Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Ramanujan’s 1/π Series and Conformal Field Theories

Faizan Bhat1,* and Aninda Sinha1,2,†

  • *Contact author: faizanbhat@iisc.ac.in
  • †Contact author: asinha@iisc.ac.in

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 231602 – Published 2 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/c38g-fd2v

Abstract

In 1914, Ramanujan unveiled 17 extraordinary infinite series for 1/π. In this Letter, we uncover their physics origin by relating them to 2D logarithmic conformal field theories (LCFTs), which emerge in diverse settings such as the fractional quantum Hall effect, percolation, polymers, and even holography. Through this LCFT connection, we reinterpret such infinite series in terms of fundamental CFT data-the operator spectrum and OPE coefficients. This perspective leads to novel physics-inspired approximations for 1/π. Drawing lessons from Ramanujan’s formulas, we construct a new family of bases for expanding LCFT correlators that converge far more rapidly than the standard conformal block decomposition. This is achieved using recently developed stringy/parametric crossing-symmetric dispersion relations. Remarkably, when working with these new expansions, the action of a certain differential operator (which arises naturally from the Ramanujan connection) dramatically enhances convergence, with the entire contribution collapsing to that of the logarithmic identity operator. This striking simplification hints at a universal property of LCFTs. Finally, we discuss a new holographic interpretation of this unexpected mathematics-physics connection.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (44)

  1. S. Ramanujan, Modular equations and approximations to π, Q. J. Math. 45, 350 (1914).
  2. J. Guillera, History of the formulas and algorithms for π, La Gaceta RSME 10, 159 (2007).
  3. H. Saleur, Polymers and percolation in two-dimensions and twisted N=2 supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B382, 486 (1992).
  4. V. Gurarie, Logarithmic operators in conformal field theory, Nucl. Phys. B410, 535 (1993).
  5. M. Flohr, Bits and pieces in logarithmic conformal field theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18, 4497 (2003).
  6. J. L. Cardy, Critical percolation in finite geometries, J. Phys. A 25, L201 (1992).
  7. M. A. I. Flohr and A. Muller-Lohmann, Conformal field theory properties of two-dimensional percolation, J. Stat. Mech. (2005) P12004.
  8. R. Langlands, P. Pouliot, and Y. Saint-Aubin, Conformal invariance in two-dimensional percolation, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 30, 1 (1994).
  9. V. Gurarie, M. Flohr, and C. Nayak, The Haldane-Rezayi quantum Hall state and conformal field theory, Nucl. Phys. B498, 513 (1997).
  10. A. Bissi, L. Donnay, and B. Valsesia, Logarithmic doublets in CCFT, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 031.
  11. M. Grinberg and J. Maldacena, Proper time to the black hole singularity from thermal one-point functions, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 131.
  12. J. Guillera, A method for proving Ramanujan series for 1/π, arXiv:1807.07394.
  13. F. Bhat and A. Sinha, Mathematica notebook for this paper, Wolfram Community, STAFF PICKS, 2025, https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/3438221.
  14. M. R. Gaberdiel and H. G. Kausch, A rational logarithmic conformal field theory, Phys. Lett. B 386, 131 (1996).
  15. M. R. Gaberdiel and H. G. Kausch, A local logarithmic conformal field theory, Nucl. Phys. B538, 631 (1999).
  16. M. R. Gaberdiel, An Algebraic approach to logarithmic conformal field theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18, 4593 (2003).
  17. H. G. Kausch, Curiosities at c=−2, arXiv:hep-th/9510149.
  18. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/c38g-fd2v for more details, which includes Refs. [19–24].
  19. M. S. Mahadeva Naika, Modular equations in the spirit of Ramanujan, in Talk in IIT, Bangalore (2012), https://www.iiitb.ac.in/csl/events/conference/ramanujan/rmit2012talks/IIITB_MSM.pdf.
  20. H. Rosengren, String theory amplitudes and partial fractions, Ramanujan J. 67, 26 (2025).
  21. J. G. Wan, Series for 1/π using Legendre’s relation, arXiv:1302.5984.
  22. Y. He, Logarithmic operators in c=0 bulk CFTs, SciPost Phys. 19, 008 (2025).
  23. P. A. Pearce, J. Rasmussen, and J. B. Zuber, Logarithmic minimal models, J. Stat. Mech. (2006) P11017.
  24. A. A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Infinite conformal symmetry in two-dimensional quantum field theory, Nucl. Phys. B241, 333 (1984).
  25. F. Bhat, A. P. Saha, and A. Sinha, A stringy dispersion relation for field theory, arXiv:2506.03862.
  26. J. Borwein and P. J. Borwein, Pi and the AGM: A Study in Analytic Number Theory and Computational Complexity, Canadian Mathematical Society Series of Monographs and Advanced Texts (John Wiley & Son, New York, 1987).
  27. M. Hogervorst, M. Paulos, and A. Vichi, The ABC (in any D) of logarithmic CFT, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 201.
  28. Explicitly a0=(21825486901/2147483648),a1=−(66594751779/2147483648),a2=(52661096730/2147483648).

  29. A. P. Saha and A. Sinha, Field theory expansions of string theory amplitudes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 221601 (2024).
  30. F. Bhat, D. Chowdhury, A. P. Saha, and A. Sinha, Bootstrapping string models with entanglement minimization and machine learning, Phys. Rev. D 111, 066013 (2025).
  31. A. Sinha and A. Zahed, Crossing symmetric dispersion relations in quantum field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 181601 (2021).
  32. R. Gopakumar, A. Sinha, and A. Zahed, Crossing symmetric dispersion relations for Mellin amplitudes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 211602 (2021).
  33. P. Raman and A. Sinha, QFT, EFT and GFT, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 203.
  34. A. Bissi and A. Sinha, Positivity, low twist dominance and CSDR for CFTs, SciPost Phys. 14, 083 (2023).
  35. C. Song, Crossing-symmetric dispersion relations without spurious singularities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 161602 (2023).
  36. More precisely, it behaves as z−σ for 0≤σ≤1 and z−1/2log(z) when σ=1/2.

  37. The validity of this can be checked numerically following, e.g., the analysis in [34].

  38. The dispersive representation does not appear useful for getting series representations for 1/π as there is a 1/π explicitly appearing outside the integral. However, we can reuse the dispersion relation to replace the FσFσ factors in the integral, which could be used for such a purpose. This idea is briefly discussed in Supplemental Material [18].

  39. H. G. Kausch, Symplectic fermions, Nucl. Phys. B583, 513 (2000).
  40. This theory also plays a role in 2d topological gravity [41].

  41. D. Gaiotto and L. Rastelli, A paradigm of open/closed duality: Liouville D-branes and the Kontsevich model, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2005) 053.
  42. H. G. Kausch, Extended conformal algebras generated by a multiplet of primary fields, Phys. Lett. B 259, 448 (1991).
  43. S. A. Hartnoll, Lectures on holographic methods for condensed matter physics, Classical Quantum Gravity 26, 224002 (2009).
  44. A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Generalized gravitational entropy, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2013) 090.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation