Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Master Stability for Traveling Waves on Networks

Stefan Ruschel

Andrus Giraldo

Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 257201 – Published 27 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/6v64-j5fd

Abstract

We present a framework for determining effectively the spectrum and stability of traveling waves on networks with symmetries, such as rings and lattices, by computing master stability curves (MSCs). Unlike traditional methods, MSCs are independent of system size and can be readily used to assess wave destabilization and multistability in small and large networks.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (46)

  1. E. Fermi, P. Pasta, S. Ulam, and M. Tsingou, Studies of the nonlinear problems, Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM, Report No. 630001, 1955, 10.2172/4376203.
  2. N. Zabusky and M. Kruskal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 240 (1965).
  3. T. Erneux and G. Nicolis, Physica (Amsterdam) 67D, 237 (1993).
  4. G. B. Ermentrout and D. Kleinfeld, Neuron 29, 33 (2001).
  5. D. Avitabile, J. L. Davis, and K. Wedgwood, SIAM Rev. 65, 147 (2023).
  6. S. Watanabe, H. S. van der Zant, S. H. Strogatz, and T. P. Orlando, Physica (Amsterdam) 97D, 429 (1996).
  7. K. Alfaro-Bittner, S. Barbay, and M. Clerc, Chaos 30, 083136 (2020).
  8. R. Parker, A. Aceves, J. Cuevas-Maraver, and P. G. Kevrekidis, Phys. Rev. E 108, 024214 (2023).
  9. J. F. Totz, J. Rode, M. R. Tinsley, K. Showalter, and H. Engel, Nat. Phys. 14, 282 (2018).
  10. A. Aigner, A. Champneys, and V. Rothos, Physica (Amsterdam) 186D, 148 (2003).
  11. G. Iooss and D. E. Pelinovsky, Physica (Amsterdam) 216D, 327 (2006).
  12. R. Parker, P. Kevrekidis, and A. Aceves, Nonlinearity 35, 1036 (2021).
  13. P. W. Bates and A. Chmaj, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 150, 281 (1999).
  14. R. M. L. Evans, C. A. Hall, R. A. Simha, and T. S. Welsh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 138301 (2015).
  15. P. Sprenger, C. Chong, E. Okyere, M. Herrmann, P. Kevrekidis, and M. A. Hoefer, arXiv:2404.16750.
  16. C. R. Laing, Physica (Amsterdam) 240D, 1960 (2011).
  17. P. Perlikowski, S. Yanchuk, M. Wolfrum, A. Stefanski, P. Mosiolek, and T. Kapitaniak, Chaos 20, 013111 (2010).
  18. G. Orosz, B. Krauskopf, and R. E. Wilson, Physica (Amsterdam) 211D, 277 (2005).
  19. G. Friesecke and J. A. Wattis, Commun. Math. Phys. 161, 391 (1994).
  20. S.-N. Chow, J. Mallet-Paret, and W. Shen, J. Differ. Equations 149, 248 (1998).
  21. K. A. Abell, C. E. Elmer, A. Humphries, and E. S. Van Vleck, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 4, 755 (2005).
  22. M. J. Ablowitz, B. Prinari, and A. D. Trubatch, Discrete and Continuous Nonlinear Schrödinger Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2003).
  23. P. G. Kevrekidis, The Discrete Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation: Mathematical Analysis, Numerical Computations and Physical Perspectives (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009), Vol. 232.
  24. O. M. Braun and Y. S. Kivshar, The Frenkel-Kontorova Model: Concepts, Methods, and Applications (Springer, New York, 2004), Vol. 18.
  25. S. Flach and C. Willis, Phys. Rep. 295, 181 (1998).
  26. H. Duran, J. Cuevas-Maraver, P. G. Kevrekidis, and A. Vainchtein, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 111, 106435 (2022).
  27. T. Kapitula and P. Kevrekidis, Nonlinearity 14, 533 (2001).
  28. G. Ermentrout, J. Math. Biol. 23, 55 (1985).
  29. V. Klinshov, D. Shchapin, S. Yanchuk, M. Wolfrum, O. D’Huys, and V. Nekorkin, Phys. Rev. E 96, 042217 (2017).
  30. P. Perlikowski, S. Yanchuk, and O. Popovych, Phys. Rev. E 82, 036208 (2010).
  31. M. Kantner, E. Schöll, and S. Yanchuk, Sci. Rep. 5, 8522 (2015).
  32. M. Golubitsky and I. Stewart, The Symmetry Perspective: From Equilibrium to Chaos in Phase Space and Physical Space, Progress in Mathematics (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2012).
  33. C. Bick, E. Gross, H. A. Harrington, and M. T. Schaub, SIAM Rev. 65, 686 (2023).
  34. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/6v64-j5fd for derivation, theorems, proofs and numerical implementation of the master stability framework.
  35. L. M. Pecora and T. L. Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2109 (1998).
  36. G. B. Whitham, Linear and Nonlinear Waves (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2011).
  37. Y. A. Kuznetsov, Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory, 3rd ed., Applied Mathematical Sciences Vol. 112 (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2004).
  38. J. Sieber, K. Engelborghs, T. Luzyanina, G. Samaey, and D. Roose, arXiv:1406.7144.
  39. B. Krauskopf and H. M. Osinga, in Numerical Continuation Methods for Dynamical Systems: Path Following and Boundary Value Problems, edited by B. Krauskopf, H. M. Osinga, and J. Galán-Vioque (Springer, The Netherlands, 2007), pp. 117–154.
  40. A. J. Homburg and B. Sandstede, in Handbook of Dynamical Systems (Elsevier, New York, 2010), Vol. 3, pp. 379–524.
  41. A. Giraldo and S. Ruschel, Nonlinearity 36, 7105 (2023).
  42. R. FitzHugh, Biophys. J. 1, 445 (1961).
  43. J. Nagumo, S. Arimoto, and S. Yoshizawa, Proc. IRE 50, 2061 (1962).
  44. S. Coombes and K. C. Wedgwood, Neurodynamics: An Applied Mathematics Perspective (Springer Nature, 2023), Vol. 75.
  45. H. Hupkes, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 365, 251 (2013).
  46. https://github.com/andrusgiraldo/RG_MasterStability

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation