. Lellouch, K. K. Szabo, B. C. Toth, and C. Zimmermann, arXiv:2411.11719.
  55. S. Borsanyi et al. (BMW Collaboration), Nature (London) 593, 51 (2021).
  56. C. Aubin, T. Blum, M. Golterman, and S. Peris, Phys. Rev. D 106, 054503 (2022).
  57. C. Alexandrou et al. (Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 107, 074506 (2023).
  58. M. Cè et al., Phys. Rev. D 106, 114502 (2022).
  59. A. Bazavov et al. (Fermilab Lattice, HPQCD, MILC Collaborations), Phys. Rev. D 107, 114514 (2023).
  60. T. Blum et al. (RBC, UKQCD Collaborations), Phys. Rev. D 108, 054507 (2023).
  61. A. Boccaletti et al., arXiv:2407.10913.
  62. S. Kuberski, M. Cè, G. von Hippel, H. B. Meyer, K. Ottnad, A. Risch, and H. Wittig, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 172.
  63. T. Blum et al. (RBC, UKQCD Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 201901 (2025).
  64. S. Spiegel and C. Lehner, arXiv:2410.17053.
  65. D. Djukanovic, G. von Hippel, S. Kuberski, H. B. Meyer, N. Miller, K. Ottnad, J. Parrino, A. Risch, and H. Wittig, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 098.
  66. C. Alexandrou et al. (Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration (ETMC), Phys. Rev. D 111, 054502 (2025).
  67. A. Bazavov et al. (Fermilab Lattice, HPQCD, MILC Collaborations), Phys. Rev. D 111, 094508 (2025).
  68. G. Benton, D. Boito, M. Golterman, A. Keshavarzi, K. Maltman, and S. Peris, Phys. Rev. D 111, 034018 (2025).
  69. T. Blum, P.  A. Boyle, V. Gülpers, T. Izubuchi, L. Jin, C. Jung, A. Jüttner, C. Lehner, A. Portelli, and J.  T. Tsang (RBC, UKQCD Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 022003 (2018).
  70. G. Colangelo, A. X. El-Khadra, M. Hoferichter, A. Keshavarzi, C. Lehner, P. Stoffer, and T. Teubner, Phys. Lett. B 833, 137313 (2022).
  71. G. Benton, D. Boito, M. Golterman, A. Keshavarzi, K. Maltman, and S. Peris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 251803 (2023).
  72. M. Davier, Z. Fodor, A. Gerardin, L. Lellouch, B. Malaescu, F. M. Stokes, K. K. Szabo, B. C. Toth, L. Varnhorst, and Z. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 109, 076019 (2024).
  73. G. Benton, D. Boito, M. Golterman, A. Keshavarzi, K. Maltman, and S. Peris, Phys. Rev. D 109, 036010 (2024).
  74. M. Della Morte, A. Francis, V. Gülpers, G. Herdoíza, G. von Hippel, H. Horch, B. Jäger, H. B. Meyer, A. Nyffeler, and H. Wittig, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 020.
  75. A. Bazavov et al., Proc. Sci. LATTICE2023 (2024) 292 [arXiv:2401.06522].
  76. A. Bazavov et al. (Fermilab Lattice, MILC) (to be published).
  77. T. Blum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 052001 (2003).
  78. D. Bernecker and H. B. Meyer, Eur. Phys. J. A 47, 148 (2011).
  79. A. Bazavov et al. (Fermilab Lattice, HPQCD, MILC) (to be published).
  80. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/d583-yhfs, which includes Refs. [81–84], for additional details on the noise-reduction strategy, lattice corrections, continuum extrapolation, and Bayesian model averaging procedures.
  81. S. Borsanyi et al. (Budapest-Marseille-Wuppertal Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 022002 (2018).
  82. G. P. Lepage et al., Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 106, 12 (2002).
  83. C. M. Bouchard, G. P. Lepage, C. Monahan, H. Na, and J. Shigemitsu, Phys. Rev. D 90, 054506 (2014).
  84. A. Bazavov et al. (Fermilab Lattice, MILC Collaborations), Phys. Rev. D 93, 113016 (2016).
  85. Y. Aoki et al. (Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG) Collaboration), arXiv:2411.04268.
  86. A. Bazavov et al. (Fermilab Lattice, MILC Collaborations), Phys. Rev. D 90, 074509 (2014).
  87. B. Chakraborty et al. (Fermilab Lattice, HPQCD, MILC Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 152001 (2018).
  88. A. Bazavov, C. Bernard et al. (Fermilab Lattice, MILC) (to be published).
  89. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  90. A. Bazavov et al. (MILC Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 82, 074501 (2010).
  91. A. Bazavov et al. (MILC Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 87, 054505 (2013).
  92. A. Bazavov et al. (Fermilab Lattice, MILC Collaborations), Phys. Rev. D 98, 074512 (2018).
  93. MILC, GitHub (2021), https://github.com/milc-qcd/sharing/wiki/LatticeSharing.
  94. The 0.09 fm ensemble was, in part, generated by the CalLat Collaboration [95] using retuned values of the quark masses determined by MILC [86].

  95. N. Miller et al., Phys. Rev. D 103, 054511 (2021).
  96. D. Hatton, C. T. H. Davies, G. P. Lepage, and A. T. Lytle (HPQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 100, 114513 (2019).
  97. D. Hatton, C. T. H. Davies, B. Galloway, J. Koponen, G. P. Lepage, and A. T. Lytle (HPQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 102, 054511 (2020).
  98. T. A. DeGrand and S. Schaefer, Comput. Phys. Commun. 159, 185 (2004).
  99. L. Giusti, P. Hernandez, M. Laine, P. Weisz, and H. Wittig, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2004) 013.
  100. T. Blum, T. Izubuchi, and E. Shintani, Phys. Rev. D 88, 094503 (2013).
  101. G. P. Lepage, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (Cornell, Ithaca, 1989), https://lib-extopc.kek.jp/preprints/PDF/1990/9003/9003479.pdf.
  102. S. Lahert, C. DeTar, A. X. El-Khadra, S. Gottlieb, A. S. Kronfeld, and R. S. Van de Water, arXiv:2409.00756.
  103. B. Chakraborty, C. T. H. Davies, P. G. de Oliveira, J. Koponen, G. P. Lepage, and R. S. Van de Water (HPQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 96, 034516 (2017).
  104. E. T. Neil and J. W. Sitison, Phys. Rev. D 109, 014510 (2024).
  105. E. T. Neil and J. W. Sitison, Phys. Rev. E 108, 045308 (2023).
  106. C. T. H. Davies et al. (Fermilab Lattice, HPQCD, MILC Collaborations), Phys. Rev. D 101, 034512 (2020).
  107. G. Lepage, C. Gohlke, and D. Hackett, gplepage/gvar v11.10 (2022).
  108. W. I. Jay and E. T. Neil, Phys. Rev. D 103, 114502 (2021).
  109. We follow the Muon g-2 Theory Initiative’s white paper scheme (WP25) and take w0 from Ref. [55] as a fixed value, w0=0.17236  fm.

  110. Our results for aμll,LD(conn) and aμll(conn) obtained from fπ scale setting are at 1.0% and 0.63% precision, respectively.

  111. C. Lehner and A. S. Meyer, Phys. Rev. D 101, 074515 (2020).
  112. C. Aubin, T. Blum, C. Tu, M. Golterman, C. Jung, and S. Peris, Phys. Rev. D 101, 014503 (2020).
  113. D. Giusti, F. Sanfilippo, and S. Simula, Phys. Rev. D 98, 114504 (2018).
  114. A. Gérardin, M. Cè, G. von Hippel, B. Hörz, H. B. Meyer, D. Mohler, K. Ottnad, J. Wilhelm, and H. Wittig, Phys. Rev. D 100, 014510 (2019).
  115. E. Shintani and Y. Kuramashi (PACS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 100, 034517 (2019).
  116. C. E. DeTar et al. (Fermilab Lattice, HPQCD, MILC Collaborations), Proc. Sci. LATTICE2019 (2019) 070.
  117. G. Wang, T. Draper, K.-F. Liu, and Y.-B. Yang (χQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 107, 034513 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation