Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Smooth String Vacua in a Gravitationally Nonperturbative Regime

Mirjam Cvetič1,2,3 and Max Wiesner4

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
  • 2Department of Mathematics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
  • 3Center for Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
  • 4II. Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Hamburg, Notkestrasse 9, 22607 Hamburg, Germany

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 121602 – Published 26 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/cty8-hg73

Abstract

The strong coupling regime of four-dimensional N=2 supersymmetric vacua of the heterotic string is analyzed from a dual domain wall perspective. Using modular invariance, we compute a closed form for the nonperturbative corrections to the supersymmetric domain wall equations, which enables a quantitative study of gravitational strong coupling regimes. A strong coupling singularity for the hidden Hořava-Witten 9-brane is resolved, and the domain wall interpolates between the visible 9-brane and a supersymmetric anti–de Sitter vacuum, thereby realizing a variant of the Randall-Sundrum model.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (36)

  1. C. Vafa, The string landscape and the Swampland, arXiv:hep-th/0509212.
  2. F. Carta, F. Marchesano, W. Staessens, and G. Zoccarato, Open string multi-branched, and Kähler potentials, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2016) 062.
  3. E. Palti, The Swampland: Introduction and review, Fortschr. Phys. 67, 1900037 (2019).
  4. M. Graña and A. Herráez, The Swampland conjectures: A bridge from quantum gravity to particle physics, Universe 7, 273 (2021).
  5. M. van Beest, J. Calderón-Infante, D. Mirfendereski, and I. Valenzuela, Lectures on the Swampland program in string compactifications, Phys. Rep. 989, 1 (2022).
  6. N. B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M. J. Kang, and C. Vafa, Lectures on the string landscape and the Swampland, arXiv:2212.06187.
  7. P. Horava and E. Witten, Heterotic and type I string dynamics from eleven dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B460, 506 (1996).
  8. E. Witten, Strong coupling expansion of Calabi-Yau compactification, Nucl. Phys. B471, 135 (1996).
  9. M. Cvetič and M. Wiesner, Nonperturbative resolution of strong coupling singularities in 4D N=1 heterotic M-theory, Phys. Rev. D 110, 106008 (2024).
  10. S. Alexandrov and K. Bendriss, Hypermultiplet metric and NS5-instantons, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 140.
  11. B. R. Greene, A. D. Shapere, C. Vafa, and S.-T. Yau, Stringy cosmic strings and noncompact Calabi-Yau manifolds, Nucl. Phys. B337, 1 (1990).
  12. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, An alternative to compactification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4690 (1999).
  13. M. Cvetič and M. Robnik, Gravity trapping on a finite thickness domain wall: An analytic study, Phys. Rev. D 77, 124003 (2008).
  14. L. J. Romans, Self-duality for interacting fields: Covariant field equations for six-dimensional chiral supergravities, Nucl. Phys. B276, 71 (1986).
  15. E. Witten, String theory dynamics in various dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B443, 85 (1995).
  16. P. S. Aspinwall, K3 surfaces and string duality, in Differential Geometry Inspired by String Theory (1996), pp. 421–540, arXiv:hep-th/9611137.
  17. A. Lukas, B. A. Ovrut, K. S. Stelle, and D. Waldram, The universe as a domain wall, Phys. Rev. D 59, 086001 (1999).
  18. A. Lukas, B. A. Ovrut, K. S. Stelle, and D. Waldram, Heterotic M theory in five-dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B552, 246 (1999).
  19. In HW language, the heterotic anomaly cancellation corresponds classically to the condition QG4++QG4−=0.

  20. K. Skenderis and P. K. Townsend, Gravitational stability and renormalization group flow, Phys. Lett. B 468, 46 (1999).
  21. Strictly speaking, there is no Kähler potential in 5D theories of supergravity, but on the slice of the moduli space that we are interested in, we can define a function from which the moduli space metric is derived; see Ref. [9] for details.

  22. M. Cvetič, S. Griffies, and S.-J. Rey, Static domain walls in N=1 supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B381, 301 (1992).
  23. M. Cvetič and H. H. Soleng, Naked singularities in dilatonic domain wall space times, Phys. Rev. D 51, 5768 (1995).
  24. M. Cvetič and H. H. Soleng, Supergravity domain walls, Phys. Rep. 282, 159 (1997).
  25. The EOM for codimension one objects are the same irrespective of the total dimension of spacetime. Here, we use 4D N=1 language as in [22, 23, 24] even though this language is not the most natural in five dimensions.

  26. G. Buratti, J. Calderón-Infante, M. Delgado, and A. M. Uranga, Dynamical cobordism and Swampland distance conjectures, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 037.
  27. See Ref. [11] for a similar approach to obtain cosmic string solutions in 4D.

  28. Since the Kähler metric on the moduli space is inherited from the hyperbolic metric on the upper half space, all corrections to Geff have to be of the form of a Kähler transformation, thereby excluding the addition of modular weight (−2) to the classical (T+T¯) term appearing in the Kähler potential.

  29. The above is a minimal choice for the dependence of Geff on the j function. In principle, one could add to Geff the quotient of two polynomials in j of the same degree without affecting the asymptotics. This could, however, induce additional, unphysical zeros or poles for Geff within the fundamental domain. It would be interesting to confirm the above form of Geff by explicitly computing M5-brane instanton corrections to superpotential in 5D gauged supergravity.

  30. The exponent accounts for the fact that T is classically the overall volume of K3×T2.

  31. Even though the geometric realization of the string is not obvious in this regime, there is still a Bogomol’nyi-Prasad-Sommerfeld string with tension given by the expression on the rhs of (29), which now has to be evaluated at y→∞.

  32. M. Atiyah, J. M. Maldacena, and C. Vafa, An M theory flop as a large N duality, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 42, 3209 (2001).
  33. S. Kachru and C. Vafa, Exact results for N=2 compactifications of heterotic strings, Nucl. Phys. B450, 69 (1995).
  34. S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche, and T. Weigand, Emergent strings from infinite distance limits, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2022) 190.
  35. B. Hassfeld, J. Monnee, T. Weigand, and M. Wiesner, Emergent strings in type IIB Calabi–Yau compactifications, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2026) 140.
  36. M. Wiesner, Light strings and strong coupling in F-theory, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2022) 088.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation