Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

One-Loop Corrections to Near-Extremal Kerr Thermodynamics from Semiclassical Virasoro Blocks

Paolo Arnaudo*

Giulio Bonelli† and Alessandro Tanzini‡

  • *Contact author: P.Arnaudo@soton.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: bonelli@sissa.it
  • ‡Contact author: tanzini@sissa.it

Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 251401 – Published 27 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/cd6l-bl2s

Abstract

We propose a method to perform an exact calculation of one-loop quantum corrections to black hole entropy in terms of Virasoro semiclassical blocks. We analyze in detail a four-dimensional Kerr black hole and show that in the near-extremal limit a branch of long-lived modes arises. We prove that the contribution of these modes accounts for a (s−1/2)logTHawking correction to the entropy for massless particles of spin s=1, 2. We show that in the full calculation performed in the exact Kerr background the leading contribution actually is sourced by the near-horizon region only, and as such has a universal validity for any asymptotic behavior at infinity.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (53)

  1. J. Preskill, P. Schwarz, A. D. Shapere, S. Trivedi, and F. Wilczek, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 06, 2353 (1991).
  2. S. Banerjee, R. K. Gupta, and A. Sen, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2011) 147.
  3. S. Banerjee, R. K. Gupta, I. Mandal, and A. Sen, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2011) 143.
  4. A. Sen, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 44, 1207 (2012).
  5. A. Sen, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 44, 1947 (2012).
  6. S. Bhattacharyya, A. Grassi, M. Marino, and A. Sen, Classical Quantum Gravity 31, 015012 (2014).
  7. L. A. Pando Zayas and Y. Xin, Phys. Rev. D 100, 126019 (2019).
  8. F. Benini, D. Gang, and L. A. Pando Zayas, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 057.
  9. J. R. David, E. Gava, R. K. Gupta, and K. S. Narain, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 171.
  10. A. G. Lezcano, A. Ray, and I. Jeon, Phys. Rev. D 108, 045018 (2023).
  11. A. A. H., P. V. Athira, C. Chowdhury, and A. Sen, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 095.
  12. L. V. Iliesiu and G. J. Turiaci, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 145.
  13. D. Kapec, A. Sheta, A. Strominger, and C. Toldo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 021601 (2024).
  14. I. Rakic, M. Rangamani, and G. J. Turiaci, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 011.
  15. N. Banerjee, M. Saha, and S. Srinivasan, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2024) 077.
  16. S. Maulik, L. A. Pando Zayas, A. Ray, and J. Zhang, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 034.
  17. D. Kapec, Y. T. A. Law, and C. Toldo, arXiv:2409.14928.
  18. M. Kolanowski, D. Marolf, I. Rakic, M. Rangamani, and G. J. Turiaci, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 020.
  19. P. Arnaudo, G. Bonelli, and A. Tanzini, Phys. Rev. D 110, 106006 (2024).
  20. G. V. Dunne, J. Phys. A 41, 304006 (2008).
  21. F. Denef, S. A. Hartnoll, and S. Sachdev, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 125001 (2010).
  22. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/cd6l-bl2s for details on the determinant of confluent Heun differential operators and on confluent conformal blocks.
  23. G. Aminov, A. Grassi, and Y. Hatsuda, Ann. Henri Poincaré 23, 1951 (2022).
  24. G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D. P. Lichtig, and A. Tanzini, Phys. Rev. D 105, 044047 (2022).
  25. L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto, and Y. Tachikawa, Lett. Math. Phys. 91, 167 (2010).
  26. N. Banerjee and M. Saha, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 010.
  27. Y. F. Bautista, G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, A. Tanzini, and Z. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 109, 084071 (2024).
  28. F. Novaes, C. Marinho, M. Lencsés, and M. Casals, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2019) 033.
  29. B. Carneiro da Cunha and J. a. P. Cavalcante, Phys. Rev. D 102, 105013 (2020).
  30. M. Bianchi, D. Consoli, A. Grillo, and J. F. Morales, Phys. Lett. B 824, 136837 (2022).
  31. D. Fioravanti and D. Gregori, arXiv:2112.11434.
  32. G. Aminov, P. Arnaudo, G. Bonelli, A. Grassi, and A. Tanzini, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 059.
  33. G. Aminov and P. Arnaudo, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 115.
  34. L. V. Iliesiu, S. Murthy, and G. J. Turiaci, arXiv:2209.13608.
  35. S. A. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 1114 (1972).
  36. In principle, the dictionary is not unique (there are 23=8 possible dictionaries) reflected in the symmetries a0↔−a0, a1↔−a1, and (μ,ε)↔−(μ,ε). Here, we specify a choice that will then determine uniquely the ingoing solution at the event horizon and the outgoing one at infinity, as specified in (11).

  37. This is a convergent series [38] whose coefficients can be computed explicitly (see [23, 24] for details).

  38. P. Arnaudo, G. Bonelli, and A. Tanzini, Ann. Henri Poincaré 25, 2389 (2024).
  39. These quantities μ1 and μ2, together with the parameter μ, are the masses of the hypermultiplets in the fundamental representation from the gauge theory point of view.

  40. G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D. Panea Lichtig, and A. Tanzini, Commun. Math. Phys. 397, 635 (2023).
  41. Strictly speaking the GY formula computes the regularized determinant without zero modes det′. For s=1, 2 the operator we consider does not display zero modes so that det′=det.

  42. From the gauge theory viewpoint, this procedure corresponds to the holomorphic decoupling of the hypermultiplet mass μ2, and it produces the Nf=2 theory from the original Nf=3 one. The new parameter Λ≡−8M2ω(ω−mΩHext), with ΩHext=1/(2M), corresponds to the instanton-counting parameter of the Nf=2 theory.

  43. J. a. P. Cavalcante, M. Richartz, and B. C. da Cunha, Phys. Rev. D 110, 124064 (2024).
  44. H. Yang, F. Zhang, A. Zimmerman, D. A. Nichols, E. Berti, and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 87, 041502(R) (2013).
  45. E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and M. Casals, Phys. Rev. D 73, 024013 (2006); 73, 109902(E) (2006).
  46. S. Hod, Phys. Lett. B 715, 348 (2012).
  47. H. Yang, A. Zimmerman, A. Zenginoğlu, F. Zhang, E. Berti, and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 88, 044047 (2013).
  48. H. Yang, A. Zimmerman, A. i. e. i. f. Zenginoğlu, F. Zhang, E. Berti, and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 88, 044047 (2013).
  49. M. Casals and L. F. Longo Micchi, Phys. Rev. D 99, 084047 (2019).
  50. S. Hod, Phys. Rev. D 88, 084018 (2013).
  51. In detail, this extra factor can be seen as the combination of an overall factor ε12−μ in the normalization of the irregular semiclassical block around infinity and a factor εa coming from the irregular semiclassical block around zero with shifted intermediate momentum, arising in the confluence procedure between the singularities at z=0 and z=1. Specifically, the first factor can be seen by taking the semiclassical limit of the Λ factors in the first line of formula (3.2.7) in [40]. In particular, considering the semiclassical limit b→0, the term bΛ corresponds to our parameter ε, and the semiclassical limit of Δ2,1−θ b μ in [40] becomes −12+μ in our notation. This, consistently with our choices of the local solution around z=∞, cancels the factor ε12−μ. The other factor can be seen by taking the semiclassical limit of the Λ2 term in formula (3.4.4) in [40], when considering the shift of the intermediate momentum. Indeed, Δσ→σa in the semiclassical limit, and this simplifies with the corresponding factor in the connection formula (12). This, in turn, implies the simplification of the term εa in (28) after taking the confluent limit.

  52. A. Castro, C. Keeler, and P. Szepietowski, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 070.
  53. The Matsubara frequencies associated with the anti-QNMs are obtained by taking the asymptotic behavior ψ+(1) in Eq. (1) in Supplemental Material, which, together with the corresponding normalization, amounts to impose 2a1=k, k≥0, so that ωk(M)(−s)=ω¯k(M)(s).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation