Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

How Lorentz Boosts Reshape Relaxation Spectra

L. Gavassino

  • Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, United Kingdom

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 022301 – Published 7 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/d2xr-rj7g

Abstract

In relativity, relaxation processes are often assumed to undergo time dilation under Lorentz boosts. We show that this intuition fails generically. Because of relativity of simultaneity, Lorentz boosts can split a single relaxation mode into a continuum of excitations, with a width set by the maximal signal propagation speed. Focusing on linearized relativistic (kinetic or rheological) theories with an Onsager-type symmetry, we derive rigorous bounds on relaxation spectra in arbitrary inertial frames, expressed solely in terms of rest-frame spectral data at zero wave number. As a consequence, nonhydrodynamic gaps, maximal relaxation rates, and the convergence radii of hydrodynamic modes obey nontrivial Lorentz-covariant constraints. These results provide a unified framework for understanding how relativity constrains relaxation dynamics in many-body systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (75)

  1. P. K. Kovtun and A. O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. D 72, 086009 (2005).
  2. S. Pu, T. Koide, and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D 81, 114039 (2010).
  3. G. S. Denicol, J. Noronha, H. Niemi, and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D 83, 074019 (2011).
  4. M. P. Heller, R. A. Janik, M. Spaliński, and P. Witaszczyk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 261601 (2014).
  5. P. Romatschke, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 352 (2016).
  6. S. Grozdanov, N. Kaplis, and A. O. Starinets, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2016) 151.
  7. A. Kurkela and U. A. Wiedemann, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 776 (2019).
  8. G. D. Moore, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2018) 084.
  9. S. Grozdanov, P. K. Kovtun, A. O. Starinets, and P. Tadić, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 251601 (2019).
  10. P. Kovtun, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 034.
  11. D. Dash, S. Bhadury, S. Jaiswal, and A. Jaiswal, Phys. Lett. B 831, 137202 (2022).
  12. L. Gavassino, M. Antonelli, and B. Haskell, Phys. Rev. D 106, 056010 (2022).
  13. M. P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spaliński, and B. Withers, Nat. Phys. 20, 1948 (2024).
  14. R. Brants, Phys. Rev. D 110, 116027 (2024).
  15. G. S. Rocha, I. Danhoni, K. Ingles, G. S. Denicol, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D 110, 076003 (2024).
  16. L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L042043 (2024).
  17. J. Hu, SciPost Phys. 20, 020 (2026).
  18. M. Bajec, S. Grozdanov, and A. Soloviev, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 065.
  19. L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. D 113, 023035 (2026).
  20. M. Bajec and A. Soloviev, Phys. Rev. D 112, 065002 (2025).
  21. W. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, Phys. Rev. D 31, 725 (1985).
  22. L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. X 12, 041001 (2022).
  23. S. Bhattacharyya, S. Mitra, S. Roy, and R. Singh, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2026) 215.
  24. R. E. Hoult, arXiv:2512.24819.
  25. L. Gavassino, Phys. Lett. B 840, 137854 (2023).
  26. For clarity, we work at finite D, which in kinetic theory amounts to truncating the moment expansion at some very large number (e.g., 10100 moments). This is physically acceptable: the distribution function is already a coarse-grained object, and kinetic theory ceases to hold at too fine momentum resolution (Ref. [27], Sec. 3.1).

  27. K. Huang, Statistical Mechanics, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987).
  28. R. Geroch and L. Lindblom, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1855 (1990).
  29. L. Gavassino, M. Antonelli, and B. Haskell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 010606 (2022).
  30. R. Geroch and L. Lindblom, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 207, 394 (1991).
  31. L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. D 107, 065013 (2023).
  32. L. Gavassino, M. M. Disconzi, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 222302 (2024).
  33. G. Soares Rocha, L. Gavassino, and N. Mullins, Phys. Rev. D 110, 016020 (2024).
  34. L. Gavassino, M. Antonelli, and B. Haskell, Symmetry 12, 1543 (2020).
  35. L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. D 111, 103011 (2025).
  36. W. Israel and J. Stewart, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 118, 341 (1979).
  37. W. A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 151, 466 (1983).
  38. T. S. Olson, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 199, 18 (1990).
  39. I. S. Liu, I. Müller, and T. Ruggeri, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 169, 191 (1986).
  40. L. Stricker and H. C. Öttinger, Phys. Rev. E 99, 013105 (2019).
  41. L. Gavassino and M. Antonelli, Classical Quantum Gravity 40, 075012 (2023).
  42. B. Carter, Proc. R. Soc. A 433, 45 (1991).
  43. D. Priou, Phys. Rev. D 43, 1223 (1991).
  44. L. Gavassino, Classical Quantum Gravity 39, 185008 (2022).
  45. L. Gavassino, M. M. Disconzi, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D 109, 096041 (2024).
  46. L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. 37, 405 (1931).
  47. H. B. G. Casimir, Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 343 (1945).
  48. J. A. Krommes and G. Hu, Phys. Fluids B 5, 3908 (1993).
  49. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/d2xr-rj7g for some explicit proofs and examples that were omitted from the main text.
  50. R. Geroch, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 36, 4226 (1995).
  51. S. Grozdanov, A. Lucas, and N. Poovuttikul, Phys. Rev. D 99, 086012 (2019).
  52. M. Stephanov and Y. Yin, Phys. Rev. D 98, 036006 (2018).
  53. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Theory of Elasticity, 3rd ed., Course of Theoretical Physics Vol. 7 (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1986). Translated from Russian by J. B. Sykes and W. H. Reid.
  54. T. Andrade, M. Baggioli, and O. Pujolàs, Phys. Rev. D 100, 106014 (2019).
  55. M. Baggioli, M. Vasin, V. Brazhkin, and K. Trachenko, Phys. Rep. 865, 1 (2020).
  56. L. Gavassino, Classical Quantum Gravity 40, 165008 (2023).
  57. L. Gavassino and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D 109, 096040 (2024).
  58. Y. Ahn, M. Baggioli, Y. Bu, M. Matsumoto, and X. Sun, Phys. Rev. D 112, 086013 (2025).
  59. E. Gourgoulhon, Special Relativity in General Frames: From Particles to Astrophysics, 1st ed., Graduate Texts in Physics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2013).
  60. C. Cercignani and G. M. Kremer, The relativistic Boltzmann equation: Theory and applications (Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Boston, Berlin, 2002).
  61. In kinetic theory, one usually finds that, for each k>0, there is a continuum of “improper” solutions of (4), with |Reω| extending up to k, but never beyond [5].

  62. L. Gavassino, M. M. Disconzi, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 162301 (2024).
  63. M. P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spaliński, and B. Withers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 261601 (2023).
  64. For any invertible D×D matrix S, we can write Eμ=S†E˜μS and σ=S†σ˜S, where E˜μ and σ˜ are Hermitian and inherit the positivity properties of the originals. Plugging these decompositions into (3), we obtain an equivalent theory E˜μ∂μΨ˜=−σ˜Ψ˜, with Ψ˜=SΨ.

  65. G. Teschl, Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics with Applications to Schrödinger Operators, Graduate Studies in Mathematics Vol. 99 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2009).
  66. R. Bhatia, Notes on Functional Analysis, Texts and Readings in Mathematics Vol. 50 (Hindustan Book Agency, Gurgaon, India, 2009).
  67. C. Cattaneo, Sur une forme de l’équation de la chaleur éliminant le paradoxe d’une propagation instantanée, in Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l’Académie des sciences (Gauthier-Villars, 1958).
  68. L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. D 110, 094012 (2024).
  69. J. Armas and A. Jain, SciPost Phys. 11, 054 (2021).
  70. G. Başar, J. Bhambure, R. Singh, and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. C 110, 044903 (2024).
  71. J. Bhambure, A. Mazeliauskas, J.-F. Paquet, R. Singh, M. Singh, D. Teaney, and F. Zhou, Phys. Rev. C 111, 064910 (2025).
  72. Density-frame hydrodynamics posits that, in any inertial frame (not necessarily comoving), the conserved fluxes JIk admit an expansion in powers of spatial derivatives of the conserved densities JI0. Equivalently, that the hydrodynamic eigenfrequencies ω can be expanded in powers of the spatial wave vector kj.

  73. T. Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, Reprint of the 1980 ed., Classics in Mathematics (Springer, New York, 1995).
  74. T. Kato, Prog. Theor. Phys. 4, 514 (1949).
  75. L. Gavassino, M. Antonelli, and B. Haskell, Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 075001 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation