Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

First Measurement of Charged-Current Muon-Neutrino-Induced K+ Production on Argon Using the MicroBooNE Detector

P. Abratenko39, D. Andrade Aldana14, L. Arellano22, J. Asaadi38, A. Ashkenazi37, S. Balasubramanian12, B. Baller12, A. Barnard29, G. Barr29 et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration*)

G. Barr29, D. Barrow29, J. Barrow26, V. Basque12, J. Bateman15,22, O. Benevides Rodrigues14, S. Berkman25, A. Bhat7, M. Bhattacharya12, M. Bishai3, A. Blake19, B. Bogart24, T. Bolton18, M. B. Brunetti17,41, L. Camilleri10, D. Caratelli4, F. Cavanna12, G. Cerati12, A. Chappell41, Y. Chen33, J. M. Conrad23, M. Convery33, L. Cooper-Troendle30, J. I. Crespo-Anadón6, R. Cross41, M. Del Tutto12, S. R. Dennis5, P. Detje5, R. Diurba2, Z. Djurcic1, K. Duffy29, S. Dytman30, B. Eberly35, P. Englezos32, A. Ereditato7,12, J. J. Evans22, C. Fang4, G. A. Fiorentini Aguirre34, W. Foreman14,20, B. T. Fleming7, D. Franco7, A. P. Furmanski26, F. Gao4, D. Garcia-Gamez13, S. Gardiner12, G. Ge10, S. Gollapinni20, E. Gramellini22, P. Green29, H. Greenlee12, L. Gu19, W. Gu3, R. Guenette22, P. Guzowski22, L. Hagaman7, M. D. Handley5, O. Hen23, C. Hilgenberg26, G. A. Horton-Smith18, A. Hussain18, B. Irwin26, M. S. Ismail30, C. James12, X. Ji27, J. H. Jo3, R. A. Johnson8, D. Kalra10, G. Karagiorgi10, W. Ketchum12, M. Kirby3, T. Kobilarcik12, N. Lane15,22, J.-Y. Li11, Y. Li3, K. Lin32, B. R. Littlejohn14, L. Liu12, W. C. Louis20, X. Luo4, T. Mahmud19, C. Mariani40, D. Marsden22, J. Marshall41, N. Martinez18, D. A. Martinez Caicedo34, S. Martynenko3, A. Mastbaum32, I. Mawby19, N. McConkey31, V. Meddage18, L. Mellet25, J. Mendez21, J. Micallef23,39, A. Mogan9, T. Mohayai16, M. Mooney9, A. F. Moor5, C. D. Moore12, L. Mora Lepin22, M. M. Moudgalya22, S. Mulleriababu2, D. Naples30, A. Navrer-Agasson15, N. Nayak3, M. Nebot-Guinot11, C. Nguyen32, J. Nowak19, N. Oza10, O. Palamara12, N. Pallat26, V. Paolone30, A. Papadopoulou1, V. Papavassiliou28, H. B. Parkinson11, S. F. Pate28, N. Patel19, Z. Pavlovic12, E. Piasetzky37, K. Pletcher25, I. Pophale19, X. Qian3, J. L. Raaf12, V. Radeka3, A. Rafique1, M. Reggiani-Guzzo11, J. Rodriguez Rondon34, M. Rosenberg39, M. Ross-Lonergan20, I. Safa10, D. W. Schmitz7, A. Schukraft12, W. Seligman10, M. H. Shaevitz10, R. Sharankova12, J. Shi5, E. L. Snider12, M. Soderberg36, S. Söldner-Rembold15, J. Spitz24, M. Stancari12, J. St. John12, T. Strauss12, A. M. Szelc11, N. Taniuchi5, K. Terao33, C. Thorpe22, D. Torbunov3, D. Totani4, M. Toups12, A. Trettin22, Y.-T. Tsai33, J. Tyler18, M. A. Uchida5, T. Usher33, B. Viren3, J. Wang27, M. Weber2, H. Wei21, A. J. White7, S. Wolbers12, T. Wongjirad39, K. Wresilo5, W. Wu30, E. Yandel4,20, T. Yang12, L. E. Yates12, H. W. Yu3, G. P. Zeller12, J. Zennamo12, and C. Zhang3 (MicroBooNE Collaboration*)

  • 1Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Lemont, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 2Universität Bern, Bern CH-3012, Switzerland
  • 3Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, New York 11973, USA
  • 4University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA
  • 5University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom
  • 6Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), Madrid E-28040, Spain
  • 7University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
  • 8University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA
  • 9Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA
  • 10Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA
  • 11University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, United Kingdom
  • 12Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
  • 13Universidad de Granada, Granada E-18071, Spain
  • 14Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT), Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
  • 15Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
  • 16Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
  • 17The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA
  • 18Kansas State University (KSU), Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA
  • 19Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, United Kingdom
  • 20Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
  • 21Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA
  • 22The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
  • 23Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
  • 24University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
  • 25Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
  • 26University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
  • 27Nankai University, Nankai District, Tianjin 300071, China
  • 28New Mexico State University (NMSU), Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003, USA
  • 29University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom
  • 30University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA
  • 31Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom
  • 32Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
  • 33SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA
  • 34South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (SDSMT), Rapid City, South Dakota 57701, USA
  • 35University of Southern Maine, Portland, Maine 04104, USA
  • 36Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244, USA
  • 37Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, 69978
  • 38University of Texas, Arlington, Texas 76019, USA
  • 39Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA
  • 40Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
  • 41University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom

  • *Contact author: microboone_info@fnal.gov

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 251804 – Published 19 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/96vx-gq2g

Abstract

The MicroBooNE experiment is an 85 tonne active mass liquid argon time projection chamber neutrino detector exposed to the on-axis Booster Neutrino Beam at Fermilab. One of MicroBooNE’s physics goals is the precise measurement of neutrino interactions on argon in the 1 GeV energy regime. Building on the capabilities of the MicroBooNE detector, this analysis identifies K+ mesons, a key signature for the study of strange particle production in neutrino interactions. This measurement is furthermore valuable for background estimation for future nucleon decay searches and for improved reconstruction and particle identification capabilities in experiments such as the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment. In this Letter, we present the first-ever measurement of a flux-integrated cross section for charged-current muon neutrino induced K+ production on argon nuclei, determined to be 7.93±3.22(stat)±2.83(syst)×10−42  cm2/nucleon based on an analysis of 6.88×1020 protons on target. This result was found to be consistent with model predictions from different neutrino event generators within the reported uncertainties.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (56)

  1. H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Unity of all elementary-particle forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 438 (1974).
  2. J. Hisano, H. Murayama, and T. Yanagida, Nucleon decay in the minimal supersymmetric SU(5) grand unification, Nucl. Phys. B402, 46 (1993).
  3. B. Abi et al., Deep underground neutrino experiment (DUNE), far detector technical design report, volume I. Introduction to DUNE, J. Instrum. 15, T08008 (2020).
  4. K. Abe et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Hyper-Kamiokande design report, arXiv:1805.04163.
  5. K. Abe et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Search for proton decay via p→νK+ using 260  kilotonΔyear data of Super-Kamiokande, Phys. Rev. D 90, 072005 (2014).
  6. K. Abe et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Search for proton decay via p→e+π0 and p→μ+π0 in 0.31  megaton·years exposure of the Super-Kamiokande water Cherenkov detector, Phys. Rev. D 95, 012004 (2017).
  7. K. Abe et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Search for proton decay via p→e+π0 and p→μ+π0 with an enlarged fiducial volume in Super-Kamiokande I-IV, Phys. Rev. D 102, 112011 (2020).
  8. S. J. Barish et al., Strange-particle production in neutrino interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1446 (1974).
  9. H Deden et al., Strange particle production and charmed particle search in the Gargamelle neutrino experiment, Phys. Lett. B 58, 361 (1975).
  10. J. E. Jensen, The Brookhaven National Laboratory 80-inch liquid hydrogen bubble chamber, in Proceedings of the 1964 Cryogenic Engineering Conference (Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, 1964).
  11. N. J. Baker, P. L. Connolly, S. A. Kahn, H. G. Kirk, M. J. Murtagh, R. B. Palmer, N. P. Samios, and M. Tanaka, Strange-particle production from neutrino interactions in the BNL 7-foot bubble chamber, Phys. Rev. D 24, 2779 (1981).
  12. D. Son et al., Quasielastic charmed-baryon production and exclusive strange-particle production by high-energy neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 28, 2129 (1983).
  13. C. M. Marshall et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Measurement of K+ production in charged-current νμ interactions, Phys. Rev. D 94, 012002 (2016).
  14. C. M. Marshall et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Measurement of neutral-current K+ production by neutrinos using MINERvA, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 011802 (2017).
  15. C. M. Marshall, Measurement of charged kaon production by neutrinos at MINERvA, Ph.D. thesis, University of Rochester, 2016.
  16. Z. Wang, C. M. Marshall et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Evidence of coherent K+ meson production in neutrino-nucleus scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 061802 (2016).
  17. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  18. B. Fleming (MicroBooNE Collaboration), The MicroBooNE technical design report, 10.2172/1333130 (2012).
  19. R. Acciarri et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Design and construction of the MicroBooNE detector, J. Instrum. 12, P02017 (2017).
  20. E. L. Snider and G. Petrillo, larsoft: Toolkit for simulation, reconstruction and analysis of liquid argon TPC neutrino detectors, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 898, 042057 (2017).
  21. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Neutrino flux prediction at MiniBooNE, Phys. Rev. D 79, 072002 (2009).
  22. C. Andreopoulos et al., The GENIE neutrino Monte Carlo generator, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 614, 87 (2010).
  23. C. Andreopoulos et al. (GENIE Collaboration), Neutrino-nucleon cross-section model tuning in genie v3, Phys. Rev. D 104, 072009 (2021).
  24. D. Rein and L. M. Sehgal, Neutrino-excitation of baryon resonances and single pion production, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 133, 79 (1981).
  25. Z. Koba, H. B. Nielsen, and P. Olesen, Scaling of multiplicity distributions in high energy hadron collisions, Nucl. Phys. B40, 317 (1972).
  26. T. Yang, C. Andreopoulos, H. Gallagher, K. Hofmann, and P. Kehayias, A hadronization model for few-GeV neutrino interactions, Eur. Phys. J. C 63, 1 (2009).
  27. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands, pythia 6.4 physics and manual, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2006) 026.
  28. G. T. Jones et al., Neutral strange particle production in neutrino and anti-neutrino charged current interactions on protons, Z. Phys. C 57, 197 (1993).
  29. D. Allasia et al., Production of neutral strange particles in ν¯μd2 and νμd2 charged current interactions, Nucl. Phys. B224, 1 (1983).
  30. S. Willocq et al. (WA59 Collaboration), Neutral strange particle production in anti-neutrino—neon charged current interactions, Z. Phys. C 53, 207 (1992).
  31. P. Bosetti et al., Strange particle production in ν and ν¯ neon interactions, Nucl. Phys. B209, 29 (1982).
  32. N. J. Baker et al., Strange-particle production in neutrino-neon charged-current interactions, Phys. Rev. D 34, 1251 (1986).
  33. D. DeProspo et al., Neutral strange particle production in neutrino and antineutrino charged-current interactions on neon, Phys. Rev. D 50, 6691 (1994).
  34. M. Rafi Alam, I. Ruiz Simo, M. Sajjad Athar, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Weak kaon production off the nucleon, Phys. Rev. D 82, 033001 (2010).
  35. L. Alvarez-Ruso, J. Nieves, I. Ruiz Simo, M. Valverde, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Charged kaon production by coherent scattering of neutrinos and antineutrinos on nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 87, 015503 (2013).
  36. M. Alam, C. Andreopoulos et al., genie production release 2.10.0, arXiv:1512.06882.
  37. S. Agostinelli et al., geant4—a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 (2003).
  38. J. Allison et al., geant4 developments and applications, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 270 (2006).
  39. J. Allison et al., Recent developments in geant4, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 835, 186 (2016).
  40. R. Acciarri et al., The pandora multi-algorithm approach to automated pattern recognition of cosmic-ray muon and neutrino events in the MicroBooNE detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 82 (2018).
  41. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), First measurement of inclusive muon neutrino charged current differential cross sections on argon at Eν∼0.8  GeV with the MicroBooNE detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 131801 (2019).
  42. A. Hoecker et al., TMVA—toolkit for multivariate data analysis, arXiv:physics/0703039.
  43. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Calorimetric classification of track-like signatures in liquid argon TPCs using MicroBooNE data, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 153.
  44. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/96vx-gq2g for further details on sideband studies, event selection displays, and K+-Ca data-geant4 cross-section comparison, which includes Ref. [45].
  45. E. Friedman et al., K+ nucleus reaction and total cross sections: New analysis of transmission experiments, Phys. Rev. C 55, 1304 (1997).
  46. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), New CC0π GENIE model tune for MicroBooNE, Phys. Rev. D 105, 072001 (2022).
  47. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Novel approach for evaluating detector-related uncertainties in a LArTPC using MicroBooNE data, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 454 (2022).
  48. J. Calcutt, C. Thorpe, K. Mahn, and L. Fields, geant4reweight: A framework for evaluating and propagating hadronic interaction uncertainties in geant4, J. Instrum. 16, P08042 (2021).
  49. P. Stowell et al., nuisance: A neutrino cross-section generator tuning and comparison framework, J. Instrum. 12, P01016 (2017).
  50. T. Golan, J. T. Sobczyk, and J. Żmuda, nuwro: The Wrocław Monte Carlo generator of neutrino interactions, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 229–232, 499 (2012).
  51. Y. Hayato and L. Pickering, The neut neutrino interaction simulation program library, Eur. Phys. J.: Spec. Top. 230, 24 (2021).
  52. gibuu Collaboration, The Giessen Boltzmann-Uehling-Uhlenbeck (gibuu) project, https://gibuu.hepforge.org (2025).
  53. R. Acciarri et al. (SBND Collaboration), The short-baseline near detector at Fermilab, arXiv:2504.00245.
  54. S. Amerio et al., Design, construction and tests of the ICARUS T600 detector, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 527, 329 (2004).
  55. E Gramellini, Measurement of the negative pion and positive kaon total hadronic cross sections on argon at the LArIAT experiment, Ph.D. thesis, Yale University, 2018.
  56. A. Abed Abud et al. (DUNE Collaboration), First measurement of the total inelastic cross section of positively charged kaons on argon at energies between 5.0 and 7.5 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 110, 092011 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation